Small Claims Court Complaint

I have a complaint that I want to submit to small claims court. I need a proof read

Plaintiff: Mr. Singleton Defendant: Murray's Garage Inc. Introduction This lawsuit arises from a breach of contract and potential violations of Alabama consumer protection laws committed by Defendant, Murray's Garage Inc., in repairing Plaintiff's * Toyota Tundra. Facts On February *, *, Plaintiff brought his * Toyota Tundra to Defendant's repair shop experiencing starting problems when the engine was warmed up. Plaintiff verbally requested Defendant to diagnose and repair the issue. Defendant performed a diagnostic and verbally quoted Plaintiff $* to replace the thermostat and temperature sender. Although Plaintiff found the price slightly high, he verbally authorized the repair due to an urgent need for his truck for a job the following day. Several hours later, Defendant contacted Plaintiff and informed him of a price increase to $*.* due to a needed crankshaft position/angle sensor replacement. Though reluctant due to the cost increase, Plaintiff again verbally authorized the repair due to his urgent need for the truck. Upon completion of the repairs on February *, *, and after paying Defendant $*.* in cash, the battery light came on while Plaintiff was driving home. Plaintiff immediately contacted Defendant and informed them of the new issue. Defendant instructed him to bring the truck back for another diagnostic. Less than an hour later, a technician at Defendant's shop informed Plaintiff that the alternator was failing and required replacement. Plaintiff expressed that the alternator was functioning properly when he initially brought the truck in. The technician dismissed his concerns. Due to the significant expense he just incurred, Plaintiff declined the additional repair and chose to have a friend replace the alternator with a warrantied part for $* on February *, *. Following the alternator replacement, the check engine light came back on, and the temperature gauge indicated overheating. Plaintiff contacted Defendant again and expressed concerns about the overheating and the check engine light. Defendant instructed him to bring the truck back for yet another diagnostic. Due to a planned out-of-town trip, Plaintiff was unable to bring the truck in until March *, *. Upon arrival at Defendant's shop, Plaintiff was informed the technician had a doctor's appointment and would not be available until later. Despite needing his truck for work, Plaintiff left it at the shop hoping for a resolution. No contact was made by Defendant throughout the day, prompting Plaintiff to return to the shop in the afternoon. He was informed the technician could not look at the truck that day but would have an answer by March *, *. On March *, *, Defendant called the Plaintiff and stated a new cooling fan clutch was needed at a cost of $*.*. Plaintiff objected to the additional cost, highlighting that the issue wasn't present during the initial inspection and questioning why it wasn't included in the original estimate. Defendant refused to repair the truck without payment for the cooling fan clutch and threatened to leave the vehicle on the street for which he eventually did. Plaintiff requested receipts for all parts ordered during his visits, but only received a receipt for the initial $*.* payment, lacking any part details with receipts and an estimate for cooling fan clutch replacement which totaled $*.*. A disagreement ensued, with Plaintiff accused Defendant of overcharging due to the high overpriced parts and failing to properly repair the truck that was the first issue of the disagreement. The technician present made false statements about the condition of the truck upon initial arrival insinuating that the truck was already overheating before the first visit which was false. The disagreement reached a standstill, prompting Plaintiff to leave the shop and pursue legal action. Claims Breach of Contract: Plaintiff alleges Defendant breached their verbal contract to repair the starting issue in his truck. The additional repairs and price increases were not quoted initially and the up-charged agreement was tendered via a $*.* cash payment which resulted in an incomplete repair. Deceptive Trade Practices (DTPA) Violations: Section *-*-*(*): Representing the services of a particular quality or standard if they are of another. (Defendant failed to fix the starting issue and created additional problems.) Section *-*-*(*): Making a false or misleading statement concerning the reasons for, existence of, or amounts of, price increases. (Defendant misled Plaintiff about the initial price and the need for additional repairs.) **Relief Sought** * A court order requiring Defendant to: * Reimburse Plaintiff for the $*.* paid for the initial repairs. * Reimburse Plaintiff for the $* spent on the alternator replacement. * Damages for Inconvenience and Mental Anguish.

How should I highlight the key points? In bold or by another means? I have the dates included do I need to include more? Releif sought what can I do to make it more clear?