Mrp Discrepancy Clarification

Summary

In cases of MRP discrepancies, it is important to acknowledge the error and clarify that it was not intentional. Relevant case laws such as Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd. V. Santosh Mittal (2007) and Future Retail Ltd. V. Competition Commission of India & Ors. (2019) emphasize the importance of rectifying errors promptly and ensuring no recurrence. Additionally, the State of Maharashtra v. Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd. (2015) highlights the importance of consumer protection and addressing MRP violations.

Full Conversation

in my case i want to say that the mrp which was masked over a new sticker by my shop was a clerical error with a difference of just *.* rs from the original mrp . give me case laws with regards to this supporting me
In cases involving MRP discrepancies due to clerical errors, it’s crucial to acknowledge the mistake and demonstrate that it was not intentional. Here are a few relevant case laws that might support your situation:
- Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd. v. Santosh Mittal (*): Emphasizes rectifying pricing errors promptly and ensuring no recurrence.
- Future Retail Ltd. v. Competition Commission of India & Ors. (*): Discusses the importance of adhering to MRP regulations and penalties for discrepancies.
- State of Maharashtra v. Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd. (*): Highlights the importance of consumer protection and rectifying any MRP violations promptly.
Would you like more information on any of these cases or assistance with something else?