Let's break down the situation and relevant legal principles:
-
Consideration: In contract law, consideration is the value exchanged between parties. Without it, a contract is generally not enforceable.
-
Part Payment of Debt: Typically, part payment does not satisfy the entire debt unless additional consideration (something extra) is provided.
-
Promissory Estoppel: This doctrine can prevent someone from going back on a promise if the other party relied on it to their detriment.
Application to Facts:
- Original Rent & £*:
- Promissory Estoppel: If Rohan relied on Hansaj’s promise of reduced rent and this reliance was to his detriment, Hansaj might be estopped (prevented) from claiming the £*.
- Rohan should resume paying the original rent going forward.
- £* from Sheila:
- Without a formal agreement or consideration, Sheila’s promise appears as a gift. Therefore, it’s not legally enforceable.
Would you like more detailed information or assistance on any specific point?
yes elaborate on sheila please
Regarding Sheila's situation:
- Consideration: For a contract to be enforceable, there must be an exchange of value. Rohan fixed Sheila's bike, but no formal agreement or consideration was established.
- Gift: Sheila's promise of £* may be viewed as a gift, which is generally not enforceable unless there was clear intent and consideration.
Would you like more details on how to handle such informal promises?
TRY ME!
Start a new chat