Online Listings Legal Implications

Summary

Courts may interpret systemic online listings as implying availability assurances under the Consumer Rights Act 2015. While specific cases arent provided, resources like BAILII, Westlaw UK, and LexisNexis UK can help find relevant case law. For negligent misrepresentation, Charlottes conduct under the Misrepresentation Act 1967 is analyzed, with Redgrave v Hurd (1881) as a precedent. Ivan may rescind the contract and recover damages.

Full Conversation

which case best shows ths: courts increasingly treat systemic online listings as carrying implied assurances of availability
To address your query, you might want to look into cases related to the Consumer Rights Act *. While I can't pinpoint a specific case, you could explore decisions where implied terms about service availability were contested. These cases often involve disputes about whether the online listing led to a reasonable expectation of availability.
can you show me
I understand that you're looking for a specific case where courts have treated systemic online listings as carrying implied assurances of availability. While I can't provide a specific case directly, you can research legal databases or case law websites for relevant cases under the Consumer Rights Act *.
Here are a few resources where you might find relevant cases:
- BAILII (British and Irish Legal Information Institute)
- Westlaw UK
- LexisNexis UK
These platforms allow you to search for cases using keywords related to your query.
which case relates to this: courts increasingly treat systemic online listings as carrying implied assurances of availability
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you're looking for a specific legal precedent. While I can't provide a specific case directly, I recommend searching the following resources for cases related to the Consumer Rights Act *:
- BAILII (British and Irish Legal Information Institute)
- Westlaw UK
- LexisNexis UK
These platforms should help you find relevant case law.
show me ddress your query, you might want to look into cases related to the Consumer Rights Act *. While I can't pinpoint a specific case, you could explore decisions where implied terms about service availability were contested. These cases often involve disputes about whether the online listing led to a reasonable expectation of availability.
Case Rating: *
It seems you're looking for a specific case where courts have treated systemic online listings as carrying implied assurances of availability. Unfortunately, I cannot provide specific cases, but you can search legal databases like BAILII, Westlaw UK, or LexisNexis UK for cases related to the Consumer Rights Act *.
Is there another legal issue you'd like information on?
what do you think of this: Charlotte’s conduct amounts to negligent misrepresentation under section *(*) of the Misrepresentation Act *. Her TRNRS listing, complete with product details and a “Buy Now” function, implicitly asserted ownership or control of the trainers. This was untrue, and Ivan relied on it when completing the transaction. Although Charlotte may argue she intended to source the trainers post-sale, misrepresentation does not require dishonesty—only a lack of reasonable grounds for belief in the statement’s truth. As held in Redgrave v Hurd (*) * Ch D *, a party cannot escape liability by claiming ignorance when they had the opportunity—and responsibility—to verify the facts. Charlotte’s repeated trading and failure to confirm possession fell short of that standard. Accordingly, Ivan is entitled to rescind the contract and recover reliance-based damages.
Case Rating: *
Your analysis of Charlotte's conduct seems well-founded under the Misrepresentation Act *, Section *(*). The use of Redgrave v Hurd (*) as precedent to establish liability for negligent misrepresentation is appropriate. If you need more legal precedents or deeper insights, you might want to consult a legal database or a solicitor.
Would you like more information on how to proceed with your case or any other legal issues?
yes
Case Rating: *
Could you please provide more details about your case? Are you seeking guidance on how to proceed with a claim against Charlotte for negligent misrepresentation, or do you have another legal issue in mind?