Contract Law Principles Explained

Summary

The conversation covers various principles of English contract law, such as the necessity of consideration for contract enforceability, the inability to use silence as acceptance, and the doctrine of frustration. It also discusses the implications of anticipatory breach and the non-recoverability of deposits in case of breach. Understanding these principles is crucial for determining the enforceability of contracts and the rights of parties involved.

Full Conversation

A offers to sell his PS5 to B for £*. A and B agree that, if B does not contact A by the following Thursday, then A can assume that B has accepted the offer. Thursday passes and A claims that a contract has been formed. B refuses to pay. Which one of the following statements is true? Question * Select one: a. The Sale of Goods Act * prevents A from imposing a contract on B with silence. b. Because A and B have agreed upon the mode of acceptance, a contract of sale is formed after Thursday by B's failure to respond to A. c. A cannot impose silence on B as a means of acceptance so no contract has yet been formed. d. B's offer lapses after Thursday, so B does not have a contract with A.
The correct statement is:
c. A cannot impose silence on B as a means of acceptance so no contract has yet been formed.
In English contract law, silence cannot be imposed as a means of acceptance. Acceptance must be communicated clearly and unequivocally, and silence does not fulfill this requirement.
Which ONE of the following statements is correct? Question * Select one: Consideration may be executed, past but not executory. Consideration may be executed , executory , but not past. Cisideration must be of equivalent value Considertaion must move from the promisor
The correct statement is:
Consideration may be executed, executory, but not past.
This means that consideration can be something that has been done (executed) or something that will be done in the future (executory), but it cannot be something that was done before the promise was made (past consideration).
The basic distinction between a representation and a term is that a term involves a promise to achieve a certain result, whereas a representation involves a promise to use reasonable care and skill to achieve a certain result. Question * Select one: True False
Case Rating: *
The answer to your question is False.
In contract law, a term involves a promise to achieve a certain result, while a representation is a statement that induces a party to enter into the contract but does not involve a promise to achieve a specific result.
A, the owner of a vessel, enters into an agreement with a charterer, B, for the charter of the vessel. A spends money preparing the vessel before B subsequently, in breach of contract, repudiates the agreement. However, A is then immediately able to enter into a new agreement with another charterer, C, and due to an upturn in the market rate, receives a much greater profit than that which he would have received under the agreement with B. Regardless of the greater profit received, A will always be entitled to recover the wasted expenditure in reliance on the agreement with B. Question * Select one: True False
Case Rating: *
The correct answer to the question is False.
In English contract law, the principle of mitigation of damages applies. This means that if the non-breaching party (A) manages to mitigate their losses and ends up in a better financial position due to the breach (by receiving greater profit from a new agreement with C), they may not be entitled to recover the wasted expenditure from the original breaching party (B). This is because the overall aim of damages is to put the non-breaching party in the position they would have been had the contract been performed, not to allow them to recover more than their actual loss.
B hired A to deliver and erect a conservatory for £*,*. Midway, A informs B of potential bankruptcy and inability to finish the job. B agrees to pay A an additional £*,* if the work is completed, as she has a buyer (X) for her house who needs to move in quickly. After completing the job, A receives £*,* but claims the extra £*,*. B refuses, arguing A hasn’t provided consideration for the additional payment. The most likely true statement is: a. A was only performing his contractual duty, so he has not provided any extra consideration for the £*,*. b. A exceeded his contractual duty and is therefore entitled to the extra £*,*. c. Under Glasbrook Bros. v Glamorgan C.C.l [*] AC *, B is bound to pay the extra £*,*. d. A is probably entitled to the extra £*,* because B has derived a practical benefit from the new arrangement.
Case Rating: *
The most likely true statement is:
d. A is probably entitled to the extra £*,* because B has derived a practical benefit from the new arrangement.
In English contract law, a practical benefit to the promisee can constitute valid consideration.
A buys a train ticket from a self-service machine. After he gets on the train, he goes to the back of the carriage and sees a small sign by the luggage storage that says: 'The train operator is not liable for any loss of property to passengers whilst travelling on this train.' Which one of the following statements is most likely to be true in relation to this exclusion clause? Question * Select one: a. The clause is not binding upon A, because it has not been incorporated into the contract. b. The clause is not binding upon A under the Sale of Goods Act Section *. c. The clause is subject to the reasonableness test under the Unfair Contract Terms Act * s. *. d. The clause is binding upon A because it has been reasonably drawn to his attention.
Case Rating: *
The most likely true statement in relation to the exclusion clause is:
a. The clause is not binding upon A, because it has not been incorporated into the contract.
The exclusion clause must be brought to the passenger's attention before or at the time of contracting. Since A bought the ticket from a self-service machine and only saw the sign after boarding, the clause was not incorporated into the contract.
In which one of the following cases was it held that the contract might not be enforceable because one of the parties knew, or should have known, of the other party's mistake and failed to draw it to the other party's attention at the time when the contract was made? Question * Select one: Couturier v Hastie (*) HL Cas * Hartog v Colin & Shields [*] * All ER * Bell v Lever Bros [*] AC * Shogun Finance Ltd. v Hudson [*] UKHL *
Case Rating: *
The correct answer to your question is:
Hartog v Colin & Shields [*] * All ER *
In this case, it was held that the contract might not be enforceable because one of the parties knew, or should have known, of the other party's mistake and failed to draw it to the other party's attention at the time when the contract was made.
Which one of the following statements most accurately describes the decision in Jones v Associated Tunnelling [*] IRLR *? Question * Select one: a. If a contract has been written down, then the parol evidence rule always applies, and no analysis of the circumstances is required. b. A term of contract does not have to be written down - it may be established orally or by the actions of the parties. c. A party will have a successful claim for breach of an employment contract if they are asked to work in a different location. d. All contractual obligations must be written down by the parties.
Case Rating: *
The most accurate statement describing the decision in Jones v Associated Tunnelling [*] IRLR * is:
b. A term of contract does not have to be written down - it may be established orally or by the actions of the parties.
A is B's landlord. B is behind on his rent. B asks A not to bring action in return for partial payment of the rent. A accepts the partial payment and then brings the action anyway. Question * Select one: a. B does not have to pay the additional rent under the Unfair Contract Terms Act Section *. b. A has to accept the lower rent because B offered it and A accepted the payment. c. A cannot bring the action because B provided consideration. d. A can bring the action against B even though A accepted the payment because partial payment of a debt does not constitute consideration.
Case Rating: *
The correct answer is:
d. A can bring the action against B even though A accepted the payment because partial payment of a debt does not constitute consideration.
Would you like more information on this topic or any other legal matter?
A false representation is a representation that is untrue according to the construction put on it by the representee. Question * Select one: True False
Case Rating: *
Based on the information provided, a false representation is indeed a representation that is untrue according to the construction put on it by the representee. Therefore, the statement is:
True
Would you like more information on this topic or any other legal matter?
The doctrine of frustration cannot apply to supervening events that are foreseeable at the time at which the contract is made. Question * Select one: True False
Case Rating: *
The doctrine of frustration in English contract law applies to unforeseen events that make contractual obligations impossible to perform. If a supervening event is foreseeable at the time the contract is made, the doctrine of frustration typically does not apply.
Question *: True
A hired B to paint the outside walls of his house for £*,*. After completing the work, A refuses to pay due to "liquidity problems." A later wins the lottery and offers to pay B the £*,* if he also paints the window frames for an additional £*. B agrees and paints the frames, but A now refuses to pay more than the original £*,*. The most accurate legal position is: a. B is entitled to £* because he should deduct the additional £* from what was already owed. b. B is entitled to full payment (£*,* plus £*) because he exceeded his contractual duty by painting the window frames. c. B is only entitled to £*,* because otherwise A would infringe the principle incorporated in Foakes v Beer (*) * App Cas *. d. B is only entitled to £* because the previous painting of A's house is past consideration and cannot therefore be used as justification for the payment of the £*,* (see Re McArdle [*] Ch *).
Case Rating: *
B is entitled to full payment (£*,* plus £*) because he exceeded his contractual duty by painting the window frames. This is supported by the principle that performing an additional task beyond the original contract can constitute valid consideration for an additional payment.
Would you like more information on this topic or any other legal matter?
Which one of the following is not a potentially frustrating event? Question * Select one: a. A ship specified in a charter party to complete a voyage within three months runs aground by reason of unforeseeable storms and is not to be ready to sail until five months later. b. A fund entered into a contract to finance the operation of a casino but, subsequently, a Money Laundering Act banned that type of contract. c. A seller is unable to fulfil a contract for sale of goods because one of his suppliers' factories has been burned down by accidental fire. d. A singer contracts bird flu and is unable to fulfil a performance contract at the fixed date for performance.
Case Rating: *
All the options provided are examples of potentially frustrating events, but considering the specific context and the doctrine of frustration in English law, the most suitable answer would be:
c. A seller is unable to fulfil a contract for sale of goods because one of his suppliers' factories has been burned down by accidental fire.
This is because the seller can still obtain the goods from another supplier. Would you like to know more about the doctrine of frustration in contract law?
Match the relevant law report or statute with the principle of law stated. You must correctly identify all the principles for ONE mark. consideration must move from the promisee performance of an existing duty cannot count as consideration in the formation of a new contract where both parties are aware that contracts in their industry are carried out subject to a number commonly used terms, the court may imply those terms into an agreement in a sale of goods contract between two businesses the goods must be of satisfactory quality
Case Rating: *
Sure, here are the relevant legal principles matched with their respective law reports or statutes:
- Consideration must move from the promisee: Tweedle v Atkinson (*)
- Performance of an existing duty cannot count as consideration in the formation of a new contract: Stilk v Myrick (*)
- Where both parties are aware that contracts in their industry are carried out subject to a number commonly used terms, the court may imply those terms into an agreement: British Crane Hire Corp Ltd v Ipswich Plant Hire Ltd (*)
- In a sale of goods contract between two businesses, the goods must be of satisfactory quality: Sale of Goods Act *
Is there anything else you would like to know?
Don’t change the words
Case Rating: *
It looks like you're working through a set of legal questions and answers related to English contract law. If you need assistance with a specific part of the content or have any other legal inquiries, please let me know!
Match the relevant law report or statute with the principle of law stated. You must correctly identify all the principles for ONE mark. consideration must move from the promisee performance of an existing duty cannot count as consideration in the formation of a new contract where both parties are aware that contracts in their industry are carried out subject to a number commonly used terms, the court may imply those terms into an agreement in a sale of goods contract between two businesses the goods must be of satisfactory quality match exactly don’t change words
Case Rating: *
Sure, here are the relevant legal principles matched with their respective law reports or statutes:
- Consideration must move from the promisee: Tweedle v Atkinson (*)
- Performance of an existing duty cannot count as consideration in the formation of a new contract: Stilk v Myrick (*)
- Where both parties are aware that contracts in their industry are carried out subject to a number commonly used terms, the court may imply those terms into an agreement: British Crane Hire Corp Ltd v Ipswich Plant Hire Ltd (*)
- In a sale of goods contract between two businesses the goods must be of satisfactory quality: Sale of Goods Act *
Is there anything else you would like to know?
For performance of an existing duty cannot count as consideration in the formation of a new contract, which of these would be the option: section *(*) Sale of Goods Act * Glassbrook Bros. v Glamorgan County Council [*] Tweddle v Atkinson section *(*) Sale of Goods Act * Re McArdle [*] British Crane Hire Corp v Ipswich Plant Hire Ltd [*]
Case Rating: *
For the principle that performance of an existing duty cannot count as consideration in the formation of a new contract, the relevant case is Stilk v Myrick (*).
However, from the given options, the correct one is not explicitly listed. Based on the cases provided:
- Glassbrook Bros. v Glamorgan County Council [*]: This case deals with exceeding an existing duty.
- Re McArdle [*]: This case addresses past consideration.
Would you like assistance with any other legal matter?
Which one of them is the possible answer
Case Rating: *
The correct answer is: Glassbrook Bros. v Glamorgan County Council [*].
This case discusses the principle related to performing an existing duty and how it can count as consideration if the duty is exceeded.
Is there anything else you need assistance with?
Which one of those options matches these: in a sale of goods contract between two businesses the goods must be of satisfactory quality
Case Rating: *
The relevant option for "in a sale of goods contract between two businesses the goods must be of satisfactory quality" is:
- section *(*) Sale of Goods Act *.
Would you like assistance with any other legal matter?
A consideration for a promise is the promisee's action, inaction or a promise thereof, which induces the promise in question. Question * Select one: True False
Case Rating: *
The statement "A consideration for a promise is the promisee's action, inaction or a promise thereof, which induces the promise in question" is generally consistent with the principles of consideration in contract law. Thus, the correct answer is:
True
Is there anything else you would like to know about contract law or any other legal matter?
A owes B £*,*. With the knowledge that B has run into some financial problems, A starts to pressurise B to agree to a reduction of the debt. B finally agrees to accept £*,* in full satisfaction of the debt. B receives £*,* from A and now brings an action to claim the balance. Which of the following statements most accurately summarise the legal position? [Please select all that apply.] Question * Select one or more: a. B is not entitled to the balance, because B has received some practical benefit from the payment of £*,*. b. B may be entitled to the balance if he can show that A placed him under duress to accept the lesser amount. c. B is not entitled to the balance, because B cannot revoke the promise to accept £*,* in full satisfaction of the whole debt. d. B is entitled to the balance, because B's promise is not supported by a valid consideration.
Case Rating: *
In your scenario, the legal position can be summarized as follows:
- b. B may be entitled to the balance if he can show that A placed him under duress to accept the lesser amount.
- d. B is entitled to the balance, because B's promise is not supported by a valid consideration.
Is there anything else you'd like to know about this or any other legal matter?
A consideration for a promise must move from someone other than the promisor, although not necessarily from the party enforcing the promise. Question * Select one: True False
Case Rating: *
False. In English contract law, consideration must move from the promisee, meaning the person to whom the promise is made must provide something of value in return. It cannot move from someone other than the promisee. This principle ensures that there is a reciprocal exchange in the contract.
Would you like more information on this topic or any other legal matter?
Where part of the contract price is paid in advance as a deposit, the payment is normally not recoverable in the event of breach of the contract by the payor, even if the payee has not suffered any loss as a result of the breach. Question * Select one: True False
Case Rating: *
True. In English contract law, a deposit paid in advance is generally not recoverable by the payor if they breach the contract, even if the payee has not suffered any loss. This is because deposits are often considered as security for performance and a form of liquidated damages.
Would you like to know more about any specific aspect of contract law?
A Ltd entered a contract with B Ltd to develop software for a fixed price. Before B Ltd begins development, A Ltd cancels the contract, citing a change in business strategy. B Ltd ignores the cancellation and continues the development, but this will not enhance B Ltd's reputation. The most accurate legal positions between the parties are: a. B Ltd is bound to terminate the contract following A Ltd's anticipatory breach because B Ltd has no legitimate interest in affirming the contract and continuing its performance. b. B Ltd is entitled to the contract price because it may freely decide whether to terminate or affirm the contract following A Ltd's anticipatory breach. c. B Ltd is not entitled to the contract price because it cannot complete its performance of the contract without the cooperation of A Ltd. d. B Ltd is entitled to the contract price because its performance of the contract does not require the cooperation of A Ltd.
Case Rating: *
The most accurate legal position between the parties is:
a. B Ltd is bound to terminate the contract following A Ltd's anticipatory breach because B Ltd has no legitimate interest in affirming the contract and continuing its performance.
Would you like more information on this topic or any other legal matter?
Is there more than one asnwer
Case Rating: *
It seems like you're working through legal questions related to contract law. To answer your query, there can be multiple correct answers in certain legal scenarios, especially when questions are framed to select all that apply. For example, in Question *, both options b and d are correct.
If you have any more specific questions or need assistance with a particular area, feel free to ask!