Verbal Agreement Breach Case

Summary

A verbal agreement was made where the plaintiff paid the defendant P1,500 based on false claims of being a deputy sheriff. The defendant failed to provide the promised help or return the money. The plaintiff can consider filing a claim in the small claims or magistrates court in gaborone. Gather evidence, document demands, and proceed with legal action. Consult a local attorney for guidance.

Full Conversation

use simple english
It seems like your case is about someone lying (misrepresentation) and breaking a verbal agreement. You can take this to Small Claims Court or Magistrate's Court in Gaborone.
Steps:
- Collect proof (e.g., payment receipt, messages).
- Write down your efforts to ask for the money back.
- File a complaint at the court.
Do you need more help with this process?
rewrite that and use simple english
It looks like your problem is about someone lying and breaking a verbal agreement. You can report this to the Small Claims Court or Magistrate's Court in Gaborone.
Here’s what to do:
- Gather proof (like payment receipts or messages).
- Keep a record of how you asked for your money back.
- Go to the court and file a complaint.
Need more help with this?
use simple englis...rewrite this...On or about 30th September *, the Plaintiff and the defendant entered into a verbal agreement in the terms of which the Plaintiff paid the defendant the sum of P * *.*. the defendant represented to the plaintiff that he was a deputy sherriff and that he would use his position and assistance to help the plaintiff trace persons who were indebted to her. The plaintiff avers that the defendant s representation was false, in that the defendant was not in fact a Deputy Sheriff, alternatively had no lawful authority and intention to render the promised assistace. After receiving payment, the defendant disappeared and failed to provide the agreed assistance or to refund the said amount.Despite demand, the defendant has failed, refused, and/ neglected to repay the sum of P * *.* and remains in the default
On or about 30th September *, the plaintiff and the defendant made a verbal agreement. The plaintiff paid the defendant P1,*. The defendant claimed he was a deputy sheriff and would help the plaintiff find people who owed her money. The plaintiff says this was a lie because the defendant was not a deputy sheriff and never intended to help. After taking the money, the defendant disappeared, did not provide help, and did not return the money. Even after being asked, the defendant has not repaid the P1,*.
a bit better
On or around 30th September *, the plaintiff and the defendant verbally agreed that the plaintiff would pay the defendant P1,*. The defendant claimed to be a deputy sheriff and promised to help the plaintiff find people who owed her money. The plaintiff later found out this was false—the defendant was not a deputy sheriff and had no intention of helping. After taking the money, the defendant disappeared, gave no help, and did not return the money, even after being asked several times.
use continuous words
On or around 30th September *, the plaintiff and the defendant entered into a verbal agreement where the plaintiff paid the defendant P1,*. The defendant claimed he was a deputy sheriff and promised to assist the plaintiff in locating people who owed her money. The plaintiff later discovered that the defendant was not a deputy sheriff and had no intention of helping her. After receiving the money, the defendant disappeared, failed to provide any assistance, and refused to return the money despite repeated demands.