Summary
Ellison v Ellison (1802) establishes that without legal formalities, an intended gift is invalid, highlighting the need for proper execution to ensure equitable intentions are fulfilled. Other relevant cases include Ex Parte Pye (1811) and Jones v Lock (1865), which further emphasize the importance of legal formalities in the context of intended gifts. These cases are crucial for understanding the principles of equity and the necessity of completing voluntary settlements in equity.Full Conversation
I want a first but i need help
Hey there! It sounds like you might be seeking some guidance on how to excel in your studies. Do you need help with understanding specific legal concepts, preparing for exams, or something else? Let me know how I can assist you!
I need a list of case law which we're pre milroy v Lord. More precisely, one which established that without legal formalities, an intended gift is invalid. Highlighting the proper need for proper execution of Equitable intentions
For cases prior to Milroy v Lord (*) that highlight the importance of legal formalities for an intended gift to be valid, check out the following:
- Ellison v Ellison (*): Established that a voluntary settlement must be complete in equity.
- Ex Parte Pye (*): Highlighted that equity will not assist a volunteer.
- Jones v Lock (*): Reinforced the necessity of proper transfer instrument for gifts.
Are you looking for more cases or a deeper explanation of these?
Which case is more relevant?
For your studies and understanding of the principles prior to Milroy v Lord, Ellison v Ellison (*) might be the most relevant. It directly addresses the requirement that a voluntary settlement must be complete in equity, highlighting the importance of legal formalities.
Do you need further clarification on this case or additional examples?
Does it establish that without legal formalities, an intended gift is invalid. Highlighting the proper need for proper execution of Equitable intentions ???
Ellison v Ellison (*) establishes that without legal formalities, an intended gift is invalid, reinforcing the need for proper execution to ensure equitable intentions are fulfilled.
Would you like further clarification on this case or information on other relevant cases?
Whats the citation?
Ellison v Ellison (*) citation:
- Ellison v Ellison (*) * Ves *
Is there anything else you need help with?
Any other case?
For additional cases that emphasize the need for legal formalities in intended gifts, you can refer to:
- Ex Parte Pye (*): * Ves *
- Jones v Lock (*): LR * Ch App *
Do you need more details on these cases or any specific areas of law?