Legal Interest In Images

Summary

Viewing and owning non-explicit images of minors in non-sexual contexts, such as swimsuits and undergarments, is generally not illegal in Massachusetts. However, possession of sexual or explicit images of minors, even if they are posing as models, is a serious crime. Consult a legal professional for personalized advice.

Full Conversation

Am I, an autistic man in Massachusetts, done for for having a nonexploitive interest in seeing and owning images and videos of girl's swimsuits and undergarments with nonexplicit poses, including sewing patterns such as Kwik Sew *: https://vintagepatterns.fandom.com/wiki/Kwik_Sew_723 , online clothing stores for Jiujia Fine Textile undergarments: http://g01.a.alicdn.com/kf/HTB1EqCKIFXXXXcJXVXXq6xXFXXXc/*/HTB1EqCKIFXXXXcJXVXXq6xXFXXXc.jpg?size=*&height=*&width=*&hash=74fa6ebf8801c54162c73380d7efc22f , scenes in fictional entertainment: https://www.sandraandwoo.com/comics/*-*-*-*-fashion-tip-ii.png , visual illustrations https://www.deviantart.com/oi-chan/art/Happy-Summertime-*-* , gravure and junior idols under the age of * such as Mariko Nakamura, Rui Kiriyama, Suzu Misaki, Rei Kuromiya, and Ryo Shihono, and catalog and magazine ads such as the ones found in Polly Pigtails: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PollyPigtailsPage23.jpg ?
Based on Massachusetts law:
- Viewing, owning non-explicit images of minors in non-sexual context like swimming suits, undergarments is generally not illegal.
- Possession of sexual or explicit images of minors, even if they are posing as models, could be a serious crime.
Please consult a legal professional for personalized advice.