Auto Part Purchase Discrepancy
Summary
In Texas, purchasing an auto part for a value much lower than paid may involve misrepresentation or fraud. The Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA) prohibits deceptive acts in commerce. Even if you knowingly agreed to a purchase, fraud may still be present if intentional deception occurred. Nunc pro tunc orders can correct past court errors. Consider gathering evidence of the transaction and consulting legal advice for your specific situation.Full Conversation
business and commerce code regarding knowingly entering into an agreement of labor adn goods
In Texas, the Business and Commerce Code addresses issues related to fraud and misrepresentation in commercial transactions. Some key points include:
- Section *.*: Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA) prohibits false, misleading, or deceptive acts in trade or commerce.
- Section *.*: Addresses fraud in real estate and stock transactions, which can also apply to other goods.
Do you have specific details about the agreement or transaction?
if knowingly agreed to product, then not fraud case law
In Texas, even if you knowingly agreed to purchase a product, it doesn't necessarily negate the possibility of fraud if there was intentional deception involved. Here are a few points to consider:
- Intentional Deception: The seller's intent to deceive you is key.
- Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA): Misleading or false information provided during the transaction.
Do you have any evidence showing the seller's intent to deceive?
Nunc pro tunc explaine
Nunc pro tunc is a Latin term meaning "now for then." In legal context, it refers to a court order that retroactively corrects an earlier ruling. It can be used to correct clerical errors or to reflect what should have happened at an earlier date.
Do you need more information on how this might apply to your case?
case law regarding allergic reaction to tattoo does negligence fall on artist
In Texas, negligence claims against tattoo artists due to allergic reactions could be considered under personal injury law. Key points to consider:
- Duty of Care: Tattoo artists must provide a safe environment and use safe materials.
- Breach of Duty: Failure to inquire about allergies or use of harmful materials.
- Causation: Proving the allergic reaction was caused by the artist’s negligence.
- Damages: Documenting the harm suffered due to the allergic reaction.
Do you have any evidence or documentation of the allergic reaction and the circumstances of the tattoo application?