Sexually Explicit Conversations Explained

Summary

Engaging in sexually explicit conversations with minors can lead to serious legal consequences in Minnesota, including potential felony charges under statutes like Minnesota Statute § 609.352. This statute criminalizes solicitation of minors for sexual conduct. The statute of limitations for such offenses is generally three years, but exceptions may apply. If the incident occurred five years ago, prosecution might be barred unless new evidence emerges. Its crucial to avoid further communication of this nature and seek legal advice for clarity. Ignorance of the law is not a defense, and consulting a lawyer can provide guidance on potential risks and protections.

Full Conversation

What do you mean by "sexually explicit messages" explain more what that means
"Sexually explicit messages" refer to communications that include graphic sexual content, suggestive language, or detailed descriptions of sexual acts or fantasies. They can be shared via texts, emails, or online chats. If you have concerns about the legality of these messages, especially in certain settings like the workplace, feel free to ask more specific questions.
Can you give me bullet point examples of what constitutes as that
Certainly! Here are examples of what constitutes "sexually explicit messages":
- Graphic Descriptions: Detailed accounts of sexual acts.
- Sexual Fantasies: Sharing elaborate sexual scenarios or desires.
- Suggestive Language: Use of innuendos or sexually charged words.
- Propositions: Inviting someone to engage in sexual activities.
- Visual Content: Sending explicit images or videos.
If you have specific legal concerns related to these messages, let me know!
Will talking about masterbation count
Case Rating: *
Talking about masturbation can count as engaging in sexually explicit conversations, depending on the context and setting. If you're concerned about potential legal implications, especially in a public or professional environment, it may be worth considering. Do you have specific concerns regarding where this conversation is taking place?
So if someone online person A (just turned *) has a conversation with person B (14 year old) about masterbation if person B initiated the conversation what legal consequences will person A face
Case Rating: *
In Minnesota, engaging in sexually explicit communications with a minor (under *) can lead to serious legal consequences, even if the minor initiates the conversation. Potential issues include:
- Criminal charges for solicitation or corruption of minors.
- Possible requirement to register as a sex offender.
- Legal ramifications vary based on context and specifics of the conversation.
Do you have more details about the nature of the conversation or its context?
So just talking about masterbation is illegal in that senario
Case Rating: *
In Minnesota, engaging in sexually explicit conversations with a minor, including discussions about masturbation, can lead to serious legal consequences for the adult involved. These can include criminal charges and the potential requirement to register as a sex offender. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
What statue is it that make it illegal
Case Rating: *
In Minnesota, the relevant statutes that might apply include:
- Minnesota Statute § *.*: Solicitation of children to engage in sexual conduct.
- Minnesota Statute § *.*: Criminal sexual conduct in the fifth degree, which includes engaging in lewd conversations with minors.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
What will make it count as solicitation of a minor
Case Rating: *
In Minnesota, solicitation of a minor typically involves:
- Encouraging a minor to engage in sexual conduct.
- Using electronic communication to discuss sexual acts with a minor.
- Requesting or attempting to engage a minor in sexual activities.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
What will the statue of limitations be for the offense
Case Rating: *
In Minnesota, the statute of limitations for criminal sexual conduct involving minors is generally three years from the offense date. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
Will it be on this message chat
Case Rating: *
Since the case involves potential criminal charges related to sexually explicit communication with a minor, this is a serious matter. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
So if it happened 5 years ago will the statue of limitations be up?
Case Rating: *
In Minnesota, the statute of limitations for criminal sexual conduct involving minors is typically three years. Therefore, if the incident occurred five years ago, the statute of limitations may have expired.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
If i am connected to a local lawyer will they chat with me on here?
Case Rating: *
Local lawyers typically communicate through their own platforms or in person, rather than continuing the conversation here. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, I can ask a few questions to proceed.
Sure
Case Rating: *
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, I can ask a few questions to proceed.
What is your name?
H
Case Rating: *
Since you've agreed to connect with local lawyers, I'll need a bit more information to proceed. Could you please provide your phone number?
Nvm i wanted to see what will happen
Case Rating: *
It seems like a potentially serious situation involving legal implications for communications with a minor. If you change your mind or have further questions, feel free to reach out for assistance.
So if it happened 5 years ago the statue should be up? Where dose it state that
Case Rating: *
In Minnesota, the statute of limitations for criminal sexual conduct involving minors is typically three years according to Minnesota Statute § *.*. This statute outlines the time limits for commencing criminal proceedings. If the incident occurred five years ago, the statute of limitations may have expired.
I thought after * it was indefinite or is that for sexual assault cases
Case Rating: *
In Minnesota, certain sexual assault cases involving minors may have no statute of limitations, meaning charges can be filed indefinitely. However, for cases like solicitation, the statute typically remains three years unless specific legal changes have been made. To clarify, the indefinite period generally applies to severe offenses like certain degrees of sexual assault. Would you like more information on this distinction?
So person A committed what crime
Case Rating: *
In the scenario you described, Person A could potentially be charged with solicitation of a minor or engaging in sexually explicit communications with a minor under Minnesota Statutes §§ *.* or *.*.
If you have more details or specific questions, feel free to ask!
Can you elaborate more on the statures on what they mean
Case Rating: *
In Minnesota:
- Minnesota Statute § *.*: This statute addresses solicitation of children to engage in sexual conduct. It criminalizes communication aimed at encouraging or enticing a minor to participate in sexual acts.

- Minnesota Statute § *.*: This statute pertains to criminal sexual conduct in the fifth degree, which includes engaging in lewd conversations or acts with minors.
If you need further clarification or have more questions, feel free to ask!
Can so for "Minnesota Statute § *.*" to apply what has to be present in the conversation
Case Rating: *
For Minnesota Statute § *.* to apply, the following elements must be present in the conversation:
- An adult communicates with a minor.
- The conversation involves encouraging or enticing the minor to engage in sexual conduct.
- The intention is to solicit the minor for sexual acts.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
Can you explain more to me what you mean in more details
Case Rating: *
In Minnesota, to apply Minnesota Statute § *.*, the conversation must show clear intent for the adult to solicit or entice the minor into sexual conduct. It involves specific language encouraging or suggesting participation in sexual acts.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
Give me * examples based off the conversation from person A and B that will make it be unlawful
I'm sorry, but I can't assist with that request.
Give me as much examples based off the conversation from person A and B that will make it be this statue
I'm sorry, but I can't assist with that request.
So if person A tells them how to and says "if you want to" when they asked is this something they should do it will fall under solicitation
Case Rating: *
In Minnesota, if an adult (Person A) provides instructions or encouragement related to sexual conduct with a minor (Person B), it could indeed fall under solicitation according to Minnesota Statute § *.*. This applies if there's intent to entice the minor into engaging in sexual acts.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
Would person A saying "if you want to" count as encouragement and/or intent
Case Rating: *
In Minnesota, saying "if you want to" in a conversation about sexual conduct with a minor could be interpreted as encouragement or intent, especially if it leads to further discussions or actions. Intent is key, and specific language or context can influence legal outcomes. If you have more questions, feel free to ask!
If the conversation ended after that was said and no more conversations about that came up will that change anything
Case Rating: *
In Minnesota, even a single instance of communication with a minor involving sexual content can be problematic, regardless of whether the conversation continued. Intent and context are crucial in determining legal consequences.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
So for both of the violations ( Minnesota Statute § *.*, and Minnesota Statute § *.*) the statue will be 3 years? so if it happened 5 years ago what will happen?
Case Rating: *
In Minnesota, the statute of limitations for solicitation or criminal sexual conduct involving minors is generally three years. If the incident occurred five years ago, the statute of limitations may have expired, potentially barring prosecution. Legal interpretations can vary, so consulting a lawyer for specific advice can be helpful.
So what words of advice will you have for person A in this senario and dose anything change if they didn't know the conversation was illegal
Case Rating: *
In this scenario, Person A should:
- Avoid engaging in any further communication with minors about sexual topics.
- Be aware that ignorance of the law is not typically a defense.
- Consider consulting a lawyer to understand potential legal risks and protections.
The statute of limitations may prevent prosecution if the incident happened five years ago, but it's crucial to seek legal advice for clarity.
How about for person B
Case Rating: *
For Person B (the minor), the legal system often aims to protect rather than prosecute. Key considerations include:
- Protection: Person B is typically viewed as a victim or potential victim, especially if they are under the age of consent.
- Counseling: It's advisable for Person B to have access to counseling or support services to understand and cope with the situation.
- Parental Involvement: Ideally, a parent or guardian should be informed to ensure appropriate protective measures.
If you have more specific questions regarding Person B's situation or legal protections, feel free to ask!
What dose statue "Minnesota Statute § *.*" entail and give * scenarios
Case Rating: *
Minnesota Statute § *.* refers to criminal sexual conduct in the fifth degree. Here's what it entails:
- Engaging in non-consensual sexual contact.
- Committing lewd acts in the presence of a minor.
- Engaging in indecent exposure.
Scenarios:
*. Unwanted Touching: An individual touches another person in a sexual manner without their consent in a public place.

*. Indecent Exposure: A person exposes themselves in a lewd manner in a public park where children are present.

*. Lewd Conversations: An adult initiates sexually explicit conversations with a minor in a public chat room.
If you have more questions about this statute, feel free to ask!
So could person A be found guilty of unlawful transaction with a minor
Case Rating: *
In Minnesota, Person A could potentially face charges under Minnesota Statute § *.* for solicitation or engaging in sexually explicit communications with a minor. However, the "unlawful transaction with a minor" is not specifically mentioned in the statutes discussed. The statute of limitations may play a role if the incident occurred five years ago, potentially barring prosecution. It would be wise for Person A to seek legal counsel for specific guidance.
Will a therapist make a mandatory report for this situation
Case Rating: *
In Minnesota, therapists are mandated reporters, meaning they are required to report any suspected abuse or neglect of a minor, including sexual exploitation or inappropriate communication. If the therapist believes the communication was harmful or abusive, they may make a report to authorities. Is there anything else you'd like to know?
Can you give me "Minnesota Statute § *.*, and Minnesota Statute § *.*" and explain in full details what they mean and is it a felony or misdemeanor for the person A and B senario and why is the statue 3 years
Case Rating: *
Sure, let's go over the statutes:
- Minnesota Statute § *.*: This involves criminal sexual conduct in the fifth degree, which includes non-consensual sexual contact, lewd acts in the presence of a minor, or indecent exposure. It's typically a misdemeanor but can escalate based on circumstances.
- Minnesota Statute § *.*: This statute addresses the solicitation of children to engage in sexual conduct. It criminalizes communication aimed at enticing a minor into sexual acts. This is generally considered a felony.
The statute of limitations for these offenses is generally three years from the offense date unless special circumstances apply.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
What will be the statue of limitations for those crimes in Minnesota be if it happened 5 years ago also would things change if person B was * instead
Case Rating: *
In Minnesota, the statute of limitations for criminal sexual conduct involving minors is generally three years. If the incident occurred five years ago, prosecution might be barred. The age of Person B doesn't typically change the statute of limitations. Legal advice would be beneficial for specific details.
If you have more questions or need clarification, feel free to ask!
When you say "generally three years" what are the cases where it won't be 3 years but more than or less than 3 years
Case Rating: *
In Minnesota, the statute of limitations might differ in certain cases:
- DNA Evidence: If DNA evidence is obtained, the limitations period can extend.
- Delayed Reporting: If a minor reports an offense after turning *, the timeframe may extend.
- Certain Severe Offenses: Some serious sexual offenses involving minors may have no limitations.
If you need more information, feel free to ask!
So for delayed reporting cases how long will it extend to afterward
Case Rating: *
In Minnesota, for delayed reporting cases involving minors, the statute of limitations may extend to three years after the victim turns *. This allows for prosecution even if the initial incident occurred many years prior. If you have more questions or need clarification, feel free to ask!
The person A and person B scenario should person A have to worry about legal consequences if no signs of anything is happening and it happened 5 years ago, and if so what are the chances something will happen
Case Rating: *
In the scenario given, if the conversation between Person A and Person B happened five years ago, and there have been no developments or reports since, the statute of limitations for solicitation or criminal sexual conduct involving minors in Minnesota, which is generally three years, may be expired. Thus, legal consequences are less likely after this time period unless new evidence emerges or specific exceptions apply. However, consulting a lawyer for personal legal advice is always wise.
If you were to say on a scale of * to * the likely hood of something happening where would you scale it
Case Rating: *
Given the information you've provided, the likelihood of legal consequences arising from the situation with Person A and Person B after five years, assuming no new evidence or reports, seems relatively low. On a scale of * to *, with * being very likely, I'd estimate it around a *. However, seeking personal legal advice is always a good idea for peace of mind.
How about on a scale of * to *
Case Rating: *
On a scale of * to *, considering the information provided, the likelihood of legal consequences for Person A seems relatively low, approximately around *, assuming no new evidence or reports have surfaced. Consulting with a lawyer is still advised for tailored legal advice.