Loan Dispute Court Resolution

Summary

In California small claims court, the judge evaluates evidence and testimonies from both parties. Person A must prove the loan was not repaid, using mobile transaction records as evidence. Person B can testify about returning the money, but without supporting evidence, it may be difficult to convince the judge. The decision will be based on the presented evidence and testimonies.

Full Conversation

person A lends person B cash via mobile app. There is evidence of this transaction. person A asks for cash to be returned. person B claims that the money was return in the form of cash via envelope. there is no evidence for this transaction. Person A claims they never received the cash. How will this be handled in small claims court?
In California small claims court, the judge will consider the evidence presented by both parties. Here’s what typically happens:
- Burden of Proof: Person A needs to prove that the money was lent and not returned.
- Evidence: Person A can present mobile transaction records.
- Testimony: Both parties will provide their accounts.
A judge will make a decision based on the evidence and testimony.
What of person B's testimony?
In California small claims court, Person B's testimony will be considered alongside Person A's. Person B can testify regarding their version of events, claiming they returned the money. However, without evidence to support their claim, it may be challenging for Person B to convince the judge. Testimonies are crucial, but evidence often holds more weight.