Perjury And Falsification Explained

Summary

Perjury is committed when a person under oath intentionally makes a false statement about a material fact in a legal proceeding. Evidence needed includes proof of oath, false statement documentation, materiality, and intent to deceive. Falsification involves altering or fabricating documents with intent to deceive, requiring evidence of the original document, alterations, and intent. If a falsified document is not verified, proving falsification becomes challenging. In cases where an e-signature is used without consent, gather evidence of unauthorized use and consult a legal professional for guidance.

Full Conversation

What evidences needed in a perjury case?
To prove perjury, the following evidence is typically needed:
- Proof of the person's oath to tell the truth in a legal proceeding.
- Documentation or testimony showing the false statement made under oath.
- Evidence that the false statement is material to the case.
- Demonstration of intent to mislead or deceive.
Is there a specific aspect of your situation you need more clarification on?
How is falsification committed?
Falsification is committed when someone alters, forges, or fabricates a document or information with the intent to deceive others. In the Philippines, it can involve:
- Forging a signature or document.
- Altering an official document.
- Using a falsified document as if it were genuine.
Is there a particular context or situation you're dealing with related to falsification?
What evidences needed in falsification?
Case Rating: *
To prove falsification in the Philippines, the following evidence is typically needed:
- The falsified document itself.
- Proof of the document's original form.
- Evidence showing the alteration or fabrication.
- Testimony or evidence of intent to deceive.
- Verification that the falsified document was used as genuine.
Is there a specific context you're dealing with regarding falsification?
What if the falsified document is not verified?
Case Rating: *
If a falsified document is not verified, it can impact the ability to prove falsification. Verification is crucial as it establishes the authenticity or inauthenticity of the document. Without verification, it may be challenging to demonstrate the document's original form or alterations. Do you have any specific concerns regarding the document?
Yes. It was submitted with my E-signature without my consent. I only have a photocopy of the document. Original copy was withheld.
Case Rating: *
It seems that your situation involves potential falsification of a document with your e-signature. In your case, it could be essential to establish:
- The original form of the document.
- Proof of the unauthorized use of your e-signature.
- Evidence showing how the document was used.
If you have further questions or need more clarification on this issue, feel free to ask!
Original copy kept by forger
Case Rating: *
In your situation, proving falsification may be challenging without the original document. Consider the following steps:
- Gather evidence of how your e-signature was obtained and used.
- Document any communications or transactions related to the document.
- Consult with a legal professional to explore options for retrieving the original document or pursuing legal action.
Would you like more information on how to proceed with this matter?