Case Summary For Moot

Summary

The case R v Aziz involves Miriam Aziz, convicted of burglary under the Theft Act 1968. She entered Eves house, allegedly not as a trespasser, and accidentally injured Eve. The appeal argues no intent to harm and questions the trespassing claim. Relevant cases include R v Collins and DPP v Smith.

Full Conversation

im p****epa****ing fo**** my moot, lemme sne du the issue at hand and then my speech; im the senio**** ****espondent
Hi ****! Su****e, go ahead and sha****e the issue at hand and you**** speech. I'll be happy to p****ovide some guidance on it.
wait leave that , gimme the case summa****y of the case si ask
He****e's a concise summa****y of the case:Case: R v Aziz- Cou****t: Cou****t of Appeal (C****iminal Division)- Defendant: Mi****iam Aziz- Conviction: Bu****gla****y unde**** section *(*)(a) of the Theft Act *- Facts: - Mi****iam, ang****y at he**** f****iend Eve fo**** sleeping with he**** ex-boyf****iend, went to Eve’s house with a sha****p twig. - She climbed into Eve’s bed****oom using a ladde****, fell inside, and accidentally stabbed Eve in the eye du****ing a conf****ontation.- Appeal G****ounds: - Mi****iam a****gues she was not a t****espasse**** as she was always welcomed into Eve’s house. - Claims no intent to inflict g****ievous bodily ha****m at ent****y and that the inju****y to Eve was accidental and not g****ievous.Relevant Cases:- R v Collins [*] QB *- R v B****own (Vincent) [*] C****im L.R. *- R v Ryan (Lee Be****na****d) (*) * JP *- R v Jones, R v Smith [*] * WLR *- DPPv Smith [*] AC *- R v B****own, R v St****atton [*] C****im LR *Feel f****ee to ask if you have mo****e questions o**** need fu****the**** cla****ification!