Salary Discrimination Legal Analysis

Here are some legal points to consider in Rohit's case:
- Minimum Wages Act, *: This Act ensures employees receive at least the minimum wage. If the increase pertains to minimum wages, Rohit might have a claim.

- Equality before Law: Article * of the Indian Constitution guarantees equality before law. Rohit can argue discrimination if other temporary employees received increases.
- Right to Equal Pay for Equal Work: Although not explicitly in the Constitution, this principle has been upheld by the Supreme Court in various judgments.
It's advisable for Rohit to seek legal representation for thorough analysis and argumentation of the case.

Here are some legal points to consider in Rohit's case:
- Minimum Wages Act, *: Ensures employees receive at least the minimum wage. If salary increase pertains to this, Rohit might have a claim.

- Equality before Law: Article * of the Indian Constitution guarantees equality before law. Rohit can argue discrimination if other temporary employees received increases.
- Right to Equal Pay for Equal Work: This principle, although not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, has been upheld by the Supreme Court through various judgments.
It is advisable for Rohit to seek legal representation to thoroughly analyze and argue the case based on these points.

Case Rating: *
Rohit's case involves potential discrimination and violation of labor laws. Here are key legal points:
- Minimum Wages Act, *: Ensures employees receive at least minimum wages.
- Article * of the Indian Constitution: Guarantees equality before law, which may support claims of discrimination.
- Right to Equal Pay for Equal Work: Supported by Supreme Court judgments.
Given the complexity, legal representation would be beneficial to thoroughly analyze and present his case.

Case Rating: *
Rohit's case revolves around potential discrimination against temporary employees and involves several legal considerations:
*. Minimum Wages Act, *: Ensures employees receive at least the minimum wage. If the salary increase pertains to the minimum wage, Rohit might have a claim.
*. Article * of the Indian Constitution: This article guarantees equality before the law, which Rohit can use to argue discrimination if other temporary employees received salary increases.
*. Right to Equal Pay for Equal Work: Although not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, this principle has been upheld by the Supreme Court. It implies that employees doing similar work should receive similar pay.
*. Legal Precedents: The Supreme Court has upheld the principle of equal pay for equal work, which can be leveraged in Rohit's argument.
*. Eligibility Criteria: Rohit should verify if the Government Order explicitly excludes temporary employees. If it does not, he might have grounds for contestation.
Given the complexity of this issue, it would be beneficial for Rohit to seek legal representation to thoroughly analyze and present his case in court.