Extent Of Justifiable Force

Summary

The force continuum and international human rights standards guide the ethical use of force by law enforcement. The force continuum ranges from presence to lethal force, ensuring actions are proportional to the threat. International standards emphasize necessity, proportionality, and choosing the least harmful option. For example, verbal commands should precede physical restraint, and lethal force is justified only when theres an immediate threat to life. These frameworks protect both law enforcement and individual rights. If you have concerns about force use, consider consulting a legal professional.

Full Conversation

Place your answers on yellow paper (preferably Victory Paper) Note: In giving your insights, consider the parts: Introduction, Body or discussion, and conclusion. They will be scored accordingly. Per item is equivalent to 10pts. Answer the following: *. Under the rule of force continuum and international human rights standard, what is the supposed extent of force to be justifiable? Discuss illustratively. SC suspend police officer for using excessive force during buy-bust operation
The rule of force continuum and international human rights standards set clear guidelines on the extent of force that can be justifiably used by law enforcement officers. Here's a concise breakdown:
- Introduction: The force continuum and international human rights standards are critical frameworks guiding the ethical and lawful use of force by law enforcement.

- Body/Discussion:
- Force Continuum:
- Presence: The mere presence of law enforcement can deter criminal behavior.
- Verbal Commands: Officers should start with verbal warnings or commands.
- Physical Restraint: If verbal commands fail, physical restraint may be necessary.
- Non-lethal Force: Tools like tasers or pepper spray can subdue a suspect without causing death.
- Lethal Force: Used only as a last resort when there is an immediate threat to life.
- International Human Rights Standards:
- Necessity: Force must be necessary to achieve a legitimate objective.
- Proportionality: The level of force must match the threat posed.
- Least Harmful Option: The least harmful means should always be chosen.
- Illustr - Illustration:
- Scenario *: A non-compliant but non-violent individual should be managed with verbal commands first. If non-compliance continues, physical restraint may be considered.
- Scenario *: An immediate threat to life can justify the use of lethal force.
- Conclusion**: Justifiable force must be necessary, proportionate, and the least harmful option. This framework protects both law enforcement officers and individuals' rights.
If you have another question or need further details, feel free to ask!