Misleading Conduct In Australia
Summary
Rieper Biofoods failure to supply plant-based patties and apply a 5% discount may constitute misleading conduct under Australian Consumer Law. This could also be a breach of contract. Consider seeking legal advice, negotiating with the company, or contacting Fair Trading NSW for mediation or to lodge a complaint.Full Conversation
Under the Australian Consumer Law, has Rieper Biofoods engaged in
misleading or deceptive conduct in relation to the failure to continue
supplying plant-based fried chicken substitute burger patties?
Rieper Biofoods may have engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct under the Australian Consumer Law (ACL). Key points:
- Misleading representation about the ability to supply plant-based fried chicken patties for the contract’s duration.
- Failure to apply the agreed *% discount, potentially breaching the contract and misleading conduct.
Have you considered seeking legal advice to assess your options for remedying this situation?
can you expand on this
Key Points to Consider:
*.
Misleading or Deceptive Conduct (ACL Section *):
- Rieper Biofoods may have engaged in misleading conduct by claiming they could supply plant-based fried chicken patties for the contract’s duration when they could not.
- The failure to apply the agreed *% discount also potentially amounts to misleading or deceptive conduct.
*.
Breach of Contract:
- Failure to supply the agreed product can constitute a breach of contract.
- Not applying the *% discount breaches the express terms of the agreement.
Potential Remedies:
- Seek Legal Advice: Consult a lawyer specialized in contract and consumer law to evaluate the merits of your case and potential for compensation.
- Negotiation: Consider negotiating with Rieper Biofoods for compensation or alternative arrangements.
- Fair Trading NSW: You can contact Fair Trading NSW for mediation or to lodge a complaint.
Would you like more detailed information on any of these points?
TRY ME!
Start a new chat