Theft Vs Abandoned Property

Summary

In Oregon, the distinction between theft and finding abandoned property hinges on intent and actions. If someone takes property without making reasonable efforts to find the owner, it may be considered theft. In this case, since no attempts were made to contact the owner or notify the store, it could be classified as theft. Consulting with a lawyer is advisable to understand potential defenses and implications.

Full Conversation

My friend found a purse in a shopping cart at a store. He thought that it was abandoned and took it home with him with the intention to contact the owner. Of course he's been accused of theft. What is the line between theft and finding something abandoned.
Hi ****! In Massachusetts, the difference between theft and finding abandoned property generally depends on intent and actions taken:
- Theft: Taking property with the intent to permanently deprive the owner.
- Lost Property: If reasonable efforts to find the owner are not made, it can be considered theft.
Did your friend make any attempts to contact the owner or notify the store?
This is in Oregon. He did not make any attempts to contact the owner or notify the store
Got it, ****. Oregon law is similar in that intent and actions taken matter. Here's a brief outline:
- Theft: Taking property with the intent to permanently deprive the owner.
- Lost Property: If reasonable efforts to find the owner are not made, it can be considered theft.
Did your friend attempt to contact the authorities or make any public announcements to find the owner?
No
Case Rating: *
****, based on the information provided, your friend's situation could be considered theft since he did not make efforts to locate the owner or notify the store. It might be beneficial for your friend to consult with a lawyer to understand the full implications and potential defenses.
Would your friend like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist with this case?