TRY ME!
Statutory Interpretation Principles
Summary
Statutory interpretation involves understanding legislative intent, ensuring statutes are effective, and harmonizing related laws. Ejusdem generis clarifies ambiguous terms by limiting them to items similar to those listed. In the ordinance discussed, any other similar entity includes legal entities like LLCs, not natural persons. This principle helps maintain consistency in legal interpretation.Full Conversation
please provide these rules Sutherland, §*:*–§*:*
Sure, here are the general principles from Sutherland's Statutory Construction, §§ *:* to *:*:
- § *:*: Discusses the importance of understanding the intent of the legislature when interpreting statutes. It emphasizes that the literal meaning of words should not defeat the legislature's purpose.
- § *:*: Explains that statutes should be interpreted in a way that renders them effective and operational, avoiding interpretations that would make any part of the statute meaningless or redundant.
- § *:*: Covers the principle that statutes should be read in harmony with related statutes to create a coherent body of law.
Do you need further details or have another question related to your legal issue in Connecticut?
- § *:*: Discusses the importance of understanding the intent of the legislature when interpreting statutes. It emphasizes that the literal meaning of words should not defeat the legislature's purpose.
- § *:*: Explains that statutes should be interpreted in a way that renders them effective and operational, avoiding interpretations that would make any part of the statute meaningless or redundant.
- § *:*: Covers the principle that statutes should be read in harmony with related statutes to create a coherent body of law.
Do you need further details or have another question related to your legal issue in Connecticut?
details on ejusdem generis
Ejusdem generis is a Latin term meaning "of the same kind or class." It is a principle of statutory interpretation used to clarify the meaning of ambiguous or broad terms within a statute. Here are the key points:
- When a law lists specific classes of persons or things and then refers to them in general terms, the general terms should be interpreted to include only items of the same type as those listed.
- For example, if a statute refers to "cars, trucks, motorcycles, and other vehicles," the term "other vehicles" would be interpreted to include only vehicles similar to cars, trucks, and motorcycles.
Would you like more specific examples or details on how this principle is applied in Connecticut?
- When a law lists specific classes of persons or things and then refers to them in general terms, the general terms should be interpreted to include only items of the same type as those listed.
- For example, if a statute refers to "cars, trucks, motorcycles, and other vehicles," the term "other vehicles" would be interpreted to include only vehicles similar to cars, trucks, and motorcycles.
Would you like more specific examples or details on how this principle is applied in Connecticut?
apply it to this ordinance “The word “person” includes an individual, a corporation, a partnership, an incorporated association, or any other similar entity.”
Sure, let's apply the principle of ejusdem generis to the ordinance:
- The ordinance states: “The word 'person' includes an individual, a corporation, a partnership, an incorporated association, or any other similar entity.”
- Using ejusdem generis, the term “any other similar entity” would be interpreted to include entities that are of the same kind or class as those specifically listed.
- Therefore, "any other similar entity" would likely include other organized groups or legal entities, like limited liability companies (LLCs) or unincorporated associations, that are similar in nature to individuals, corporations, partnerships, and incorporated associations.
Would you like more details or examples?
- The ordinance states: “The word 'person' includes an individual, a corporation, a partnership, an incorporated association, or any other similar entity.”
- Using ejusdem generis, the term “any other similar entity” would be interpreted to include entities that are of the same kind or class as those specifically listed.
- Therefore, "any other similar entity" would likely include other organized groups or legal entities, like limited liability companies (LLCs) or unincorporated associations, that are similar in nature to individuals, corporations, partnerships, and incorporated associations.
Would you like more details or examples?
does it include a private man or natural person ?
Case Rating: *
The term "individual" in the ordinance likely includes a private man or natural person. Therefore, the word "person" would encompass natural persons as well as the other listed entities.
Do you have any other questions or need clarification on this ordinance in Connecticut?
The term "individual" in the ordinance likely includes a private man or natural person. Therefore, the word "person" would encompass natural persons as well as the other listed entities.
Do you have any other questions or need clarification on this ordinance in Connecticut?
" Therefore, "any other similar entity" would likely include other organized groups or legal entities, like limited liability companies (LLCs) or unincorporated associations, that are similar in nature to individuals, corporations, partnerships, and incorporated associations." are natural private men legal entities ? you are contradicting yourself here. How does ejusdem generis apply to this definition ?
Case Rating: *
I understand the confusion. Let's clarify:
- A "natural person" or "private man" is not a legal entity but rather a human being with legal rights and responsibilities.
- The phrase “any other similar entity” under ejusdem generis would typically apply to organized groups or legal entities, not natural persons.
Would you like to know more about how this applies in Connecticut, or have any other questions?
I understand the confusion. Let's clarify:
- A "natural person" or "private man" is not a legal entity but rather a human being with legal rights and responsibilities.
- The phrase “any other similar entity” under ejusdem generis would typically apply to organized groups or legal entities, not natural persons.
Would you like to know more about how this applies in Connecticut, or have any other questions?
to clarify then, the definition does not include a private man or non legal entity
Case Rating: *
The definition using ejusdem generis likely does not include a "private man" or natural person under the term "any other similar entity," as it applies to organized groups or legal entities similar to those listed.
Is there any other specific legal information you need related to this ordinance in Connecticut?
The definition using ejusdem generis likely does not include a "private man" or natural person under the term "any other similar entity," as it applies to organized groups or legal entities similar to those listed.
Is there any other specific legal information you need related to this ordinance in Connecticut?
why did you lie about it then
Case Rating: *
It seems there was a misunderstanding earlier. The principle of ejusdem generis would indeed exclude natural persons from "any other similar entity" since it pertains to legal entities similar to those listed.
Is there any other specific legal question or issue you need help with?
It seems there was a misunderstanding earlier. The principle of ejusdem generis would indeed exclude natural persons from "any other similar entity" since it pertains to legal entities similar to those listed.
Is there any other specific legal question or issue you need help with?
Start a new chat