For the moot court competition involving "The State vs Jando Khan," you will need to define the positions and arguments for both the Prosecution (State) and the Defense. Here's a brief outline for each:
Prosecution (State):
-
Objective: Prove that Jando Khan is guilty of the charges against him.
-
Arguments:
- Emphasize the DNA evidence and medical report supporting the claim of rape under Section * PPC.
- Argue that the victim's testimony is credible and consistent.
- Highlight the lack of evidence for consensual intercourse.
- Address any delays in FIR as common in such cases due to trauma.
Defense:
- Objective: Establish reasonable doubt about Jando Khan's guilt.
- Arguments:
- Challenge the credibility of the victim's testimony by pointing out inconsistencies.
- Argue that the lack of physical injuries suggests consensual intercourse, hence applicable under Section * PPC.
- Question the reliability of the DNA evidence and its handling.
- Highlight any procedural lapses or delays in filing the FIR.
Each side should build their case based on these points, supported by legal principles, precedents, and the facts of the case.
Whether the case appropriately falls under section * of the Pakistan Penal
Code (PPC) concerning rape, with all necessary prerequisites met, or if it
instead falls under section * PPC regarding fornication, with its own
prerequisites satisfied give this question research give me
In considering whether the case falls under Section * PPC (rape) or Section * PPC (fornication), the following points are relevant:
- Section * PPC (Rape):
- Requires proof of non-consensual sexual intercourse.
- DNA evidence and victim's consistent testimony are crucial.
- Lack of physical resistance does not negate rape if coercion is established.
- Section * PPC (Fornication):
- Involves consensual sexual intercourse outside of marriage.
- Defense arguments may focus on the absence of physical evidence indicating force or coercion.
The case's classification depends on the interpretation of evidence and testimony regarding consent.
Facts article arguments
Case Rating: *
For the moot court case "The State vs Jando Khan," you need to research and outline arguments for whether the case falls under Section * PPC (rape) or Section * PPC (fornication). Here’s a brief outline:
- Section * PPC (Rape):
- Requires non-consensual intercourse proof.
- DNA evidence and victim's testimony are key.
- Lack of resistance doesn't negate rape if coercion is proven.
- Section * PPC (Fornication):
- Consensual intercourse outside marriage.
- Focus on absence of physical evidence indicating force.
The classification depends on the interpretation of evidence and testimony regarding consent. Would you like further assistance with legal arguments or strategy?
TRY ME!
Start a new chat