Change Negotiations In Finland

Summary

In Finland, change negotiations are governed by the Act on Cooperation within Undertakings. Employers must inform employees about changes, aim for mutual agreement, and allow employee representation. The Supreme Court case KKO 2010:54 emphasizes the need for transparent communication and justification in role changes or relocations. Understanding the Collective Agreement and documenting communication are crucial steps. Consider having a union representative or legal advisor present during negotiations.

Full Conversation

Employer admitted that the responsibilities are assigned to other employees and my role will be moved to manila due to cost efficiency.
It sounds like your employer is initiating change negotiations under Finnish law. Here are some key points to consider during "muutosneuvottelut":
- Information Requirement: The employer must provide clear reasons and impacts of the changes.
- Negotiation Aim: The goal is to reach a mutual agreement regarding the changes.
- Employee Representation: You can have representatives in these negotiations to support your interests.
Would you like advice on how to prepare for these negotiations or explore your legal rights further?
Yes
In preparing for "muutosneuvottelut," consider the following:
- Review the Collective Agreement: Understand provisions related to role changes or relocations.
- Gather Information: Request detailed reasons for the change and its impact on your role.
- Consider Representation: Have a union representative or legal advisor present.
- Document Communication: Keep records of all discussions and proposals.
Would you like to explore potential compensation or severance options?
what is KKO *:*
Case Rating: *
KKO *:* refers to a decision by the Supreme Court of Finland (Korkein oikeus, KKO) concerning employment law and the interpretation of Finnish legislation related to employment rights and employer obligations. Specifically, this case involves the interpretation of the Act on Cooperation within Undertakings and how it applies to change negotiations, especially concerning employee roles and relocations.
Here are some key points from the case:
- The Supreme Court clarified the extent to which employers must justify role changes or relocations.
- It examined the balance between employer interests and employee rights in change negotiations.
- The decision emphasized the importance of transparent communication and justification during such negotiations.
If you need further insights into how this decision might affect your situation, feel free to ask!