TRY ME!
Employment Discrimination And Retaliation
Summary
Employment discrimination and retaliation are prohibited under federal and texas law. Fmla provides job-protected leave for eligible employees. If you have documentation supporting your claims, it may strengthen your case. Defendants might opt to settle if evidence is compelling. Consider consulting with a local attorney for personalized advice.Full Conversation
Asia Howard
Hi Asia! What legal issue can I help you with today?
Employment discrimination and retaliation, and FMLA interference and retaliation
It sounds like you're dealing with a challenging situation at work. Here are a few general points about employment discrimination, retaliation, and FMLA rights in Texas:
- Employers cannot discriminate based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, or genetic information.
- Retaliation against an employee for reporting discrimination or participating in an investigation is prohibited.
- Under the FMLA, eligible employees are entitled to take unpaid, job-protected leave for specific family and medical reasons with continuation of group health insurance coverage.
Would you like to be connected to a local lawyer who can assist you further?
- Employers cannot discriminate based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, or genetic information.
- Retaliation against an employee for reporting discrimination or participating in an investigation is prohibited.
- Under the FMLA, eligible employees are entitled to take unpaid, job-protected leave for specific family and medical reasons with continuation of group health insurance coverage.
Would you like to be connected to a local lawyer who can assist you further?
no
Alright, Asia. If you have any specific questions about your situation or need further information, feel free to ask. I'm here to help with any general legal information you might need regarding employment discrimination or FMLA rights in Texas.
I need to know how i stack up against defendants counsel as a pro se plaintiff. I inquired about FMLA in late july, was scheduled to meet with HR first week of august to discuss further and start the process, HR and * other employees released me of emplyment on the 5th of august two days before i was supposed to meet HR. They said i was inlcuded in and RIF due to budget shortfall within the insitution. another coworker in the same department was released that day and then rehired a week later. another fellow coworker in the same department who was only there a year compared to my three was retained. i ended up filing an eeoc charge where the employer then said i was chosen for the rif due to misconduct and noncomplaince which was not stated in my termination meeting even when i asked why me. the school even provided documentation to the eeoc to suport their statement which they obatined from my school email after i was terminated.
Case Rating: *
Your situation appears to have significant legal implications, especially concerning employment discrimination, retaliation, and FMLA interference. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
Your situation appears to have significant legal implications, especially concerning employment discrimination, retaliation, and FMLA interference. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
no
Case Rating: *
Your situation involves complex issues such as employment discrimination, retaliation, and potential FMLA violations, making it a high-value case. Since you've chosen not to be connected with local lawyers, feel free to ask any specific questions or request general legal information. I'm here to help with any concerns you might have.
Your situation involves complex issues such as employment discrimination, retaliation, and potential FMLA violations, making it a high-value case. Since you've chosen not to be connected with local lawyers, feel free to ask any specific questions or request general legal information. I'm here to help with any concerns you might have.
I have proof documentation to show that i was denied due process, and the bad faith that the school keeps continuin to make how do you think i would fair during trial. or is counsel more liekly to settle?
Case Rating: *
Your case seems strong, especially since you have documentation supporting claims of due process denial and bad faith. Generally, if your evidence is compelling, defendants might prefer to settle rather than face a trial. However, each case is unique, and outcomes can vary.
Your case seems strong, especially since you have documentation supporting claims of due process denial and bad faith. Generally, if your evidence is compelling, defendants might prefer to settle rather than face a trial. However, each case is unique, and outcomes can vary.
Start a new chat