Summary
Drafting a skeleton argument for an Employment Tribunal case involves outlining key points and evidence for claims of racial discrimination, victimization, and harassment. Include an introduction, factual background, legal framework, application to facts, and conclusion. Reference relevant laws like the Equality Act 2010 and case law such as Essop v Home Office and Richmond Pharmacology v Dhaliwal. Tailor the argument to your specific situation, ensuring alignment of legal principles with case facts. Consider consulting a local attorney for personalized guidance.Full Conversation
Can you write a legal skeleton argument for me for the employment Tribunal case racial discrimination victimization and harassment
Hi ****! Drafting a skeleton argument involves outlining the key points and evidence you intend to present in your Tribunal case. Here's a general structure you might consider:
*. Introduction:
- Brief overview of the case.
- State the claims: racial discrimination, victimization, and harassment.
*. Factual Background:
- Outline relevant facts chronologically.
- Detail incidents of discrimination, victimization, and harassment.
*. Legal Framework:
- Reference relevant laws:
- Equality Act * (covers discrimination and harassment).
- Specific sections related to your claims.
*. Application to Facts:
- Apply the legal framework to your case.
- Highlight evidence supporting each claim.
*. Conclusion:
- Summarize key points.
- State the relief sought (e.g., compensation, corrective actions).
Make sure to tailor it to your specific situation and include any evidence or documents you have.
Drive to legal skeletal argument for an employment Tribunal case providing relevant case law
Hi ****! For a skeleton argument in an Employment Tribunal case, particularly for claims involving racial discrimination, victimisation, and harassment, consider including the following case law references:
*. Equality Act *:
- Section *: Direct Discrimination
- Section *: Harassment
- Section *: Victimisation
*. Relevant Case Law:
- Essop v Home Office [*] UKSC *: Discusses the burden of proof in discrimination cases.
- Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Shaw [*] EWCA Civ *: Addresses victimisation claims.
- Richmond Pharmacology v Dhaliwal [*] UKEAT 0458_08_0704: Explores harassment and its impact on the workplace.
Ensure that your argument logically aligns these legal principles with the facts of your case. If you need further assistance, feel free to ask!
Please help me draw the skeletal argument using the witness statement attached
Case Rating: *
Here’s a skeletal argument outline based on the witness statement for your Employment Tribunal case involving racial discrimination, victimization, and harassment:
*. Introduction:
- Briefly introduce the Claimant, Miss Mina Epelle, and the nature of the claims against NHS North East London.
- State the claims: racial discrimination, victimization, and harassment.
*. Factual Background:
- Explain the employment history at NHS NEL CCG and previous roles.
- Detail specific incidents of alleged racial discrimination, victimization, and harassment, including the grievance process and the lack of an EDI policy.
- Reference the lack of investigation into the racist graffiti incident and the impact on the Claimant's health.
*. Legal Framework:
- Cite relevant sections of the Equality Act *:
- Section *: Direct Discrimination
- Section *: Harassment
- Section *: Victimization
- Mention any relevant case law that supports the claims.
*. Application to Facts:
- Apply the legal framework to the facts of the case.
- Highlight supporting evidence from the witness statement regarding each claim.
- Address the issues of non-disclosed documents and discrepancies in document disclosure.
*. Conclusion:
- Summarize the key arguments and evidence.
- State the relief sought, such as compensation and corrective actions.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?