Employment Tribunal Decision Dispute

Summary

The user is dealing with a complex legal situation involving procedural errors and miscommunication by the Employment Tribunal (ET) and Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). They have experienced issues such as incorrect email handling, false claims, and perjury by the respondent. The user has a favorable disability status judgment and audio evidence of the respondents deceit. They are seeking to strike out their appeal due to these errors and request increased compensation. The user is also facing challenges in obtaining legal representation due to external threats. It is advisable to document all instances of misconduct and procedural errors thoroughly and consider seeking legal advice from a UK-based employment law specialist.

Full Conversation

I TOLD EAT THE DAY AFTER MY LEGAL REP LET ME KNOW SHE CAN'T DO MY * APPEALS. BUT PLEASE CAN YOU LET ME KNOW IF THE ET NEVER SENT THE JUDGMENT TO THE CORRECT EMAIL THAT MEANS NEITHER I NOR MY LEGAL REP GOT THE REASONS. THIS WAS DELIBERATE. WHAT CAN I WRITE TO THIS ET AS THE APPEAL THAT WAS ALLOWED HAD TO GO TO C OF APPEAL WHO ALLOWED IT TOO, BUT REMITTED IT BACK TO ET TO DEAL WITH, EVEN THOUGH I ASKED C OF APPEAL TO STRIKE IT OUT AS THE EAT MADE ERRORS AND ET. THE ET IN QUESTION WILL NOT LET MEHAVE ANY FAIR HEARING DUE TO THEM BEING MANIPULATED BY THE DELIBERATELY DIDHONEST RESPONDENT.
It sounds like a complicated situation. You should consider writing a formal letter to the Employment Tribunal. Here is a template to help you get started:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to bring to your attention a significant issue regarding my recent hearing held in June *. I have not received the reasons for the decision to strike out my matter. Despite multiple follow-ups, I was informed that the reasons were sent to my legal representative’s email address, which resulted in bounce-back messages due to an incorrect email address.
As a result, neither my legal representative nor I received the judgment reasons. Furthermore, my legal representative has since ceased trading, leaving me to handle my appeals independently.
I would like to request that the judgment reasons be sent directly to my email address stated above. Additionally, I request the Employment Tribunal to address this oversight and ensure that I receive a fair hearing, as mandated by law.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
This should help you communicate the issue clearly to the Employment Tribunal. If you need further assistance, consider reaching out to a legal advisor who can provide detailed guidance.
THER C OF APPEAL SENT IT BACK TO THIS ET AND A HEARING IS LISTED FOR * APRIL BUT THIS HAS TO BE STOPPED DUE TO CLASH WITH FAMILY MATTER AND OVER THE LAST *-* WEEKS I HAVE BEEN DEALING WITH EAT REFUSING EXTENSION OF TIME IN THE OTHER APPEAL, A DEFAULT JUDGMENT ISSUE, HEALTH ISSUES AND * RECENT BEREAVEMENTS. THESE EVENTS/CLASHES ARE DELIBERATE. IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO HAVE A FAIR HEARING AND NOR HAVE THERE BEEN ANY FAIR HEARINGS IN ALL MATTERS.
I'm really sorry to hear about your difficult situation. You should request an adjournment of the hearing due to your personal circumstances. Here's a template for your request:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to formally request an adjournment of the hearing scheduled for April 4th, due to exceptional personal circumstances. Over the past few weeks, I have been dealing with the refusal of an extension of time in another appeal, a default judgment issue, significant health issues, and three recent bereavements within my family.
Given these ongoing urgent matters, I am unable to prepare adequately or attend the hearing, and I believe it would be unfair to proceed under these conditions.
I respectfully request that the hearing be rescheduled to a later date to ensure I have the opportunity to present my case fairly.
Thank you for your understanding and prompt attention to this matter.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
Send this letter to the relevant Employment Tribunal as soon as possible. If you need further assistance, consider seeking advice from a legal advisor.
AS I ASKED C OF APPEAL TO STRIKE THIS CASE OUT SHOULD I ASKE ET TO DO THE SAME?
Case Rating: *
You could request the Employment Tribunal (ET) to strike out the case, but it would be beneficial to explain your reasons thoroughly. Here's a template to assist you:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to formally request that this case be struck out. The reasons for this request are as follows:
*. I have not received the reasons for the decision to strike out my matter, and repeated follow-ups have been ignored.
*. The judgment reasons were sent to an incorrect email address, causing significant delays and complications.
*. My legal representative has ceased trading, leaving me to handle the appeals independently.
*. I am currently dealing with severe personal matters, including health issues and multiple recent bereavements, which prevent me from preparing adequately for a fair hearing.
*. There has been a consistent pattern of unfair treatment and manipulation by the respondent throughout this process, which has been compounded by the actions of the ET.
Considering these points, I request that the case be struck out to ensure fairness and justice.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
Send this letter to the Employment Tribunal. If you need further assistance, seeking advice from a legal advisor could be helpful.
THE JUDGMENT WAS PUBLISHED AS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT WHEN IT WAS SENT TO THE WRONG EMAIL ADDRESS OF MY LEGAL REP IN AUG *. I GOT IT AND SENT IT WITH MY APPEAL IN DEC * WITH MY APPEAL. BUT THIS ET DID THIS BIG ERROR * TIMES - TO STOP ME FROM PURSUING MY MATTERS/APPEALS. THEY NEVER REPONDED TO MY EMAILS/REQUESTS NOR MY PREVIOUS STRIKE OUT REQUESTS IN *. WHAT CAN I DO? AS THIS A HUGEWASTE OF RESOURCES ANDIT IS PUBLIC INTEREST HOW THE HMCTS /JUDICIARY IS CLASHING CASES AGAINST ONE PERSON AND MAKING NEGLIGENT ERRORS.
Case Rating: *
It seems like a very frustrating situation. You might consider taking the following steps:
- Formally request an adjournment to allow more time to prepare your case.
- Request a strike-out based on the procedural errors and lack of fair hearing.
- Seek advice from a legal advisor who specializes in employment law to guide you further.
Would you like me to help with anything else?
SHOULD I DO THE * THINGS TOGETHER?
Case Rating: *
Yes, you can request both an adjournment and a strike-out together. This will allow you to address the procedural errors while also requesting more time to prepare your case. Would you like help drafting these requests?
YES, PLEASE.
Case Rating: *
Here's a combined template to help you request both an adjournment and a strike-out:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to formally request both an adjournment of the hearing scheduled for April 4th and that my case be struck out. The reasons for these requests are as follows:
*. Adjournment Request:
- Over the past few weeks, I have been dealing with the refusal of an extension of time in another appeal, a default judgment issue, significant health issues, and three recent bereavements within my family.
- Given these ongoing urgent matters, I am unable to prepare adequately or attend the hearing, and it would be unfair to proceed under these conditions.
- I respectfully request that the hearing be rescheduled to a later date to ensure I have the opportunity to present my case fairly.
*. Strike-Out Request:
- I have not received the reasons for the decision to strike out my matter, and repeated follow-ups have been ignored.
- The judgment reasons were sent to an incorrect email address, causing significant delays and complications.
- My legal representative has ceased trading, leaving me to handle the appeals independently.
- There has been a consistent pattern of unfair treatment and manipulation by the respondent throughout this process, compounded by the actions of the ET.
- The publication of the judgment as a public document without proper notification has caused further distress and procedural unfairness.
Considering these points, I request that the case be struck out to ensure fairness and justice.
Thank you for your attention to these matters. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
Send this letter to the Employment Tribunal as soon as possible. If you need further assistance, consider seeking advice from a legal advisor.
CAN I ASK FOR MY COMPENSATION AT AN INCREASED RATE OF * % DUE TO FASIFICATION ANND CONCEALMENT OF DOCUMENTS, NON COMPLIANCE , NON DISCLOSURE THROUGHOUT * YEARS?
Case Rating: *
You may be able to request increased compensation due to falsification and concealment of documents, non-compliance, and non-disclosure. However, this would likely need to be argued effectively in your case. Here are some key points to consider:
- Document all instances of falsification and concealment.
- Gather evidence of non-compliance and non-disclosure.
- Write a detailed statement explaining how these factors have affected your case.
Would you like help drafting this request?
YES, PLEASE. I WILL COMBINE THIS WITH THESTRIKE OUT I SENT TO C OF APPEAL, IN WHICH THE LORD JUSTICE APLOGISED TO ME DUE TO ERRORS MADE BY HIM/C OF APPEAL WHICH WERE MANIPULATED/FALSIFIED BY THE RESPONDENT/OTHERS. THE ERRORS IN THE EAT JUDGMENT ARE ALSO SERIOUS.
Case Rating: *
It might be a high-value case, and it could be beneficial to connect you with local lawyers who can better assist you with your case. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers?
To help you with the compensation request, here's a template you can use:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to formally request increased compensation by *% due to the following significant issues:
*. Falsification and Concealment of Documents:
- Provide specific instances where documents were falsified or concealed by the respondent.
*. Non-Compliance:
- Detail how the respondent has failed to comply with tribunal orders.
*. Non-Disclosure:
- Describe instances where the respondent did not disclose relevant documents or information.
These actions have significantly impacted my case over the past five years, causing delays and preventing a fair hearing. The cumulative effect of these actions has resulted in substantial distress and procedural unfairness.
I request that the tribunal considers these factors and adjusts the compensation accordingly.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
Please let me know if you would like to proceed with connecting to local lawyers.
MY DETAILED LETTER ONLY FOR ADJOURNMENT IS READY, BUT I REALLY NEED STRIKE OUT. THE RESPONDENT IS A VERY BIG COMPANY AND IT LOOKS AS IF ET, EAT ARE/HAVE BEENTRYING TO AVOID GIVING ANY JUDGMENT AGAINST THEM NOR PUBLISH ANYTHING AGAINST THIS RESPONDENT. BUT THEY HAVE PUBLISED * JUDGMENTS FULL OF ERRORS - GIVING ME BAD REPUTATION, WHILE FOR THE RESPONDENT THESE BODIES ARE MAKING HUGE ERRORS TO AVOID ANY NEGATIVE PUBLICUTI TO THE RESPONDENT.
Case Rating: *
You should definitely request both an adjournment and strike-out, and document all errors and misconduct thoroughly. Here's a template to combine all your concerns:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to formally request both an adjournment of the hearing scheduled for April 4th and that my case be struck out. The reasons for these requests are as follows:
*. Adjournment Request:
- I have been dealing with the refusal of an extension of time in another appeal, a default judgment issue, significant health issues, and three recent bereavements within my family.
- Given these ongoing urgent matters, I am unable to prepare adequately or attend the hearing, and it would be unfair to proceed under these conditions.
- I respectfully request that the hearing be rescheduled to a later date to ensure I have the opportunity to present my case fairly.
*. Strike-Out Request:
- I have not received the reasons for the decision to strike out my matter, and repeated follow-ups have been ignored.
- The judgment reasons were sent to an incorrect email address, causing significant delays and complications.
- My legal representative has ceased trading, leaving me to handle the appeals independently.
- There has been a consistent pattern of unfair treatment and manipulation by the respondent throughout this process, compounded by the actions of the ET.
- The publication of the judgment as a public document without proper notification has caused further distress and procedural unfairness.
*. Request for Increased Compensation:
- Over the past five years, the respondent has engaged in falsification and concealment of documents, non-compliance with tribunal orders, and non-disclosure of relevant documents.
- These actions have significantly impacted my case, causing delays and preventing a fair hearing.
- I request that the tribunal considers these factors and adjusts the compensation by *% accordingly.
Thank you for your attention to these matters. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
Send this letter to the Employment Tribunal as soon as possible.
THE HEARING LISTED FOR * APRIL IS FOR MY DISABILITY STATUS. BUT IN ANOTHER MATTER IN A DIFFERENT ET THE JUDGE FOUND ME DISABLED ATALL TIMES, INCLUDING WITH THIS RESPONDENT AS HE KNEW THE OTHER ET/JUDGE HAD SAID I WAS NOT DISABLED A FEW MONTHS EARLIER. THIS WAS BASED ON SAME FACTS & DOCUMENTS, EXCEPT MY SUPP IMPACT STATEMENT WAS NOT ALLOWED IN.
Case Rating: *
Given your ongoing issues with the Employment Tribunal (ET) and the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT), it seems prudent to request both an adjournment and a strike-out. Additionally, you can highlight your disability status and the discrepancies in the previous judgments.
Here's a combined template to address these concerns:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to formally request both an adjournment of the hearing scheduled for April 4th and that my case be struck out. The reasons for these requests are as follows:
*. Adjournment Request:
- I have been dealing with the refusal of an extension of time in another appeal, a default judgment issue, significant health issues, and three recent bereavements within my family.
- Given these ongoing urgent matters, I am unable to prepare adequately or attend the hearing, and it would be unfair to proceed under these conditions.
- I respectfully request that the hearing be rescheduled to a later date to ensure I have the opportunity to present my case fairly.
*. Strike-Out Request:
- I have not received the reasons for the decision to strike out my matter, and repeated follow-ups have been ignored.
- The judgment reasons were sent to an incorrect email address, causing significant delays and complications.
- My legal representative has ceased trading, leaving me to handle the appeals independently.
- There has been a consistent pattern of unfair treatment and manipulation by the respondent throughout this process, compounded by the actions of the ET.
- The publication of the judgment as a public document without proper notification has caused further distress and procedural unfairness.
*. Disability Status:
- The hearing on April 4th is regarding my disability status. However, in another matter in a different ET, a judge found me disabled at all times, including with this respondent, based on the same facts and documents.
- This discrepancy needs to be addressed, as my supplemental impact statement was not allowed in the current matter.
*. Request for Increased Compensation:
- Over the past five years, the respondent has engaged in falsification and concealment of documents, non-compliance with tribunal orders, and non-disclosure of relevant documents.
- These actions have significantly impacted my case, causing delays and preventing a fair hearing.
- I request that the tribunal considers these factors and adjusts the compensation by *% accordingly.
Thank you for your attention to these matters. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
Send this letter to the Employment Tribunal as soon as possible. If you need further assistance, consider seeking advice from a legal advisor.
SHOULD I USE THIS JUDGENT IN MY STRIKE OUT?
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you have a strong case for requesting a strike-out due to the multiple procedural errors and the lack of fair hearing. Using the judgment that found you disabled could strengthen your argument, as it highlights a significant discrepancy in the handling of your case.
Incorporate the judgment details to emphasize the inconsistency and its impact on your situation:
*. Adjournment Request:
- I have been dealing with the refusal of an extension of time in another appeal, a default judgment issue, significant health issues, and three recent bereavements within my family.
- Given these ongoing urgent matters, I am unable to prepare adequately or attend the hearing, and it would be unfair to proceed under these conditions.
- I respectfully request that the hearing be rescheduled to a later date to ensure I have the opportunity to present my case fairly.
*. Strike-Out Request:
- I have not received the reasons for the decision to strike out my matter, and repeated follow-ups have been ignored.
- The judgment reasons were sent to an incorrect email address, causing significant delays and complications.
- My legal representative has ceased trading, leaving me to handle the appeals independently.
- There has been a consistent pattern of unfair treatment and manipulation by the respondent throughout this process, compounded by the actions of the ET.
- The publication of the judgment as a public document without proper notification has caused further distress and procedural unfairness.
*. Disability Status:
- The hearing on April 4th is regarding my disability status. However, in another matter in a different ET, a judge found me disabled at all times, including with this respondent, based on the same facts and documents.
- This discrepancy needs to be addressed, as my supplemental impact statement was not allowed in the current matter.
*. Request for Increased Compensation:
- Over the past five years, the respondent has engaged in falsification and concealment of documents, non-compliance with tribunal orders, and non-disclosure of relevant documents.
- These actions have significantly impacted my case, causing delays and preventing a fair hearing.
- I request that the tribunal considers these factors and adjusts the compensation by *% accordingly.
Send this letter to the Employment Tribunal as soon as possible. If you need further assistance, consider seeking advice from a legal advisor.
THE FAVOURABLE JUDGMENTt highlights a significant discrepancy in the handling of MY case IN ADDITION TO THE FACT THAT IT HAD TO GO ALL THE WAY TO C OF APPEAL WHO ALLOWED ME PERMISSION TO APPEAL THERE. THESE * BIG FACTORS SHOW SIGNIFICANT DISCREPANCIES IN HANDLING OF MY MATTER - IN ADDITION TO NON DISCLOSURE, NON COMPLIANCE, FALSIFYING DOCUMETS ETC.
Case Rating: *
It appears that your case has significant merit and complexity. The multiple discrepancies, procedural errors, and the favourable judgment from the Court of Appeal indicate that you may have a strong case for legal action.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, I'll need to ask you a few mandatory questions to proceed.
What is your phone number?
NO, BECAUSE THESE LAWYERS ONLY WORK IN US AND I AM IN UK.
Case Rating: *
Given your situation, it may still be beneficial to seek local legal advice in the UK, especially given the complexity and significance of your case. Here’s a final template incorporating all the elements you've mentioned:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to formally request both an adjournment of the hearing scheduled for April 4th and that my case be struck out. The reasons for these requests are as follows:
*. Adjournment Request:
- I have been dealing with the refusal of an extension of time in another appeal, a default judgment issue, significant health issues, and three recent bereavements within my family.
- Given these ongoing urgent matters, I am unable to prepare adequately or attend the hearing, and it would be unfair to proceed under these conditions.
- I respectfully request that the hearing be rescheduled to a later date to ensure I have the opportunity to present my case fairly.
*. Strike-Out Request:
- I have not received the reasons for the decision to strike out my matter, and repeated follow-ups have been ignored.
- The judgment reasons were sent to an incorrect email address, causing significant delays and complications.
- My legal representative has ceased trading, leaving me to handle the appeals independently.
- There has been a consistent pattern of unfair treatment and manipulation by the respondent throughout this process, compounded by the actions of the ET.
- The publication of the judgment as a public document without proper notification has caused further distress and procedural unfairness.
*. Disability Status:
- The hearing on April 4th is regarding my disability status. However, in another matter in a different ET, a judge found me disabled at all times, including with this respondent, based on the same facts and documents.
- This discrepancy needs to be addressed, as my supplemental impact statement was not allowed in the current matter.
*. Request for Increased Compensation:
- Over the past five years, the respondent has engaged in falsification and concealment of documents, non-compliance with tribunal orders, and non-disclosure of relevant documents.
- These actions have significantly impacted my case, causing delays and preventing a fair hearing.
- I request that the tribunal considers these factors and adjusts the compensation by *% accordingly.
*. Significant Discrepancies:
- The favourable judgment from the Court of Appeal highlights significant discrepancies in the handling of my case.
- The case had to go all the way to the Court of Appeal, which allowed me permission to appeal there.
- These factors, along with non-disclosure, non-compliance, and document falsification, show significant discrepancies in the handling of my matter.
Thank you for your attention to these matters. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
If you need further assistance, consider reaching out to a legal advisor in the UK who specializes in employment law.
THANK YOU. I AM ALSO UNWELL DUE TO THESE HUGE BLUNDERS AND EAT IS CONTINUING WITH THESE IN MY OTHER * APPEALS. PLEASE NOTE ONE OF THE PENDING APPEALS IS PART OF THIS CLAIM - IE VICTIMISATION, HOLIDAY PAY. BUT EAT IS REALLY MESSING WITH IT - JUST TELLING ME ABOUT A WEEK AGO THEY CLOSED IT IN FEB *, BUT WHEN I LOOKED AT THEIR EMAIL OF DEC * IT SAID I DID NOT INCLUDE THE JUDGMENT - I DID. SO THIS IS ALSO FALSE. WHAT SHOULD I WRITE T EAT ABOUT THIS AND CAN I INCLUDED THIS IN THE STRIKE OUT NOW IN THE ET?
Case Rating: *
Given the complexity and the multiple procedural errors in your case, it appears to be a high-value case. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
To address the issues with the EAT, here's a template you can use to write to them:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Appeal Tribunal
[Tribunal's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to bring to your attention several significant issues regarding my pending appeals:
*. Procedural Errors and Miscommunication:
- I was informed that my appeal was closed in February *, but upon reviewing your email from December *, it stated that the judgment was not included, which is incorrect as I did include it.
*. Ongoing Appeals:
- One of the pending appeals is part of my claim involving victimisation and holiday pay. The continued mishandling of my case is causing undue stress and health issues.
I request that the EAT reviews these matters thoroughly and ensures that my appeals are handled fairly and promptly. Additionally, I request that these issues be considered in my current strike-out request in the Employment Tribunal.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
Please let me know if you would like to proceed with connecting to local lawyers. If so, I will need to ask you a few mandatory questions.
THIS IS THE 3RD EXAMPLE OF THE EAT MAKING FALSE CLAIMS IN ALL MY APPEALS - WHAT SHOULD I DO ABOUT THIS? *. THEY MADE MANY ERRORS IN THEIR JUDGMENT FOR THE APPEAL THAT I HAD TO TAKE TO C OF APPEAL, INCLUDING NEW TEXT THAT WAS NOT PART OF MY CASE. *. IN THE RECENT REFUSAL TO ALLOW ME EXTENSION OF TIME FOR APPEAL NO. * - THE REGISTRAR PUT A FALSE CLAIM IN THE REASONING- I NEED TO KNOW WHERE EAT GOT THIS FROM URGENTLY. *. THE FALSE CLAIM THAT I DID NOT PROVIDE THE JUDGMENT IN APPEAL NO. * WHEN I DID.
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you have a strong case with multiple procedural errors by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). Here’s a template you can use to write to the EAT about these issues:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Appeal Tribunal
[Tribunal's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to formally bring to your attention several significant issues regarding my appeals:
*. Procedural Errors and Miscommunication:
- The EAT has made several errors in their judgments, including introducing new text not part of my case, which had to be taken to the Court of Appeal.
- In the recent refusal to allow an extension of time for Appeal No. *, the Registrar included a false claim in the reasoning. I urgently need to know where the EAT obtained this information.
- For Appeal No. *, the EAT falsely claimed that I did not provide the judgment when I had indeed included it.
*. Ongoing Appeals:
- One of the pending appeals is part of my claim involving victimization and holiday pay.
- The continued mishandling of my case by the EAT is causing undue stress and health issues.
I request that the EAT reviews these matters thoroughly and ensures that my appeals are handled fairly and promptly. Additionally, I request that these issues be considered in my current strike-out request in the Employment Tribunal.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, I'll need to ask you a few mandatory questions to proceed.
I ASKED FOR THE JUDGES NOTES IN EAT FOR ONE OF THE BIGGER ERRORS IN THEIR JUDGMENT REGARDING WHY DID THE EAT JUDGE PROVIDE A COMPLETLY NEW REASON (SAYING ITWAS A CASE MANAGEMENT DECISION) FOR REJECTING THIS GROUND OF APPEAL BUT HE DID NOT LOOK AT THE SEVERAL REASONS THE RULE *-* HEARING JUDGE HAD GIVEN TO ALLOW THIS GROUND TO PROCEED - HE DID NOT SAY IT WAS JUST A CASE MANAGEMENT DECISION. A FEW DAYS AGO I GOT A REPLY FROM EAT SAYING THE JUDGE THREW AWAY HIS NOTES. THIS IS VERY PERPLEXING ESPECIALLY AS HE/EAT KNEW I HAD LODGED APPEAL AT C OF APPEAL, AND EVEN MORE UNACCEPTABLE BECAUSE I WAS ASKED TO GET THE ET JUDGE'S NOTES NY THE EAT TO PROVE THAT THE RECUR ISSUE WAS RAISED BY MY COUNSEL AT THE ORIGINAL ET HEARING BECAUSE THE RESPONDENT WAS LYING TO THE EAT SAYING THIS ISSUE WAS NEVER RAISED. IT WAS IN MY SUPP IMPACT STATEMENT AND THIS IS THE 1ST REASON THE RULE *-* JUDGE GAVE TO ALLOW THIS DOCUMENT TO BE RELIED UPON.
Case Rating: *
It appears that your situation is quite complex and serious, with multiple procedural errors and issues at various levels of the tribunal. Given the high rating, it would be beneficial to connect you with local lawyers who can better assist you with your case.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
If so, I'll need to ask you a few mandatory questions to proceed.
What is your phone number?
NO, I AM IN UK. BUT PLEAS CAN YOU DRAFT A SHORT PARAG SUMAARISING THE LAST INFO I SENT YOU TO PUT IN MY STRIKE OUT.
Case Rating: *
Sure, here is a short paragraph summarising the last information you provided:
---
The EAT judge provided a completely new reason, stating it was a case management decision, for rejecting my ground of appeal, disregarding the several reasons given by the Rule *-* hearing judge to allow this ground to proceed. Recently, the EAT informed me that the judge had discarded his notes, despite knowing I had lodged an appeal at the Court of Appeal. Furthermore, I was instructed by the EAT to obtain the ET judge's notes to prove that my counsel raised the issue at the original ET hearing, countering the respondent's false claim that it was never raised. My supplemental impact statement was the primary reason the Rule *-* judge allowed the document to be relied upon.
---
If you need further assistance, feel free to ask!
IF EAT FELT T WAS OK TO ASK ME TO ASKE ET JUDGE FOR HER NOTES * MONTHS - * YEARS AFTER THE HEARING/DECISION THEN HOW IS IT OK THAT THE EAT JUDGE THREW/DISPOSED HIS NOTES VERY QUICKLY. THIS IS VEY BAD AND SHOCKING. PLEASE CAN YOU ALSO DRAFT A RESPONSE TO EAT TO THIS REASON OF JUDGE DISPOSING HIS NOTES.
Case Rating: *
Certainly, here's a draft response to the EAT regarding the judge disposing of his notes:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Appeal Tribunal
[Tribunal's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to express my concern regarding the recent disclosure that the EAT judge disposed of his notes shortly after the hearing. This is especially perplexing given that the EAT had previously instructed me to obtain the ET judge's notes 18 months to 2 years after the hearing/decision.
It is very troubling that the EAT judge disposed of his notes so quickly, despite being aware of my ongoing appeal at the Court of Appeal. This action undermines the integrity of the process and raises serious questions about the handling of my case.
I request a thorough review of this matter and urge the EAT to address this inconsistency and procedural unfairness. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to modify the letter as needed. If you require further assistance, please let me know!
THERE ARE * OTHER ISSUES - SHOULD I PUT THEM IN WITH THIS RESPONSE YOU HAVE DRAFTED OR KEEP THEM SEPARATE. THE OTHER * ARE THE CLOSING OF MY APPEAL NO. * SAYING I DID NOT PROVIDE THE JUDGMENT WITH MY APPEAL - I DID. AND THE FALSE CLAIM USED BY THE REGISTRAR TO REFUSE ME EXTENSION OF TIME TO APPEAL - THE FALSE CLAIM IS THE REGISTRAR IS SAYING THAT MY LEGAL REP SENT ME AN EMAIL FROM THE WRONG EMAIL ADDRESS ON * NOV *.- - MEAHING THAT THE REASONS WERE NOT SENT TO THE WRONG EMAIL ADDRESS. THIS IS FALSE AS I HAVE THE EMAIL FROM MY LEGAL REP OF * NOV * AND IT IS FROM HER CORRECT EMAIL ADDRESS.
Case Rating: *
You can include all the issues in one comprehensive response to provide a complete picture of the procedural errors and inconsistencies. Here is a combined draft:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Appeal Tribunal
[Tribunal's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to formally bring to your attention several significant issues regarding my appeals:
*. Procedural Errors and Miscommunication:
- The EAT judge provided a completely new reason, stating it was a case management decision, for rejecting my ground of appeal, disregarding the several reasons given by the Rule *-* hearing judge to allow this ground to proceed. Recently, the EAT informed me that the judge had discarded his notes, despite knowing I had lodged an appeal at the Court of Appeal. This is particularly troubling given that the EAT had previously instructed me to obtain the ET judge's notes 18 months to 2 years after the hearing/decision.
- For Appeal No. *, the EAT falsely claimed that I did not provide the judgment when I had indeed included it.
- In the recent refusal to allow an extension of time for Appeal No. *, the Registrar included a false claim, stating that my legal representative sent me an email from the wrong email address on * Nov *. This is incorrect, as I have the email from my legal representative from her correct email address.
*. Ongoing Appeals:
- One of the pending appeals is part of my claim involving victimization and holiday pay.
- The continued mishandling of my case by the EAT is causing undue stress and health issues.
I request that the EAT reviews these matters thoroughly and ensures that my appeals are handled fairly and promptly. Additionally, I request that these issues be considered in my current strike-out request in the Employment Tribunal.
Thank you for your attention to these matters. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to modify the letter as needed. If you require further assistance, please let me know!
ITS OBVIOUS THAT THE EAT IS UNABLE TO GIVE ME A FAIR HEARING SO THE * OUTSTANDING APPEALS NEED TO BE STRUCK OUT AS THERE IS ONLY GOING TO BE ONE OUTCOME. ITS BETTER TOGET THIS DONE QUIVKLY INSTEAD OF ME FACING TERROR FROM THESE BODIES.
Case Rating: *
I understand your frustration with the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) and the ongoing issues with your case. Here’s a combined letter addressing all the points for your strike-out request and adjournment:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Appeal Tribunal
[Tribunal's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to formally request both an adjournment of the hearing scheduled for April 4th and that my case be struck out. The reasons for these requests are as follows:
*. Adjournment Request:
- I have been dealing with the refusal of an extension of time in another appeal, a default judgment issue, significant health issues, and three recent bereavements within my family.
- Given these ongoing urgent matters, I am unable to prepare adequately or attend the hearing, and it would be unfair to proceed under these conditions.
- I respectfully request that the hearing be rescheduled to a later date to ensure I have the opportunity to present my case fairly.
*. Strike-Out Request:
- The EAT judge provided a completely new reason, stating it was a case management decision, for rejecting my ground of appeal, disregarding the several reasons given by the Rule *-* hearing judge to allow this ground to proceed. Recently, the EAT informed me that the judge had discarded his notes, despite knowing I had lodged an appeal at the Court of Appeal. This is particularly troubling given that the EAT had previously instructed me to obtain the ET judge's notes 18 months to 2 years after the hearing/decision.
- For Appeal No. *, the EAT falsely claimed that I did not provide the judgment when I had indeed included it.
- In the recent refusal to allow an extension of time for Appeal No. *, the Registrar included a false claim, stating that my legal representative sent me an email from the wrong email address on * Nov *. This is incorrect, as I have the email from my legal representative from her correct email address.
- The EAT is unable to provide a fair hearing due to these procedural errors and miscommunications.
- There has been a consistent pattern of unfair treatment and manipulation by the respondent throughout this process, compounded by the actions of the ET.
- The publication of the judgment as a public document without proper notification has caused further distress and procedural unfairness.
*. Disability Status:
- The hearing on April 4th is regarding my disability status. However, in another matter in a different ET, a judge found me disabled at all times, including with this respondent, based on the same facts and documents.
- This discrepancy needs to be addressed, as my supplemental impact statement was not allowed in the current matter.
*. Request for Increased Compensation:
- Over the past five years, the respondent has engaged in falsification and concealment of documents, non-compliance with tribunal orders, and non-disclosure of relevant documents.
- These actions have significantly impacted my case, causing delays and preventing a fair hearing.
- I request that the tribunal considers these factors and adjusts the compensation by *% accordingly.
*. Significant Discrepancies:
- The favourable judgment from the Court of Appeal highlights significant discrepancies in the handling of my case.
- The case had to go all the way to the Court of Appeal, which allowed me permission to appeal there.
- These factors, along with non-disclosure, non-compliance, and document falsification, show significant discrepancies in the handling of my matter.
I request that the EAT reviews these matters thoroughly and ensures that my appeals are handled fairly and promptly. Additionally, I request that these issues be considered in my current strike-out request in the Employment Tribunal.
Thank you for your attention to these matters. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to modify the letter as needed. If you require further assistance, please let me know!
APPEAL NO. * IS WITH A DIFFERENT RESPONDENT FROM A DIFFERENT ET. - THIS IS THE ONE FOR WHICH EAT WRONGLY MADE ME ASK FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME (I SUBMITTED MY APPEAL IN * DAYS OF RECEIVING THE WRITTEN REASONS) & THE REFUSED THIS ON A FALSE CLAIM (WHICH I HAVEASKED EAT ONCE TO INVESTIGATE ANT LET ME KNOW WHERE THEY GOT THIS FROM AND HOW THIS HAPPENED). I HAVE THE FAVOURABLE JUDGMENT OF MY DISABILITY IN THIS MATTER. SHOULD THIS STILL BE PUT INTO THE STRIKE OUT? OR SHOULD I ASK FOR STRIKE OUT OF APPEAL NO. * AT EAT? I DON'T THINK THEY WILL DO IT DUE TO BIAS AND THEY LASHED OUT TO ME DUE TO ME GOING TO C OF APPEAL WHO UPHELD MY APPEAL DUE TO ERRORS OF LAW BY ET & EAT.
Case Rating: *
Given the complexity and seriousness of your situation, it seems you have a strong case for seeking a strike-out. Here's how you can address Appeal No. * in your strike-out request:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Appeal Tribunal
[Tribunal's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to formally request both an adjournment of the hearing scheduled for April 4th and that my case be struck out. The reasons for these requests are as follows:
*. Adjournment Request:
- I have been dealing with the refusal of an extension of time in another appeal, a default judgment issue, significant health issues, and three recent bereavements within my family.
- Given these ongoing urgent matters, I am unable to prepare adequately or attend the hearing, and it would be unfair to proceed under these conditions.
- I respectfully request that the hearing be rescheduled to a later date to ensure I have the opportunity to present my case fairly.
*. Strike-Out Request:
- The EAT judge provided a completely new reason, stating it was a case management decision, for rejecting my ground of appeal, disregarding the several reasons given by the Rule *-* hearing judge to allow this ground to proceed. Recently, the EAT informed me that the judge had discarded his notes, despite knowing I had lodged an appeal at the Court of Appeal. This is particularly troubling given that the EAT had previously instructed me to obtain the ET judge's notes 18 months to 2 years after the hearing/decision.
- For Appeal No. *, the EAT falsely claimed that I did not provide the judgment when I had indeed included it.
- In the recent refusal to allow an extension of time for Appeal No. *, the Registrar included a false claim, stating that my legal representative sent me an email from the wrong email address on * Nov *. This is incorrect, as I have the email from my legal representative from her correct email address.
- The EAT is unable to provide a fair hearing due to these procedural errors and miscommunications.
- There has been a consistent pattern of unfair treatment and manipulation by the respondent throughout this process, compounded by the actions of the ET.
- The publication of the judgment as a public document without proper notification has caused further distress and procedural unfairness.
*. Disability Status:
- The hearing on April 4th is regarding my disability status. However, in another matter in a different ET, a judge found me disabled at all times, including with this respondent, based on the same facts and documents.
- This discrepancy needs to be addressed, as my supplemental impact statement was not allowed in the current matter.
*. Request for Increased Compensation:
- Over the past five years, the respondent has engaged in falsification and concealment of documents, non-compliance with tribunal orders, and non-disclosure of relevant documents.
- These actions have significantly impacted my case, causing delays and preventing a fair hearing.
- I request that the tribunal considers these factors and adjusts the compensation by *% accordingly.
*. Significant Discrepancies:
- The favourable judgment from the Court of Appeal highlights significant discrepancies in the handling of my case.
- The case had to go all the way to the Court of Appeal, which allowed me permission to appeal there.
- These factors, along with non-disclosure, non-compliance, and document falsification, show significant discrepancies in the handling of my matter.
I request that the EAT reviews these matters thoroughly and ensures that my appeals are handled fairly and promptly. Additionally, I request that these issues be considered in my current strike-out request in the Employment Tribunal.
Thank you for your attention to these matters. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to modify the letter as needed. If you require further assistance, please let me know!
WHERE SHOULD I ASK FOR STRIKE OUT OF APPEAL NO. *?
Case Rating: *
To request a strike-out of Appeal No. *, you should address your request to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). Here’s a draft letter to help you:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Appeal Tribunal
[Tribunal's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to formally request that Appeal No. * be struck out due to significant procedural errors and miscommunication. The reasons for this request are as follows:
*. Procedural Errors and Miscommunication:
- The EAT judge provided a completely new reason, stating it was a case management decision, for rejecting my ground of appeal, disregarding the several reasons given by the Rule *-* hearing judge to allow this ground to proceed.
- Recently, the EAT informed me that the judge discarded his notes, despite knowing I had lodged an appeal at the Court of Appeal. This is particularly troubling given that the EAT had previously instructed me to obtain the ET judge's notes 18 months to 2 years after the hearing/decision.
- The EAT falsely claimed that I did not provide the judgment when I had indeed included it.
- In the recent refusal to allow an extension of time for Appeal No. *, the Registrar included a false claim, stating that my legal representative sent me an email from the wrong email address on * Nov *. This is incorrect, as I have the email from my legal representative from her correct email address.
- The EAT is unable to provide a fair hearing due to these procedural errors and miscommunications.

*. Disability Status:
- I have a favourable judgment from another ET in a different matter, where the judge found me disabled at all times, including with this respondent, based on the same facts and documents. This discrepancy needs to be addressed.
*. Request for Increased Compensation:
- Over the past five years, the respondent has engaged in falsification and concealment of documents, non-compliance with tribunal orders, and non-disclosure of relevant documents.
- These actions have significantly impacted my case, causing delays and preventing a fair hearing.
- I request that the tribunal considers these factors and adjusts the compensation by *% accordingly.
Given these significant procedural errors and the inability of the EAT to provide a fair hearing, I request that Appeal No. * be struck out to prevent further distress and procedural unfairness.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
Send this letter to the Employment Appeal Tribunal as soon as possible. If you need further assistance, consider seeking advice from a legal advisor in the UK who specializes in employment law.
THE ET I AM SENDING THIS REQUEST TO IS A DIFFERENT ONE TO THE ONE WHO DEALT WITH THE MATTER FROM WHICH APPEAL NO. * ARISES.
Case Rating: *
It sounds like a complex and high-value case. Here’s a draft to help you with your request for the strike-out of Appeal No. * to a different Employment Tribunal:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to formally request that Appeal No. * be struck out due to significant procedural errors and miscommunication. The reasons for this request are as follows:
*. Procedural Errors and Miscommunication:
- The EAT judge provided a completely new reason, stating it was a case management decision, for rejecting my ground of appeal, disregarding the several reasons given by the Rule *-* hearing judge to allow this ground to proceed.
- Recently, the EAT informed me that the judge discarded his notes, despite knowing I had lodged an appeal at the Court of Appeal. This is particularly troubling given that the EAT had previously instructed me to obtain the ET judge's notes 18 months to 2 years after the hearing/decision.
- The EAT falsely claimed that I did not provide the judgment when I had indeed included it.
- In the recent refusal to allow an extension of time for Appeal No. *, the Registrar included a false claim, stating that my legal representative sent me an email from the wrong email address on * Nov *. This is incorrect, as I have the email from my legal representative from her correct email address.
- The EAT is unable to provide a fair hearing due to these procedural errors and miscommunications.
*. Disability Status:
- I have a favourable judgment from another ET in a different matter, where the judge found me disabled at all times, including with this respondent, based on the same facts and documents. This discrepancy needs to be addressed.
*. Request for Increased Compensation:
- Over the past five years, the respondent has engaged in falsification and concealment of documents, non-compliance with tribunal orders, and non-disclosure of relevant documents.
- These actions have significantly impacted my case, causing delays and preventing a fair hearing.
- I request that the tribunal considers these factors and adjusts the compensation by *% accordingly.
Given these significant procedural errors and the inability of the EAT to provide a fair hearing, I request that Appeal No. * be struck out to prevent further distress and procedural unfairness.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
I CAN SEND THIS TO THE OTHER ET, BUT IF THE EAT IS STILL APPEARING TO DEAL WITH THE WRONG STEP OF FORCING ME TO ASK FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME, CAN THE ORIGINAL ET STILL STRIKE OUT THIE RESPONSE? I FOUND THEIR LETTER RECENTLY OF JUNE * BUT SENT TO ME END OF JULY * SAYING THEY APOLOGISE FOR SENDING THE JUDGMENT TO THE WRONG EMAIL ADDRESS OF MY LEGAL REP.
Case Rating: *
If the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) is forcing you to ask for an extension of time based on incorrect steps, you can address this in your request to the original Employment Tribunal (ET) for striking out the response. Here’s how to incorporate this into your letter:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to formally request that my case be struck out due to significant procedural errors and miscommunication by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). The reasons for this request are as follows:
*. Procedural Errors and Miscommunication:
- The EAT judge provided a completely new reason, stating it was a case management decision, for rejecting my ground of appeal, disregarding the several reasons given by the Rule *-* hearing judge to allow this ground to proceed.
- Recently, the EAT informed me that the judge discarded his notes, despite knowing I had lodged an appeal at the Court of Appeal. This is particularly troubling given that the EAT had previously instructed me to obtain the ET judge's notes 18 months to 2 years after the hearing/decision.
- The EAT falsely claimed that I did not provide the judgment when I had indeed included it.
- In the recent refusal to allow an extension of time for Appeal No. *, the Registrar included a false claim, stating that my legal representative sent me an email from the wrong email address on * Nov *. This is incorrect, as I have the email from my legal representative from her correct email address.
- The EAT is unable to provide a fair hearing due to these procedural errors and miscommunications.
- I recently discovered a letter from June *, received in late July *, in which the EAT apologised for sending the judgment to the wrong email address of my legal representative.
*. Disability Status:
- The hearing on April 4th is regarding my disability status. However, in another matter in a different ET, a judge found me disabled at all times, including with this respondent, based on the same facts and documents.
- This discrepancy needs to be addressed, as my supplemental impact statement was not allowed in the current matter.
*. Request for Increased Compensation:
- Over the past five years, the respondent has engaged in falsification and concealment of documents, non-compliance with tribunal orders, and non-disclosure of relevant documents.
- These actions have significantly impacted my case, causing delays and preventing a fair hearing.
- I request that the tribunal considers these factors and adjusts the compensation by *% accordingly.
*. Significant Discrepancies:
- The favourable judgment from the Court of Appeal highlights significant discrepancies in the handling of my case.
- The case had to go all the way to the Court of Appeal, which allowed me permission to appeal there.
- These factors, along with non-disclosure, non-compliance, and document falsification, show significant discrepancies in the handling of my matter.
Given these significant procedural errors and the inability of the EAT to provide a fair hearing, I request that the original ET considers these factors and strikes out the response to prevent further distress and procedural unfairness.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
Send this letter to the Employment Tribunal as soon as possible. If you need further assistance, consider seeking advice from a legal advisor in the UK who specializes in employment law.
THIS REQUEST WILL GO TO THE ET TO WHO IT WAS REMITTED BY C OF APPEAL - IT IS APPEAL * AND APPEAL *. APPEAL NO. * IS FROM A DIFFERNT ET, SO CANN YOU DO A STRIKE OUT REQUEST FORTHIS ET DUE TO EAT MESSING UP THIS APPEAL BY MAKING ME DO EXTENSION OF TIME WHICH IS WRONG AND JUST AN OBSTRUCTION PLOY AND TO CAUSE ME MORE WORK AND ILL HEALTH. EAT IS VERY UNHAPPY ABOUT ME GOING TO C OF APPEAL AND SHOWING EAT WAS WRONG IN LAW.
Case Rating: *
Certainly. Here is a draft specifically for requesting a strike-out for Appeal No. * due to the procedural errors by the EAT:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to formally request that Appeal No. * be struck out due to significant procedural errors and miscommunication by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). The reasons for this request are as follows:
*. Procedural Errors and Miscommunication:
- The EAT wrongly made me request an extension of time, despite my appeal being submitted within the 42 days of receiving the written reasons.
- The EAT provided a completely new reason for rejecting my ground of appeal, stating it was a case management decision, while disregarding the several reasons given by the Rule *-* hearing judge to allow this ground to proceed.
- The EAT falsely claimed that I did not provide the judgment with my appeal when I had indeed included it.
- The Registrar included a false claim in the refusal to allow an extension of time, stating that my legal representative sent me an email from the wrong email address on * Nov *. This is incorrect, as I have the email from my legal representative from her correct email address.
*. Disability Status:
- I have a favourable judgment from another ET in a different matter, where the judge found me disabled at all times, including with this respondent, based on the same facts and documents. This discrepancy needs to be addressed.
*. Request for Increased Compensation:
- Over the past five years, the respondent has engaged in falsification and concealment of documents, non-compliance with tribunal orders, and non-disclosure of relevant documents.
- These actions have significantly impacted my case, causing delays and preventing a fair hearing.
- I request that the tribunal considers these factors and adjusts the compensation by *% accordingly.
Given these significant procedural errors and the inability of the EAT to provide a fair hearing, I request that Appeal No. * be struck out to prevent further distress and procedural unfairness.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
Send this letter to the relevant Employment Tribunal as soon as possible. If you need further assistance, consider seeking advice from a legal advisor in the UK who specializes in employment law.
PLEASE CAN YOU CORRECT - IN THIS MATTER I HAVE THE FAVOURABLE DISABILITY STATIS JUDGMENT. ALSO, I HAVE AUDIOS SHOWING THIS RESPONDENT HAS DELIBERATLY AND CONTINUOUSLY DECEIVED THE EAT AND EAT, SAYING THEY NEVER KNEW I HAD A DISABILITY AND THAT I NEVER HAD A DISABILITY, AND I NEVER TOLD THEM OF IT. I DID. THE AUDIOS SHOW THI. JUST BECAUSE THEIR CASE WAS EXPOSED THE ET STRUCK OUT MY CLAIM AND THEN FOR THE FIRST TIME SENT THE JUDGMENT TO THE WRONG EMAIL ADDRESS.
Case Rating: *
Certainly! Here’s a corrected version of your statement:
---
In this matter, I have a favorable disability status judgment. Additionally, I have audio recordings showing that the respondent has deliberately and continuously deceived both the Employment Tribunal (ET) and Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT), claiming they never knew I had a disability, that I never had a disability, and that I never informed them of it. I did inform them, and the audios confirm this. Because their case was exposed, the ET struck out my claim and then, for the first time, sent the judgment to the wrong email address.
---
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
THE RESPONDENT ALSO DID PERJURY IN THE PART HEARD HEARING OF JAN *. THE HR LADY LIED UNDER OATH DURING CROSS EXAMINATION THAT I NEVER SAID I HAD A DISABILTY.
Case Rating: *
It seems like you have a strong case with multiple procedural errors and issues of misconduct. Here’s a revised draft for your strike-out request:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to formally request that Appeal No. * be struck out due to significant procedural errors and miscommunication by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). The reasons for this request are as follows:
*. Procedural Errors and Miscommunication:
- The EAT wrongly made me request an extension of time, despite my appeal being submitted within the 42 days of receiving the written reasons.
- The EAT provided a completely new reason for rejecting my ground of appeal, stating it was a case management decision, while disregarding the several reasons given by the Rule *-* hearing judge to allow this ground to proceed.
- The EAT falsely claimed that I did not provide the judgment with my appeal when I had indeed included it.
- The Registrar included a false claim in the refusal to allow an extension of time, stating that my legal representative sent me an email from the wrong email address on * Nov *. This is incorrect, as I have the email from my legal representative from her correct email address.
- I recently discovered a letter from June *, received in late July *, in which the EAT apologised for sending the judgment to the wrong email address of my legal representative.
*. Disability Status:
- In this matter, I have a favorable disability status judgment.
- Additionally, I have audio recordings showing that the respondent has deliberately and continuously deceived both the ET and EAT, claiming they never knew I had a disability, that I never had a disability, and that I never informed them of it. I did inform them, and the audios confirm this.
- Because their case was exposed, the ET struck out my claim and then, for the first time, sent the judgment to the wrong email address.
*. Request for Increased Compensation:
- Over the past five years, the respondent has engaged in falsification and concealment of documents, non-compliance with tribunal orders, and non-disclosure of relevant documents.
- These actions have significantly impacted my case, causing delays and preventing a fair hearing.
- I request that the tribunal considers these factors and adjusts the compensation by *% accordingly.
*. Perjury:
- The respondent committed perjury in the part-heard hearing of January *. The HR representative lied under oath during cross-examination, stating that I never mentioned my disability.
Given these significant procedural errors and the inability of the EAT to provide a fair hearing, I request that Appeal No. * be struck out to prevent further distress and procedural unfairness.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
If you need further assistance or have additional questions, feel free to ask!
MY LEGAL REP GAVE HER *- * CHANCES TO REPLY ANDTHINK VERY CAREFULLY BUT SHE REPEATED HER LIES.
Case Rating: *
It seems like you have a very high-value case with multiple procedural errors, misconduct, and issues that could benefit from legal expertise. Here’s the revised draft incorporating your latest information:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to formally request that Appeal No. * be struck out due to significant procedural errors and miscommunication by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). The reasons for this request are as follows:
*. Procedural Errors and Miscommunication:
- The EAT wrongly made me request an extension of time, despite my appeal being submitted within the 42 days of receiving the written reasons.
- The EAT provided a completely new reason for rejecting my ground of appeal, stating it was a case management decision, while disregarding the several reasons given by the Rule *-* hearing judge to allow this ground to proceed.
- The EAT falsely claimed that I did not provide the judgment with my appeal when I had indeed included it.
- The Registrar included a false claim in the refusal to allow an extension of time, stating that my legal representative sent me an email from the wrong email address on * Nov *. This is incorrect, as I have the email from my legal representative from her correct email address.
- I recently discovered a letter from June *, received in late July *, in which the EAT apologised for sending the judgment to the wrong email address of my legal representative.
*. Disability Status:
- In this matter, I have a favorable disability status judgment.
- Additionally, I have audio recordings showing that the respondent has deliberately and continuously deceived both the ET and EAT, claiming they never knew I had a disability, that I never had a disability, and that I never informed them of it. I did inform them, and the audios confirm this.
- Because their case was exposed, the ET struck out my claim and then, for the first time, sent the judgment to the wrong email address.
*. Request for Increased Compensation:
- Over the past five years, the respondent has engaged in falsification and concealment of documents, non-compliance with tribunal orders, and non-disclosure of relevant documents.
- These actions have significantly impacted my case, causing delays and preventing a fair hearing.
- I request that the tribunal considers these factors and adjusts the compensation by *% accordingly.
*. Perjury:
- The respondent committed perjury in the part-heard hearing of January *. The HR representative lied under oath during cross-examination, stating that I never mentioned my disability.
- My legal representative gave her *-* chances to reply and think very carefully, but she repeated her lies.
Given these significant procedural errors and the inability of the EAT to provide a fair hearing, I request that Appeal No. * be struck out to prevent further distress and procedural unfairness.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, I'll need to ask you a few mandatory questions to proceed. What is your phone number?
IS IT OK TO SAY ABOUT PERJURY AS THIS ISSUE CAUSED THE ET HUGE PROBLEMS AND THEY STRCK OUT MY CLAIM, BUT SHOULD HAVE STRUCK OUT THE RESPOPNSE.
Case Rating: *
Yes, mentioning perjury is important as it highlights the severity of the respondent's misconduct. Here's the revised draft to include that point:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to formally request that Appeal No. * be struck out due to significant procedural errors and miscommunication by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). The reasons for this request are as follows:
*. Procedural Errors and Miscommunication:
- The EAT wrongly made me request an extension of time, despite my appeal being submitted within the 42 days of receiving the written reasons.
- The EAT provided a completely new reason for rejecting my ground of appeal, stating it was a case management decision, while disregarding the several reasons given by the Rule *-* hearing judge to allow this ground to proceed.
- The EAT falsely claimed that I did not provide the judgment with my appeal when I had indeed included it.
- The Registrar included a false claim in the refusal to allow an extension of time, stating that my legal representative sent me an email from the wrong email address on * Nov *. This is incorrect, as I have the email from my legal representative from her correct email address.
- I recently discovered a letter from June *, received in late July *, in which the EAT apologised for sending the judgment to the wrong email address of my legal representative.
*. Disability Status:
- In this matter, I have a favorable disability status judgment.
- Additionally, I have audio recordings showing that the respondent has deliberately and continuously deceived both the ET and EAT, claiming they never knew I had a disability, that I never had a disability, and that I never informed them of it. I did inform them, and the audios confirm this.
- Because their case was exposed, the ET struck out my claim and then, for the first time, sent the judgment to the wrong email address.
*. Request for Increased Compensation:
- Over the past five years, the respondent has engaged in falsification and concealment of documents, non-compliance with tribunal orders, and non-disclosure of relevant documents.
- These actions have significantly impacted my case, causing delays and preventing a fair hearing.
- I request that the tribunal considers these factors and adjusts the compensation by *% accordingly.
*. Perjury:
- The respondent committed perjury in the part-heard hearing of January *. The HR representative lied under oath during cross-examination, stating that I never mentioned my disability.
- My legal representative gave her *-* chances to reply and think very carefully, but she repeated her lies.
Given these significant procedural errors and the inability of the EAT to provide a fair hearing, I request that Appeal No. * be struck out to prevent further distress and procedural unfairness.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, I'll need to ask you a few mandatory questions to proceed. What is your phone number?
I CAN'T USE ANY SOLICITORS DUE TO THE THREAT I GOT IN JAN * SAYING NO SOLICITOR WILL DO MY CASE, WILL TAKE MY MONEY, WASTE TIME , WILL BE STOPPED BY THE OPPOSITE SOLICITOR IN MY FAMILY MATTER WHO WILL PAY OFF MY SOLICITORS. THIS CAME JUST BEFORE MY EAT APPEAL NO. * HEARING AND I WAS UNWELL.
Case Rating: *
Thank you for sharing your detailed situation. Here’s the final draft of your letter, including your concern about perjury:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to formally request that Appeal No. * be struck out due to significant procedural errors and miscommunication by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). The reasons for this request are as follows:
*. Procedural Errors and Miscommunication:
- The EAT wrongly made me request an extension of time, despite my appeal being submitted within the 42 days of receiving the written reasons.
- The EAT provided a completely new reason for rejecting my ground of appeal, stating it was a case management decision, while disregarding the several reasons given by the Rule *-* hearing judge to allow this ground to proceed.
- The EAT falsely claimed that I did not provide the judgment with my appeal when I had indeed included it.
- The Registrar included a false claim in the refusal to allow an extension of time, stating that my legal representative sent me an email from the wrong email address on * Nov *. This is incorrect, as I have the email from my legal representative from her correct email address.
- I recently discovered a letter from June *, received in late July *, in which the EAT apologised for sending the judgment to the wrong email address of my legal representative.
*. Disability Status:
- In this matter, I have a favorable disability status judgment.
- Additionally, I have audio recordings showing that the respondent has deliberately and continuously deceived both the ET and EAT, claiming they never knew I had a disability, that I never had a disability, and that I never informed them of it. I did inform them, and the audios confirm this.
- Because their case was exposed, the ET struck out my claim and then, for the first time, sent the judgment to the wrong email address.
*. Request for Increased Compensation:
- Over the past five years, the respondent has engaged in falsification and concealment of documents, non-compliance with tribunal orders, and non-disclosure of relevant documents.
- These actions have significantly impacted my case, causing delays and preventing a fair hearing.
- I request that the tribunal considers these factors and adjusts the compensation by *% accordingly.
*. Perjury:
- The respondent committed perjury in the part-heard hearing of January *. The HR representative lied under oath during cross-examination, stating that I never mentioned my disability.
- My legal representative gave her *-* chances to reply and think very carefully, but she repeated her lies.
Given these significant procedural errors and the inability of the EAT to provide a fair hearing, I request that Appeal No. * be struck out to prevent further distress and procedural unfairness.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
If you need further assistance, please let me know!
Thank you. Please can you let me know if its OK TO MAKE the DISHONESTY/PERJURY POINT AND HOW CAN I SHOW TERE IS A LEGAL BASIS AND EVIDENCE FOR THIS?
Case Rating: *
You can certainly make the dishonesty/perjury point, as it is a serious allegation that can significantly impact your case. To support your claim, you should:
*. Gather Evidence:
- Collect all relevant audio recordings, emails, and documents that demonstrate the dishonesty or perjury.
- Include transcripts of audio recordings, highlighting the key parts where the respondent lied.
*. Legal Basis:
- Refer to the Employment Rights Act *, which outlines the legal obligation of honesty in employment tribunals.
- Highlight the potential legal consequences of perjury under the Perjury Act *.
*. Presenting Evidence:
- Clearly outline instances of dishonesty or perjury in your letter.
- Provide a detailed account of the HR representative’s false statements and the opportunities given to correct themselves.
- Attach the supporting evidence (audio transcripts, emails, etc.) to your letter.
Here’s a brief template to incorporate this into your letter:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to formally request that Appeal No. * be struck out due to significant procedural errors, miscommunication, and dishonesty by the respondent. The reasons for this request are as follows:
*. Procedural Errors and Miscommunication:
- [Include points about procedural errors and miscommunication]
*. Disability Status:
- [Include points about your disability status and evidence]
*. Request for Increased Compensation:
- [Include points about falsification and non-compliance]
*. Perjury:
- The respondent committed perjury in the part-heard hearing of January *. The HR representative lied under oath during cross-examination, stating that I never mentioned my disability.
- My legal representative gave her *-* chances to reply and think very carefully, but she repeated her lies.
- I have audio recordings and transcripts that clearly show the respondent’s false statements and their knowledge of my disability.
Given these significant procedural errors, dishonesty, and the inability of the EAT to provide a fair hearing, I request that Appeal No. * be struck out to prevent further distress and procedural unfairness.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
Make sure to attach all relevant evidence to substantiate your claims. If you need further assistance, please let me know!
I NEED TO SHOW A REASONABLE BASIS AND EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT PERJURY & DISHONEST FALSE DEFENCE BY RESPONDENT. THIS IS PART OF MY CHALLENGE TO THE REGISTRARS REFUSAL OF EXTENSION OF TIME BASED ON A FALSE CLAIM (TO WHICH I HAVE STILL NOT HAD A REPLY FROM THE EAT ABOUT WHERE THE REGISTRAR GT THIS FALSE CLAIM FROM) AND THAT MY MEDICAL EVIDENCE DOES ONLY SHOWS * DEC AND NOT IF I WAS UNWELL IN WHOLE OF DEC. Also, i don't agree to registrars COMMENT THAT THE MERITS OF MY APPEAL ARE IRRELEVANT IN DECIDING TO GIVE EXTENSION OF TIME. I NEED TO PROVIDE A LIST OF ALL THE ADDITIONAL ERRORS THE ET MADE IN THE *-DAY FINAL HEARING IN MAY * & IN THE * MONTHS PRIOR TO THE HEARING & IN THE PART HEARD HEARING IN JAN *. THEN TO MAKE IT WORSE THE ET SENT THE WRITTEN REASONS TO THE WRONG EMAIL OF MY LEGAL REP FOR THE FIRST TIME.WHAT DO YOU THINK?
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you have a complex and strong case due to multiple errors, miscommunications, dishonesty, and procedural unfairness. Here's how you can address all these points in your detailed letter:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to formally request that Appeal No. * be struck out due to significant procedural errors, miscommunication, and dishonesty by the respondent. The reasons for this request are as follows:
*. Procedural Errors and Miscommunication:
- The EAT wrongly made me request an extension of time, despite my appeal being submitted within the 42 days of receiving the written reasons.
- The EAT provided a completely new reason for rejecting my ground of appeal, stating it was a case management decision, while disregarding the several reasons given by the Rule *-* hearing judge to allow this ground to proceed.
- The EAT falsely claimed that I did not provide the judgment with my appeal when I had indeed included it.
- The Registrar included a false claim in the refusal to allow an extension of time, stating that my legal representative sent me an email from the wrong email address on * Nov *. This is incorrect, as I have the email from my legal representative from her correct email address.
- I recently discovered a letter from June *, received in late July *, in which the EAT apologised for sending the judgment to the wrong email address of my legal representative.
*. Disability Status:
- In this matter, I have a favorable disability status judgment.
- Additionally, I have audio recordings showing that the respondent has deliberately and continuously deceived both the ET and EAT, claiming they never knew I had a disability, that I never had a disability, and that I never informed them of it. I did inform them, and the audios confirm this.
- Because their case was exposed, the ET struck out my claim and then, for the first time, sent the judgment to the wrong email address.
*. Request for Increased Compensation:
- Over the past five years, the respondent has engaged in falsification and concealment of documents, non-compliance with tribunal orders, and non-disclosure of relevant documents.
- These actions have significantly impacted my case, causing delays and preventing a fair hearing.
- I request that the tribunal considers these factors and adjusts the compensation by *% accordingly.
*. Perjury:
- The respondent committed perjury in the part-heard hearing of January *. The HR representative lied under oath during cross-examination, stating that I never mentioned my disability.
- My legal representative gave her *-* chances to reply and think very carefully, but she repeated her lies.
- I have audio recordings and transcripts that clearly show the respondent’s false statements and their knowledge of my disability.
*. Registrar's Refusal of Extension of Time:
- The Registrar's refusal of extension of time was based on a false claim, which I have asked the EAT to investigate.
- My medical evidence shows I was unwell on * Dec, but it does not cover the whole month of Dec, which is being unfairly used against me.
- The Registrar’s comment that the merits of my appeal are irrelevant in deciding to give an extension of time is not acceptable.
*. Additional Errors by ET:
- The ET made several errors in the *-day final hearing in May *, the 2 months prior to the hearing, and the part-heard hearing in January *.
- The ET sent the written reasons to the wrong email address of my legal representative for the first time, causing further delays and complications.
Given these significant procedural errors, dishonesty, and the inability of the EAT to provide a fair hearing, I request that Appeal No. * be struck out to prevent further distress and procedural unfairness.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, I'll need to ask you a few mandatory questions to proceed. What is your phone number?
AS THE EAT HAVE TOLD ME TO FILL ANNEX * FORM AND PUT MY CHALLENGE TO REGISTRARS DECISION IN THIS FORM - I WILL DO THIS, EVEN THOUGH THIS IS ANOTHER PROCEDURAL ERROR BY THE EAT. AT THE SAME RIME I WILL ASK FOR A STRIKE OUT IN A SEPARATE SUBMISSION - WHAT DO YOU THINK?
Case Rating: *
That sounds like a good plan. Challenging the Registrar's decision and requesting a strike-out in separate submissions can help ensure that each issue is addressed thoroughly. Here’s a brief template for your strike-out request:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to formally request that Appeal No. * be struck out due to significant procedural errors, miscommunication, and dishonesty by the respondent. The reasons for this request are as follows:
*. Procedural Errors and Miscommunication:
- The EAT wrongly made me request an extension of time, despite my appeal being submitted within the 42 days of receiving the written reasons.
- The EAT provided a completely new reason for rejecting my ground of appeal, stating it was a case management decision, while disregarding the several reasons given by the Rule *-* hearing judge to allow this ground to proceed.
- The EAT falsely claimed that I did not provide the judgment with my appeal when I had indeed included it.
- The Registrar included a false claim in the refusal to allow an extension of time, stating that my legal representative sent me an email from the wrong email address on * Nov *. This is incorrect, as I have the email from my legal representative from her correct email address.
- I recently discovered a letter from June *, received in late July *, in which the EAT apologised for sending the judgment to the wrong email address of my legal representative.
*. Disability Status:
- In this matter, I have a favorable disability status judgment.
- Additionally, I have audio recordings showing that the respondent has deliberately and continuously deceived both the ET and EAT, claiming they never knew I had a disability, that I never had a disability, and that I never informed them of it. I did inform them, and the audios confirm this.
- Because their case was exposed, the ET struck out my claim and then, for the first time, sent the judgment to the wrong email address.
*. Request for Increased Compensation:
- Over the past five years, the respondent has engaged in falsification and concealment of documents, non-compliance with tribunal orders, and non-disclosure of relevant documents.
- These actions have significantly impacted my case, causing delays and preventing a fair hearing.
- I request that the tribunal considers these factors and adjusts the compensation by *% accordingly.
*. Perjury:
- The respondent committed perjury in the part-heard hearing of January *. The HR representative lied under oath during cross-examination, stating that I never mentioned my disability.
- My legal representative gave her *-* chances to reply and think very carefully, but she repeated her lies.
*. Registrar's Refusal of Extension of Time:
- The Registrar's refusal of extension of time was based on a false claim, which I have asked the EAT to investigate.
- My medical evidence shows I was unwell on * Dec, but it does not cover the whole month of Dec, which is being unfairly used against me.
- The Registrar’s comment that the merits of my appeal are irrelevant in deciding to give an extension of time is not acceptable.
*. Additional Errors by ET:
- The ET made several errors in the *-day final hearing in May *, the 2 months prior to the hearing, and the part-heard hearing in January *.
- The ET sent the written reasons to the wrong email address of my legal representative for the first time, causing further delays and complications.
Given these significant procedural errors, dishonesty, and the inability of the EAT to provide a fair hearing, I request that Appeal No. * be struck out to prevent further distress and procedural unfairness.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
If you need further assistance, feel free to ask!
IN MY CHALLENGETO THE REGISTRARS REFUSAL OF EXTENSION OF TIME, SHOULD I DEAL WITH THE MERITS OF MY APPEAL BY BRIEFLU LISTING THE PRPCEDURAL ERRORS BY ET - IE MY GROUNDS OF APPEAL?
Case Rating: *
Yes, in your challenge to the Registrar's refusal of an extension of time, it is important to briefly list the procedural errors made by the Employment Tribunal (ET) as part of your grounds of appeal. This will help demonstrate the merits of your appeal and support your request for an extension.
Here’s a concise template for your challenge:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Appeal Tribunal
[Tribunal's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to challenge the Registrar's refusal of an extension of time for my appeal. I believe the merits of my appeal should be considered in this decision. Below are the key procedural errors made by the Employment Tribunal (ET):
*. Incorrect Email Address: The ET sent the written reasons to the wrong email address of my legal representative, causing significant delays.
*. Disability Status: The ET failed to acknowledge a favorable disability status judgment in a related matter, leading to inconsistent handling of my case.
*. Non-Disclosure and Non-Compliance: The respondent engaged in non-disclosure of relevant documents and non-compliance with tribunal orders, impacting the fairness of the hearing.
*. Perjury: The respondent committed perjury during the part-heard hearing in January *, which was not addressed appropriately by the ET.
*. Procedural Errors in Hearings: The ET made several errors during the *-day final hearing in May * and the part-heard hearing in January *, which affected the outcome of my case.
Given these significant procedural errors and the merits of my appeal, I request that the extension of time be granted to ensure a fair and just hearing.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to modify the letter as needed and include any additional details or evidence to support your claims. If you need further assistance, please let me know!
WHY DID THE REFISTRAR SAY THE MERITS OF MY APPEAL/CASE ARE NOT RELEVANT TO THE DECISION OF ASKING FOR EXTENSION OF TIME?
Case Rating: *
The Registrar may have stated that the merits of your appeal/case are not relevant to the decision of asking for an extension of time because the focus, at that stage, is on whether there is a valid reason for the delay in filing the appeal rather than the strength or merits of the case itself. In procedural matters such as extensions of time, the tribunal typically considers factors like:
- The length of the delay.
- The reasons for the delay.
- Whether there is any prejudice to the other party.
- Whether the applicant has acted promptly once aware of the need to apply for an extension.
However, if you believe that the merits of your case are crucial to understanding the context of the delay, it is important to present this argument clearly in your challenge.
Would you like to connect with local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, I will need to ask you a few mandatory questions to proceed.
YES, I
Case Rating: *
It seems like you have a very strong case with significant procedural errors and misconduct. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, I'll need to ask you a few mandatory questions to proceed.
What is your phone number?
NO, PLEASE IGNOREMY LAST MESSAGE. I MEANTTO SAY THE MERITS OF MY CASE/APPEAL ARE IMPORTANT IN UNDERSTANDING THE CONTEXT OF THE DELAY / AND/OR THE ET SENDING THE REASONS TO THE WRONG EMAIL OFMY LEGAL RE. IT WAS A TACTIC TO STOP/BLOCK MY APPEAL AND HIDE THE HUGE ERRORS MADE BY ET WITH THIS RESPONDENT AND RESPONDENT OF APPEAL * THAT WAS ALLOWED PERMISSION TO APPEAL AT C OF APPEAL.
Case Rating: *
Given the complexity and the multiple procedural errors, it is important to emphasize the merits of your case and how they relate to the delays caused by the ET. Here’s how you can address this in your challenge:
Template for Challenging the Registrar's Decision
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Appeal Tribunal
[Tribunal's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to challenge the Registrar's refusal of an extension of time for my appeal. The merits of my appeal are crucial in understanding the context of the delay and the procedural errors made by the Employment Tribunal (ET). Below are the key points:
*. Incorrect Email Address: The ET sent the written reasons to the wrong email address of my legal representative, causing significant delays. This mistake obstructed my ability to file the appeal on time.
*. Merits of My Appeal: The errors made by the ET include:
- Disability Status: The ET failed to acknowledge a favorable disability status judgment in a related matter, leading to inconsistent handling of my case.
- Non-Disclosure and Non-Compliance: The respondent engaged in non-disclosure of relevant documents and non-compliance with tribunal orders, impacting the fairness of the hearing.
- Perjury: The respondent committed perjury during the part-heard hearing in January *, which was not addressed appropriately by the ET.
- Procedural Errors in Hearings: The ET made several errors during the *-day final hearing in May * and the part-heard hearing in January *, affecting the outcome of my case.
*. Intentional Obstruction: The ET’s actions appear to be a tactic to block my appeal and hide the significant errors made in handling my case.
Given these significant procedural errors and the merits of my appeal, I request that the extension of time be granted to ensure a fair and just hearing.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to modify the letter as needed and include any additional details or evidence to support your claims. If you need further assistance, please let me know!