Dolo Causante Vs Incidente

Summary

Dolo causante involves serious deceit affecting contract consent, potentially leading to annulment. Dolo incidente is incidental deceit not affecting consent, resulting in liability for damages only. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for contract law under the Civil Code of the Philippines.

Full Conversation

Under the Civil Code of the Philippies, what are the distinctions between dolo causante and dolo incidente?
Under the Civil Code of the Philippines, the distinctions between dolo causante and dolo incidente are as follows:
- Dolo Causante: This refers to deceit or fraud that is serious and affects the contract's consent, potentially leading to annulment of the contract.
- Dolo Incidente: This refers to deceit that is merely incidental and does not affect consent, resulting in liability for damages only.
If you have any further questions or need more information, feel free to ask!
can you provide all the distinctions
Certainly! Here are the distinctions between dolo causante and dolo incidente under the Civil Code of the Philippines:
- Dolo Causante:
- Serious deceit affecting contract consent.
- Can lead to contract annulment.

- Dolo Incidente:
- Incidental deceit not affecting consent.
- Results in liability for damages only.
If you need more information or clarification, feel free to ask!