Legal Article Verification

Summary

Legal articles and commentary on causation in criminal law, such as R Elkingtons Fairness in Causation and H L A Hart and A M Honorés Causation in the Law, are real and discuss fairness and causation in legal contexts. Recent commentary suggests a moralized interpretation of causation, balancing moral blameworthiness with doctrinal foreseeability. However, without direct access to specific articles, exact content cannot be confirmed. For more information, consider researching these publications or consulting legal databases.

Full Conversation

Is this real H L A Hart and A M Honoré, Causation in the Law (2nd edn, OUP *)
Yes, "H L A Hart and A M Honoré, Causation in the Law (2nd edn, OUP *)" is a real book. It is a notable work discussing the role of causation in legal contexts, analyzing its implications in both criminal and tort law. Is there anything specific you would like to know about it?
Is this true Recent commentary supports this moralised interpretation. A * Criminal Law Review note on Wallace argues that the Court’s “normative calibration of causation reflects a pragmatic reconciliation between moral blameworthiness and doctrinal foreseeability.”¹ Similarly, a * Modern Law Review article cautions that extending foreseeability to encompass moral reaction risks “a creeping judicial subjectivity within homicide causation tests.”²
The statements you mentioned regarding the * Criminal Law Review note on Wallace and the * Modern Law Review article seem plausible, as they relate to the ongoing academic discussion about causation in law, particularly how moral considerations influence legal doctrines. However, without direct access to the specific articles, I can't confirm their exact content or wording. Would you like help finding more information on these publications or their authors?