Academic Misconduct Or Acceptable
Summary
Proper citation and original arguments are essential in academic work to avoid misconduct. Paraphrasing without crediting the source is considered plagiarism. Always ensure accurate citations and original contributions to maintain academic integrity. If unsure, consult your institutions guidelines or seek advice on proper citation practices.Full Conversation
V
Hi Dua! It seems like your message got cut off. Could you please provide more details about the legal issue you're facing? This will help me provide you with the most relevant information.
“Armies were raised either through some form of voluntary enlistment, or by compulsion. In practice, although the seventeenth century witnessed an increasing resort to compulsion, a majority of soldiers generally joined as volunteers. Two different methods were used to recruit them: commission and contract.”
Imagine that the extract below was submitted as part of an assignment.
States explicitly compelling their subjects to fight was not the norm; according to Tallett, a majority of soldiers voluntarily joined the armies.* However, I argue that this perspective neglects aspects of early modern warfare that produced a more subtle coercive effect…
* Tallett, F., War and Society (London, *), p. *.
Is this acceptable practice or academic misconduct?
Question 11Select one:
a.
Acceptable practice
b.
Academic misconduct
Hi Dua, based on the information provided, it seems that the assignment involves citing a source and presenting an argument. This practice is acceptable as long as the citation is accurate and the arguments are original. The citation given meets academic standards, so it would be:
a. Acceptable practice
Do you have any more questions or need further clarification on this?
a. Acceptable practice
Do you have any more questions or need further clarification on this?
“Armies were raised either through some form of voluntary enlistment, or by compulsion. In practice, although the seventeenth century witnessed an increasing resort to compulsion, a majority of soldiers generally joined as volunteers. Two different methods were used to recruit them: commission and contract.”
Imagine that the extract below was submitted as part of an assignment.
States explicitly compelling their subjects to fight was not the norm; according to Tallett, a majority of soldiers voluntarily joined the armies.* However, I argue that this perspective neglects aspects of early modern warfare that produced a more subtle coercive effect…
* Tallett, F., War and Society (London, *), p. *.
Is this acceptable practice or academic misconduct?
Question 11Select one:
a.
Acceptable practice
b.
Academic misconduct
Based on the information provided, the practice described seems to be acceptable. The assignment properly cites the source and attempts to build upon the argument presented by Tallett. This is a standard academic practice, as long as the citation is accurate and the argument presented is original. However, to ensure accuracy and integrity, it’s always best to review the specific guidelines provided by the academic institution.
Is there any other aspect of this issue that you need assistance with?
Is there any other aspect of this issue that you need assistance with?
“Armies were raised either through some form of voluntary enlistment, or by compulsion. In practice, although the seventeenth century witnessed an increasing resort to compulsion, a majority of soldiers generally joined as volunteers. Two different methods were used to recruit them: commission and contract.”
Imagine that the extract below was submitted as part of an assignment.
States explicitly compelling their subjects to fight was not the norm; according to Tallett, a majority of soldiers voluntarily joined the armies.* However, I argue that this perspective neglects aspects of early modern warfare that produced a more subtle coercive effect…
* Tallett, F., War and Society (London, *), p. *.
Is this acceptable practice or academic misconduct?
Question 11Select one:
a.
Acceptable practice
b.
Academic misconduct
It looks like you're asking whether the use of the excerpt from Tallett's work constitutes acceptable practice or academic misconduct. Based on the information provided, this appears to be acceptable practice because the author has properly cited Tallett's work. Academic misconduct typically involves plagiarism or improper citation, neither of which seems to be the case here.
Is there anything else you need assistance with regarding this issue or any other legal matter?
Is there anything else you need assistance with regarding this issue or any other legal matter?
Annette is a first-year Psychology student who's having trouble with an assignment for one of her modules. She understands the module, but she can't seem to express her ideas in writing, so she decides to look online. There, she finds the perfect piece of text - it's not quite what she was thinking, but it's very close, so she copy-pastes it into a Word document and reorders it to fit her essay title. She does not acknowledge the source, and does not add her own commentary or other original text.
Is this acceptable practice or academic misconduct?
Question 12Select one:
a.
Acceptable practice
b.
Academic misconduct
Annette's actions constitute academic misconduct. Copy-pasting text without acknowledging the source and not adding original commentary is considered plagiarism, which is a serious violation of academic integrity.
Would you like more information on how to properly cite sources or avoid plagiarism?
Would you like more information on how to properly cite sources or avoid plagiarism?
Read the extract below from Tallett, F., War and Society in Early Modern Europe: *-* (London, *), p. *.
“Armies were raised either through some form of voluntary enlistment, or by compulsion. In practice, although the seventeenth century witnessed an increasing resort to compulsion, a majority of soldiers generally joined as volunteers. Two different methods were used to recruit them: commission and contract.”
Imagine that the extract below was submitted as part of an assignment.
A majority of soldiers in early modern Europe joined armies voluntarily through commission or contract, two different methods of recruitment. This shows that compulsion was not yet a key part of raising armies…
Is this acceptable practice or academic misconduct?
Select one:
a.
Acceptable practice
b.
Academic misconduct
This seems like a case of academic misconduct. The text closely mirrors the original extract without proper citation. Rephrasing without crediting the source still constitutes plagiarism. Proper academic practice requires citation even if the original text is paraphrased.
Would you like more information on how to properly cite sources or avoid plagiarism?
Would you like more information on how to properly cite sources or avoid plagiarism?
Read the extract below from Tallett, F., War and Society in Early Modern Europe: *-* (London, *), p. *.
“Armies were raised either through some form of voluntary enlistment, or by compulsion. In practice, although the seventeenth century witnessed an increasing resort to compulsion, a majority of soldiers generally joined as volunteers. Two different methods were used to recruit them: commission and contract.”
Imagine that the extract below was submitted as part of an assignment.
A majority of soldiers in early modern Europe joined armies voluntarily through commission or contract, two different methods of recruitment. This shows that compulsion was not yet a key part of raising armies…
Is this acceptable practice or academic misconduct?
Select one:
a.
Acceptable practice
b.
Academic misconduct
This example constitutes academic misconduct. Even though the text is paraphrased, it closely follows the original source's structure and ideas without proper citation. Proper acknowledgment of Tallett's work is necessary to avoid plagiarism.
Is there anything else you need assistance with?
Is there anything else you need assistance with?
There are a range of problems faced by minorities in the workplace. First, the selection and recruitment process is biased against them in one form or another. Second, they have very few role models in the work environment, who could mentor them and socialize them towards organizational life. Third, they do not get the feedback they need in terms of performance appraisal to guide them through the turbulent waters of their careers.
Arnold et al. (*: *) suggest that minorities encounter three key problems: 'First, the selection and recruitment process in biased against them in one form or another. Second, they have very few role models in the work environment, who could mentor them and socialise them towards organisational life. Third, they do not get the feedback they need in terms of performance appraisal to guide them through the turbulent waters of their careers.'
Is this acceptable practice or academic misconduct?
Select one:
a.
Acceptable practice
b.
Academic misconduc
This example constitutes academic misconduct. The text is nearly identical to the original source without proper citation. Proper acknowledgment of Arnold et al.'s work is necessary to avoid plagiarism.
Would you like more information on how to properly cite sources or avoid plagiarism?
Would you like more information on how to properly cite sources or avoid plagiarism?
What is the word for expressing an idea or quotation in your own words?
The word for expressing an idea or quotation in your own words is "paraphrasing."
Would you like more information on how to properly paraphrase or any other legal matter?
Would you like more information on how to properly paraphrase or any other legal matter?
What is the word for working together with a second party to deceive the marker for your own benefit?
The word you're looking for is "collusion." It involves working together with another party to deceive someone, often for personal gain.
Is there anything else you need help with regarding this matter?
Is there anything else you need help with regarding this matter?
Consideration may be past because_____
Question 1Select one:
A.
Its performance predates the acceptance sought to be enforced
B.
Its performance predates the promise sought to be enforced
C.
Its performance predates the offer sought to be enforced
D.
The offer predates the promise
E.
Its performance predates the invitation to treat
To answer your question, consideration may be past because:
B. Its performance predates the promise sought to be enforced.
Would you like more information on the concept of past consideration or any other legal topic?
B. Its performance predates the promise sought to be enforced.
Would you like more information on the concept of past consideration or any other legal topic?
Consideration may be past because_____
Question 1Select one:
A.
Its performance predates the acceptance sought to be enforced
B.
Its performance predates the promise sought to be enforced
C.
Its performance predates the offer sought to be enforced
D.
The offer predates the promise
E.
Its performance predates the invitation to treat
Consideration may be past because its performance predates the promise sought to be enforced.
Would you like to discuss any other legal concepts or have more questions on this topic?
Would you like to discuss any other legal concepts or have more questions on this topic?
In consideration an undertaking is enforceable if_____
Question 2Select one:
A.
A non-reciprocal undertaking is made in relation to a bilateral contract or actual performance in relation to a unilateral contract.
B.
If no new terms can be formed if a counter-offer is accepted
C.
A reciprocal undertaking is made in relation to a bilateral contract or actual performance in relation to a unilateral contract.
D.
It constitutes a non-contractual undertaking resulting from the connected underlying issues.
E.
A non-reciprocal undertaking is made in relation to a bilateral contract or actual non-performance in relation to a unilateral contract.
An undertaking is enforceable if a reciprocal undertaking is made in relation to a bilateral contract or actual performance in relation to a unilateral contract.
Would you like to discuss more about contract law or have any other legal questions?
Would you like to discuss more about contract law or have any other legal questions?
Which statement is true?
Question 3Select one:
A.
Generally, consideration is the idea that there must be no ‘bargain’ between the contracting parties
B.
Generally, consideration is not the idea that there must be a ‘bargain’ between the contracting parties
C.
Generally, consideration is the idea that there must be a ‘bargain’ between non contracting parties
D.
Generally, consideration is the idea that there must be a ‘bargain’ between the contracting parties
E.
Generally, consideration is the non-idea that there must be a ‘bargain’ between the contracting parties
The correct answer is:
D. Generally, consideration is the idea that there must be a ‘bargain’ between the contracting parties.
Would you like to ask anything else related to contract law or any other legal matter?
D. Generally, consideration is the idea that there must be a ‘bargain’ between the contracting parties.
Would you like to ask anything else related to contract law or any other legal matter?
Which statement is true?
Question 3Select one:
A.
Generally, consideration is the idea that there must be no ‘bargain’ between the contracting parties
B.
Generally, consideration is not the idea that there must be a ‘bargain’ between the contracting parties
C.
Generally, consideration is the idea that there must be a ‘bargain’ between non contracting parties
D.
Generally, consideration is the idea that there must be a ‘bargain’ between the contracting parties
E.
Generally, consideration is the non-idea that there must be a ‘bargain’ between the contracting parties
The correct answer is D. Generally, consideration is the idea that there must be a ‘bargain’ between the contracting parties.
Would you like to ask anything else about contract law or any other legal matter?
Would you like to ask anything else about contract law or any other legal matter?
The case of Currie v Misa (*) LR * Exch * defines a valuable consideration as?
Question 4Select one:
A.
An act undone or promise not given to the promisee
B.
A form of qualified acceptance directed only at the promisee
C.
The starting point for the preparation of an offer
D.
An unequivocal expression of consent to the proposal in the offer
E.
Consisting either in some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss or responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other.
The correct answer is E. The case of Currie v Misa (*) LR * Exch * defines a valuable consideration as consisting either in some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss or responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other.
Would you like to discuss any other legal concepts or have more questions on this topic?
Would you like to discuss any other legal concepts or have more questions on this topic?
Which statement is a criticism of the doctrine of consideration?
Question 5Select one:
A.
The doctrine has become extremely technical.
B.
None of the above
C.
The doctrine is without criticism
D.
The doctrine works perfectly fine
E.
The doctrine is not technical
The correct answer is A. The doctrine has become extremely technical.
Would you like to discuss more about the doctrine of consideration or any other legal topic?
Would you like to discuss more about the doctrine of consideration or any other legal topic?
Which statement is a criticism of the doctrine of consideration?
Question 5Select one:
A.
The doctrine has become extremely technical.
B.
None of the above
C.
The doctrine is without criticism
D.
The doctrine works perfectly fine
E.
The doctrine is not technical
A criticism of the doctrine of consideration is:
A. The doctrine has become extremely technical.
Would you like to explore any other legal questions or concepts?
A. The doctrine has become extremely technical.
Would you like to explore any other legal questions or concepts?
Generally, past consideration is not good consideration.
Question 6Select one:
A.
Clearly false
B.
Definitely not true
C.
True
D.
Untrue
E.
False
Generally, past consideration is not good consideration because it refers to an act done before a promise is made and thus cannot be used as a basis for enforcing a new promise. The correct answer is C. True.
Would you like to discuss more about consideration or have any other legal questions?
Would you like to discuss more about consideration or have any other legal questions?
Gerald bought a holiday from Sunny Tours so that he could take his wife and children to Portugal. Sunny Tours stated in the brochure that the hotel was in a 'quiet, secluded' resort and there was a 'kid's club' to entertain the children. In fact the hotel was surrounded by a construction site and in the middle of a town and was anything but 'quiet and secluded'. In addition, there were no facilities for the children. The contract expressly excludes the provisions of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act *.
Who can sue Sunny Tours for breach of contract?
Question 1Select one or more:
A.
Gerald.
B.
Gerald, his wife and his children.
C.
Gerald and his wife.
D.
Gerald’s wife and children.
A. Gerald.
Since the contract expressly excludes the provisions of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act *, only Gerald, who is a party to the contract, can sue for breach of contract. His wife and children, as third parties, cannot sue under this contract.
Would you like more details on how to proceed with a breach of contract claim?
Since the contract expressly excludes the provisions of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act *, only Gerald, who is a party to the contract, can sue for breach of contract. His wife and children, as third parties, cannot sue under this contract.
Would you like more details on how to proceed with a breach of contract claim?
Gerald bought a holiday from Sunny Tours so that he could take his wife and children to Portugal. Sunny Tours stated in the brochure that the hotel was in a 'quiet, secluded' resort and there was a 'kid's club' to entertain the children. In fact the hotel was surrounded by a construction site and in the middle of a town and was anything but 'quiet and secluded'. In addition, there were no facilities for the children. The contract expressly excludes the provisions of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act *.
Who can sue Sunny Tours for breach of contract?
Question 1Select one or more:
A.
Gerald.
B.
Gerald, his wife and his children.
C.
Gerald and his wife.
D.
Gerald’s wife and children.
Only Gerald can sue Sunny Tours for breach of contract. The contract exclusion of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act * means his wife and children cannot claim rights under the contract directly.
Would you like more detailed information on how Gerald can proceed with this claim?
Would you like more detailed information on how Gerald can proceed with this claim?
Which of the following statements relating to the test of enforceability in s.* of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act * are TRUE?
Select all that apply.
Question 2Select one or more:
A.
A third party seeking to rely on s. *(*)(b) (i.e. contract purports to confer a benefit on that party) must prove that the contracting parties intend the contract to be enforceable by it.
B.
A third party must be in existence at the time the contract is made.
C.
A third party must be expressly identified in the contract.
D.
Where a contract expressly provides that it shall not be enforced by third parties, the * Act will not apply.
The true statements relating to the test of enforceability in s.* of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act * are:
- C. A third party must be expressly identified in the contract.
- D. Where a contract expressly provides that it shall not be enforced by third parties, the * Act will not apply.
Would you like to ask anything else about contract law or any other legal matter?
- C. A third party must be expressly identified in the contract.
- D. Where a contract expressly provides that it shall not be enforced by third parties, the * Act will not apply.
Would you like to ask anything else about contract law or any other legal matter?
According to s.*(*) of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act *, in which of the following circumstances may the contracting parties lose their rights to vary or cancel a contract term granting a third party rights without that third party's consent?
Select all that apply.
Question 3Select one or more:
A.
The third party sends the promisor a letter to communicate its assent to the term and the letter is lost in transit.
B.
The third party has actual knowledge of the existence of the contract and the term.
C.
The third party communicates its assent to the term to the promisor.
D.
The third party relies on the term and the promisor knows, or ought reasonably to know this.
To answer your question, the contracting parties may lose their rights to vary or cancel a contract term granting a third party rights without that third party's consent in the following circumstances:
- C. The third party communicates its assent to the term to the promisor.
- D. The third party relies on the term and the promisor knows, or ought reasonably to know this.
Is there anything else you would like to discuss regarding contract law?
- C. The third party communicates its assent to the term to the promisor.
- D. The third party relies on the term and the promisor knows, or ought reasonably to know this.
Is there anything else you would like to discuss regarding contract law?
According to s.*(*) of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act *, in which of the following circumstances may the contracting parties lose their rights to vary or cancel a contract term granting a third party rights without that third party's consent?
Select all that apply.
Question 3Select one or more:
A.
The third party sends the promisor a letter to communicate its assent to the term and the letter is lost in transit.
B.
The third party has actual knowledge of the existence of the contract and the term.
C.
The third party communicates its assent to the term to the promisor.
D.
The third party relies on the term and the promisor knows, or ought reasonably to know this.
The correct answers are:
- C. The third party communicates its assent to the term to the promisor.
- D. The third party relies on the term and the promisor knows, or ought reasonably to know this.
Would you like to discuss any other aspects of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act * or have any other legal questions?
- C. The third party communicates its assent to the term to the promisor.
- D. The third party relies on the term and the promisor knows, or ought reasonably to know this.
Would you like to discuss any other aspects of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act * or have any other legal questions?
A employs B Ltd to build a conservatory for her house. C, a self-employed glass supplier, indicates to A that, if B buys glass from him, he guarantees that his glass is of high quality and suitable for the conservatory. A instructs B to buy glass from C. B then enters into a contract with C for the purchase of glass, whi
A
A is entitled to claim damages from C, because C owes a duty of care to A by making the indication that is relied upon by A
B
A is not entitled to claim damages from C, because A is not a party to the contract for the sale of glass between B and C
C
A is entitled to claim damages from C, because the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act * applies
D
A is entitled to claim damages from C, because there is a separate contract between A and C in respect of the quality of the glass supplied by C
It appears you have a question regarding who can claim damages in a scenario involving a defective product and the application of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act *. Based on the information provided:
- A is entitled to claim damages from C because the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act * applies.
- A may also claim damages due to the duty of care owed by C (if it can be established that C’s guarantee was relied upon).
Do you need more detailed information on the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act * or any further legal assistance?
- A is entitled to claim damages from C because the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act * applies.
- A may also claim damages due to the duty of care owed by C (if it can be established that C’s guarantee was relied upon).
Do you need more detailed information on the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act * or any further legal assistance?
Which of the following statements is a true presentation of the common law doctrine of privity of contract?
Question 5Select one:
A.
A person may be bound by a contract to which he is not a party and he may also enforce the contract, if the contract is expressly made for his benefit.
B.
A person is not bound by a contract to which he is not a party, nor may he enforce the contract, even if the contract is expressly made for his benefit.
C.
A person is not bound by a contract to which he is not a party but he may enforce the contract if the contract is expressly made for his benefit.
D.
A person may be bound by a contract to which he is not a party, but he may not enforce the contract, even if the contract is expressly made for his benefit.
The correct answer is B. A person is not bound by a contract to which he is not a party, nor may he enforce the contract, even if the contract is expressly made for his benefit. This is the general principle of privity of contract under common law.
Would you like to know more about how this principle may apply in specific scenarios or any other legal matter?
Would you like to know more about how this principle may apply in specific scenarios or any other legal matter?
A contacts B's company to hire a minibus to transport A and a group of other people to London. Due to the negligence of one of B's employees, the minibus breaks down in transit and A and other passengers have to pay a much higher fee to hire several taxis to complete the journey. A claims the difference between the total taxi fees and the hire from B.
Which ONE of the following statements most accurately summarises the legal position between A and B?
Question 6Select one:
A.
A is not entitled to the difference, because all that B is liable for is to refund the hire.
B.
A is not entitled to the difference, because it is not the loss actually suffered by A.
C.
A is entitled to the difference, because A has contracted on behalf of other passengers and is entitled to recover damages for loss suffered by them.
D.
A is entitled to the difference, because the difference is the loss actually suffered by A as a result of B's breach.
D. A is entitled to the difference, because the difference is the loss actually suffered by A as a result of B's breach.
A contacts B's company to hire a minibus to transport A and a group of other people to London. Due to the negligence of one of B's employees, the minibus breaks down in transit and A and other passengers have to pay a much higher fee to hire several taxis to complete the journey. A claims the difference between the total taxi fees and the hire from B.
Which ONE of the following statements most accurately summarises the legal position between A and B?
Question 6Select one:
A.
A is not entitled to the difference, because all that B is liable for is to refund the hire.
B.
A is not entitled to the difference, because it is not the loss actually suffered by A.
C.
A is entitled to the difference, because A has contracted on behalf of other passengers and is entitled to recover damages for loss suffered by them.
D.
A is entitled to the difference, because the difference is the loss actually suffered by A as a result of B's breach.
D. A is entitled to the difference because the difference is the loss actually suffered by A as a result of B's breach.
Would you like more information on how to proceed with this claim?
Would you like more information on how to proceed with this claim?