TRY ME!
Employment Tribunal Document Removal
Summary
Brief Summary: If you believe irrelevant documents are included in your employment tribunal bundle, you can request their removal by applying to the tribunal. Clearly identify and explain why these documents are not pertinent. For workplace safety concerns, demonstrate serious and imminent danger, inability to avert danger, and proportionate response under section 100 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Consider citing Health and Safety Executive guidelines if applicable.Full Conversation
the risk assessment was not followed and the action needed to make to lower the risk was not done
It sounds like you might have a case related to workplace safety and negligence. Here are a few steps you might consider:
- Gather evidence showing the risk assessment was not followed.
- Document any incidents or injuries that occurred due to the lack of action.
- Review your company's health and safety policies.
Do you have any specific questions or need more details on any of these steps?
- Gather evidence showing the risk assessment was not followed.
- Document any incidents or injuries that occurred due to the lack of action.
- Review your company's health and safety policies.
Do you have any specific questions or need more details on any of these steps?
if the bundle for emploment tribunal as documents that are not relvent to the case how would i get the removed
You can request the removal of irrelevant documents from the bundle by making an application to the Employment Tribunal. Here are the steps:
- Identify the irrelevant documents: Clearly list the documents you believe are not relevant.
- Draft a letter: Write to the tribunal explaining why these documents should be removed.
- Submit the letter: Send it to the tribunal and copy the other party.
Have you already identified the irrelevant documents in your bundle?
- Identify the irrelevant documents: Clearly list the documents you believe are not relevant.
- Draft a letter: Write to the tribunal explaining why these documents should be removed.
- Submit the letter: Send it to the tribunal and copy the other party.
Have you already identified the irrelevant documents in your bundle?
yes
Case Rating: *
It seems like your case involves workplace safety and potential negligence, which can be significant. Since you have already identified the irrelevant documents in your bundle, the next step would be to draft a letter to the Employment Tribunal.
Would you like any assistance with drafting this letter or have any other questions?
It seems like your case involves workplace safety and potential negligence, which can be significant. Since you have already identified the irrelevant documents in your bundle, the next step would be to draft a letter to the Employment Tribunal.
Would you like any assistance with drafting this letter or have any other questions?
yes please can you help with draftign a letter
Case Rating: *
Sure, I can help you draft a letter to the Employment Tribunal requesting the removal of irrelevant documents from your bundle. Here’s a suggested template:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to request the removal of certain irrelevant documents from the bundle submitted for my employment tribunal case. I have identified the following documents that I believe are not pertinent to the issues at hand:
*. [Document * Description]
*. [Document * Description]
*. [Document * Description]
The inclusion of these documents does not contribute to the resolution of the matters being addressed and may cause unnecessary complications and delays in the proceedings. Therefore, I request that these documents be removed from the bundle.
Please find attached a detailed explanation for each document's irrelevance.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
Make sure to include specific details about each document and your reasoning for their removal. If you need further assistance, feel free to ask!
Sure, I can help you draft a letter to the Employment Tribunal requesting the removal of irrelevant documents from your bundle. Here’s a suggested template:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to request the removal of certain irrelevant documents from the bundle submitted for my employment tribunal case. I have identified the following documents that I believe are not pertinent to the issues at hand:
*. [Document * Description]
*. [Document * Description]
*. [Document * Description]
The inclusion of these documents does not contribute to the resolution of the matters being addressed and may cause unnecessary complications and delays in the proceedings. Therefore, I request that these documents be removed from the bundle.
Please find attached a detailed explanation for each document's irrelevance.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
Make sure to include specific details about each document and your reasoning for their removal. If you need further assistance, feel free to ask!
there is around * pages to be taken out this included a lot of policy documents that do not relate to the case
Case Rating: *
You should list out the specific policy documents and any other pages you want removed in your letter. Make sure to explain why each document is irrelevant to your case. This level of detail will help the tribunal understand your request. Do you need help with anything else related to your case?
You should list out the specific policy documents and any other pages you want removed in your letter. Make sure to explain why each document is irrelevant to your case. This level of detail will help the tribunal understand your request. Do you need help with anything else related to your case?
is there any part of rules for the employment court that this would fall into
Case Rating: *
To address your situation, you might find useful information in the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure. Specific rules that may be relevant include:
- Rule *: Case management orders, including the removal of irrelevant documents.
- Rule *: Power to regulate procedure and evidence during hearings.
Would you like more details on these rules or any other aspect of your case?
To address your situation, you might find useful information in the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure. Specific rules that may be relevant include:
- Rule *: Case management orders, including the removal of irrelevant documents.
- Rule *: Power to regulate procedure and evidence during hearings.
Would you like more details on these rules or any other aspect of your case?
can you add the rules * to the letter
Case Rating: *
Sure, here's the updated draft of your letter including Rule *:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to request the removal of certain irrelevant documents from the bundle submitted for my employment tribunal case. I have identified the following documents that I believe are not pertinent to the issues at hand:
*. [Document * Description]
*. [Document * Description]
*. [Document * Description]
The inclusion of these documents does not contribute to the resolution of the matters being addressed and may cause unnecessary complications and delays in the proceedings. Therefore, I request that these documents be removed from the bundle.
According to Rule * of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure, the Tribunal has the power to make case management orders, including the removal of irrelevant documents. Please find attached a detailed explanation for each document's irrelevance.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
If you need more details or have any other questions, feel free to ask!
Sure, here's the updated draft of your letter including Rule *:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Case Number [Your Case Number]
I am writing to request the removal of certain irrelevant documents from the bundle submitted for my employment tribunal case. I have identified the following documents that I believe are not pertinent to the issues at hand:
*. [Document * Description]
*. [Document * Description]
*. [Document * Description]
The inclusion of these documents does not contribute to the resolution of the matters being addressed and may cause unnecessary complications and delays in the proceedings. Therefore, I request that these documents be removed from the bundle.
According to Rule * of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure, the Tribunal has the power to make case management orders, including the removal of irrelevant documents. Please find attached a detailed explanation for each document's irrelevance.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
If you need more details or have any other questions, feel free to ask!
if all the policy do not hace any effect would i need to explain each one or can i add this as one wexplaination
Case Rating: *
You should briefly explain why each policy document is irrelevant. However, if many documents fall under the same category (e.g., general policies not related to your case), you can group them together in your explanation.
Would you like help refining your letter further?
You should briefly explain why each policy document is irrelevant. However, if many documents fall under the same category (e.g., general policies not related to your case), you can group them together in your explanation.
Would you like help refining your letter further?
if there is a big section of documents can i just put the index number or would i have to list them all
Case Rating: *
You can group documents under a common category and refer to them collectively in your letter. For instance, you could state, "Documents listed under index numbers [X-Y] are general policies unrelated to my case." Just ensure your explanation is clear and concise.
Do you need any additional help with your letter?
You can group documents under a common category and refer to them collectively in your letter. For instance, you could state, "Documents listed under index numbers [X-Y] are general policies unrelated to my case." Just ensure your explanation is clear and concise.
Do you need any additional help with your letter?
You have not explained what the circumstances of danger were, why these were both serious and
imminent (and not simply a mere suggestion that harm could arise), why you could not have
reasonable averted such danger and what appropriate steps it is claimed that you are relying upon.
Case Rating: *
It looks like you're dealing with a complicated employment tribunal case involving workplace safety and negligence. Your questions are quite detailed and important.
To address your latest concern:
- Circumstances of Danger: Clearly describe the specific dangers in the workplace (e.g., faulty machinery, hazardous materials).
- Serious and Imminent: Explain why these dangers posed a serious and immediate threat (e.g., high risk of injury, previous incidents).
- Reasonable Prevention: State why it was not possible to reasonably avert these dangers (e.g., lack of proper equipment, insufficient training).
- Appropriate Steps: List the steps you took or requested to mitigate these dangers (e.g., reporting to supervisors, following safety protocols).
Would you like assistance drafting a response or need more details on any of these points?
It looks like you're dealing with a complicated employment tribunal case involving workplace safety and negligence. Your questions are quite detailed and important.
To address your latest concern:
- Circumstances of Danger: Clearly describe the specific dangers in the workplace (e.g., faulty machinery, hazardous materials).
- Serious and Imminent: Explain why these dangers posed a serious and immediate threat (e.g., high risk of injury, previous incidents).
- Reasonable Prevention: State why it was not possible to reasonably avert these dangers (e.g., lack of proper equipment, insufficient training).
- Appropriate Steps: List the steps you took or requested to mitigate these dangers (e.g., reporting to supervisors, following safety protocols).
Would you like assistance drafting a response or need more details on any of these points?
is this true.. Simply put here – your claim does not meet the necessary requirements for protection under s.*
Employment Rights Act *. You were not dismissed for discussing health and safety with Steven
Campbell many months earlier and so it is not reasonable to suggest that this was a reason for your
termination. The legislation does not protect an employee from simply refusing a task unless the
strict requirements of s.* Employment Rights Act * are met.
Case Rating: *
It sounds like your case revolves around workplace safety and your rights under the Employment Rights Act *. To help you better, could you provide more details on the circumstances of the danger you faced and why you believe your dismissal was related to your health and safety concerns?
It sounds like your case revolves around workplace safety and your rights under the Employment Rights Act *. To help you better, could you provide more details on the circumstances of the danger you faced and why you believe your dismissal was related to your health and safety concerns?
i was dissmissed for refusing a resonble request from my manager due to my healkth and saftey concerns. which were the emgerncy plan is to call *, the risk assessment was not being followed
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you have significant grounds to pursue this matter, given the potential health and safety concerns and non-compliance with risk assessments. Here are some additional points that might help:
- Circumstances of Danger: Explain the specific health and safety risks you identified.
- Serious and Imminent Danger: Describe why these risks were serious and immediate.
- Reasonable Prevention: Outline why you couldn't reasonably avoid the danger.
- Steps Taken: Detail any steps you took to address these concerns.
Would you need further assistance with drafting your responses or any other part of your case?
It sounds like you have significant grounds to pursue this matter, given the potential health and safety concerns and non-compliance with risk assessments. Here are some additional points that might help:
- Circumstances of Danger: Explain the specific health and safety risks you identified.
- Serious and Imminent Danger: Describe why these risks were serious and immediate.
- Reasonable Prevention: Outline why you couldn't reasonably avoid the danger.
- Steps Taken: Detail any steps you took to address these concerns.
Would you need further assistance with drafting your responses or any other part of your case?
this involded going into a confined spaces
Case Rating: *
It seems like you have a significant case regarding workplace safety and your dismissal due to health and safety concerns. Your situation involves serious and immediate dangers related to confined spaces.
To strengthen your case, you should:
- Clearly detail the risks associated with confined spaces.
- Explain why these risks posed a serious and immediate danger.
- Describe why it was not possible to reasonably avoid these dangers.
- State the steps you took to address these concerns.
Would you like more detailed assistance on any of these points or help with drafting a specific response?
It seems like you have a significant case regarding workplace safety and your dismissal due to health and safety concerns. Your situation involves serious and immediate dangers related to confined spaces.
To strengthen your case, you should:
- Clearly detail the risks associated with confined spaces.
- Explain why these risks posed a serious and immediate danger.
- Describe why it was not possible to reasonably avoid these dangers.
- State the steps you took to address these concerns.
Would you like more detailed assistance on any of these points or help with drafting a specific response?
and cleaning
Case Rating: *
It seems like you have a compelling case regarding workplace safety and wrongful dismissal. Here's a concise summary of the points you need to cover in your response:
- Detail the risks: Explain the dangers of entering confined spaces.
- Serious and immediate danger: Show why these risks were urgent and severe.
- Reasonable prevention: State why avoiding the danger wasn't possible.
- Steps taken: Describe the actions you took to mitigate the risks.
Would you like further assistance on drafting your response or any other aspect of your case?
It seems like you have a compelling case regarding workplace safety and wrongful dismissal. Here's a concise summary of the points you need to cover in your response:
- Detail the risks: Explain the dangers of entering confined spaces.
- Serious and immediate danger: Show why these risks were urgent and severe.
- Reasonable prevention: State why avoiding the danger wasn't possible.
- Steps taken: Describe the actions you took to mitigate the risks.
Would you like further assistance on drafting your response or any other aspect of your case?
he fact that the risk assessment was not conducted until *-3 months after you began working on the machine, and that no gas readings were taken, which is a breach of the risk assessment requirements. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) guidelines support my position that relying solely on calling * is inadequate for an emergency plan.
Case Rating: *
It appears you have a strong case regarding workplace safety and potential wrongful dismissal. The fact that the risk assessment was delayed and no gas readings were taken indicates a breach of safety regulations. Here are some key points to include in your argument:
- Risk Assessment Delay: Mention that the risk assessment was not conducted until *-3 months after starting work on the machine.
- Lack of Gas Readings: Emphasize that no gas readings were taken, breaching risk assessment requirements.
- HSE Guidelines: Cite Health and Safety Executive (HSE) guidelines, which state that relying solely on calling * is inadequate for an emergency plan.
Would you like assistance with drafting a detailed response or any other part of your case?
It appears you have a strong case regarding workplace safety and potential wrongful dismissal. The fact that the risk assessment was delayed and no gas readings were taken indicates a breach of safety regulations. Here are some key points to include in your argument:
- Risk Assessment Delay: Mention that the risk assessment was not conducted until *-3 months after starting work on the machine.
- Lack of Gas Readings: Emphasize that no gas readings were taken, breaching risk assessment requirements.
- HSE Guidelines: Cite Health and Safety Executive (HSE) guidelines, which state that relying solely on calling * is inadequate for an emergency plan.
Would you like assistance with drafting a detailed response or any other part of your case?
is this true - Simply put here – your claim does not meet the necessary requirements for protection under s.*
Employment Rights Act *. You were not dismissed for discussing health and safety with Steven
Campbell many months earlier and so it is not reasonable to suggest that this was a reason for your
termination. The legislation does not protect an employee from simply refusing a task unless the
strict requirements of s.* Employment Rights Act * are met.
Case Rating: *
Your situation is complex and revolves around the strict requirements of section * of the Employment Rights Act *. To meet these requirements, you must show:
- The danger was serious and imminent.
- You could not reasonably avert the danger.
- Your refusal was a proportionate response to the danger.
Would you like more information on how to demonstrate these points in your case?
Your situation is complex and revolves around the strict requirements of section * of the Employment Rights Act *. To meet these requirements, you must show:
- The danger was serious and imminent.
- You could not reasonably avert the danger.
- Your refusal was a proportionate response to the danger.
Would you like more information on how to demonstrate these points in your case?
yes please
Case Rating: *
Sure, here are some details to help demonstrate the points required under section * of the Employment Rights Act *:
- Serious and Imminent Danger: Clearly describe the specific health and safety risks you identified, such as the confined spaces and lack of gas readings.
- Reasonable Prevention: Explain why it was not possible to reasonably avoid the danger, such as inadequate safety measures and delayed risk assessments.
- Proportionate Response: Detail why your refusal to perform the task was a proportionate response, emphasizing your health and safety concerns.
Would you like more assistance on any specific point?
Sure, here are some details to help demonstrate the points required under section * of the Employment Rights Act *:
- Serious and Imminent Danger: Clearly describe the specific health and safety risks you identified, such as the confined spaces and lack of gas readings.
- Reasonable Prevention: Explain why it was not possible to reasonably avoid the danger, such as inadequate safety measures and delayed risk assessments.
- Proportionate Response: Detail why your refusal to perform the task was a proportionate response, emphasizing your health and safety concerns.
Would you like more assistance on any specific point?
Start a new chat