TRY ME!
Ucc 9 406 Affidavit Clarification
Summary
UCC 9-406 requires that an unauthenticated assignment cannot be used as valid evidence without direct testimony from the signatory. Therefore, payments should be directed to the original lender if the transfer is not authenticated, as payments made otherwise would not satisfy the obligation under the note.Full Conversation
The Following statement is a part of an affidavit in MA, please enhance; UCC *-* states that an unauthenticated assignment is not evidence without direct testimony from the signatory; therefore, payments must be paid to the original lender because they did not authenticate a transfer; otherwise, payments would not satisfy the obligation under the note.
Here's an enhanced version of your statement:
"According to UCC *-*, an assignment that is not authenticated cannot be considered valid evidence without direct testimony from the signatory. Consequently, payments should be made to the original lender due to the lack of authentication of the transfer. Any payments made otherwise would not fulfill the obligation under the note."
Do you need any more information related to this issue?
"According to UCC *-*, an assignment that is not authenticated cannot be considered valid evidence without direct testimony from the signatory. Consequently, payments should be made to the original lender due to the lack of authentication of the transfer. Any payments made otherwise would not fulfill the obligation under the note."
Do you need any more information related to this issue?
Please enhance; Invalid Eviction
My partial eviction on October * and *, *, was based on an expired “Execution for Possession” the plain language stated it was valid until October *, *, the 90th day being October *, *, as the execution was granted on July *, *. The Hampden County Sheriff's Department, the debt collector, along with the WHC are well aware of the well-established Massachusetts Law of a *-day limit for execution. All three ignored the law as they claimed they had the discretion not to count the first day. (See pp. *-*)
Sure, here's an enhanced version of your statement:
---
---
Invalid Eviction
My partial eviction on October * and *, *, was based on an expired "Execution for Possession." The plain language stated it was valid until October *, *, with the 90th day being October *, *, as the execution was granted on July *, *. The Hampden County Sheriff's Department, the debt collector, and the WHC were all aware of the well-established Massachusetts Law imposing a *-day limit for execution. However, they ignored the law, claiming they had the discretion not to count the first day. (See pp. *-*)
---
Do you need any more assistance related to this issue?
My partial eviction on October * and *, *, was based on an expired "Execution for Possession." The plain language stated it was valid until October *, *, with the 90th day being October *, *, as the execution was granted on July *, *. The Hampden County Sheriff's Department, the debt collector, and the WHC were all aware of the well-established Massachusetts Law imposing a *-day limit for execution. However, they ignored the law, claiming they had the discretion not to count the first day. (See pp. *-*)
---
Do you need any more assistance related to this issue?
Enhance; Not only did they trespass during the illegal partial eviction they took belongings including my passport, but they utilize a warehouser, Race Street Properties, who was not licensed by the Massachusetts Department of Licensure and my possessions were transported to an address different from the approved Massachusetts legal address listed by the state (* Race St. Holyoke, MA) listed on the execution for possession. These illegal actions were paid for by the debt buyer/ debt collector.
Sure, here's an enhanced version of your statement:
---
During the illegal partial eviction, not only did they trespass, but they also took my belongings, including my passport. They utilized a warehouser, Race Street Properties, which was not licensed by the Massachusetts Department of Licensure. My possessions were transported to an unapproved address different from the legal one listed on the execution for possession (* Race St. Holyoke, MA). These illegal actions were funded by the debt buyer/debt collector.
---
Do you need any further assistance or have additional details to add to this statement?
---
During the illegal partial eviction, not only did they trespass, but they also took my belongings, including my passport. They utilized a warehouser, Race Street Properties, which was not licensed by the Massachusetts Department of Licensure. My possessions were transported to an unapproved address different from the legal one listed on the execution for possession (* Race St. Holyoke, MA). These illegal actions were funded by the debt buyer/debt collector.
---
Do you need any further assistance or have additional details to add to this statement?
Start a new chat