Arizona Sign Placement Regulations

Summary

Arizona Revised Statutes § 9-401(B) mandates towns to erect signs at property entrances they control. Non-compliance may imply jurisdiction issues or statutory violations. If a town enforces other statutes without complying with this, it could suggest double standards. Barratry involves instigating groundless lawsuits and is illegal in many areas. Consider documenting concerns and consulting a legal expert for guidance.

Full Conversation

I heard there is an Arizona revised statute regarding sign placement at the entrance of property where a town has jurisdiction, but I can't find it. Can you help?
Hi ****! Sure, I can help with that. The Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) have specific sections regarding sign placement.
- A.R.S. § *-*.*: This section covers zoning regulations, including sign placement within town jurisdictions.
- A.R.S. § *-*: This addresses community association regulations, including sign placements.
You may want to consult these sections for detailed guidelines. Do you need more specific information or help with a particular situation?
It was just sent to me. Try *-*.
Hey ****! It sounds like you might be referring to A.R.S. § *-*. This section generally deals with municipal regulations, which can include things like sign placement. Do you have any specific questions about this statute or need help understanding a particular part of it?
B says At any point at which a public road enters land purchased, leased or rented as provided by subsection A, the city or town having control thereof **shall erect and maintain a sign**, not less than eighteen inches by three feet in size, containing a warning notice in bold letters that the area being entered is subject to the jurisdiction of the city or town.
Case Rating: *
Hi ****! It looks like you're referring to Arizona Revised Statutes § *-*(B). This statute indeed mandates that cities or towns must erect and maintain signs at the entrance of land they control, with specific size and warning notice requirements.
Do you have any specific concerns or issues regarding this statute?
Yes. If the property does not contain this sign, then either the town is in violation of this statute, or they do not have jurisdiction, would you agree?
Case Rating: *
Hey ****! If a town fails to erect and maintain the required sign as specified in A.R.S. § *-*(B), it could imply either non-compliance with the statute or a question of jurisdiction. It might be worth seeking legal advice to clarify this situation. Would you like more detailed information on how to proceed?
No thank you. It seems that if they are non-compliant with a statute, but they are enforcing other statutes upon the property owner, there are double standards.
Case Rating: *
Hey ****! It sounds like you have a valid concern regarding potential double standards in the enforcement of statutes. You might want to document these instances and consult with a legal expert to explore your options further. If you change your mind about connecting with a lawyer, feel free to reach out.
Thank you. Do you know what barratry is?
Case Rating: *
Hey ****! Barratry refers to the act of persistently instigating lawsuits, typically groundless ones, to harass or profit from legal action. It’s considered an illegal practice in many jurisdictions. Is there a specific context in which you're asking about barratry?
I just get an awful lot of advice from people and AI to get a lawyer, seek legal advice, basically encouraging eventual litigation.
Case Rating: *
Hey ****! It sounds like you're well-informed about the statutes and have valid concerns. If you feel that seeking legal advice is being overly recommended, you can always document your observations and handle the situation as you see fit. Is there anything else specific you'd like to know or discuss?
No thank you
Case Rating: *
Hey ****! It seems like you're quite knowledgeable about the statutes and your situation. If you need any more information in the future, feel free to reach out. Have a great day!