TRY ME!
Employment Tribunal Case Strategy
Summary
You are dealing with a complex employment tribunal case involving claims of manipulation and unreasonable behavior by the respondent. Highlight the respondents lack of engagement and unreasonable behavior in your costs warning letter and request to strike out the case. Document any evidence of manipulation or procedural errors, and consider addressing these formally in your submissions. If you suspect undue influence, gather supporting evidence and explore legal avenues for addressing it. If you face challenges with legal representation, consider reaching out to legal aid services or advocacy groups for support.Full Conversation
employment matter. I NEED TO SEND A COSTS WARNING LETTER TO THE EMPLOYER/RESP AND TO ET TO EITHER STRIKE OUT THE MATTER OR ANYTHING ELSE. THIS CASE NEEDES TO CEASE IMMED AS ITS BEEN DRAGGED SINCE * AND BEEN TO EAT, C OF APPEAL AND REMITTED BACK TO ET - VERY BAD SYSTEM - TJHE RESP MISLED ET, EAT AND IN C OF APPEAL THEY REALLY MESSED UP AND LORD JUSTICE HAD TO APOLOGISE. IT IS A DISAB DISC CASE. THE OTHER COMPELLING EVID I HAV IS A FAVOURABLE JUDGMENT FROM ANOTHER ET SAYING I WAS DISABLED IN THAT MATTER AND WHILE I WAS EMPLOYED WITH RESP IN THIS MATTER - THAT WENT TO C OF APPEAL.
It sounds like you're dealing with a challenging employment tribunal situation. In such cases, it's important to draft a strong costs warning letter. Here are a few key points you might consider including:
- Clearly state the reasons for seeking costs, such as unreasonable behavior or dishonesty by the respondent.
- Reference specific instances where the respondent failed to comply with tribunal directions.
- Highlight any favorable judgments that support your case.
- Mention any offers made that were unreasonably rejected by the respondent.
If you need more specific guidance or template letters, consulting with a legal professional experienced in employment tribunals can be beneficial. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can assist with your case?
- Clearly state the reasons for seeking costs, such as unreasonable behavior or dishonesty by the respondent.
- Reference specific instances where the respondent failed to comply with tribunal directions.
- Highlight any favorable judgments that support your case.
- Mention any offers made that were unreasonably rejected by the respondent.
If you need more specific guidance or template letters, consulting with a legal professional experienced in employment tribunals can be beneficial. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can assist with your case?
NO, PLEASE CAN YOU DRAFT THE LETTER. I SENT THE FAVOURABLE JUDGEM TO THE RESP IN SEPT * BUT THEY SAID ITS NOT RELEVANT. BUT ALL EVID THE JUDGE RELIED ON IS THE SAME AS WHAT I HAVE NOW. I ALSO NEED A LETTE FOR ET RE. THIS.
Drafting a letter for a legal matter requires precise language and understanding of the full context. Here’s a general framework to help you draft your costs warning letter for both the employer/respondent and the Employment Tribunal:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email]
[Date]
[Employer/Respondent Name]
[Employer/Respondent Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear [Employer/Respondent Name],
Re: Costs Warning
I am writing to formally notify you of my intention to seek costs in relation to the ongoing employment tribunal proceedings. This decision is based on the following grounds:
- Unreasonable Behavior: Instances where you have unreasonably failed to comply with tribunal directions, causing unnecessary delays and obstructing the proceedings.
- Dishonesty: Misleading the Employment Tribunal, Employment Appeal Tribunal, and the Court of Appeal, as acknowledged by [specific reference, such as Lord Justice's apology].
- Evidence of Disability: Despite your claim, a favorable judgment from a previous Employment Tribunal has confirmed my disability status during the relevant employment period.
- Rejected Offer: My reasonable offer made prior to the hearing on * May * regarding my disability status was unreasonably rejected.
This matter has been excessively prolonged since *, and I believe your actions have contributed significantly to this delay. I urge you to reconsider your stance and resolve this matter efficiently.
Please be aware that I will submit a similar request to the Employment Tribunal to strike out the case based on the above points.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal Name]
[Tribunal Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Tribunal Members,
Re: Request to Strike Out Case
I am writing to formally request that the current employment tribunal case be struck out based on the following grounds:
- Unreasonable Behavior: The respondent has repeatedly failed to comply with tribunal directions, causing unnecessary delays.
- Dishonesty: Instances of misleading the tribunal and other courts, as noted during appeals.
- Disability Evidence: A previous tribunal ruling confirmed my disability status during the relevant employment period, which the respondent continues to contest without valid grounds.
Given the prolonged nature of this case, I request the tribunal to consider my application to strike out the respondent’s case due to their unreasonable and obstructive behavior.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
These templates should be adapted to fit your specific situation and details. If you need further legal advice, consulting a solicitor may be beneficial.
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email]
[Date]
[Employer/Respondent Name]
[Employer/Respondent Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear [Employer/Respondent Name],
Re: Costs Warning
I am writing to formally notify you of my intention to seek costs in relation to the ongoing employment tribunal proceedings. This decision is based on the following grounds:
- Unreasonable Behavior: Instances where you have unreasonably failed to comply with tribunal directions, causing unnecessary delays and obstructing the proceedings.
- Dishonesty: Misleading the Employment Tribunal, Employment Appeal Tribunal, and the Court of Appeal, as acknowledged by [specific reference, such as Lord Justice's apology].
- Evidence of Disability: Despite your claim, a favorable judgment from a previous Employment Tribunal has confirmed my disability status during the relevant employment period.
- Rejected Offer: My reasonable offer made prior to the hearing on * May * regarding my disability status was unreasonably rejected.
This matter has been excessively prolonged since *, and I believe your actions have contributed significantly to this delay. I urge you to reconsider your stance and resolve this matter efficiently.
Please be aware that I will submit a similar request to the Employment Tribunal to strike out the case based on the above points.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal Name]
[Tribunal Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Tribunal Members,
Re: Request to Strike Out Case
I am writing to formally request that the current employment tribunal case be struck out based on the following grounds:
- Unreasonable Behavior: The respondent has repeatedly failed to comply with tribunal directions, causing unnecessary delays.
- Dishonesty: Instances of misleading the tribunal and other courts, as noted during appeals.
- Disability Evidence: A previous tribunal ruling confirmed my disability status during the relevant employment period, which the respondent continues to contest without valid grounds.
Given the prolonged nature of this case, I request the tribunal to consider my application to strike out the respondent’s case due to their unreasonable and obstructive behavior.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
These templates should be adapted to fit your specific situation and details. If you need further legal advice, consulting a solicitor may be beneficial.
THANK YOU. PLEASE NOTE I WROTE TO RESP AND ET IN MARCH TO MOVE A CLASHED HEARING AND I GOT LETTER FROM ET SAYING THEY HAVE MOVED THE HEARING. BUT ORIORTO THIS THEY CONTACTED THE RESP FOR A RESPLY/RESPONSE - BUT THERE WAS NONE. SO IT LOOKS ASIF THEY ARE NO LONGER ENGAGING IN THIS MATTER. CAN I REFER TO THIS IN MY LETTERS?
Case Rating: *
You can certainly refer to the respondent's lack of engagement in your letters. It can be highlighted as part of their unreasonable behavior. Make sure to include any specific evidence or correspondence that supports this claim to strengthen your case.
You can certainly refer to the respondent's lack of engagement in your letters. It can be highlighted as part of their unreasonable behavior. Make sure to include any specific evidence or correspondence that supports this claim to strengthen your case.
THE ET SENT ME AN EMAIL SAYING THEY HAVE GIVEN RESPONDENT A WEEK TO RESPOND. THERE WAS NO RES AND ET MOVED THEDATE. IS THIS ENOUGH EVID FOR THIS ISSUE?
Case Rating: *
The lack of response from the respondent can be considered as evidence of unreasonable behavior, especially if it resulted in unnecessary delays. Including this information in your letters can strengthen your argument. If you need further assistance, consulting a solicitor for specific advice might be beneficial.
The lack of response from the respondent can be considered as evidence of unreasonable behavior, especially if it resulted in unnecessary delays. Including this information in your letters can strengthen your argument. If you need further assistance, consulting a solicitor for specific advice might be beneficial.
OK.
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you're dealing with a complex employment tribunal matter involving claims of unreasonable behavior and dishonesty. Your efforts to draft a costs warning letter are crucial. If the respondent's lack of engagement led to delays, it's a valid point to include in your letter.
It sounds like you're dealing with a complex employment tribunal matter involving claims of unreasonable behavior and dishonesty. Your efforts to draft a costs warning letter are crucial. If the respondent's lack of engagement led to delays, it's a valid point to include in your letter.
PLSE LET ME KNOW HOW THE RESP NON RESPONSE RESULTED IN DELAYS IN THE ISSUE OF MOVING THE DATE OF THE HEARING?
Case Rating: *
The respondent's non-response may have caused delays in moving the date of the hearing due to the following reasons:
- The Employment Tribunal may require responses from all parties to make informed decisions.
- Lack of timely communication can lead to delays in proceedings and scheduling.
- The Tribunal might have waited for a response before deciding on the date, causing a delay.
If the respondent's lack of engagement is persistent, it can be highlighted as part of their unreasonable behavior in your costs warning letter.
The respondent's non-response may have caused delays in moving the date of the hearing due to the following reasons:
- The Employment Tribunal may require responses from all parties to make informed decisions.
- Lack of timely communication can lead to delays in proceedings and scheduling.
- The Tribunal might have waited for a response before deciding on the date, causing a delay.
If the respondent's lack of engagement is persistent, it can be highlighted as part of their unreasonable behavior in your costs warning letter.
THE RESP SHOULD HAVE AGREED TO CHANGING THE DATE WHEN I WROTE TO ET AND COPIED THE RESPONDENT. MY SUBMISSION WAS VERY STRONG - IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN A STRIKE OUT AS WELL.
Case Rating: *
Given the complexities and the respondent's behavior, it's understandable that you feel the case should be struck out. The lack of response leading to delays can indeed be highlighted as unreasonable behavior. You seem well-prepared, and emphasizing these points in your letters should strengthen your position. If you need further legal assistance, consider consulting a solicitor for tailored advice.
Given the complexities and the respondent's behavior, it's understandable that you feel the case should be struck out. The lack of response leading to delays can indeed be highlighted as unreasonable behavior. You seem well-prepared, and emphasizing these points in your letters should strengthen your position. If you need further legal assistance, consider consulting a solicitor for tailored advice.
its vexatious if it has been brought out of spite or to harass me - this is what they did while i was employed and throughout the proceedings.
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you've faced a challenging situation with vexatious claims during your employment tribunal proceedings. Highlighting the respondent's behavior as unreasonable and vexatious is crucial. If you need further assistance drafting your letter or legal advice, consulting a solicitor might be beneficial for your case.
Have you considered any additional evidence or documentation that could strengthen your argument against the respondent's behavior?
It sounds like you've faced a challenging situation with vexatious claims during your employment tribunal proceedings. Highlighting the respondent's behavior as unreasonable and vexatious is crucial. If you need further assistance drafting your letter or legal advice, consulting a solicitor might be beneficial for your case.
Have you considered any additional evidence or documentation that could strengthen your argument against the respondent's behavior?
it looks as if this resp/et held onto the judment from may * hearing UNTIL EARLY NOV * WHEN IT CAUSED THE MOST DETRIMENT TO ME. THEY KNEW THIS WOULD CLASH WITH MANY DEADLINES, HEARINGS.
Case Rating: *
It seems like you are facing a complex employment tribunal situation involving claims of unreasonable behavior and vexatious actions by the respondent. Holding onto the judgment until a detrimental time can be considered part of their obstructive behavior. Have you considered mentioning this in your letters as evidence of their tactics?
It seems like you are facing a complex employment tribunal situation involving claims of unreasonable behavior and vexatious actions by the respondent. Holding onto the judgment until a detrimental time can be considered part of their obstructive behavior. Have you considered mentioning this in your letters as evidence of their tactics?
FIRST I NEED TO UNDERSTAND WHAT TOOK PLACE AND HOW IS IT POSSIBLE THAT THIS RESP COULD FULLY CONTROL WHEN THE ET JUDGMENT WAS TO BE SENT TO ME. WHAT IS THIS?
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you're dealing with a complex scenario involving possible delays in judgment delivery. In employment tribunals, once a decision is made, the tribunal typically sends it to both parties. If the respondent influenced this process, it may be worth addressing as part of your case for unreasonable behavior.
It sounds like you're dealing with a complex scenario involving possible delays in judgment delivery. In employment tribunals, once a decision is made, the tribunal typically sends it to both parties. If the respondent influenced this process, it may be worth addressing as part of your case for unreasonable behavior.
BUT WHAT PART DOES ET PLAY IN ALL THIS?
Case Rating: *
The Employment Tribunal (ET) plays a crucial role in adjudicating disputes between employees and employers. They are responsible for handling the proceedings, making judgments, and ensuring fair process. If the ET's decision delivery was delayed or influenced by the respondent, it might be worth exploring further as part of your claim. Do you have any evidence or correspondence indicating such influence by the respondent?
The Employment Tribunal (ET) plays a crucial role in adjudicating disputes between employees and employers. They are responsible for handling the proceedings, making judgments, and ensuring fair process. If the ET's decision delivery was delayed or influenced by the respondent, it might be worth exploring further as part of your claim. Do you have any evidence or correspondence indicating such influence by the respondent?
THE RESP HAD PRE PLANNED HOW THEY AND/OR ET WERE GOING TO TIME ALL OF THIS. JUST BECAUSE THE WRONG DECISION MADE BY THIS ET SAYING I WASS NOT DISABLED WAS REBUTTED BY A SUNBSEQU JUGEMENT IN ANOTHER ET IN SEPT * SAYING I WAS DISABLED WHILE I WAS EMPLOYED WITH THIS EMPLOYER AND THE NEXT ONE.
Case Rating: *
It seems you have a complex employment tribunal case involving allegations of unreasonable behavior and manipulation by the respondent. Here are a few points that might be useful:
- Employment Tribunals should operate independently without influence from either party.
- If you suspect manipulation, consider gathering evidence or correspondence that supports this claim.
- Highlight the favorable judgment confirming your disability status in your submissions.
If you need further assistance or feel this situation requires legal representation, consider consulting a solicitor for tailored guidance.
It seems you have a complex employment tribunal case involving allegations of unreasonable behavior and manipulation by the respondent. Here are a few points that might be useful:
- Employment Tribunals should operate independently without influence from either party.
- If you suspect manipulation, consider gathering evidence or correspondence that supports this claim.
- Highlight the favorable judgment confirming your disability status in your submissions.
If you need further assistance or feel this situation requires legal representation, consider consulting a solicitor for tailored guidance.
CAN YOU SHED SOME LIGHT ON - CAN THIS RESPONDENT CONTROL THE ET ACTIONS?
Case Rating: *
In general, respondents should not control Employment Tribunal actions. Tribunals are meant to operate independently, making decisions based on evidence and legal principles. If you suspect any undue influence or manipulation, it may be worth gathering evidence to support your claim and addressing it formally in your submissions. Have you considered reaching out to a legal professional for advice on this matter?
In general, respondents should not control Employment Tribunal actions. Tribunals are meant to operate independently, making decisions based on evidence and legal principles. If you suspect any undue influence or manipulation, it may be worth gathering evidence to support your claim and addressing it formally in your submissions. Have you considered reaching out to a legal professional for advice on this matter?
I CAN'T GO TO SOLS AS I HAD A THREAT IN JAN * SAYING NO SOL WILL DO MY CASE, TAKE MY MONEY , MESS IT UP AND WILL BESTOPPED BY THE OPPOS SOL IN THE FAM CASE WHO WILL PAY THEM OFF.
Case Rating: *
It seems you're dealing with a difficult and complex situation. Here are a few points to consider:
- Employment Tribunals should act independently and fairly.
- Any suspicion of manipulation should be backed with evidence.
- Highlight any favorable judgments and instances of unreasonable behavior by the respondent.
If you feel unsafe reaching out to solicitors, consider contacting legal aid services or advocacy groups for support. They may offer assistance without cost and ensure your case is handled correctly. If you need more guidance on specific actions or documentation, please let me know.
It seems you're dealing with a difficult and complex situation. Here are a few points to consider:
- Employment Tribunals should act independently and fairly.
- Any suspicion of manipulation should be backed with evidence.
- Highlight any favorable judgments and instances of unreasonable behavior by the respondent.
If you feel unsafe reaching out to solicitors, consider contacting legal aid services or advocacy groups for support. They may offer assistance without cost and ensure your case is handled correctly. If you need more guidance on specific actions or documentation, please let me know.
SUSPICIOUN OF MANIPULATION EVIDENCE IS - THE DISAB STATUS HEARING TOOK PLACE IN MAY *, WITHIN * DAYS I INFORMED THIS ET I WOULD LIKE A RECONSIDERATION, IN JUNE * THE RESP WROTE SAYING WE WILL PUT ON HOLD THE VICTIMSATION CLAIM AS THE HEARING FOR THIS WAS LISTED FOR * DEC *, I AGREED (NOT KNOWING THIS WAS PLOY FOR SOMETHING ELSE), IN I SEPT * I WON MY DISAB STATUS IN ANOTHER ET, I SENT THIS TO THE FIRST RESP - THEY REFUSED TO GIVE IT ANY IMPORTANCE, EVEN THOUGH IT CONFLICTED WITH THE DECISION OF THE OTHER ET, I CHASED UP THE WRITTEN REASONS/JUDGMENT ON PHONE AND ON EMAIL, I EVENT GOT IT EARLY NOV, I DID RECONSIDERATION, I ALSO NEEDED TO SEND APPEAL ON THIS, AT THE SAME TIME THE RESP STARTED TO REFUSE TO GIVE BUNDLE AND OR DISC DOCUMENTS, SAYING HE ALREADY SENT IT TO MY SOL IN FEB *, I GOT ILL, THE OTHER ET MATTER WAS ALSO CLASHING HEAVILY AND A FINAL HEARING WAS LISTED FOR JAN *. THERES MORE EVID.
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you're dealing with a complex and challenging employment tribunal case, involving manipulation and unreasonable behavior. Gathering evidence that supports your claims is crucial. You might consider:
- Highlighting any conflicting judgments.
- Documenting the respondent's refusal to cooperate.
- Addressing delays and obstruction in your submissions.
If you're looking for guidance on specific actions or documentation, let me know!
It sounds like you're dealing with a complex and challenging employment tribunal case, involving manipulation and unreasonable behavior. Gathering evidence that supports your claims is crucial. You might consider:
- Highlighting any conflicting judgments.
- Documenting the respondent's refusal to cooperate.
- Addressing delays and obstruction in your submissions.
If you're looking for guidance on specific actions or documentation, let me know!
THE RESP IN THE 2ND ET CASE ALSO SENT ME EMAIL SAYING THEY WANT TO POSTPONE DOING THE BUNDLE UNTIL NOV - THE SAME TIME AS THE 1ST RESPON/ET DECIDED TO RELEASE THE JUDGMENT. THIS ISFURTHER EVIDENCE. PLSE CAN YOU DRAFT A SECTION FOR ALL THIS IN THE LETTER.
Case Rating: *
Certainly! Here's a section you might consider including in your letter to strengthen your argument regarding the respondent's unreasonable behavior:
---
Manipulation and Delay Tactics
I wish to bring to your attention the respondent's repeated manipulation and delay tactics throughout the proceedings. This includes:
- Postponing the preparation of the bundle until November, coinciding with the judgment release, which further obstructs the progress of the case.
- Ignoring correspondence and requests for necessary documents, causing significant delays.
- Refusing to acknowledge and address the conflicting judgment regarding my disability status from another tribunal.
These actions have caused undue stress and prolonged the resolution of this matter, which could have been settled efficiently and fairly. I urge consideration of these points in evaluating the respondent's behavior.
---
Feel free to adapt this section to your specific situation and provide any additional evidence or documentation you have. If you need further assistance, please let me know!
Certainly! Here's a section you might consider including in your letter to strengthen your argument regarding the respondent's unreasonable behavior:
---
Manipulation and Delay Tactics
I wish to bring to your attention the respondent's repeated manipulation and delay tactics throughout the proceedings. This includes:
- Postponing the preparation of the bundle until November, coinciding with the judgment release, which further obstructs the progress of the case.
- Ignoring correspondence and requests for necessary documents, causing significant delays.
- Refusing to acknowledge and address the conflicting judgment regarding my disability status from another tribunal.
These actions have caused undue stress and prolonged the resolution of this matter, which could have been settled efficiently and fairly. I urge consideration of these points in evaluating the respondent's behavior.
---
Feel free to adapt this section to your specific situation and provide any additional evidence or documentation you have. If you need further assistance, please let me know!
IS THIS FOR STRIKE OUT OR COSTS
Case Rating: *
The section provided can be used for both a strike-out request and a costs warning. It highlights the respondent's unreasonable behavior and manipulation tactics, supporting both actions. For a costs warning, emphasize the financial implications of the delays. For a strike-out, focus on the obstruction of justice.
The section provided can be used for both a strike-out request and a costs warning. It highlights the respondent's unreasonable behavior and manipulation tactics, supporting both actions. For a costs warning, emphasize the financial implications of the delays. For a strike-out, focus on the obstruction of justice.
IN THE EAT JUDGMENT ALL THE ERRORS I FOUND IN OCT/NOV * - IS THE RESPOND RESPONS FOR THESE AND THE TEXT THAT I HAVE NEVER SEEN BEFORE AND WHICH THE RESP REFUSED TO REPLY TO ME ABOUT ITS PROVENANCE. AFTER A LONG DELAY THEY SAID ITS IN THE EAT JUDGMENT AND PART OF MY GROUND OF APPEAL. THIS IS COM INCORRECT AS MY GROUNDS OF APPEAL DID NOT CONTAIN THIS TEXT. SO THE RESP HAS REFUSED TO PROVIDE THE ANSWER TO THIS AND ITS IN THE C OF APPEAL ORDER WHICH HAS ERRORS IN IT.
Case Rating: *
It seems you have a complex situation involving errors in the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) judgment and its connection to your grounds of appeal. Here are some general pointers:
- Tribunals and courts should provide clear and accurate judgments.
- If there are errors in the judgment, you may request clarification or correction.
- Consider formally addressing these discrepancies in your submissions.
Have you already raised these errors with the tribunal or court in writing?
It seems you have a complex situation involving errors in the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) judgment and its connection to your grounds of appeal. Here are some general pointers:
- Tribunals and courts should provide clear and accurate judgments.
- If there are errors in the judgment, you may request clarification or correction.
- Consider formally addressing these discrepancies in your submissions.
Have you already raised these errors with the tribunal or court in writing?
YES, I RAISED ALL EAT ERRORS IN C OF APPEAL AND ASKED FOR STRIKE OUT, BUT IT LOOKS AS IF C OF APPEAL DID NOT ADDRESS THIS REQUEST BUT INSTEAD AN ORDER WAS SENT DONE IN A GREAT HURRY.
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you're dealing with a complex and frustrating situation involving errors in the Employment Appeal Tribunal judgment and the Court of Appeal's response. Addressing these issues formally is essential. You may want to consider:
- Documenting all errors and discrepancies.
- Requesting clarification or correction from the relevant tribunal or court.
- Highlighting any procedural errors or oversight in your submissions.
If you need further guidance on specific actions or documents, feel free to ask!
It sounds like you're dealing with a complex and frustrating situation involving errors in the Employment Appeal Tribunal judgment and the Court of Appeal's response. Addressing these issues formally is essential. You may want to consider:
- Documenting all errors and discrepancies.
- Requesting clarification or correction from the relevant tribunal or court.
- Highlighting any procedural errors or oversight in your submissions.
If you need further guidance on specific actions or documents, feel free to ask!
THE EAT JUDGE - I ASKED FOR HIS NOTES RE. THE REMAINING GROUND OF APPEAL AT C OF APPEAL, BUT IN MARCH EAT REPLIED THE JUDHE DISPOSED OF HIS NOTES. I FIND THIS PERPLEXING AS I TOLD EAT IMMED I WILL BE APPEALING THEIR DECIS. WHT/HOW COULD THE EAT JUDGE HAVE DISPOSED OFHIS NOTES.
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you're facing a challenging situation with the Employment Appeal Tribunal. Generally, judges should retain notes related to ongoing cases, especially if an appeal is notified. Here are some points to consider:
- You may request an explanation for the disposal of notes officially.
- Consider documenting all communications related to this matter.
- If you suspect procedural errors, you might explore options for addressing them through legal avenues.
If you need further guidance on specific actions or documentation, let me know!
It sounds like you're facing a challenging situation with the Employment Appeal Tribunal. Generally, judges should retain notes related to ongoing cases, especially if an appeal is notified. Here are some points to consider:
- You may request an explanation for the disposal of notes officially.
- Consider documenting all communications related to this matter.
- If you suspect procedural errors, you might explore options for addressing them through legal avenues.
If you need further guidance on specific actions or documentation, let me know!
PLASE CAN YOU DRAFT ME A LETTER TO EAT RE. DISPOSAL OF EAT JUDGES NOTES. THE ERROR I FOUND RELATING TO MY OUTST GROUND OF APPEAL IN C OF APPEAL IS THE EAT JUDGE DID NOT CONSIDER OR OVERLOOKED ALL THE REASONS PROVIDED BY THE RULE *-* JUDGE FOR ALLOWING THIS GROUND OF APPEAL TO GO AHEAD. HE HAD MADE A CLEAR IINSTRUCTION IN HIS REASONS THAT THEY ARE FOR THE EAT JUDGE TO UNDERSTAND WHY HE ALLOWED THIS GROUND TO PROCEED AT RULE *-* HEARING.
Case Rating: *
Here's a draft for your letter to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT):
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email]
[Date]
Employment Appeal Tribunal
[Tribunal Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Tribunal Members,
Re: Request for Explanation on Disposal of Judge's Notes
I am writing to express my concern regarding the disposal of notes by the EAT judge related to my outstanding ground of appeal at the Court of Appeal. It has come to my attention that these notes were crucial for understanding the reasons provided by the Rule *-* judge for allowing this ground of appeal to proceed.
Despite notifying the EAT immediately of my intention to appeal their decision, I find it perplexing that such essential documentation was disposed of. These notes were intended to guide the EAT judge in comprehending the grounds for proceeding with the appeal, as clearly instructed by the Rule *-* judge.
I kindly request an explanation of why these notes were disposed of and urge consideration of the procedural importance they held in my case. Transparent handling of court documents is vital for ensuring fair proceedings and appeals.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to adjust the letter to fit your specific situation and details. If you need further assistance, let me know!
Here's a draft for your letter to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT):
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email]
[Date]
Employment Appeal Tribunal
[Tribunal Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear Tribunal Members,
Re: Request for Explanation on Disposal of Judge's Notes
I am writing to express my concern regarding the disposal of notes by the EAT judge related to my outstanding ground of appeal at the Court of Appeal. It has come to my attention that these notes were crucial for understanding the reasons provided by the Rule *-* judge for allowing this ground of appeal to proceed.
Despite notifying the EAT immediately of my intention to appeal their decision, I find it perplexing that such essential documentation was disposed of. These notes were intended to guide the EAT judge in comprehending the grounds for proceeding with the appeal, as clearly instructed by the Rule *-* judge.
I kindly request an explanation of why these notes were disposed of and urge consideration of the procedural importance they held in my case. Transparent handling of court documents is vital for ensuring fair proceedings and appeals.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to adjust the letter to fit your specific situation and details. If you need further assistance, let me know!
CAN I USE THIS NEW EVID TO SHOW COF APPEAL THAT MY REM GROUND OF APPEAL MUST BE ALLOWED - AS IT IS ALSO PART OF THE GROUND THE C OF APPEAL DID ALLOW. ITS TO DO WITH ADMISSIBILITY OF MY SUPP IMPACT STATEMENT. THE EAT CAME UP WITH A COMPLETELY NEW/RANDOM REASON THAT IT WAS A CASE MANAGEM DECIS THAT ET REFUSED TO ALLOW THIS DOC. BUT THIS REASON IS NOT USED BY THE RULE *-* JUDGE. SO THERE IS A CLEAR CONFLICT BERTWEEN JUDGES IN THE EAT AND I AM NOT ABLE TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS GOING ON, OR WHY THIS DECISION WAS GIVEN. NO DOUBT THE RESP IS ALSO CONTROLLING THE EAT.
Case Rating: *
You can use new evidence to support your remaining ground of appeal. Highlight the conflict between the judges and the admissibility of your supplemental impact statement. This evidence can be crucial in showing procedural errors or inconsistencies. Consider formally presenting this evidence in your appeal submissions to the Court of Appeal. If you need further guidance, feel free to ask!
You can use new evidence to support your remaining ground of appeal. Highlight the conflict between the judges and the admissibility of your supplemental impact statement. This evidence can be crucial in showing procedural errors or inconsistencies. Consider formally presenting this evidence in your appeal submissions to the Court of Appeal. If you need further guidance, feel free to ask!
OK, GREAT. FIRST I WILL WRITE TO RESPOND RE. COSTS AND CEASE THIS MATTER. AND TO ET, THEN TO EAT AND POSS C OF APPEAL, DEPENDING ON EAT REPLY. I AM ALSO SUFF FROM ILL HEALTH DUE TO THESE TERRIBLE ANTICS OF TRIBUNALS, JUDGES, RESPONDENTS. ITS CLEAR THE RESPPONDENTS ARE CONTROLLING THE TRIBUNALS AND ALL ARE DOING ACTIONS ALIGNING WITH THE THREAT I GOT AND I AM ALSO HAVING GREAT TECH ISSUES.
Case Rating: *
It seems like you're dealing with a highly complex employment tribunal case, involving claims of manipulation and unreasonable behavior by respondents and tribunals. Your health concerns and technical issues add layers to this challenging situation. If there's anything specific you'd like to know or need assistance with, feel free to ask!
It seems like you're dealing with a highly complex employment tribunal case, involving claims of manipulation and unreasonable behavior by respondents and tribunals. Your health concerns and technical issues add layers to this challenging situation. If there's anything specific you'd like to know or need assistance with, feel free to ask!
Start a new chat