Latent Defects In Contracts

Summary

Latent defects in Nigerian contract law refer to hidden faults not discoverable by reasonable inspection. Sellers must disclose known latent defects, or face legal consequences. Key cases include Uhunmwangho v. Okojie, Okwejiminor v. Gbakeji, and Olanrenwaju v. Afribank, which emphasize the sellers duty to disclose. Non-disclosure can lead to contract rescission or voidability. For more detailed information, consult legal databases or a local legal expert.

Full Conversation

Nigerian case laws about latent defect on contract with citations
Here are some Nigerian case laws addressing latent defects in contracts:
- Uhunmwangho v. Okojie (*) * NWLR (Pt. *) *: The court held that a seller must disclose any known latent defects.
- Okwejiminor v. Gbakeji (*) All FWLR (Pt. *) *: It was established that failure to disclose latent defects can lead to the contract being voidable.
- Olanrenwaju v. Afribank (Nig.) Plc. (*) * NWLR (Pt. *) *: The court emphasized the duty of the seller to disclose latent defects.
Would you like to know more about any of these cases or how to apply them in your situation?
Give me more case laws with citations
Here are more Nigerian case laws addressing latent defects in contracts:
- Osemebor v. Onitiri (*) * NWLR (Pt. *) *: The court ruled that non-disclosure of latent defects can lead to rescission of the contract.
- Sule v. Aromire (*) * NWLR (Pt. *) *: Established that latent defects must be disclosed by the seller to avoid liability.
- Ogbuagu v. Ekesiobi (*) * NWLR (Pt. *) *: The court confirmed that sellers are liable for latent defects known to them but undisclosed to the buyer.
Would you need further information or assistance with a specific case?