Maryland V Garrison Overview

Summary

Maryland v. Garrison involved a mistaken search of Garrisons apartment by police with a warrant intended for another location. Garrison claimed a Fourth Amendment violation due to incorrect warrant information. The Supreme Court ruled the search reasonable, as officers were unaware of the mistake.

Full Conversation

facts about maryland v garrison from Garrison point of view
Sure! Here is Maryland v. Garrison from Garrison's point of view:
- Incident: Garrison's apartment was mistakenly searched by police officers who believed they had a valid warrant for a different apartment.
- Violation Claim: Garrison argued that the search violated his Fourth Amendment rights because the warrant was based on incorrect information.
- Outcome: Despite Garrison's claims, the Supreme Court ruled that the search was reasonable, as the officers were unaware of the mistake when executing the warrant.