Dam Destruction Legal Consequences

Summary

Damaging property to prevent greater harm may be considered a justifiable act under the Korean Criminal Act. However, the act must be necessary and proportionate. Consulting a legal professional is advisable for personalized guidance.

Full Conversation

The island is in danger due to flooding. If the dam is not torn down, the entire island will be in danger, so the residents dig up the dam. At this time, the minions of a powerful man who was trying to devour the entire island by building a dam interfered, and David, who was angry, said, "You bastard, are people's lives or your greed more important?" One of them was thrown into the muddy current.
It seems like a complex situation you're in, John. To clarify, are you seeking advice on potential legal repercussions for damaging the dam, or concerning the person thrown into the current?
yes but by damaging the dam, majority of people saved their lives
It seems like you're describing a scenario where property was damaged to prevent a greater harm. In Korea, this may fall under 'Justifiable Acts' in the Criminal Act. However, this can be complex and you should consult a legal professional.
please help lol
Sure, here's some general guidance:
- Justifiable Acts (Korean Criminal Act): Exception to criminal liability when an act is committed to avoid imminent danger to a legal interest.
- However, such acts must be necessary and proportionate.
- Engaging a legal professional would be the best course of action.