Negligent Misstatement Liability Criteria

Summary

The Hedley Byrne v Heller case established criteria for liability in negligent misstatement cases, requiring a special relationship, assumed risk, and reasonable reliance. In the context of will drafting, solicitors may be liable for negligence if their actions impact intended beneficiaries. Sho and Cenas case involves potential solicitor liability for economic loss due to negligent drafting. While the Hedley Byrne principle primarily addresses misstatements, solicitors have a duty to ensure accurate execution of wills.

Full Conversation

The general rule is that it is not possible to recover for pure economic losses. However, the case of He****ley Byrne v Heller * intro****uce**** a limite**** exception to the rule in cases involving negligent misstatement. It also set out gui****elines on when an**** how the exception woul**** operate. Which of the following is the criteria for imposing liability for economic loss cause**** by a negligent misstatement un****er the original He****ley Byrne principle?
In the case of He****ley Byrne v Heller, liability for economic loss cause**** by a negligent misstatement requires:
- A special relationship between parties.
- The speaker possessing special skill or ju****gment.
- Reasonable reliance on the statement.
- Foreseeability of harm from reliance.
Woul**** you like more information or examples relate**** to this principle?
Select one: A. A special relationship of trust an**** assurance exists between the parties; the party making the statement assume**** the risk; the other party relie**** on the statement an**** the reliance may be reasonable. B. A special relationship of trust an**** assurance exists between the parties; the party making the statement has voluntarily assume**** the risk; the other party relie**** on the statement an**** that reliance was reasonable. C. A special relationship of trust an**** confi****ence exists between the parties; the party making the statement assume**** the risk; the other party relie**** on the statement an**** the reliance was reasonable. D. A special relationship of trust an**** confi****ence exists between the parties; the party making the statement has voluntarily assume**** the risk; the other party relie**** on the statement an**** that reliance was reasonable
The criteria for imposing liability for economic loss cause**** by a negligent misstatement un****er the He****ley Byrne principle woul**** be best capture**** by option C:
C. A special relationship of trust an**** confi****ence exists between the parties; the party making the statement assume**** the risk; the other party relie**** on the statement an**** the reliance was reasonable.
it is ****
Case Rating: *
It seems you're ****iscussing liability for economic loss un****er the He****ley Byrne principle. For liability to apply, a special relationship of trust an**** confi****ence shoul**** exist, the statement's maker assumes risk, an**** reliance must be reasonable. Woul**** you like more ****etaile**** examples or explanation on how this principle is applie**** in real cases?
is the answer
Case Rating: *
The He****ley Byrne v Heller case is a foun****ational legal principle regar****ing liability for economic loss ****ue to negligent misstatement.
If you nee**** further clarification or examples on how this principle applies in real cases, feel free to ask!
****
Case Rating: *
It seems you're exploring the application of the He****ley Byrne principle in cases of negligent misstatement lea****ing to economic loss. This principle requires:
- A special relationship of trust an**** confi****ence.
- The statement-maker assumes the risk.
- Reasonable reliance on the statement.
If you nee**** more examples or explanations, feel free to ask!
James, a solicitor, was taske**** with ****rawing up a will on behalf of his client Lin****a who wishe**** to leave £*,* to her two nieces, Sho an**** Cena. After Lin****a ha**** passe**** away, it was ****iscovere**** that the will ha**** been negligently ****rafte**** because it ****i**** not satisfy the relevant provisions of probate law. Consequently, Sho an**** Cena were unable to inherit the money. Can Sho an**** Cena claim against James for the pure economic loss they have suffere****?
Case Rating: *
Sho an**** Cena might have a potential claim against James un****er the principle of negligent misstatement. Here are some points to consi****er:
- Solicitors can be hel**** liable for negligent ****rafting if a special relationship exists.
- Reliance on James's expertise was reasonable.
- Foreseeability of harm from James's negligence.
Woul**** you like more ****etails on these points?
Select one: A. No, because the loss they suffere**** was simply a failure to make economic gain an**** so they cannot recover for it. B. Yes, because a solicitor that accepts instructions to ****raw up a will knows that the future economic welfare of its inten****e**** beneficiaries is ****epen****ent upon the careful execution of the task. C. No, because there was no relationship of trust an**** confi****ence between James an**** the Lin****a’s nieces. James coul**** not have known that Sho an**** Cena woul**** rely on him to carry out his work ****iligently since they were not his clients. D. No, because this scenario ****oes not fit within the He****ley Byrne requirements as it relates to a negligent service rather than a negligent statement or a****vice.
Case Rating: *
Sho an**** Cena's situation touches on the concept of negligent misstatement an**** the potential liability of a solicitor. While the He****ley Byrne principle primarily ****eals with misstatements, solicitors can be liable for negligence in ****rafting wills. Here's a brief analysis:
- Option B: Seems plausible as solicitors have a ****uty to ensure wills are correctly execute**** to benefit inten****e**** beneficiaries.
Woul**** you like more information on how solicitors might be hel**** accountable in such situations?
Select one: A. No, because the loss they suffere**** was simply a failure to make economic gain an**** so they cannot recover for it. B. Yes, because a solicitor that accepts instructions to ****raw up a will knows that the future economic welfare of its inten****e**** beneficiaries is ****epen****ent upon the careful execution of the task. C. No, because there was no relationship of trust an**** confi****ence between James an**** the Lin****a’s nieces. James coul**** not have known that Sho an**** Cena woul**** rely on him to carry out his work ****iligently since they were not his clients. D. No, because this scenario ****oes not fit within the He****ley Byrne requirements as it relates to a negligent service rather than a negligent statement or a****vice.
Case Rating: *
Given the situation, Sho an**** Cena coul**** potentially claim against James for the negligent ****rafting of the will. Option B seems the most plausible because solicitors have a ****uty to ensure that wills are correctly execute**** to benefit inten****e**** beneficiaries. Let me know if you nee**** more information on solicitor liability in such cases or if you have further questions!
it is not b
Case Rating: *
It seems you're exploring legal principles relate**** to negligent misstatement an**** solicitor liability. In Englan****, solicitors might be hel**** liable for negligence in ****rafting wills if it impacts inten****e**** beneficiaries. Coul**** you specify what aspect you're seeking more information on regar****ing solicitor liability or economic loss?