Case Dismissal Arguments
Summary
The case between ZIMRA and Trish Nyamuzihwa involves allegations of bribery. The complainant, ZIMRA, failed to provide concrete evidence to support the bribery claim. The complainants witness abandoned the proceedings before the defense could complete cross-examination, undermining the credibility of the testimony. There is no evidence that Trish Nyamuzihwa demanded a bribe, and the witness provided inconsistent dates, admitting to errors. These factors suggest that the charges against Trish Nyamuzihwa should be dismissed.Full Conversation
DO CLOSING SUBMISSIONS FOR A CASE BETWEEN ZIMRA AND TRISH NYAMUZIHWA IN WHICH THE FACTS TO INCLUDE ARE AS FOLLOWS. THET COMPLAINANT ZIMRA FAILED TO PROVE THE ALLEGATION OF BRIBE, THE COMPLAINANT WITNESS ABANDONED THE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE CROSS EXAMINATION BY THE DEFENDANT WERE COMPLETED, THERE IS NOWHERE WERE TRISH DEMANDED BRIBE OR ANY EVIDENCE THAT SHE DEMANDED BRIBE, THE WITNESS FAILED CHANGED DATES AND ADMITTED THAT SOME DATES WERE WRONG
Closing Submissions
Case: ZIMRA vs. Trish Nyamuzihwa
Your Honour,
We submit that the case against Trish Nyamuzihwa should be dismissed based on the following points:
- Lack of Evidence: The complainant, ZIMRA, has failed to substantiate the allegation of bribery with concrete evidence.
- Witness Abandonment: The complainant's witness abandoned the proceedings before cross-examination by the defense was completed, undermining the credibility and completeness of the testimony.
- No Demand for Bribe: There is no evidence or testimony indicating that Trish Nyamuzihwa demanded a bribe at any point.
- Inconsistent Testimony: The witness provided inconsistent dates and admitted to errors, further questioning the reliability of the accusations.
In light of these points, we respectfully request that the charges against Trish Nyamuzihwa be dismissed.
Thank you.
---
Would you like to connect with a local lawyer for further assistance?
TRY ME!
Start a new chat