Viewing Nonexplicit Teen Images

Summary

Massachusetts law prohibits the possession, promotion, or distribution of obscene material involving minors. Explicit material is defined as anything depicting sexual conduct in a patently offensive way. It is safest to avoid gray areas to prevent legal complications.

Full Conversation

Am I, an autistic man in Massachusetts, done for for having seen junior idol pictures with nonexplicit poses of Mariko Nakamura, born on December *, *, from imouto.tv and Moecco when she was *-15 years old during *-* such as https://asianteens.club/content/st1_imo_nakamura_ma_017.jpg , https://livedoor.blogimg.jp/akb48gmatomer/imgs/*/c/8c69fc41.jpg , https://i001.imx.to/i/*/*/*/583b75becba5b.jpg , https://mura2max.files.wordpress.com/*/*/akc778.jpg ?
Hi Derek, thanks for reaching out. It is generally not illegal to view non-explicit images of teenagers. However, Massachusetts law does prohibit the possession, promotion, or distribution of obscene material involving minors. It's always best to avoid any potential risks. Is there a specific concern you have?
My concern mostly boils down to differentiating between nonexplicit and explicit poses in regards to junior idol images and videos due to the legal gray area involved.
It can be challenging to differentiate nonexplicit and explicit poses. Massachusetts law defines explicit material as anything that depicts sexual conduct in a way that is patently offensive. It's always safest to steer clear of any potential gray areas to avoid legal complications.