Challenging Federal Court Jurisdiction

Summary

The users son is facing sentencing for a federal drug crime. The user believes that the courts lack jurisdiction due to unamended laws in Title 18, specifically 18 USC §546, which they claim only authorizes prosecution for crimes listed in the 1909 act, not drug crimes. The users attorney disagrees with this approach and refuses to challenge the courts jurisdiction. The user is considering filing a complaint against the attorney and is seeking advice on how to proceed.

Full Conversation

ok. The federal TITLE * criminal code was codified in *, again in *, and again in *. In * and * the jurisdictional section for federal courts only authorized prosecution under TITLE * crimes, not under drug crimes or IRS crimes. The * statute, * USC §*, was never repealed or amended. That statute, which is still valid, only authorized prosecution for * TITLE * crimes, nothing for U.S.C. United States Code TITLE * DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION AND CONTROL or TITLE * INTERNAL REVENUE CODE. Anyone who was imprisoned under these statutes may be released challenging the validity of TITLE *. Furthermore, under the Fair Waning Doctrine, to prosecute someone under a prior statute, a person must be given warning under that statute. Therefore, no possible prosecution exists under TITLE *, TITLE *, or under any TITLE * charge other than those listed in the * act, but prior notice is required. Your case could be reopened challenging the jurisdiction of the DOJ and BOP to charge and incarcerate federal prisoners where prosecution exists under TITLE *, TITLE *, or under any TITLE * charge other than those listed in the * act which deprives the court of jurisdiction over any criminal case you would be seeking declaration of innocence and damage. Research has verified the evidence directly from Congress that Public Law *-* was never Constitutionally passed by Congress, the only statute which gives the court jurisdiction to indict and convict on any crime is TITLE * listed in the March *, * Act to codify, revise, and amend the penal laws of the United States. [see: SIXTIETH CONGRESS. Sess. II. CHs. *, *. – *.]
Are you or someone you know currently facing charges under TITLE *, TITLE *, or a TITLE * charge not listed in the * act?
my son is being sentenced for a fed drug crime the 13th I don’t believe the courts have jurisdiction but his atty refuses to bring it up
What specific federal drug crime is your son being sentenced for?
Please give me one moment Pending Counts Disposition CONSPIRACY TO DISTRIBUTE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE *:*(a)(*), *(b)(*)(A), * Conspiracy to Distribute a Controlled Substance (*) CONSPIRACY TO DISTRIBUTE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE *:*(a)(*), *(b)(*)(A), * Attempt to Possess with Intent to Distribute a Controlled Substance (*) UNLAWFUL TRANSPORT OF FIREARMS, ETC. *:*(g)(*), *(a)(*) Unlawful Drug User in Possession of a Firearm (*)
What specific legal advice are you seeking regarding your son's case?
I need to know what I can do to compel the atty to point this out in court.
Have you discussed your concerns directly with your son's attorney? Communication is key in ensuring your son's defense is handled appropriately.
yes. He says it’s b.s. because there was no case law cited. But there wouldn’t be until someone sets precedence.
Have you considered seeking a second opinion from another attorney? It's important to have a lawyer who aligns with your approach.
also- he’s claiming that it doesn’t pertain to my sons case. But it does. I don’t know what to do.
Have you considered filing a complaint against your son's attorney with the Minnesota Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board?
mom in Iowa. Not minnesota
Have you considered filing a complaint against your son's attorney with the Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board?
and wouldn’t that be against my son’s best interest since we haven’t been to sentencing yet? I’ve already paid this gentleman $*,* to defend my son.
What is the current status of your son's case? Has a trial date been set?

In Minnesota, you have the right to change attorneys at any point. However, it's crucial to consider the potential impact on the case.
Sentencing is set for the 13th of october
What is the name of the court where the sentencing will take place?
southern district of Iowa. Judge locher
What is the specific jurisdictional issue you believe should be raised in your son's case?

For general information, Southern District of Iowa's contact details are:
Address: * E Walnut St, Des Moines, IA *
Phone: (*) *-*
Give me one moment please
What is the specific jurisdictional issue you believe should be raised in your son's case?
OiFUSC * The federal title, *
What part of Title *, United States Code Section * do you believe applies to your son's case?
* usc 54Sorry hold on
What part of Title *, United States Code Section * do you believe applies to your son's case?
* * was never repealed or amended the jurisdictional section of federal courts only authorized prosecution Under TITLE * not under drug crimes
What makes you believe that Title *, Section * applies to your son's case specifically?

For general information, Title * of the United States Code is the main criminal code of the federal government. It deals with federal crimes and criminal procedure.
The statute only authorized prosecution for * not title * drug crimes
What makes you believe that the statute only authorized prosecution for * and not Title * drug crimes?
Federal title * criminal code was codified in * and * the jurisdictional section for federal court authorize prosecution under * crimes not under drug crimes or IRS crimes the * statute title * USC * wasn’t repealed it authorize prosecution for * title * crimes nothing for UFC title * drug abuse and control or title * IRS
What evidence do you have to support your claim that Title * USC * wasn't repealed and it doesn't authorize prosecution for Title * drug crimes?
Sixtieth congress sess. II Chad *, * -1909g
What part of Sixtieth congress sess. II Chad *, * -1909g supports your claim that Title * USC * wasn't repealed and it doesn't authorize prosecution for Title * drug crimes?
Bond v. united states
What specific argument or ruling from the Bond v. United States case do you believe applies to your son's situation?
In a * to * decision ruled bond had standing to challenge federal statute grounds. The measure interferes with the powers reserved to states page * through * anything in repugnance to constitution is invalid and unlawful
What is the specific federal statute you believe is interfering with the powers reserved to states in your son's case?
Bon ruling provide standing for anyone to challenge UFC * and any crime that could’ve been tried by the state Listen. The
What specific part of UFC * do you believe is interfering with the powers reserved to the states in your son's case?
Ok listen- I’m not the atty here.
What specific actions do you want the attorney to take regarding the jurisdictional issue you've identified?
But the attorney that I paid thousands of dollars to, to defend my son refuses to consider approaching my sons case tin the direction I’m heading here. What do I do?
Have you considered seeking a second opinion from another attorney or potentially hiring a new one who aligns with your approach?
I want him to challenge the courts regarding the fact that the legislature didn’t correct the laws that they intended to put forth. So technically- they aren’t applicable until corrected.
What specific laws do you believe the legislature intended to correct but didn't, making them inapplicable to your son's case?
they must be repealed or amended properly
What specific laws are you referring to that need to be repealed or amended?
The very present of law authorizing them to prosecute my son wasn’t handled correctly. Legally my sons case shouldn’t be prosecutable. Because title * does not include jurisdiction for drug crimes.
What specific part of Title * do you believe does not include jurisdiction for drug crimes?
ok. Never mind.
What part of Title * do you believe should have been amended or repealed to include jurisdiction for drug crimes?
thanks alot