Sexting Legal Consequences Explained

Summary

Engaging in sexting with a minor in British Columbia can lead to serious legal consequences, even if the minor falsely claims to be 18 or older. Adults can face criminal charges for engaging with minors, irrespective of the minors false representation of age. The law often places responsibility on the adult, emphasizing strict liability where intent is not required. Simply asking for age may not be considered a reasonable step to verify age. Platforms may have policies, but legal responsibility often falls on the user. Parents may face consequences if they knowingly allow minors to access inappropriate content. Consulting a lawyer for detailed case law or legal advice is recommended.

Full Conversation

So this is hypothetical question, if a sexting Pera to pear platform requires a declaration of age above * and I am using it as an adult where I match with another profile who is a minor pretending to be above *, who is at fault if the sexting and images are exchanged
In British Columbia, engaging in sexting with a minor can lead to serious legal consequences, even if the minor falsely claims to be * or older. Key points to consider:
- It's illegal to distribute explicit images of minors.
- Adults can face criminal charges for engaging with minors, irrespective of the minor's false representation of age.
- Platforms may have policies to address such situations, but legal liability often falls on the adult.
If you have further questions or need more clarity, feel free to ask!
As the crime requires intend but here there is no intend so how does that work
In British Columbia, even if there was no intent to engage with a minor, the law often places responsibility on the adult. Key points include:
- Strict Liability: Some offenses do not require intent; being aware of the minor's age is irrelevant.
- Reasonable Steps: Adults are expected to take reasonable steps to verify age.
If you have more questions, feel free to ask!
Would asking for age before preeciding count as reasonable steps
In British Columbia, simply asking for age may not be considered sufficient as a "reasonable step" to verify someone's age, especially on platforms that involve potentially explicit content. Here are some additional considerations:
- Platforms might require additional verification methods, like ID checks.
- Reasonable steps could involve using secure systems designed to verify age accurately.
- The responsibility often falls on the adult to ensure compliance with platform policies and legal standards.
If you need further clarification or have more questions, feel free to ask!
How come all the responsibility is on unknowing user adult but not platform not on minors parents
Case Rating: *
In British Columbia, the law prioritizes protecting minors, which often places responsibility on adults using platforms. Here are some points to consider:
- Platform Liability: Platforms may have policies, but legal responsibility often falls on the user.
- Parental Responsibility: Parents may face consequences if they knowingly allow minors to access inappropriate content.
If you have more questions or need further clarification, feel free to ask!
Can you find any case law
Case Rating: *
I'm unable to provide specific case law, but I can offer general information on how the law typically applies in such situations. In British Columbia, legal responsibility often falls on adults engaging with minors, even without intent. You might want to consult a lawyer for detailed case law or legal advice.
This is messed up tbh, charging people without intend
Case Rating: *
It can be frustrating when legal consequences arise without intent. In British Columbia, strict liability offenses can hold adults accountable even without the intention to engage with a minor. If you have more specific questions or need further guidance, feel free to ask!