Bank Fraud Legal Reference

Summary

Bank fraud is covered under 18 U.S.C. § 1344, which addresses schemes to defraud financial institutions or obtain assets through false pretenses.

Full Conversation

As I start my statement of discovery of Rico violations, I would like to include Bank Fraud. What * USC section is that under?
Hey ****! Bank Fraud is covered under * U.S.C. § *. This section deals specifically with schemes to defraud a financial institution or to obtain money, funds, credits, assets, securities, or other property owned by or under the control of a financial institution by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises.
Is there anything else you'd like to know?
AI, In the Supreme Court Settlement Agreement (index number */*) that was finalized in * what did the Bank of New York Mellon as Trustee claim in order to receive leave the $*.* billion settlement.
Hi ****! Unfortunately, I don't have access to specific case details or documents like the Supreme Court Settlement Agreement (index number */*) finalized in *. However, if you need help with legal research or general information on similar cases, I can provide guidance. Let me know how else I can assist you!
Can you summarize what the court case was about
Case Rating: *
Sure, I can provide a general summary!
This court case involves a settlement agreement where the Bank of New York Mellon, acting as a Trustee, was granted an $*.* billion settlement. The case likely pertains to claims related to financial mismanagement or fraud, as indicated by the inclusion of Bank Fraud under * U.S.C. § *, and possibly RICO violations.
If you need further assistance or specific details about the case, you might need to refer to legal documents or consult a lawyer.
Does that mean that the * trusts that were involved had origination violations That affected their enforceability or status as a legal Loan or secure document.
Case Rating: *
To better assist you, could you provide more details on the origination violations you are referring to? Specifically, what type of violations or issues are you concerned about regarding the enforceability or status of the loans or secure documents?
if Bank of New York Mellon as trustee was paid $*.* billion because they argued that the loans were defective can they years later come back in another court case and say that these loans were not defective.
Case Rating: *
Hi ****!
Regarding your question, it generally depends on the specific terms of the settlement agreement and any relevant legal principles such as estoppel or res judicata. Here are some general rules:
- Res Judicata: Prevents the same parties from litigating the same issue in a future lawsuit if it was already decided on the merits.
- Estoppel: Prevents a party from taking a position in a legal proceeding that is contrary to a position they previously maintained if it would harm the other party who relied on the original position.
Would you like more specific information on how these principles might apply to your case?
yes
Case Rating: *
Hi ****! Here's more detailed information on how Res Judicata and Estoppel might apply:
- Res Judicata: If the settlement agreement finalized the issue of loan defects, it may prevent re-litigation of the same issue.
- Estoppel: If the Bank of New York Mellon benefited from claiming loan defects, they might be prevented from claiming otherwise in future cases.
Would you like to know more about how these principles apply to your specific situation?
yes
Case Rating: *
Hi ****, to apply these principles to your specific situation, it would be useful to know more about the current legal context or case you are dealing with. Could you provide additional details about the new court case or legal issue involving the Bank of New York Mellon and the loans?
My loan was one of the * loans that they we're paid $*.* billion for violations in the origination. Today the same bank of New York Mellon as trustee has claimed that they are entitled to foreclose On a loan that they knew to be in default,
Case Rating: *
Hi ****! Given the complexities of your situation, here are some general points to consider:
- Res Judicata: If the settlement resolved the issue of loan defects, it might prevent the bank from re-litigating this issue.
- Estoppel: If the bank benefited from claiming loan defects, they may be barred from asserting otherwise.
Would you like more detailed information or help connecting to local lawyers?
more detail
Case Rating: *
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
To provide more detailed information, could you let me know:
- The specific details of the current foreclosure case.
- Your name, phone number, and zipcode.
I am filing an brief to the Federal District Court based on numerous violations of the claimant who has not presented the proof of claim or any related documents indicating their own the promissory note or the mortgage contract. In addition not only was The contract time barred but the claimant never validated a debt or provided any business records. Additionally they pretended to be creditors when they were only debt collectors. They also altered documents in an attempt to convey possession of the property promissory note along with other misrepresentations. **** King *-* *, *
Case Rating: *
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
Could you please provide more details about the current foreclosure case?