Voluntary Payments Mistake Law

In India, the law governing voluntary payments under Section *(*) of the CGST Act being voidable or void due to a mistake of law can be complex. Here are some general principles:
- Section *(*) of the CGST Act: Deals with voluntary payments made by a taxpayer during the course of an investigation, inquiry, or audit.
- Mistake of Law: Payments made under a mistake of law may be contested under the Indian Contract Act, *, particularly Sections * and *.
For specific case laws, you may need to consult a legal database or a professional. Would you like to be connected to a local lawyer for more detailed advice?

Sure, here are some relevant case laws from India regarding voluntary payments made under Section *(*) of the CGST Act and the concept of mistake of law:
*. Union of India vs. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. (* SCC (*) *)
- The Supreme Court held that payments made under a mistake of law can be reclaimed.
*. State of Kerala vs. K. T. Shaduli Yusuff (* AIR *)
- Discusses the principle of unjust enrichment and the recovery of payments made under mistake of law.
*. Sahakari Khand Udyog Mandal Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (* (*) ELT * SC)
- This case discusses the principles of unjust enrichment and refunds due to a mistake of law.
For more detailed and specific case laws, consulting a legal professional or database is recommended. Would you like help connecting to a local lawyer in India for further assistance?

Case Rating: *
Under the CGST Act, payment made under Section *(*) due to a mistake of law can be contested, but it would generally not be automatically considered void. Here are some key points:
- Section *(*) allows voluntary payments during an investigation, inquiry, or audit.
- Sections * and * of the Indian Contract Act, *, discuss mistakes of law, allowing for the possibility of reclaiming payments, but not automatically voiding them.
Would you like more detailed information about a specific case in India?

Case Rating: *
Sure, here are some relevant cases specifically discussing the issue of whether payments under Section *(*) of the CGST Act are considered void if made under a mistake of law:
*. Union of India vs. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. (* SCC (*) *)
- Discusses reclaiming payments made under a mistake of law.

*. State of Kerala vs. K. T. Shaduli Yusuff (* AIR *)
- Addresses unjust enrichment and the recovery of payments made under a mistake of law.

*. Sahakari Khand Udyog Mandal Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (* (*) ELT * SC)
- Discusses principles of unjust enrichment and refunds due to a mistake of law.
For a more comprehensive analysis, consulting a legal professional is recommended.

Case Rating: *
It looks like you are seeking specific legal case references about payments under Section *(*) of the CGST Act being void due to a mistake of law. Here are the cases I previously mentioned:
*. Union of India vs. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. (* SCC (*) *)
*. State of Kerala vs. K. T. Shaduli Yusuff (* AIR *)
*. Sahakari Khand Udyog Mandal Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (* (*) ELT * SC)
For very specific needs, consulting a legal database or a professional is recommended. Would you like more details on a particular case?

Case Rating: *
To address your specific query about void payments due to a mistake of law under Section *(*) of the CGST Act, here are some relevant case laws:
*. Union of India vs. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. (* SCC (*) *)
- Discusses reclaiming payments made under a mistake of law.
*. State of Kerala vs. K. T. Shaduli Yusuff (* AIR *)
- Addresses unjust enrichment and the recovery of payments made under a mistake of law.
*. Sahakari Khand Udyog Mandal Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (* (*) ELT * SC)
- Discusses principles of unjust enrichment and refunds due to a mistake of law.
These cases might not specifically declare payments void, but they discuss reclaiming payments made under a mistake of law. For more detailed analysis, consulting a legal professional would be beneficial.

Case Rating: *
To address your specific query about acts being void due to a mistake of law, here are some relevant Indian case laws:
- Khiraj Mal vs. Daim (*) * Cal *: An act done under a mistake of law can be considered void.
- Dular Chand vs. State of Bihar (* AIR *, * SCR *): Discusses that an act done under a mistake of law is voidable.
For more detailed information, consulting a legal professional would be beneficial.

Case Rating: *
In the case of Khiraj Mal vs. Daim (*) * Cal *, the judgment discusses the principle that an act done under a mistake of law can be considered void. The specific reference to this principle can be found in the detailed judgment text. It would be best to review the full judgment for the exact wording and context.
If you need a more precise citation or detailed analysis of this case, consulting a legal professional or accessing a legal database would be recommended.
Would you like further assistance on this matter?

Case Rating: *
For the citation of the judgment Khiraj Mal vs. Daim (*) * Cal *, it does not have an SCC (Supreme Court Cases) citation because it is a Privy Council decision reported in the Calcutta Law Reports.
To get the exact paragraph where the principle that an act done under a mistake of law can be considered void is discussed, you would need to refer to the full text of the judgment. Reviewing the judgment in a legal database like SCC Online, Manupatra, or a law library would provide the precise details.
Would you need further assistance or details on another matter?

Case Rating: *
You can find the judgment of Khiraj Mal vs. Daim (*) * Cal * in legal databases such as:
- SCC Online
- Manupatra
- Indian Kanoon
- Westlaw India
These databases typically require a subscription, but you may also access them through a law library or a legal professional.