Judges Discretion In Hearings

Summary

In Pennsylvania, judges have the discretion to order a trial de novo during child support exceptions hearings, allowing for a complete re-evaluation of the case. This can include considering new allegations if they significantly impact the case. Generally, parties must file exceptions for issues they want reviewed, but judges may permit new arguments if they find them relevant and significant. Consulting with a local attorney is advisable for specific guidance on your situation.

Full Conversation

What I’m trying to understand is at the exceptions hearing, the opposing side brought up new allegations. The judge then sent the matter back for a trial Dinovo. Was the judge allowed to do that. It’s my understanding that Philadelphia certified to the exceptions protocol only.
In Pennsylvania, during a child support exceptions hearing, judges do have the discretion to order a trial de novo if they find it necessary to re-evaluate the case thoroughly. This includes considering new allegations if they impact the case significantly. If you have further concerns, consulting with a local attorney might be beneficial.
I thought you had to file exceptions for all issues and that if you didn’t file exceptions, you were barred from introducing new arguments?
In Pennsylvania, it's generally required to file exceptions for issues you want reviewed. However, a judge may allow new arguments if they find them relevant and significant to the case. It's advisable to consult with a local attorney for specific guidance on your situation. Would you like help connecting with a local lawyer?