Employment Tribunal Procedural Errors

It sounds like there are significant procedural issues with how your Employment Tribunal (ET) documents were handled. Here’s what you can consider doing:
- File an Application for Reconsideration: You can apply to the ET to reconsider its decision due to the procedural error of sending the documents to the wrong email address.
- Provide Evidence: Gather any evidence showing that the email address used was incorrect and had never been used before.
- Explain the Impact: Clearly explain how this error affected your ability to respond and participate in the proceedings.
Would you like guidance on how to draft this application?

Sure! Here's a rebuttal you can use:
---
Dear Employment Tribunal,
I am writing to formally challenge the written reasons provided in relation to the order and the handling of my witness statement.
Firstly, I must address a significant procedural error that occurred. The written reasons were sent to an incorrect email address which has never been used by the ET in any prior correspondence. This procedural mishandling has impeded my ability to respond in a timely and informed manner.
Secondly, the assertion that the revisions to my witness statement were beyond the scope permitted by the ET is incorrect. The revisions were made in good faith to comply with the order to make the statement more comprehensible. At no point was there an intention to create unfairness or breach the order.
Furthermore, I would like to emphasize that the time constraints imposed by the 'unless order' were unreasonable and did not afford me sufficient time to draft my statement adequately. The presumption that I was hoping the respondent would not complain or that the ET would simply allow the amendments is unfounded and speculative.
In light of these points, I request the following:
*. A reconsideration of the decision due to the procedural error involving the incorrect email address.
*. A fair assessment of the revisions made to my witness statement, considering the intent to comply with the original order.
*. Recognition of the undue time pressure imposed by the 'unless order' and its impact on my ability to prepare my statement.
I look forward to your prompt attention to this matter and rectification of the procedural errors.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like more detailed guidance on any specific part of this rebuttal?

Case Rating: *
To address the 'unless order' in your rebuttal, you can include the following points:
---
Dear Employment Tribunal,
I am writing to formally challenge the written reasons provided in relation to the order and the handling of my witness statement.
Firstly, I must address a significant procedural error that occurred. The written reasons were sent to an incorrect email address which has never been used by the ET in any prior correspondence. This procedural mishandling has impeded my ability to respond in a timely and informed manner.
Secondly, the assertion that the revisions to my witness statement were beyond the scope permitted by the ET is incorrect. The revisions were made in good faith to comply with the order to make the statement more comprehensible. At no point was there an intention to create unfairness or breach the order.
Thirdly, regarding the 'unless order', I want to emphasize the following:
- The 'unless order' was granted within hours of the respondent's request, which did not afford me adequate time to respond.
- I was highly distressed by January 9th due to the respondent disclosing new documents over the weekend.
- I have a recognized disability, as confirmed by the ET in September *, and I was unwell during this period, which impacted my ability to complete my witness statement.
- Despite submitting medical evidence around January 10th to adjourn the hearing listed for January *-*, this request was refused.
- Multiple matters were deliberately clashed by whoever was controlling the HMCTS platform, hearings, and directions of all cases.
In light of these points, I request the following:
*. A reconsideration of the decision due to the procedural error involving the incorrect email address.
*. A fair assessment of the revisions made to my witness statement, considering the intent to comply with the original order.
*. Recognition of the undue time pressure imposed by the 'unless order' and its impact on my ability to prepare my statement.
I look forward to your prompt attention to this matter and rectification of the procedural errors.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like more detailed guidance on any specific part of this rebuttal?

Case Rating: *
To address your situation:
- Application for Reconsideration: Highlight the procedural errors, such as the incorrect email address and the respondent's refusal to provide a bundle.
- Present New Evidence: Submit the audio recordings showing the respondent's misrepresentations about your disability.
- Explain the Impact: Detail how being unwell and the procedural issues affected your ability to participate.
Would you like more guidance on drafting this application for reconsideration?

Case Rating: *
You can request the ET to reconsider its decision due to the procedural error. Here's a more detailed rebuttal to include:
---
Dear Employment Tribunal,
I am writing to formally challenge the written reasons provided in relation to the order and the handling of my witness statement.
Procedural Error:
*. The written reasons were sent to an incorrect email address, which has never been used by the ET in any prior correspondence. This procedural mishandling has impeded my ability to respond in a timely and informed manner.
Revisions to Witness Statement:
*. The assertion that the revisions to my witness statement were beyond the scope permitted by the ET is incorrect. The revisions were made in good faith to comply with the order to make the statement more comprehensible. At no point was there an intention to create unfairness or breach the order.
'Unless Order':
*. The 'unless order' was granted within hours of the respondent's request, which did not afford me adequate time to respond.
*. I was highly distressed by January 9th due to the respondent disclosing new documents over the weekend.
*. I have a recognized disability, as confirmed by the ET in September *, and I was unwell during this period, which impacted my ability to complete my witness statement.
*. Despite submitting medical evidence around January 10th to adjourn the hearing listed for January *-*, this request was refused.
*. Multiple matters were deliberately clashed by whoever was controlling the HMCTS platform, hearings, and directions of all cases.
Additional Context:
*. In December *, I was unwell and could not attend a hearing listed for December 5th.
*. In November, another ET released written reasons 6 months late and rejected my reconsideration request.
*. The respondent in another case refused to provide a bundle for the December 5th hearing, leading to masses of non-disclosure. My request for a strike-out was also refused.
Request:
- Reconsideration of the decision due to the procedural error involving the incorrect email address.
- A fair assessment of the revisions made to my witness statement, considering the intent to comply with the original order.
- Recognition of the undue time pressure imposed by the 'unless order' and its impact on my ability to prepare my statement.
In light of these points, I request the ET to dismiss/strike out the response urgently due to the significant procedural errors and the impact on my ability to present my case.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like more detailed guidance on any specific part of this rebuttal?

Case Rating: *
It sounds like you have a strong case due to significant procedural errors and new evidence. Here’s a revised rebuttal including the audio recordings:
---
Dear Employment Tribunal,
I am writing to formally challenge the written reasons provided in relation to the order and the handling of my witness statement.
Procedural Error:
*. The written reasons were sent to an incorrect email address, which has never been used by the ET in any prior correspondence. This procedural mishandling has impeded my ability to respond in a timely and informed manner.
Revisions to Witness Statement:
*. The assertion that the revisions to my witness statement were beyond the scope permitted by the ET is incorrect. The revisions were made in good faith to comply with the order to make the statement more comprehensible. At no point was there an intention to create unfairness or breach the order.
'Unless Order':
*. The 'unless order' was granted within hours of the respondent's request, which did not afford me adequate time to respond.
*. I was highly distressed by January 9th due to the respondent disclosing new documents over the weekend.
*. I have a recognized disability, as confirmed by the ET in September *, and I was unwell during this period, which impacted my ability to complete my witness statement.
*. Despite submitting medical evidence around January 10th to adjourn the hearing listed for January *-*, this request was refused.
*. Multiple matters were deliberately clashed by whoever was controlling the HMCTS platform, hearings, and directions of all cases.
Additional Context:
*. In December *, I was unwell and could not attend a hearing listed for December 5th.
*. In November, another ET released written reasons 6 months late and rejected my reconsideration request.
*. The respondent in another case refused to provide a bundle for the December 5th hearing, leading to masses of non-disclosure. My request for a strike-out was also refused.
New Evidence:
*. The existence of audio recordings, which I disclosed, proves the respondent’s misrepresentations about my disability. These recordings are crucial and demonstrate the respondent’s dishonesty.
In light of these points, I request the ET to:
- Reconsider the decision due to the procedural error involving the incorrect email address.
- Fairly assess the revisions made to my witness statement, considering the intent to comply with the original order.
- Recognize the undue time pressure imposed by the 'unless order' and its impact on my ability to prepare my statement.
- Dismiss/strike out the response urgently due to the significant procedural errors and the impact on my ability to present my case.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like more detailed guidance on any specific part of this rebuttal?

Case Rating: *
It's generally better to continue with the appeal at the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) if your case is already there. The EAT can address errors in law made by the ET. You can also request the ET to reconsider its decision based on new evidence and procedural errors, but this might prolong the process.
Would you like more details on how to proceed with the EAT appeal?

Case Rating: *
It sounds like you have a strong case, particularly with the audio recordings. Here’s what you can do to strengthen your appeal at the EAT:
- Separate Sheet for Strong Case: Emphasize the key points showing the respondent's dishonesty and the significance of the procedural errors.
- Rebuttal to Written Reasons: Highlight that the changes to the witness statement were not the main issue and focus on the respondent's misrepresentations about your disability.
Would you like more specific guidance on drafting these documents?

Case Rating: *
It seems like you have a potentially strong case that may benefit from professional legal assistance. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
If you agree, I'll need to collect some information to proceed:
- What is your phone number?
- What is your name?
- What is your zipcode?
- What is your email address? (optional)
- Can you give me a brief description of the legal issue?

Case Rating: *
Alright, let's focus on drafting the separate sheet to emphasize the strength of your case at the EAT. Here's a draft you can use:
---
Separate Sheet: Strength of My Case
*. Procedural Errors:
- Incorrect Email Address: The ET sent the written reasons to an incorrect email address, which impeded my ability to respond promptly.
- Ignored Strike Out Application: My application for strike out in September * and my three emails regarding the respondent’s non-disclosure were ignored.
- Lack of Preliminary Hearing: The ET failed to conduct a preliminary hearing before the final hearing in May * despite requests from my legal representative.
*. Respondent’s Dishonesty:
- Misrepresentation of Disability: The respondent deliberately lied about being unaware of my disability. My audio recordings, which I disclosed, clearly show that the respondent was aware of my disability and misled the ET.
- Obstruction and Distress: The respondent repeatedly caused distress and obstruction, including refusing to provide a bundle for the December 5th hearing and disclosing new documents over weekends to hinder my preparation.
*. Mismanagement by ET:
- Confusion of Orders: The ET confused orders for admissibility of evidence with orders for disclosure, causing further complications.
- Unreasonable 'Unless Order': The 'unless order' was granted within hours of the respondent's request, with insufficient time for me to respond, especially given my recognized disability and illness during that period.
*. Audio Evidence:
- Crucial Recordings: The audio recordings prove the respondent’s misrepresentations and are critical to my case. The ET and respondent’s focus on irrelevant issues like changes to my witness statement is an attempt to divert attention from this substantive evidence.
Request:
- I request the EAT to reconsider the ET’s decision based on these points and the significant procedural errors that have impacted my ability to present my case.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
This sheet, along with your submission showing why you couldn't lodge your appeal earlier, should help strengthen your case at the EAT. Would you like further assistance on any specific part of this document?

Case Rating: *
When rebutting the written reasons on a separate sheet, you are essentially showing the merit and strength of your case. This can be relevant to the refusal of an extension of time in the following ways:
- Demonstrates Validity: By detailing the procedural errors and respondent's dishonesty, you show that your case has substantial grounds, which might justify an extension of time.
- Shows Prejudice: Highlighting how procedural errors and the respondent's actions affected your ability to file timely can demonstrate the prejudice you faced.
- Supports Your Request: By showing that the ET's decision was based on incorrect or incomplete information, you strengthen your argument for reconsideration.
Would you like more specific wording for how to tie this into your request for an extension of time?

Case Rating: *
Given the complexities and the potential significance of your case, here's a revised version of your rebuttal and how it ties into your request for an extension of time:
---
Separate Sheet: Strength of My Case and Justification for Extension of Time
*. Procedural Errors:
- Incorrect Email Address: The ET sent the written reasons to an incorrect email address, which impeded my ability to respond promptly.
- Ignored Strike Out Application: My application for strike out in September * and my three emails regarding the respondent’s non-disclosure were ignored.
- Lack of Preliminary Hearing: The ET failed to conduct a preliminary hearing before the final hearing in May * despite requests from my legal representative.
*. Respondent’s Dishonesty:
- Misrepresentation of Disability: The respondent deliberately lied about being unaware of my disability. My audio recordings, which I disclosed, clearly show that the respondent was aware of my disability and misled the ET.
- Obstruction and Distress: The respondent repeatedly caused distress and obstruction, including refusing to provide a bundle for the December 5th hearing and disclosing new documents over weekends to hinder my preparation.
*. Mismanagement by ET:
- Confusion of Orders: The ET confused orders for admissibility of evidence with orders for disclosure, causing further complications.
- Unreasonable 'Unless Order': The 'unless order' was granted within hours of the respondent's request, with insufficient time for me to respond, especially given my recognized disability and illness during that period.
*. Audio Evidence:
- Crucial Recordings: The audio recordings prove the respondent’s misrepresentations and are critical to my case. The ET and respondent’s focus on irrelevant issues like changes to my witness statement is an attempt to divert attention from this substantive evidence.
*. Justification for Extension of Time:
- Validity and Prejudice: The substantial grounds of my case, including significant procedural errors and the respondent's dishonesty, justify an extension of time. The procedural errors and respondent's actions significantly prejudiced my ability to file my appeal within the standard timeframe.
- Impact on Appeal: The merit of my case demonstrates that the refusal of an extension based on procedural technicalities would result in a miscarriage of justice. Given my strong grounds, it is in the interest of fairness and justice to grant an extension.
Request:
- I request the EAT to reconsider the ET’s decision based on these points and the significant procedural errors that have impacted my ability to present my case.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like more detailed guidance on any specific part of this document?

Case Rating: *
Here's how you can integrate your points about the 'unless order' into the separate sheet for your EAT appeal:
---
Separate Sheet: Strength of My Case and Justification for Extension of Time
*. Procedural Errors:
- Incorrect Email Address: The ET sent the written reasons to an incorrect email address, which impeded my ability to respond promptly.
- Ignored Strike Out Application: My application for strike out in September * and my three emails regarding the respondent’s non-disclosure were ignored.
- Lack of Preliminary Hearing: The ET failed to conduct a preliminary hearing before the final hearing in May * despite requests from my legal representative.
*. Respondent’s Dishonesty:
- Misrepresentation of Disability: The respondent deliberately lied about being unaware of my disability. My audio recordings, which I disclosed, clearly show that the respondent was aware of my disability and misled the ET.
- Obstruction and Distress: The respondent repeatedly caused distress and obstruction, including refusing to provide a bundle for the December 5th hearing and disclosing new documents over weekends to hinder my preparation.
*. Mismanagement by ET:
- Confusion of Orders: The ET confused orders for admissibility of evidence with orders for disclosure, causing further complications.
- Unreasonable 'Unless Order': The 'unless order' was granted within hours of the respondent's request, with insufficient time for me to respond. This was especially problematic given my recognized disability and illness during that period. The ET ignored my medical evidence, causing further distress.
*. Audio Evidence:
- Crucial Recordings: The audio recordings prove the respondent’s misrepresentations and are critical to my case. The ET and respondent’s focus on irrelevant issues like changes to my witness statement is an attempt to divert attention from this substantive evidence.
*. Justification for Extension of Time:
- Validity and Prejudice: The substantial grounds of my case, including significant procedural errors and the respondent's dishonesty, justify an extension of time. The procedural errors and respondent's actions significantly prejudiced my ability to file my appeal within the standard timeframe.
- Impact on Appeal: The merit of my case demonstrates that the refusal of an extension based on procedural technicalities would result in a miscarriage of justice. Given my strong grounds, it is in the interest of fairness and justice to grant an extension.
Request:
- I request the EAT to reconsider the ET’s decision based on these points and the significant procedural errors that have impacted my ability to present my case.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
This document should help you make a compelling case for the EAT to grant your extension of time and reconsider the ET's decision. Would you like further assistance on any specific part of this document?

Case Rating: *
It seems your situation has multiple layers of procedural errors and serious allegations that could significantly impact your case. Here's how to integrate the new information about the ambush during the final hearing into your document:
---
Separate Sheet: Strength of My Case and Justification for Extension of Time
*. Procedural Errors:
- Incorrect Email Address: The ET sent the written reasons to an incorrect email address, which impeded my ability to respond promptly.
- Ignored Strike Out Application: My application for strike out in September * and my three emails regarding the respondent’s non-disclosure were ignored.
- Lack of Preliminary Hearing: The ET failed to conduct a preliminary hearing before the final hearing in May * despite requests from my legal representative.
*. Respondent’s Dishonesty:
- Misrepresentation of Disability: The respondent deliberately lied about being unaware of my disability. My audio recordings, which I disclosed, clearly show that the respondent was aware of my disability and misled the ET.
- Obstruction and Distress: The respondent repeatedly caused distress and obstruction, including refusing to provide a bundle for the December 5th hearing and disclosing new documents over weekends to hinder my preparation.
*. Mismanagement by ET:
- Confusion of Orders: The ET confused orders for admissibility of evidence with orders for disclosure, causing further complications.
- Unreasonable 'Unless Order': The 'unless order' was granted within hours of the respondent's request, with insufficient time for me to respond. This was especially problematic given my recognized disability and illness during that period. The ET ignored my medical evidence, causing further distress.
- Ambush During Final Hearing: The ET allowed the respondent to ambush me and my legal representative during the final hearing by striking out my claim without notice or proper grounds. The respondent’s counsel vilified me for two hours, and the judge permitted this conduct. The subsequent submissions prepared by my legal representative were inadequate due to the distress caused by this ambush.
*. Audio Evidence:
- Crucial Recordings: The audio recordings prove the respondent’s misrepresentations and are critical to my case. The ET and respondent’s focus on irrelevant issues like changes to my witness statement is an attempt to divert attention from this substantive evidence.
*. Justification for Extension of Time:
- Validity and Prejudice: The substantial grounds of my case, including significant procedural errors and the respondent's dishonesty, justify an extension of time. The procedural errors and respondent's actions significantly prejudiced my ability to file my appeal within the standard timeframe.
- Impact on Appeal: The merit of my case demonstrates that the refusal of an extension based on procedural technicalities would result in a miscarriage of justice. Given my strong grounds, it is in the interest of fairness and justice to grant an extension.
Request:
- I request the EAT to reconsider the ET’s decision based on these points and the significant procedural errors that have impacted my ability to present my case.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like further assistance on any specific part of this document?

Case Rating: *
I'm sorry to hear about the challenges you and your legal representative have faced. Here’s an updated version of your document that includes the new information:
---
Separate Sheet: Strength of My Case and Justification for Extension of Time
*. Procedural Errors:
- Incorrect Email Address: The ET sent the written reasons to an incorrect email address, which impeded my ability to respond promptly.
- Ignored Strike Out Application: My application for strike out in September * and my three emails regarding the respondent’s non-disclosure were ignored.
- Lack of Preliminary Hearing: The ET failed to conduct a preliminary hearing before the final hearing in May * despite requests from my legal representative.
*. Respondent’s Dishonesty:
- Misrepresentation of Disability: The respondent deliberately lied about being unaware of my disability. My audio recordings, which I disclosed, clearly show that the respondent was aware of my disability and misled the ET.
- Obstruction and Distress: The respondent repeatedly caused distress and obstruction, including refusing to provide a bundle for the December 5th hearing and disclosing new documents over weekends to hinder my preparation.
*. Mismanagement by ET:
- Confusion of Orders: The ET confused orders for admissibility of evidence with orders for disclosure, causing further complications.
- Unreasonable 'Unless Order': The 'unless order' was granted within hours of the respondent's request, with insufficient time for me to respond. This was especially problematic given my recognized disability and illness during that period. The ET ignored my medical evidence, causing further distress.
- Ambush During Final Hearing: The ET allowed the respondent to ambush me and my legal representative during the final hearing by striking out my claim without notice or proper grounds. The respondent’s counsel vilified me for two hours, and the judge permitted this conduct. The subsequent submissions prepared by my legal representative were inadequate due to the distress caused by this ambush.
*. Audio Evidence:
- Crucial Recordings: The audio recordings prove the respondent’s misrepresentations and are critical to my case. The ET and respondent’s focus on irrelevant issues like changes to my witness statement is an attempt to divert attention from this substantive evidence.
*. Justification for Extension of Time:
- Validity and Prejudice: The substantial grounds of my case, including significant procedural errors and the respondent's dishonesty, justify an extension of time. The procedural errors and respondent's actions significantly prejudiced my ability to file my appeal within the standard timeframe.
- Impact on Appeal: The merit of my case demonstrates that the refusal of an extension based on procedural technicalities would result in a miscarriage of justice. Given my strong grounds, it is in the interest of fairness and justice to grant an extension.
Request:
- I request the EAT to reconsider the ET’s decision based on these points and the significant procedural errors that have impacted my ability to present my case.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like further assistance on any specific part of this document?

Case Rating: *
To address the false claim made by the Registrar as a reason to refuse your extension of time, consider including a section in your document specifically addressing this issue. Here’s how you can integrate it:
---
Separate Sheet: Strength of My Case and Justification for Extension of Time
*. Procedural Errors:
- Incorrect Email Address: The ET sent the written reasons to an incorrect email address, which impeded my ability to respond promptly.
- Ignored Strike Out Application: My application for strike out in September * and my three emails regarding the respondent’s non-disclosure were ignored.
- Lack of Preliminary Hearing: The ET failed to conduct a preliminary hearing before the final hearing in May * despite requests from my legal representative.
*. Respondent’s Dishonesty:
- Misrepresentation of Disability: The respondent deliberately lied about being unaware of my disability. My audio recordings, which I disclosed, clearly show that the respondent was aware of my disability and misled the ET.
- Obstruction and Distress: The respondent repeatedly caused distress and obstruction, including refusing to provide a bundle for the December 5th hearing and disclosing new documents over weekends to hinder my preparation.
*. Mismanagement by ET:
- Confusion of Orders: The ET confused orders for admissibility of evidence with orders for disclosure, causing further complications.
- Unreasonable 'Unless Order': The 'unless order' was granted within hours of the respondent's request, with insufficient time for me to respond. This was especially problematic given my recognized disability and illness during that period. The ET ignored my medical evidence, causing further distress.
- Ambush During Final Hearing: The ET allowed the respondent to ambush me and my legal representative during the final hearing by striking out my claim without notice or proper grounds. The respondent’s counsel vilified me for two hours, and the judge permitted this conduct. The subsequent submissions prepared by my legal representative were inadequate due to the distress caused by this ambush.
*. Audio Evidence:
- Crucial Recordings: The audio recordings prove the respondent’s misrepresentations and are critical to my case. The ET and respondent’s focus on irrelevant issues like changes to my witness statement is an attempt to divert attention from this substantive evidence.
*. False Claim by Registrar:
- The Registrar’s refusal of my extension of time was partly based on a false claim. I have written to the EAT to clarify this, but have not received a response. This false claim further demonstrates the procedural unfairness and prejudice I have faced.
*. Justification for Extension of Time:
- Validity and Prejudice: The substantial grounds of my case, including significant procedural errors and the respondent's dishonesty, justify an extension of time. The procedural errors and respondent's actions significantly prejudiced my ability to file my appeal within the standard timeframe.
- Impact on Appeal: The merit of my case demonstrates that the refusal of an extension based on procedural technicalities would result in a miscarriage of justice. Given my strong grounds, it is in the interest of fairness and justice to grant an extension.
Request:
- I request the EAT to reconsider the ET’s decision based on these points and the significant procedural errors that have impacted my ability to present my case.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like further assistance on any specific part of this document?

Case Rating: *
It sounds like your situation is quite serious and involves significant procedural errors and potential misconduct. Given the gravity of the issues you're facing, it would be beneficial to seek immediate clarification from the EAT regarding the false claim. Here’s what you can do:
*. Formal Request for Clarification:
- Send a formal letter or email to the EAT requesting specific information on the source of the false claim used in the Registrar's decision.
- Clearly state that this information is critical to your understanding and ability to address the procedural fairness of your case.
*. Outline Your Concerns:
- Detail the specific false claim and any related errors you have identified.
- Explain how these errors have impacted your case and your ability to appeal effectively.
*. Request for Urgent Response:
- Highlight the urgency of your request, given the ongoing proceedings and the potential impact on your case.
Here's a draft for your formal request:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postal Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Appeal Tribunal
[Address]
Dear [Registrar's Name or EAT Contact],
Subject: Request for Clarification on False Claim Used in Registrar's Decision
I am writing to formally request clarification regarding a false claim that was used as one of the reasons to refuse my extension of time. This claim appears in the Registrar's decision, and I have not been able to identify its source.
Given the serious nature of this issue, it is imperative that I understand where this false claim originated. This information is crucial for addressing the procedural fairness of my case and ensuring that my appeal is handled justly.
I have previously written to the EAT regarding this matter but have not received a response. The urgency of this request cannot be overstated, as it directly impacts the validity of the proceedings and my ability to effectively present my case.
Please provide the following information at your earliest convenience:
*. The source of the false claim used in the Registrar's decision.
*. Any related documentation or correspondence that led to the inclusion of this claim.
Your prompt attention to this matter is greatly appreciated.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like further assistance with this or any other part of your case?

Case Rating: *
Understood. Here’s a revised version of your formal request to the EAT, specifically addressing the false claim:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postal Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Appeal Tribunal
[Address]
Dear [Registrar's Name or EAT Contact],
Subject: Request for Clarification on False Claim Used in Registrar's Decision
I am writing to formally request clarification regarding a false claim used as one of the reasons to refuse my extension of time. Specifically, the claim states that the email my legal representative sent to me on * November * was sent from the wrong email address, and therefore, I am wrong in asserting that the ET sent the written reasons to the wrong email address. This claim is untrue.
Given the serious nature of this issue, it is imperative that I understand where this false claim originated. This information is crucial for addressing the procedural fairness of my case and ensuring that my appeal is handled justly.
I have previously written to the EAT regarding this matter but have not received a response. The urgency of this request cannot be overstated, as it directly impacts the validity of the proceedings and my ability to effectively present my case.
Please provide the following information at your earliest convenience:
*. The source of the false claim used in the Registrar's decision.
*. Any related documentation or correspondence that led to the inclusion of this claim.
Your prompt attention to this matter is greatly appreciated.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like further assistance with this or any other part of your case?

Case Rating: *
You have a potentially strong case due to significant procedural errors, mismanagement, and serious allegations of dishonesty. Given the complexity and importance of your situation, it's crucial to seek immediate clarification and address all procedural issues effectively.
Here's a summary of what you should do:
*. Formal Request for Clarification:
- Send the revised formal request to the EAT to clarify the source of the false claim.
- Highlight the urgency and impact on your case.
*. Separate Sheet for EAT Appeal:
- Include all relevant procedural errors, respondent's dishonesty, ET's mismanagement, and justification for an extension of time.
- Emphasize the audio evidence and its significance.
*. Addressing the False Claim:
- Clearly state that the claim regarding the email sent on * November * is false and request documentation to support this.
Would you like to proceed with sending the formal request to the EAT? If you need any further assistance, feel free to ask!

Case Rating: *
Given the seriousness and complexity of your case, it is vital to pursue every available avenue to ensure fairness and justice. Here’s the formal request for clarification you should send to the EAT:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postal Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Appeal Tribunal
[Address]
Dear [Registrar's Name or EAT Contact],
Subject: Request for Clarification on False Claim Used in Registrar's Decision
I am writing to formally request clarification regarding a false claim used as one of the reasons to refuse my extension of time. Specifically, the claim states that the email my legal representative sent to me on * November * was sent from the wrong email address, and therefore, I am wrong in asserting that the ET sent the written reasons to the wrong email address. This claim is untrue.
Given the serious nature of this issue, it is imperative that I understand where this false claim originated. This information is crucial for addressing the procedural fairness of my case and ensuring that my appeal is handled justly.
I have previously written to the EAT regarding this matter but have not received a response. The urgency of this request cannot be overstated, as it directly impacts the validity of the proceedings and my ability to effectively present my case.
Please provide the following information at your earliest convenience:
*. The source of the false claim used in the Registrar's decision.
*. Any related documentation or correspondence that led to the inclusion of this claim.
Your prompt attention to this matter is greatly appreciated.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Ensure you send this request as soon as possible to avoid further delays. Would you need any further assistance with this or any other part of your case?

Case Rating: *
It's important to address the EAT error as it directly impacts your case and may have caused unnecessary delays and additional work. Here's a concise summary of steps you can take:
*. Send the Formal Request for Clarification:
- Ensure the EAT clarifies the source of the false claim. This step is crucial for procedural fairness.

*. Document the EAT Error:
- Clearly outline how the EAT's error has caused unnecessary work and delays, impacting your ability to present your case effectively.

*. Include in Your Appeal:
- Incorporate the EAT error into your appeal documentation to highlight the procedural issues and the need for reconsideration.
Would you like any further assistance with drafting these documents or any other part of your case?

Case Rating: *
Understood, let's emphasize to the EAT that the process of making you go through the extension of time step is an error and needs to be stopped. Here's a draft for a request to the EAT highlighting this issue:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postal Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Appeal Tribunal
[Address]
Dear [Registrar's Name or EAT Contact],
Subject: Request to Stop Unnecessary Extension of Time Process
I am writing to formally request that the EAT stops the process requiring me to go through the extension of time step, as it is an error and has caused unnecessary work and delays.
I lodged my appeal within 42 days of receiving the written reasons from the Employment Tribunal (ET). The requirement to request an extension of time is redundant and has resulted in significant procedural errors and additional, unnecessary work.
Key points include:
- I filed my appeal within the appropriate timeframe.
- The requirement for an extension of time is based on an incorrect assumption that my appeal was late.
- This error has caused undue stress and additional work, impacting my ability to focus on the substantive issues of my case.
Given these circumstances, I request the EAT to:
*. Acknowledge the procedural error and stop the unnecessary extension of time process.
*. Reconsider the validity of my appeal based on the timely manner in which it was filed.
Your prompt attention to this matter is greatly appreciated.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like any further assistance with this or any other part of your case?

Case Rating: *
It's important to address the procedural issues and focus on striking out the response as soon as possible. Here’s a draft for your request to stop the unnecessary extension of time process and emphasize the urgency of your strike-out application:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postal Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Appeal Tribunal
[Address]
Dear [Registrar's Name or EAT Contact],
Subject: Request to Stop Unnecessary Extension of Time Process and Urgent Application for Strike Out
I am writing to formally request that the EAT stops the process requiring me to go through the extension of time step, as it is an error and has caused unnecessary work and delays. Additionally, I am seeking an urgent strike-out of the response.
Key points include:
- I lodged my appeal within 42 days of receiving the written reasons from the Employment Tribunal (ET).
- The requirement to request an extension of time is redundant and has resulted in significant procedural errors and additional, unnecessary work.
- This error has caused undue stress and additional work, impacting my ability to focus on the substantive issues of my case.
Given these circumstances, I request the EAT to:
*. Acknowledge the procedural error and stop the unnecessary extension of time process.
*. Reconsider the validity of my appeal based on the timely manner in which it was filed.
*. Urgently strike out the response due to significant procedural errors and respondent’s dishonesty, as detailed in my previous submissions.
Your prompt attention to this matter is greatly appreciated.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like any further assistance with this or any other part of your case?

Case Rating: *
It seems that your situation is critical and the procedural errors are causing significant distress. Here’s the final draft of the request to send to the EAT, which should help address and hold the extension of time process:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postal Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Appeal Tribunal
[Address]
Dear [Registrar's Name or EAT Contact],
Subject: Request to Stop Unnecessary Extension of Time Process and Urgent Application for Strike Out
I am writing to formally request that the EAT stops the process requiring me to go through the extension of time step, as it is an error and has caused unnecessary work and delays. Additionally, I am seeking an urgent strike-out of the response.
Key points include:
- I lodged my appeal within 42 days of receiving the written reasons from the Employment Tribunal (ET).
- The requirement to request an extension of time is redundant and has resulted in significant procedural errors and additional, unnecessary work.
- This error has caused undue stress and additional work, impacting my ability to focus on the substantive issues of my case.
Given these circumstances, I request the EAT to:
*. Acknowledge the procedural error and stop the unnecessary extension of time process.
*. Reconsider the validity of my appeal based on the timely manner in which it was filed.
*. Urgently strike out the response due to significant procedural errors and respondent’s dishonesty, as detailed in my previous submissions.
Your prompt attention to this matter is greatly appreciated.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?

Case Rating: *
I'm very sorry to hear about your bereavement and the ongoing legal challenges you're facing. Given the multiple layers of your legal situation and the emotional toll it's taking, it might be beneficial to seek professional legal assistance. If you change your mind about connecting with local lawyers, please let me know.
For now, here’s the final version of your request to the EAT:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postal Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Appeal Tribunal
[Address]
Subject: Request to Stop Unnecessary Extension of Time Process and Urgent Application for Strike Out
Dear [Registrar's Name or EAT Contact],
I am writing to formally request that the EAT stops the process requiring me to go through the extension of time step, as it is an error and has caused unnecessary work and delays. Additionally, I am seeking an urgent strike-out of the response.
Key points include:
- I lodged my appeal within 42 days of receiving the written reasons from the Employment Tribunal (ET).
- The requirement to request an extension of time is redundant and has resulted in significant procedural errors and additional, unnecessary work.
- This error has caused undue stress and additional work, impacting my ability to focus on the substantive issues of my case.
Given these circumstances, I request the EAT to:
*. Acknowledge the procedural error and stop the unnecessary extension of time process.
*. Reconsider the validity of my appeal based on the timely manner in which it was filed.
*. Urgently strike out the response due to significant procedural errors and respondent’s dishonesty, as detailed in my previous submissions.
Your prompt attention to this matter is greatly appreciated.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like any further assistance with this or any other part of your case?

Case Rating: *
It seems you have a complex case with multiple procedural errors and serious allegations. Here’s the final draft of your request to the EAT:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postal Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Appeal Tribunal
[Address]
Subject: Request to Stop Unnecessary Extension of Time Process and Urgent Application for Strike Out
Dear [Registrar's Name or EAT Contact],
I am writing to formally request that the EAT stops the process requiring me to go through the extension of time step, as it is an error and has caused unnecessary work and delays. Additionally, I am seeking an urgent strike-out of the response.
Key points include:
- I lodged my appeal within 42 days of receiving the written reasons from the Employment Tribunal (ET).
- The requirement to request an extension of time is redundant and has resulted in significant procedural errors and additional, unnecessary work.
- This error has caused undue stress and additional work, impacting my ability to focus on the substantive issues of my case.
Given these circumstances, I request the EAT to:
*. Acknowledge the procedural error and stop the unnecessary extension of time process.
*. Reconsider the validity of my appeal based on the timely manner in which it was filed.
*. Urgently strike out the response due to significant procedural errors and respondent’s dishonesty, as detailed in my previous submissions.
Your prompt attention to this matter is greatly appreciated.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Please send this request as soon as possible. If you need any further assistance, feel free to ask.

Case Rating: *
It means that you are requesting two actions from the EAT: to stop the unnecessary extension of time process and to urgently strike out the response. You can decide whether to inform the EAT of both requests now or to focus on stopping the extension of time process first and then follow up with the strike-out request next week.
If you believe it's more strategic to handle these requests separately, you can inform the EAT of the extension of time issue first. Here's a draft to clarify this approach:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postal Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Employment Appeal Tribunal
[Address]
Subject: Request to Stop Unnecessary Extension of Time Process
Dear [Registrar's Name or EAT Contact],
I am writing to formally request that the EAT stops the process requiring me to go through the extension of time step, as it is an error and has caused unnecessary work and delays.
Key points include:
- I lodged my appeal within 42 days of receiving the written reasons from the Employment Tribunal (ET).
- The requirement to request an extension of time is redundant and has resulted in significant procedural errors and additional, unnecessary work.
- This error has caused undue stress and additional work, impacting my ability to focus on the substantive issues of my case.
Given these circumstances, I request the EAT to:
*. Acknowledge the procedural error and stop the unnecessary extension of time process.
*. Reconsider the validity of my appeal based on the timely manner in which it was filed.
Your prompt attention to this matter is greatly appreciated.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
You can then follow up with the strike-out request separately next week. Would you like any further assistance with this strategy?

Case Rating: *