Vehicle Purchase Dispute Resolution

Summary

Verbal agreements in Texas are challenging to enforce without written documentation. Texas law protects against deceptive trade practices. The use of a disbarred attorney is concerning and should be reported. Without a valid retail installment agreement, the seller may not have the right to seize the vehicle, potentially making the debt unsecured. The sellers actions, including demanding full payment before the due date and repossessing the vehicle, may provide grounds for rescinding the agreement and seeking a refund. Legal counsel is recommended to navigate this complex dispute.

Full Conversation

On */*/*, paid $*,* down payment on vehicle priced at $*,*.*. Agreed to pay $*,*.* in two payments of $*.* with the sellers verbal assurance that they would work with me if necessary, as they were aware I was unemployed (sold my previous car to purchase a truck with the intention of starting a landscaping business) and unsure of when I would have the money available. The only document (attached) alluding to this agreement is written on an incorrect and possibly even contradictory form which does not appear to meet the definition of a retail installment contract as I understand it. There exists no other mention of this agreement elsewhere in the sales paperwork.
It sounds like you're dealing with a vehicle purchase issue where verbal agreements were made, but the documentation might not fully support them. Here are a few general points to consider:
- Written Contracts: In Texas, verbal agreements can be harder to enforce than written contracts.
- Consumer Protection: Texas law offers protection against deceptive trade practices.
- Legal Advice: Consulting with an attorney may help clarify your rights and options.
Would you like to explore connecting with local lawyers who can assist you further?
hold on. more input coming in * more entries.
It sounds like you have some more details to provide. Once you're ready, feel free to share the additional information, and I'll be here to assist you!
Seller has provided no inventory of personal property, no written notice of any kind in this time. Not one single shred of paperwork post sale. Seller continues to attempt to leverage his possession of the truck in order to compel payment on what is, in my understanding, not a secured debt. Seller hired a disbarred attorney to "negotiate" which was a demand for not only the $*,* owed, but an additional $*. I have demanded my $*,* payment to be refunded and my personal property be returned, which the seller refuses to do. Seller has attempted to negotiate a reduction of the balance owed but only in the context of withholding the truck until its paid, which was not agreed to at any point, nor would it have ever been agreed to by me under the circumstances of being unemployed.
It seems you're dealing with a complex vehicle purchase dispute. Here are some points to consider under Texas law:
- Written Contracts: Verbal agreements are difficult to enforce without written documentation.
- Consumer Protection: Texas law protects against deceptive trade practices.
- Disbarred Attorney: Using a disbarred attorney is concerning; you might want to report this.
Would you like to connect with local lawyers who can assist you further with this issue?
I believe that without (as I understand it) a valid retail installment agreement, seller had no right to seize the vehicle, as our agreement would at best indicate an unsecured debt. No retail installment agreement or loan contract of any kind was signed, the "we owe" and buyers order are the only * documents mentioning the sale price and agreement. While I fully intended to pay the remaining balance, the sellers act of depriving me of the vehicle made it impossible for me to work, which made it impossible for me to pay. The sellers act of depriving me of the vehicle caused me to be unable to (and not obligated to?) honor my end. The seller has now been in possession of the vehicle for over 30 days from todays date, following the seizure. .
Case Rating: *
This seems like a high-value case where legal assistance would be beneficial. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
Can you provide more information on any written documentation you have regarding the agreement?
2 days later, on */*/*, seller arrived with law enforcement and "repossessed" the vehicle from my driveway and demanded payment for balance in full as a condition to return vehicle. **Crucially, even assuming an enforceable security interest and/or a valid retail installment contract, the demand for payment in full occurred prior to the final payment date noted on the "we owe" form, potentially giving me the remedy of rescending the agreement and receiving a full refund??**
Case Rating: *
It seems you have a strong case that could benefit from legal counsel. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, can you provide a bit more information about the written documentation you have regarding the agreement?
I took the vehicle home on the date of the sale and had it within my possession for a total of 9 days. On */*/*, the seller arrived at my home and demanded the key, threatening an $* repossession/wrecker fee if I were to refuse. I complied, unaware that this action may have been illegal. At this time, seller instructed me to pay remaining balance in full for return of truck key.
Case Rating: *
It seems you have a potentially strong case. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with this issue? If so, can you provide more information about the written documentation you have regarding the agreement?
that is out of order but thats all of it
Case Rating: *
It appears that you have a strong case regarding the vehicle purchase dispute, especially with the repossession and potential deceptive practices involved. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, can you provide more information about the written documentation you have regarding the agreement?