Departmental Investigation Notification Rules

It seems you're dealing with an employment law issue concerning departmental investigations and warnings by a service commission.
In general, relevant points include:
- A departmental investigation can proceed if there are justifiable reasons.
- The service commission typically has the authority to issue warnings under their regulations.
For specific English case law, you might consider looking into cases like "R v Civil Service Appeal Board, ex p Bruce (*)" for general principles.
Would you like more detailed information on this topic?

In many jurisdictions, including parts of the Caribbean, the service commission or other relevant authorities can notify the defendant of an impending investigation. This notification process can include:
- Formal written notice from the service commission.
- Notification from the head of the department or relevant authority.
- Investigator's direct notification.
Would you like more information on specific procedures or regulations in your area?

Sure, for English case law that discusses the notification of departmental investigations and warnings, you might consider the following cases:
*. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody [*]:
- Discusses the requirement of fairness in administrative procedures, including the need for a person to be informed of the case against them and given an opportunity to respond.
*. R v Civil Service Appeal Board, ex parte Bruce [*]:
- Addresses principles of fairness and the rights of employees during departmental investigations and disciplinary procedures.
Would you like more information on these cases or additional legal principles?

It looks like you're seeking detailed information on English case law related to departmental investigations and notifications. Here are summaries of the key cases mentioned:
*. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody [*]:
- This case highlights the principle of fairness in administrative processes, including the necessity for individuals to be informed of the accusations against them and given an opportunity to respond.
*. R v Civil Service Appeal Board, ex parte Bruce [*]:
- This case emphasizes fairness in disciplinary procedures and the rights of employees during investigations by their employers.
Would you like any more specific information on these cases or other related legal principles?

Hi! Based on the information, it seems you're asking about the necessity of an investigator informing a defendant after the service commission has already issued a notification letter. The following English case law may be relevant:
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody [*]:
- This case emphasizes that fairness in administrative procedures necessitates informing individuals of the case against them and providing the opportunity to respond.
- R v Civil Service Appeal Board, ex parte Bruce [*]:
- This case reinforces the principles of fairness and the rights of employees during departmental investigations.
Would you like more detailed information on these cases or specific procedures in your jurisdiction?