Cross Examination Fairness Rule

Summary

The Browne v Dunn case established the rule of fairness in cross-examination. This rule mandates that if a party intends to contradict a witnesss testimony, they must provide the witness an opportunity to explain or respond during cross-examination. This principle ensures fairness and prevents surprises during the trial.

Full Conversation

Based to the case ****
The legal principle established in the case of Browne v Dunn is known as the "rule of fairness" in cross-examination. Here's a brief overview:
- If a party plans to contradict a witness's testimony, they must give that witness a chance to explain or respond during cross-examination.
- This rule ensures fairness and prevents surprises during the trial.
If you have more questions or need further clarification, feel free to ask!