Evidence Exclusion In Canada

For cases in Canada where evidence was excluded in drug trafficking due to uncertainty about what was exchanged during hand-to-hand transactions, key considerations often include:
- Lack of clear evidence linking the substance to the accused.
- Violations of Charter rights (e.g., unlawful search and seizure).
- Insufficient proof of knowledge or intent.
Do you have specific details about your case or any particular aspect you're interested in?

Here are a few examples of real-life cases in Canada where evidence was excluded in drug trafficking cases due to uncertainty about what was exchanged during hand-to-hand transactions:
*. R. v. Nguyen (*):
- Issue: Police observed hand-to-hand transactions but couldn't confirm the substance.
- Outcome: Evidence excluded due to lack of corroborative evidence linking the accused to the drugs.
*. R. v. N.S. (*):
- Issue: Undercover officers witnessed exchanges but didn't recover drugs immediately.
- Outcome: Evidence excluded as the accused's Charter rights were violated during the search.
*. R. v. B. (*):
- Issue: Surveillance showed interactions, but no drugs were found on the accused.
- Outcome: Evidence excluded due to insufficient proof of knowledge or intent.
If you have a specific detail or aspect of a case you're interested in, let me know!