Notice Of Appeal Drafting

Summary

When appealing a court decision, ensure your Notice of Appeal includes all relevant orders and issues, such as jurisdictional errors, standing, judicial misconduct, and due process violations. If new evidence arises, it can be included in the designation of items and statements of issues for the appeals court. Deadlines for filing documents, like the docketing statement, include weekends and holidays, extending to the next business day if the deadline falls on a non-business day. As a defendant in the lower court, you are the Defendant-Appellant in the appeal.

Full Conversation

Yes! My next step is to revise statement of issues Appeals which would you please revise NOT using my langauge but more leagl langugae adding statutes and laws when necessary. *. Whether the order dated November *, * should be reversed due The court having narrow jursiction lacked subject matter jurisdiction to ajudicate this 'Properties Rights' case. *. In addition there was no actual case or controversy. The party asserting ownership of the subject property was not an owner but rathert a co-conspiator purpetuating a fraud on the
Sure! Here's a revised and more legally structured version of your statement of issues for appeal:
*. Whether the order dated November *, *, should be reversed on the grounds that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate the property rights case, as the court's jurisdiction was narrowly defined.
*. Whether the order should be reversed due to the absence of an actual case or controversy, as the party asserting ownership of the subject property was engaged in fraudulent activities and was not the legitimate owner.
To strengthen your argument, you may reference relevant Massachusetts statutes and case law:
- Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter *, Section *: Jurisdiction of property cases.
- Article III of the U.S. Constitution: Requirements for a case or controversy.
- Massachusetts case law on subject matter jurisdiction and fraud.
What specific statutes or case law details do you think would bolster your appeal?
court to gain an unfair advantage to steal the subject property. *. The judge failed to verify if the party had a legitimate interest in the property and did not determine their standing under the U.C.C. based on a promissory note. *. The judicial misconduct - as the judged stepped outside of his oath of judical conduct and acted as a private citizen giving orders for 4 years that he did not have the authority to take. *. Failure to dismiss the case or transfer the case to a court of general jursidcition as the counterclaims asserted by me including an illeagl foreclsoure in violation of chapter
It sounds like you have several grounds for appeal, including jurisdictional issues, lack of standing, judicial misconduct, and failure to address counterclaims. Here are some points you can consider including in your appeal:
- Jurisdiction: Courts must have subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate property rights cases. Refer to Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter *, Section *.
- Standing: The party must have a legitimate interest in the property, supported by a valid promissory note under the U.C.C.
- Judicial Misconduct: Judges must adhere to their oath and not act beyond their authority.
- Counterclaims: Courts must address all counterclaims, including alleged illegal foreclosure under Massachusetts laws.
Would you like more detailed information on any of these points?
* and criminal usuary Chapter * section * were again outside of the housing court's jurisdition to ajudicate. the judge knew this so to continue the case may be an act of judicail miscondcut. *. The Housing Court court erred by not following Federal Rule of Evidence *, which requires evidence to be authenticated before being admitted. *. The final judgment was not consistent with Article III of the Constitution, which requires proper jurisdiction and authority, and impartiality.* *. Attorney Misconduct - the trial court ignored evidence of a frabricated foreclosure deed and ommisiions by opposing counsel. *. Illegal Lending Practices - the court failed to address violations in Predatory Home Loan Practices/ Chapter 183C. *. Conspiracy to Commit Usury-the court ignored violations in
To help provide more accurate information, I need to ask: Is your appeal currently in process, and do you have a deadline for submitting your revised statement of issues?
Chapter *, Section *, prohibiting interest rate above *%. *. Jurisdictional Errors/Abuse of Discretion - the court erred extra in its application of the legal principle, statute of limitations. *. Noncompliance with MGL Chapter *, Sections 35A, 35B, and 35C - parties are in violations of foreclosure processes. *. Title Theft-parties presented fabricated documents to obtain the title, leading to an illegal foreclosure and the government seizing my property on October *, *. I am contesting an illeag; asset forfeiture as the government did not have probale cause to seize my property. *. Due Process Violations - these actions collectively violated my Constitutional rights, including due process and fairness.
It seems like you have multiple strong grounds for an appeal, including jurisdictional errors, judicial misconduct, and due process violations. Here's a brief summary of the legal points you might consider:
- Jurisdiction: Courts must have subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate property rights cases (MGL Ch. *, Sec. *).
- Standing: The party must have a legitimate interest in the property, supported by a valid promissory note under the U.C.C.
- Judicial Misconduct: Judges must adhere to their oath and not act beyond their authority.
- Counterclaims: Courts must address all counterclaims, including alleged illegal foreclosure (MGL Ch. *, Secs. 35A, 35B, 35C).
- Usury: Interest rates above *% are prohibited (MGL Ch. *, Sec. *).
- Due Process: Actions violating constitutional rights, including due process and fairness.
Would you like detailed information on how to draft your Notice of Appeal based on these points?
Yes! and Fruad uon the Court - please inlude this.
Sure, here are your points for the Notice of Appeal, including fraud on the court:
*. Jurisdiction: The court lacked subject matter jurisdiction for the property rights case (MGL Ch. *, Sec. *).
*. Standing: The opposing party had no legitimate interest in the property, supported by U.C.C. rules.
*. Judicial Misconduct: The judge acted beyond his authority, violating judicial conduct.
*. Counterclaims: The court failed to address illegal foreclosure (MGL Ch. *, Secs. 35A, 35B, 35C).
*. Usury: Interest rates above *% are prohibited (MGL Ch. *, Sec. *).
*. Evidence: The court failed to authenticate evidence (Federal Rule of Evidence *).
*. Due Process: Constitutional rights were violated, including due process.
*. Fraud on the Court: The opposing party engaged in fraudulent activities to gain an unfair advantage.
Would you like more detailed information on any of these points?
Today i am filing a notice of appeal into housing court as i am withij the time line to do so. next i must file a Civil Appeal entry fortm with my affidavit of indigency. given the information that I have provided can you draft a very powerful Notice of Appeal?
Sure, here's a draft for your Notice of Appeal:
---
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Your Name]
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
[Opposing Party's Name]
Defendant-Appellee.
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Notice is hereby given that [Your Name], the Plaintiff in the above-referenced matter, hereby appeals to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts from the order entered on November *, *, by Hon. Joseph Michaud in the Housing Court, in which the Motion for Reconsideration and Request for Judicial Notice were denied, and the Motion to Compel Opposing Counsel to Answer Pivotal Question was also denied.
STATEMENT OF ISSUES ON APPEAL
*. Jurisdiction: Whether the Housing Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate this property rights case (M.G.L. c. *, § *).
*. Standing: Whether the opposing party had a legitimate interest in the property, as required under the U.C.C., and whether the court erred in failing to verify such interest.
*. Judicial Misconduct: Whether Judge Michaud acted beyond hisauthority, violating his judicial conduct.
*. Counterclaims: Whether the Housing Court failed to address counterclaims, including allegations of illegal foreclosure in violation of M.G.L. c. *, §§ 35A, 35B, and 35C.
*. Usury: Whether the court ignored violations of the prohibition against interest rates above *% (M.G.L. c. *, § *).
*. Evidence Authentication: Whether the court erred by not following Federal Rule of Evidence *, requiring evidence to be authenticated before being admitted.
*. Due Process: Whether the proceedings violated the appellant’s constitutional rights, including due process and fairness.
*. Fraud on the Court: Whether the opposing party engaged in fraudulent activities to gain an unfair advantage, resulting in judicial errors.
Respectfully submitted,
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Your Phone Number]
Dated: [Date]
---
Would you like any additional information or assistance with another part of your appeal process?
I am the defendant
It looks like you have a strong basis for your appeal with multiple grounds, including jurisdictional errors, judicial misconduct, and due process violations. Here's a draft Notice of Appeal for you:
---
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Your Name]
Defendant-Appellant,
v.
[Opposing Party's Name]
Plaintiff-Appellee.
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Notice is hereby given that [Your Name], the Defendant in the above-referenced matter, hereby appeals to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts from the order entered on November *, *, by Hon. Joseph Michaud in the Housing Court, in which the Motion for Reconsideration and Request for Judicial Notice were denied, and the Motion to Compel Opposing Counsel to Answer Pivotal Question was also denied.
STATEMENT OF ISSUES ON APPEAL
*. Jurisdiction: Whether the Housing Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate this property rights case (M.G.L. c. *, § *).
*. Standing: Whether the opposing party had a legitimate interest in the property, as required under the U.C.C., and whether thecourt erred in failing to verify such interest.
*. Judicial Misconduct: Whether Judge Michaud acted beyond his authority, violating judicial conduct.
*. Counterclaims: Whether the Housing Court failed to address counterclaims, including allegations of illegal foreclosure in violation of M.G.L. c. *, §§ 35A, 35B, and 35C.
*. Usury: Whether the court ignored violations of the prohibition against interest rates above *% (M.G.L. c. *, § *).
*. Evidence Authentication: Whether the court erred by not following Federal Rule of Evidence *, requiring evidence to be authenticated before being admitted.
*. Due Process: Whether the proceedings violated the appellant’s constitutional rights, including due process and fairness.
*. Fraud on the Court: Whether the opposing party engaged in fraudulent activities to gain an unfair advantage, resulting in judicial errors.
Respectfully submitted,
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Your Phone Number]
Dated: [Date]
---
Would you like any additional information or assistance with another part of your
Im confused . Shouldnt this be to the Southeast housing Court and not the Appeals Court?
You are correct; if you are filing an initial notice of appeal, it should be filed with the Southeast Housing Court where your case was heard. Here’s how you can adjust your Notice of Appeal:
---
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Your Name]
Defendant-Appellant,
v.
[Opposing Party's Name]
Plaintiff-Appellee.
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Notice is hereby given that [Your Name], the Defendant in the above-referenced matter, hereby appeals to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts from the order entered on November *, *, by Hon. Joseph Michaud in the Southeast Housing Court, in which the Motion for Reconsideration and Request for Judicial Notice were denied, and the Motion to Compel Opposing Counsel to Answer Pivotal Question was also denied.
STATEMENT OF ISSUES ON APPEAL
*. Jurisdiction: Whether the Housing Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate this property rights case (M.G.L. c. *, § *).
*. Standing: Whether the opposing party had a legitimate interest in the property, asrequired under the U.C.C., and whether the court erred in failing to verify such interest.
*. Judicial Misconduct: Whether Judge Michaud acted beyond his authority, violating judicial conduct.
*. Counterclaims: Whether the Housing Court failed to address counterclaims, including allegations of illegal foreclosure in violation of M.G.L. c. *, §§ 35A, 35B, and 35C.
*. Usury: Whether the court ignored violations of the prohibition against interest rates above *% (M.G.L. c. *, § *).
*. Evidence Authentication: Whether the court erred by not following Federal Rule of Evidence *, requiring evidence to be authenticated before being admitted.
*. Due Process: Whether the proceedings violated the appellant’s constitutional rights, including due process and fairness.
*. Fraud on the Court: Whether the opposing party engaged in fraudulent activities to gain an unfair advantage, resulting in judicial errors.
Respectfully submitted,
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Your Phone Number]
**Dated: [Date]
There are three orders - * orders Denied and his order on */*/* ORDER
It sounds like you have multiple grounds for an appeal. Here's a revised Notice of Appeal directed to the Southeast Housing Court:
---
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Your Name]
Defendant-Appellant,
v.
[Opposing Party's Name]
Plaintiff-Appellee.
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Notice is hereby given that [Your Name], the Defendant in the above-referenced matter, hereby appeals to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts from the orders entered on November *, *, by Hon. Joseph Michaud in the Southeast Housing Court, in which the Motion for Reconsideration and Request for Judicial Notice were denied, and the Motion to Compel Opposing Counsel to Answer Pivotal Question was also denied.
STATEMENT OF ISSUES ON APPEAL
*. Jurisdiction: Whether the Housing Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate this property rights case (M.G.L. c. *, § *).
*. Standing: Whether the opposing party had a legitimate interest in the property, as required under the U.C.C., and whether the court erred in failing toverify such interest.
*. Judicial Misconduct: Whether Judge Michaud acted beyond his authority, violating judicial conduct.
*. Counterclaims: Whether the Housing Court failed to address counterclaims, including allegations of illegal foreclosure in violation of M.G.L. c. *, §§ 35A, 35B, and 35C.
*. Usury: Whether the court ignored violations of the prohibition against interest rates above *% (M.G.L. c. *, § *).
*. Evidence Authentication: Whether the court erred by not following Federal Rule of Evidence *, requiring evidence to be authenticated before being admitted.
*. Due Process: Whether the proceedings violated the appellant’s constitutional rights, including due process and fairness.
*. Fraud on the Court: Whether the opposing party engaged in fraudulent activities to gain an unfair advantage, resulting in judicial errors.
Respectfully submitted,
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Your Phone Number]
Dated: [Date]
---
Would you like assistance with any other part of your appeal process?
Can I include the Order he gave on Novemebr *, * too?
Yes, you should include the order given on November *, *. Here's the revised Notice of Appeal to reflect this:
---
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Your Name]
Defendant-Appellant,
v.
[Opposing Party's Name]
Plaintiff-Appellee.
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Notice is hereby given that [Your Name], the Defendant in the above-referenced matter, hereby appeals to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts from the orders entered on November *, *, by Hon. Joseph Michaud in the Southeast Housing Court, including the Motion for Reconsideration and Request for Judicial Notice being denied, the Motion to Compel Opposing Counsel to Answer Pivotal Question being denied, and the order entered on the same date.
STATEMENT OF ISSUES ON APPEAL
*. Jurisdiction: Whether the Housing Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate this property rights case (M.G.L. c. *, § *).
*. Standing: Whether the opposing party had a legitimate interest in the property, as required under the U.C.C., and whether the court erred in failing to verify such interest.
*. Judicial Misconduct: Whether Judge Michaud acted beyond his authority, violating judicial conduct.
*. Counterclaims: Whether the Housing Court failed to address counterclaims, including allegations of illegal foreclosure in violation of M.G.L. c. *, §§ 35A, 35B, and 35C.
*. Usury: Whether the court ignored violations of the prohibition against interest rates above *% (M.G.L. c. *, § *).
*. Evidence Authentication: Whether the court erred by not following Federal Rule of Evidence *, requiring evidence to be authenticated before being admitted.
*. Due Process: Whether the proceedings violated the appellant’s constitutional rights, including due process and fairness.
*. Fraud on the Court: Whether the opposing party engaged in fraudulent activities to gain an unfair advantage, resulting in judicial errors.
Respectfully submitted,
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Your Phone Number]
Dated: [Date]
---
Would you like any
do *. Due Process: Whether the proceedings violated the appellant’s constitutional rights, including due process and fairness. I dont say I am an appellant, right? Please revise
Sure, here's the revised Notice of Appeal:
---
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Your Name]
Defendant-Appellant,
v.
[Opposing Party's Name]
Plaintiff-Appellee.
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Notice is hereby given that [Your Name], the Defendant in the above-referenced matter, hereby appeals to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts from the orders entered on November *, *, by Hon. Joseph Michaud in the Southeast Housing Court, including the Motion for Reconsideration and Request for Judicial Notice being denied, the Motion to Compel Opposing Counsel to Answer Pivotal Question being denied, and the order entered on the same date.
STATEMENT OF ISSUES ON APPEAL
*. Jurisdiction: Whether the Housing Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate this property rights case (M.G.L. c. *, § *).
*. Standing: Whether the opposing party had a legitimate interest in the property, as required under the U.C.C., and whether the court erred in failing to verify such interest.
*. Judicial Misconduct: Whether Judge Michaud acted beyond his authority, violating judicial conduct.
*. Counterclaims: Whether the Housing Court failed to address counterclaims, including allegations of illegal foreclosure in violation of M.G.L. c. *, §§ 35A, 35B, and 35C.
*. Usury: Whether the court ignored violations of the prohibition against interest rates above *% (M.G.L. c. *, § *).
*. Evidence Authentication: Whether the court erred by not following Federal Rule of Evidence *, requiring evidence to be authenticated before being admitted.
*. Due Process: Whether the proceedings violated the defendant’s constitutional rights, including due process and fairness.
*. Fraud on the Court: Whether the opposing party engaged in fraudulent activities to gain an unfair advantage, resulting in judicial errors.
Respectfully submitted,
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Your Phone Number]
Dated: [Date]
---
Would you like any additional information or assistance with another part of your appeal process?
This is correct, right?Notice is hereby given that Karen Merritt, the Defendant, in the above-referenced matter, hereby appeals to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts from the orders entered on November *, *, by Hon. Joseph Michaud in the Southeast Housing Court, including the Motion for Reconsideration and Request for Judicial Notice being denied, the Motion to Compel Opposing Counsel to Answer Pivotal Question being denied, and the order entered on the same date.
Yes, your statement appears correct. Here's a concise version for clarity:
---
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Karen Merritt
Defendant-Appellant,
v.
[Opposing Party's Name]
Plaintiff-Appellee.
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Notice is hereby given that Karen Merritt, the Defendant in the above-referenced matter, hereby appeals to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts from the orders entered on November *, *, by Hon. Joseph Michaud in the Southeast Housing Court, including the Motion for Reconsideration and Request for Judicial Notice being denied, the Motion to Compel Opposing Counsel to Answer Pivotal Question being denied, and the order entered on the same date.
STATEMENT OF ISSUES ON APPEAL
*. Jurisdiction: Whether the Housing Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate this property rights case (M.G.L. c. *, § *).
*. Standing: Whether the opposing party had a legitimate interest in the property, as required under the U.C.C., and whether the court erred in failing to verify such interest.
*. Judicial Misconduct: Whether Judge Michaud acted beyond his authority, violating judicial conduct.
*. Counterclaims: Whether the Housing Court failed to address counterclaims, including allegations of illegal foreclosure in violation of M.G.L. c. *, §§ 35A, 35B, and 35C.
*. Usury: Whether the court ignored violations of the prohibition against interest rates above *% (M.G.L. c. *, § *).
*. Evidence Authentication: Whether the court erred by not following Federal Rule of Evidence *, requiring evidence to be authenticated before being admitted.
*. Due Process: Whether the proceedings violated the defendant’s constitutional rights, including due process and fairness.
*. Fraud on the Court: Whether the opposing party engaged in fraudulent activities to gain an unfair advantage, resulting in judicial errors.
Respectfully submitted,
Karen Merritt
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Your Phone Number]
Dated: [Date]
---
Would you like any further assistance or details on any specific issue?
see above
Yes, that's correct. Here's the finalized version for you:
---
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Karen Merritt
Defendant-Appellant,
v.
[Opposing Party's Name]
Plaintiff-Appellee.
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Notice is hereby given that Karen Merritt, the Defendant in the above-referenced matter, hereby appeals to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts from the orders entered on November *, *, by Hon. Joseph Michaud in the Southeast Housing Court, including the Motion for Reconsideration and Request for Judicial Notice being denied, the Motion to Compel Opposing Counsel to Answer Pivotal Question being denied, and the order entered on the same date.
STATEMENT OF ISSUES ON APPEAL
*. Jurisdiction: Whether the Housing Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate this property rights case (M.G.L. c. *, § *).
*. Standing: Whether the opposing party had a legitimate interest in the property, as required under the U.C.C., and whether the court erred in failing to verify such interest.
*. JudicialMisconduct: Whether Judge Michaud acted beyond his authority, violating judicial conduct.
*. Counterclaims: Whether the Housing Court failed to address counterclaims, including allegations of illegal foreclosure in violation of M.G.L. c. *, §§ 35A, 35B, and 35C.
*. Usury: Whether the court ignored violations of the prohibition against interest rates above *% (M.G.L. c. *, § *).
*. Evidence Authentication: Whether the court erred by not following Federal Rule of Evidence *, requiring evidence to be authenticated before being admitted.
*. Due Process: Whether the proceedings violated the defendant’s constitutional rights, including due process and fairness.
*. Fraud on the Court: Whether the opposing party engaged in fraudulent activities to gain an unfair advantage, resulting in judicial errors.
Respectfully submitted,
Karen Merritt
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Your Phone Number]
Dated: [Date]
---
Would you like any additional information or assistance with another part of your appeal process?
can you fix this?Respectfully submitted, /s/ Karen Merritt VERIFICATION I, Karen Merritt, verify under the pains and penalties of perjury that the facts and statements set forth in this Notice of Appeal are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: December *, * /s/Karen Merritt
Sure, here's your revised verification:
---
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Karen Merritt
VERIFICATION
I, Karen Merritt, verify under the pains and penalties of perjury that the facts and statements set forth in this Notice of Appeal are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date: December *, *
/s/ Karen Merritt
---
Would you like any additional information or assistance with any other part of your appeal process?
do I say Viefied notice of Appeal?
No, you should use "Verified Notice of Appeal" instead. Here's the corrected version:
---
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Karen Merritt
Defendant-Appellant,
v.
[Opposing Party's Name]
Plaintiff-Appellee.
VERIFIED NOTICE OF APPEAL
Notice is hereby given that Karen Merritt, the Defendant in the above-referenced matter, hereby appeals to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts from the orders entered on November *, *, by Hon. Joseph Michaud in the Southeast Housing Court, including the Motion for Reconsideration and Request for Judicial Notice being denied, the Motion to Compel Opposing Counsel to Answer Pivotal Question being denied, and the order entered on the same date.
STATEMENT OF ISSUES ON APPEAL
*. Jurisdiction: Whether the Housing Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate this property rights case (M.G.L. c. *, § *).
*. Standing: Whether the opposing party had a legitimate interest in the property, as required under the U.C.C., and whether the court erred in failingto verify such interest.
*. Judicial Misconduct: Whether Judge Michaud acted beyond his authority, violating judicial conduct.
*. Counterclaims: Whether the Housing Court failed to address counterclaims, including allegations of illegal foreclosure in violation of M.G.L. c. *, §§ 35A, 35B, and 35C.
*. Usury: Whether the court ignored violations of the prohibition against interest rates above *% (M.G.L. c. *, § *).
*. Evidence Authentication: Whether the court erred by not following Federal Rule of Evidence *, requiring evidence to be authenticated before being admitted.
*. Due Process: Whether the proceedings violated the defendant’s constitutional rights, including due process and fairness.
*. Fraud on the Court: Whether the opposing party engaged in fraudulent activities to gain an unfair advantage, resulting in judicial errors.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Karen Merritt
VERIFICATION
I, Karen Merritt, verify under the pains and penalties of perjury that the facts and statements set forth in this Verified Notice of Appeal are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date: December
In the Civil appeal entry Form how do I answer this: I further certify under the penalty of perjury that the notice of assembly was received on.... Do I say , not yet assembled/
You can answer "not yet assembled" if the notice of assembly has not been received yet. Here's how you can phrase it:
"I further certify under the penalty of perjury that the notice of assembly was received on: not yet assembled."
Would you like any additional help with your Civil Appeal Entry Form?
I have to file the docketing statement in 14 days - does that inlude weekends? what would be the date/
Yes, the *-day period includes weekends and holidays. To calculate the deadline, start counting from the day after the date of the order. If the 14th day falls on a weekend or holiday, the deadline extends to the next business day.
Would you like help calculating the exact deadline date based on your order date?
yes I am filing the civil appeal entry form today.
Got it. If you're filing the Civil Appeal Entry Form today, December *, *, you should count 14 days, including weekends and holidays. So:
- Start counting from December *, *.
- 14 days from December *, *, is January *, *.
January *, *, will be your deadline to file the docketing statement.
Would you like any additional help with the form or any other part of your appeal process?
am i a deffendant appealnt or a plaintiff appeallant . I was the defendant in the lowere court
Since you were the defendant in the lower court and you are appealing the decision, you are the "Defendant-Appellant."
Would you like any additional assistance with your appeal process?
Question about another matter Alton is filing filing a designation of items and statements of issues for the bankruptcy appeals court in so doing he just discoverd new evidence that he wants to address. This new evidence is in * the party filed a motion to lift Aton's stay using the title as a CRDITOR> Howver that is false as they are not creditors under the FDCPA and I want to now have the court adrres them as debt collectors. Can he make this request within his designation of items and statements of issues for the bankruptcy appeals court ?
Yes, Alton can address the new evidence in his designation of items and statements of issues for the bankruptcy appeals court. Here are some key points:
- FDCPA (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) defines who is considered a "creditor" and "debt collector."
- Alton should include the new evidence and argue that the party is a debt collector, not a creditor, under FDCPA.
- He should submit this alongside his designations and statements of issues.
Would you like more details on how to draft this argument?
Please clarify should he file a separate motion- He should submit this alongside his designations and statements of issues
Alton should submit the new evidence and argument alongside his designations and statements of issues. Presenting everything together can provide a comprehensive view of his case and support his position effectively.
Would you like more detailed guidance on how to draft the argument for including this new evidence?