TRY ME!
Unfair Dismissal Appeal Guide
Summary
When appealing a dismissal for gross misconduct, focus on providing a clear timeline of events, highlighting the lack of evidence for allegations, and emphasizing your intentions and professional boundaries. Mention any procedural errors, such as incorrect dates, that could question the investigations accuracy. Discuss prior sanctions and clarify their context to show they do not constitute misconduct. Demonstrate your commitment to safeguarding and professional conduct by outlining proactive steps taken. Argue that the dismissal is disproportionate and request a more appropriate sanction, considering procedural irregularities and policy ambiguities.Full Conversation
yes an allegation was made against me after i replied to a young person i previosuly cared for on social media. There was no evidence of the allegation and it was recognised i as only checking the young persons welfare. i previosuly received a warning for this with my previous employer, and the employer who has dismissed me has used both sanctions against me
Rob, it sounds like a challenging situation. Here are some points you might consider for your appeal:
- Provide a clear timeline of the events.
- Highlight the lack of evidence for the recent allegation.
- Emphasize your intention of checking the young person's welfare.
- Note that your previous warning should not have compounded the current situation unfairly.
Would you like more detailed advice on constructing your appeal letter?
- Provide a clear timeline of the events.
- Highlight the lack of evidence for the recent allegation.
- Emphasize your intention of checking the young person's welfare.
- Note that your previous warning should not have compounded the current situation unfairly.
Would you like more detailed advice on constructing your appeal letter?
should i upload all the documents for you ?
Hi Rob! Unfortunately, I can't review documents directly. However, I can guide you on how to present your documents effectively in your appeal. Make sure to:
- Organize your documents chronologically.
- Highlight key points that support your case.
- Include any evidence that disproves the allegation.
- Attach any previous warnings and explain how they were addressed.
If you need more detailed advice or a sample appeal letter, let me know!
- Organize your documents chronologically.
- Highlight key points that support your case.
- Include any evidence that disproves the allegation.
- Attach any previous warnings and explain how they were addressed.
If you need more detailed advice or a sample appeal letter, let me know!
i have received two letters with incorrect dates on for the days i attended meetings, this makes me question the detail the investigators took when they have failed to even record the correct date ?
Case Rating: *
Rob, you should definitely mention the incorrect dates in your appeal as it questions the accuracy of the investigation. This can be used to underline potential flaws in the investigation process.
Would you like some pointers on how to effectively highlight these errors in your appeal letter?
Rob, you should definitely mention the incorrect dates in your appeal as it questions the accuracy of the investigation. This can be used to underline potential flaws in the investigation process.
Would you like some pointers on how to effectively highlight these errors in your appeal letter?
yes please
Case Rating: *
Sure, Rob! Here are some pointers to effectively highlight the errors in your appeal letter:
- Introduction: Start with a brief introduction of your case.
- Incorrect Dates: Clearly state the discrepancies in the dates in the letters.
- Impact on Investigation: Explain how these errors question the accuracy and thoroughness of the investigation.
- Supporting Evidence: Attach the letters with the incorrect dates and any other relevant documents.
- Conclusion: Reiterate your points and request a fair re-evaluation of your case.
If you need a specific template or further guidance, feel free to ask!
Sure, Rob! Here are some pointers to effectively highlight the errors in your appeal letter:
- Introduction: Start with a brief introduction of your case.
- Incorrect Dates: Clearly state the discrepancies in the dates in the letters.
- Impact on Investigation: Explain how these errors question the accuracy and thoroughness of the investigation.
- Supporting Evidence: Attach the letters with the incorrect dates and any other relevant documents.
- Conclusion: Reiterate your points and request a fair re-evaluation of your case.
If you need a specific template or further guidance, feel free to ask!
ok thanks , can i paste in staements for you to write for me in a more concise manner ?
Case Rating: *
Sure, Rob! Please go ahead and paste the statements you need help with, and I'll help you make them more concise.
Sure, Rob! Please go ahead and paste the statements you need help with, and I'll help you make them more concise.
oh its over * characters
Case Rating: *
Rob, I can help you make your statements more concise. Please paste in the statements you need assistance with, and I'll work on them for you.
Rob, I can help you make your statements more concise. Please paste in the statements you need assistance with, and I'll work on them for you.
I acknowledge that, without full context, communication with young people in care may appear inappropriate. However, my actions were always and have always been driven by genuine concern for their welfare. The disciplinary hearing found no evidence of inappropriate content in my communications. The dismissal decision was based on the second investigation regarding communications with young people, but it is crucial to note that my prior sanction in * was related solely to a policy breach concerning social media and mobile phone use, not inappropriate communication as stated in the outcome of the disciplinary hearing.
Case Rating: *
Rob, here's a more concise version of your statement:
"My communications with young people in care were driven solely by concern for their welfare. The disciplinary hearing found no inappropriate content. The dismissal was based on a second investigation, but my prior sanction in * was for a policy breach regarding social media and mobile phone use, not inappropriate communication."
Would you like help with any other parts of your appeal?
Rob, here's a more concise version of your statement:
"My communications with young people in care were driven solely by concern for their welfare. The disciplinary hearing found no inappropriate content. The dismissal was based on a second investigation, but my prior sanction in * was for a policy breach regarding social media and mobile phone use, not inappropriate communication."
Would you like help with any other parts of your appeal?
can you concise the statement i paste in please
Case Rating: *
Sure, Rob! Please paste the statement you need help with, and I'll make it more concise for you.
Sure, Rob! Please paste the statement you need help with, and I'll make it more concise for you.
*. Context of Communication: The communication with the young person was centred on their welfare, which remains in professional boundaries. No inappropriate content was found during the investigation, and the primary purpose of the contact was to respond checking on their well-being.
The dismissal decision failed to take full account of the context in which the situation occurred, where there is evidence of checking on the young person's welfare, confirming the communication was not inappropriate but a welfare check which can be viewed under professional boundaries.
Case Rating: *
Here's a more concise version of your statement:
"The communication with the young person was centred on their welfare, within professional boundaries. No inappropriate content was found during the investigation. The primary purpose was to check on their well-being. The dismissal decision did not fully consider the context, confirming the communication was a welfare check under professional boundaries."
Would you like help with any other parts of your appeal?
Here's a more concise version of your statement:
"The communication with the young person was centred on their welfare, within professional boundaries. No inappropriate content was found during the investigation. The primary purpose was to check on their well-being. The dismissal decision did not fully consider the context, confirming the communication was a welfare check under professional boundaries."
Would you like help with any other parts of your appeal?
would you write it any differnetly ? should profesional boundaries be left in ?
Case Rating: *
The revised statement is already quite concise. Here's an alternative, with "professional boundaries" left in:
"The communication with the young person focused on their welfare and remained within professional boundaries. No inappropriate content was found. The primary purpose was to check on their well-being. The dismissal decision did not fully consider this context."
Would you like assistance with other parts of your appeal?
The revised statement is already quite concise. Here's an alternative, with "professional boundaries" left in:
"The communication with the young person focused on their welfare and remained within professional boundaries. No inappropriate content was found. The primary purpose was to check on their well-being. The dismissal decision did not fully consider this context."
Would you like assistance with other parts of your appeal?
The communication with the young person was centred on their welfare and remained within professional boundaries. No inappropriate content was found during the investigation, and the primary purpose of the contact was to check on their well-being. The dismissal decision did not fully consider this context, although the investigation did acknowledge that the communication was a welfare check.
Case Rating: *
Rob, the appeal you are working on is critical. Ensure that you emphasize the welfare context and the lack of inappropriate content in your communications.
Would you like any further assistance with other parts of your appeal letter?
Rob, the appeal you are working on is critical. Ensure that you emphasize the welfare context and the lack of inappropriate content in your communications.
Would you like any further assistance with other parts of your appeal letter?
yes please add that in thanks
Case Rating: *
Rob, I have added your statement into the appeal context. Here's the revised version for your appeal letter:
"The communication with the young person was centred on their welfare and remained within professional boundaries. No inappropriate content was found during the investigation, and the primary purpose of the contact was to check on their well-being. The dismissal decision did not fully consider this context, although the investigation did acknowledge that the communication was a welfare check."
Would you like help with any other parts of your appeal letter?
Rob, I have added your statement into the appeal context. Here's the revised version for your appeal letter:
"The communication with the young person was centred on their welfare and remained within professional boundaries. No inappropriate content was found during the investigation, and the primary purpose of the contact was to check on their well-being. The dismissal decision did not fully consider this context, although the investigation did acknowledge that the communication was a welfare check."
Would you like help with any other parts of your appeal letter?
can you do the same for the next statement i paste in please
Case Rating: *
Sure, Rob! Please go ahead and paste the next statement you need help with, and I'll make it more concise for you.
Sure, Rob! Please go ahead and paste the next statement you need help with, and I'll make it more concise for you.
*. Previous Employment Sanction: The disciplinary action from my previous employer was related to a specific social media policy and not to inappropriate communication. This was not explicitly addressed during the Service’s interview process. Your prior sanction from your former employer was due to breach of a specific policy related to social media usage and not characterised by inappropriate communication, thus qualifying your actions as not constituting misconduct. The sanction from prior employment was related to a specific social media and mobile phone policy, not inappropriate communication, and was not explicitly asked about during the Service interview process due to its nature.
Case Rating: *
Rob, here's a more concise version of your statement:
"My prior disciplinary action was related to a breach of a specific social media and mobile phone policy, not inappropriate communication. This was not explicitly addressed during the Service's interview process due to its specific nature."
Would you like help with any other parts of your appeal letter?
Rob, here's a more concise version of your statement:
"My prior disciplinary action was related to a breach of a specific social media and mobile phone policy, not inappropriate communication. This was not explicitly addressed during the Service's interview process due to its specific nature."
Would you like help with any other parts of your appeal letter?
*. Previous Employment Sanction: The disciplinary action from my previous employer was related to a specific social media policy and not to inappropriate communication. Your prior sanction from your former employer was due to breach of a specific policy related to social media usage and not characterised by inappropriate communication, thus qualifying your actions as not constituting misconduct. The sanction from prior employment was related to a specific social media and mobile phone policy, not inappropriate communication,
Case Rating: *
Hi Rob! Here's a more concise version of your statement:
"My prior disciplinary action was related to a breach of a specific social media and mobile phone policy, not inappropriate communication. This should not be viewed as misconduct."
Would you like help with any other parts of your appeal letter?
Hi Rob! Here's a more concise version of your statement:
"My prior disciplinary action was related to a breach of a specific social media and mobile phone policy, not inappropriate communication. This should not be viewed as misconduct."
Would you like help with any other parts of your appeal letter?
The disciplinary action from my previous employer was related to a specific social media policy and not to inappropriate communication. Your prior sanction from your former employer was due to breach of a specific policy related to social media usage and not characterised by inappropriate communication.
Case Rating: *
Rob, here's a more concise version of your statement:
"My prior disciplinary action was related to a breach of a specific social media and mobile phone policy, not inappropriate communication. This should not be viewed as misconduct."
Would you like help with any other parts of your appeal letter?
Rob, here's a more concise version of your statement:
"My prior disciplinary action was related to a breach of a specific social media and mobile phone policy, not inappropriate communication. This should not be viewed as misconduct."
Would you like help with any other parts of your appeal letter?
I took proactive steps to block further contact from the young person and committed to reporting any future attempts at communication. This demonstrates my dedication to safeguarding and following professional conduct moving forward. The allegations state a loss of trust and confidence, however, this doesn't consider the extenuating circumstances or the commitment demonstrated to avoid repeat situations, like blocking contact from the young person and commitment to disclose any future contact attempts. Your cooperation in blocking further contact from the concerned young person and firm commitment to transparency by reporting any such future contact promptly to management demonstrates your willingness to comply with safeguarding guidelines.
Case Rating: *
Rob, here's a more concise version of your statement:
"I took proactive steps to block further contact from the young person and committed to reporting any future attempts at communication. This shows my dedication to safeguarding and professional conduct. The allegations of loss of trust do not consider my commitment to avoid repeat situations and transparency with management."
Would you like help with any other parts of your appeal letter?
Rob, here's a more concise version of your statement:
"I took proactive steps to block further contact from the young person and committed to reporting any future attempts at communication. This shows my dedication to safeguarding and professional conduct. The allegations of loss of trust do not consider my commitment to avoid repeat situations and transparency with management."
Would you like help with any other parts of your appeal letter?
There were errors in the official documents, such as incorrect dates, which created confusion and further affected my mental health. The miscommunication and delays in updates impacted my ability to fully engage in the investigation. Miscommunication and delays in update deliveries about the disciplinary procedure highlight procedural issues affecting mental health and ability to engage in the investigation.
*. Highlight the inaccuracies and inconsistencies in provided documentation, such as misstated dates, and the impact these inaccuracies had on your mental health and participation in the investigation.
*.
*. Incorrect dates on official documents raise credibility concerns about the overall accuracy and consistency of the process.
Case Rating: *
Rob, here's a more concise version of your statement:
"There were errors in official documents, such as incorrect dates, leading to confusion and affecting my mental health. Miscommunication and delays impacted my ability to engage in the investigation. These procedural issues raise concerns about the accuracy and consistency of the process."
Would you like help with any other parts of your appeal letter?
Rob, here's a more concise version of your statement:
"There were errors in official documents, such as incorrect dates, leading to confusion and affecting my mental health. Miscommunication and delays impacted my ability to engage in the investigation. These procedural issues raise concerns about the accuracy and consistency of the process."
Would you like help with any other parts of your appeal letter?
The dismissal is disproportionate to the actions taken, with no evidence supporting inappropriate contact. Considering the context, procedural irregularities, and my commitment to improvement, i ask the panel to consider a warning or final written warning which would be viewed as more appropriate and a proportionate response. I ask the panel to review that my actions and the threshold for gross misconduct, and the severity of the sanction does not align with the circumstances, especially given the lack of clarity on post-employment rules and prior management approvals.
Case Rating: *
Here's a more concise version of your statement:
"The dismissal is disproportionate to the actions taken, with no evidence of inappropriate contact. Considering the context, procedural irregularities, and my commitment to improvement, I request the panel to consider a warning or final written warning as a proportionate response. The severity of the sanction does not align with the circumstances, especially given the lack of clarity on post-employment rules and prior management approvals."
Would you like assistance with any other parts of your appeal letter?
Here's a more concise version of your statement:
"The dismissal is disproportionate to the actions taken, with no evidence of inappropriate contact. Considering the context, procedural irregularities, and my commitment to improvement, I request the panel to consider a warning or final written warning as a proportionate response. The severity of the sanction does not align with the circumstances, especially given the lack of clarity on post-employment rules and prior management approvals."
Would you like assistance with any other parts of your appeal letter?
The disciplinary process did not adequately account for the prior approvals I received or the full context of the situation. Additionally, there was an expectation to continue following policies from my previous employer, even though I had left that role. Unreasonable expectation to continue adhering to the policy of a previous employer. The disciplinary procedure seemingly expects continuation of previous employer's policy despite having left that role and ambiguity as there is no explicit policy detailing actions when contacted by former care receivers in the Service's Code of Conduct.
Case Rating: *
Rob, I've made your statement more concise:
"The disciplinary process did not adequately account for prior approvals or the full context of the situation. There was an unreasonable expectation to continue following policies from my previous employer, despite leaving that role. The Service’s Code of Conduct lacks clarity on actions regarding contact from former care receivers."
Would you like help with any other parts of your appeal letter?
Rob, I've made your statement more concise:
"The disciplinary process did not adequately account for prior approvals or the full context of the situation. There was an unreasonable expectation to continue following policies from my previous employer, despite leaving that role. The Service’s Code of Conduct lacks clarity on actions regarding contact from former care receivers."
Would you like help with any other parts of your appeal letter?
as i did respond to the young person and check on there wellfare being stopingcommunication. How do you view this statement ? as i hav been dismissed for a breach of trust with the service. The Disciplinary Procedure suggests gross misconduct was committed but there is no evidence to support such a claim considering the positive history of service and lack of inappropriate contact evidence.
Case Rating: *
Rob, here’s a more concise version of your statement:
"I responded to the young person to check on their welfare, stopping further communication. Despite my dismissal for breach of trust, there is no evidence supporting gross misconduct. My positive service history and lack of inappropriate contact evidence should be considered."
Would you like assistance with any other parts of your appeal letter?
Rob, here’s a more concise version of your statement:
"I responded to the young person to check on their welfare, stopping further communication. Despite my dismissal for breach of trust, there is no evidence supporting gross misconduct. My positive service history and lack of inappropriate contact evidence should be considered."
Would you like assistance with any other parts of your appeal letter?
can you re write this for me and adjust the order
Case Rating: *
Sure, here's a revised and reordered version of your appeal:
---
Introduction:
I am appealing my recent dismissal for gross misconduct due to an alleged breach of trust. I believe that my actions were within professional boundaries and driven by genuine concern for the welfare of a young person.
Context of Communication:
The communication with the young person was centred on their welfare and remained within professional boundaries. No inappropriate content was found during the investigation, and the primary purpose of the contact was to check on their well-being. The dismissal decision did not fully consider this context, although the investigation did acknowledge that the communication was a welfare check.
Previous Employment Sanction:
My prior disciplinary action was related to a breach of a specific social media and mobile phone policy, not inappropriate communication. This was not explicitly addressed during the Service's interview process due to its specific nature. This should not be viewed as misconduct.
Commitment to Safeguarding:
I took proactive steps to block further contact from the young person and committed to reporting any future attempts at communication. This shows my dedication to safeguarding and professional conduct. The allegations of loss of trust do not consider my commitment to avoid repeat situations and transparency with management.
Procedural Issues:
There were errors in official documents, such as incorrect dates, leading to confusion and affecting my mental health. Miscommunication and delays impacted my ability to engage in the investigation. These procedural issues raise concerns about the accuracy and consistency of the process.
Disproportionate Dismissal:
The dismissal is disproportionate to the actions taken, with no evidence of inappropriate contact. Considering the context, procedural irregularities, and my commitment to improvement, I request the panel to consider a warning or final written warning as a proportionate response. The severity of the sanction does not align with the circumstances, especially given the lack of clarity on post-employment rules and prior management approvals.
Policy Ambiguity:
The disciplinary process did not adequately account for prior approvals or the full context of the situation. There was an unreasonable expectation to continue following policies from my previous employer, despite leaving that role. The Service’s Code of Conduct lacks clarity on actions regarding contact from former care receivers.
Conclusion:
I responded to the young person to check on their welfare, stopping further communication. Despite my dismissal for breach of trust, there is no evidence supporting gross misconduct. My positive service history and lack of inappropriate contact evidence should be considered. I ask the panel to re-evaluate the decision and consider a more proportionate response.
---
Would you like assistance with any other parts of your appeal letter?
Sure, here's a revised and reordered version of your appeal:
---
Introduction:
I am appealing my recent dismissal for gross misconduct due to an alleged breach of trust. I believe that my actions were within professional boundaries and driven by genuine concern for the welfare of a young person.
Context of Communication:
The communication with the young person was centred on their welfare and remained within professional boundaries. No inappropriate content was found during the investigation, and the primary purpose of the contact was to check on their well-being. The dismissal decision did not fully consider this context, although the investigation did acknowledge that the communication was a welfare check.
Previous Employment Sanction:
My prior disciplinary action was related to a breach of a specific social media and mobile phone policy, not inappropriate communication. This was not explicitly addressed during the Service's interview process due to its specific nature. This should not be viewed as misconduct.
Commitment to Safeguarding:
I took proactive steps to block further contact from the young person and committed to reporting any future attempts at communication. This shows my dedication to safeguarding and professional conduct. The allegations of loss of trust do not consider my commitment to avoid repeat situations and transparency with management.
Procedural Issues:
There were errors in official documents, such as incorrect dates, leading to confusion and affecting my mental health. Miscommunication and delays impacted my ability to engage in the investigation. These procedural issues raise concerns about the accuracy and consistency of the process.
Disproportionate Dismissal:
The dismissal is disproportionate to the actions taken, with no evidence of inappropriate contact. Considering the context, procedural irregularities, and my commitment to improvement, I request the panel to consider a warning or final written warning as a proportionate response. The severity of the sanction does not align with the circumstances, especially given the lack of clarity on post-employment rules and prior management approvals.
Policy Ambiguity:
The disciplinary process did not adequately account for prior approvals or the full context of the situation. There was an unreasonable expectation to continue following policies from my previous employer, despite leaving that role. The Service’s Code of Conduct lacks clarity on actions regarding contact from former care receivers.
Conclusion:
I responded to the young person to check on their welfare, stopping further communication. Despite my dismissal for breach of trust, there is no evidence supporting gross misconduct. My positive service history and lack of inappropriate contact evidence should be considered. I ask the panel to re-evaluate the decision and consider a more proportionate response.
---
Would you like assistance with any other parts of your appeal letter?
can you make the statement i post next as positive as possible please
Sure, go ahead and post the statement you need help with, and I'll make it as positive as possible for you!
I took proactive steps to block further contact from the young person and committed to reporting any future attempts at communication. This shows my dedication to safeguarding and professional conduct. The allegations of loss of trust do not consider my commitment to avoid repeat situations and transparency with management. Your cooperation in blocking further contact from the concerned young person and firm commitment to transparency by reporting any such future contact promptly to management demonstrates your willingness to comply with safeguarding guidelines.
*. A proactive commitment to avoid any such occurrence in future, including blocking any potential communication and agreeing to report any contact attempts.
Case Rating: *
Rob, here's a positively framed version of your statement:
"I proactively blocked further contact from the young person and committed to reporting any future attempts at communication. This reflects my dedication to safeguarding and professional conduct. The allegations of loss of trust do not consider my proactive measures to avoid repeat situations and my transparency with management. My actions demonstrate a firm commitment to comply with safeguarding guidelines, ensuring such occurrences are prevented in the future."
Would you like assistance with any other parts of your appeal letter?
Rob, here's a positively framed version of your statement:
"I proactively blocked further contact from the young person and committed to reporting any future attempts at communication. This reflects my dedication to safeguarding and professional conduct. The allegations of loss of trust do not consider my proactive measures to avoid repeat situations and my transparency with management. My actions demonstrate a firm commitment to comply with safeguarding guidelines, ensuring such occurrences are prevented in the future."
Would you like assistance with any other parts of your appeal letter?
would you write it any differently or is that ok ?
Case Rating: *
Rob, your revised statement is well-framed and positive. It clearly highlights your proactive measures and commitment to safeguarding guidelines. It effectively addresses the allegations of loss of trust and demonstrates your dedication to professional conduct.
Would you like assistance with any other parts of your appeal letter?
Rob, your revised statement is well-framed and positive. It clearly highlights your proactive measures and commitment to safeguarding guidelines. It effectively addresses the allegations of loss of trust and demonstrates your dedication to professional conduct.
Would you like assistance with any other parts of your appeal letter?
yes if you can help me i will go to the next section. thanks
Case Rating: *
Rob, I'm happy to assist you further! Do you need help with any specific section or statement in your appeal letter? Let me know, and I'll provide the necessary support.
Rob, I'm happy to assist you further! Do you need help with any specific section or statement in your appeal letter? Let me know, and I'll provide the necessary support.
can you make this next statement as positive as possible, and possibly the wording of professional boundaries?
Case Rating: *
Sure, Rob! Please go ahead and paste the next statement you need help with, and I'll make it as positive as possible for you.
Sure, Rob! Please go ahead and paste the next statement you need help with, and I'll make it as positive as possible for you.
The communication with the young person was centred on their welfare and remained within professional boundaries. No inappropriate content was found during the investigation, and the primary purpose of the contact was to check on their well-being. The dismissal decision did not fully consider this context, although the investigation did acknowledge that the communication was a welfare check. The context of your communication with the young person centred around their welfare, a fact acknowledged during the disciplinary hearing as no content was found inappropriate.
Case Rating: *
Rob, here's a positively framed version of your statement with a focus on professional boundaries:
---
"My communication with the young person was centred on their welfare and strictly adhered to professional boundaries. The investigation found no inappropriate content, and the main aim was to ensure their well-being. Although the disciplinary hearing acknowledged that the communication was a welfare check, the dismissal decision did not fully consider this context."
---
Would you like assistance with any other parts of your appeal letter?
Rob, here's a positively framed version of your statement with a focus on professional boundaries:
---
"My communication with the young person was centred on their welfare and strictly adhered to professional boundaries. The investigation found no inappropriate content, and the main aim was to ensure their well-being. Although the disciplinary hearing acknowledged that the communication was a welfare check, the dismissal decision did not fully consider this context."
---
Would you like assistance with any other parts of your appeal letter?
can you just check this next statement reads ok in manner to convince the appeal panel
Case Rating: *
Sure, Rob! Please go ahead and paste the next statement you need help with, and I'll make sure it reads well to convince the appeal panel.
Sure, Rob! Please go ahead and paste the next statement you need help with, and I'll make sure it reads well to convince the appeal panel.
The communication with the young person was centred on their welfare. No inappropriate content was found during the investigation, and the primary purpose of my responses was to check on their well-being. I ask for the appeal panel to fully consider this context, and that the investigation did acknowledge that the communication was a welfare check.
Case Rating: *
Rob, your statement reads well and is clear in conveying your intent. Here's a slightly revised version to ensure it is as convincing as possible for the appeal panel:
---
"My communication with the young person was centred on their welfare, with no inappropriate content found during the investigation. The primary purpose of my responses was to check on their well-being. I respectfully ask the appeal panel to fully consider this context and the investigation's acknowledgment that the communication was a welfare check."
---
Would you like assistance with any other parts of your appeal letter?
Rob, your statement reads well and is clear in conveying your intent. Here's a slightly revised version to ensure it is as convincing as possible for the appeal panel:
---
"My communication with the young person was centred on their welfare, with no inappropriate content found during the investigation. The primary purpose of my responses was to check on their well-being. I respectfully ask the appeal panel to fully consider this context and the investigation's acknowledgment that the communication was a welfare check."
---
Would you like assistance with any other parts of your appeal letter?
thanks
Case Rating: *
Rob, your case appears to be strong, particularly with the context and your proactive measures. However, if you need more personalized legal advice or representation, it might be worthwhile to consult a legal professional. Would you like help with any other parts of your appeal letter?
Rob, your case appears to be strong, particularly with the context and your proactive measures. However, if you need more personalized legal advice or representation, it might be worthwhile to consult a legal professional. Would you like help with any other parts of your appeal letter?
can you do the same with this next statement please
Case Rating: *
Sure, Rob! Please go ahead and paste the next statement you need help with, and I'll make it as positive as possible for you.
Sure, Rob! Please go ahead and paste the next statement you need help with, and I'll make it as positive as possible for you.
My prior level one sanction in * was related to a breach of a specific social media and mobile phone policy, not inappropriate communication. I respectfully ask the panel not to view this as inappropriate communication as stated in the disciplinary outcome.
Case Rating: *
Rob, here's a positively framed version of your statement:
---
"My prior level one sanction in * was related to a breach of a specific social media and mobile phone policy, not inappropriate communication. I respectfully ask the panel to accurately consider this context and not view it as inappropriate communication, as stated in the disciplinary outcome."
---
Would you like assistance with any other parts of your appeal letter?
Rob, here's a positively framed version of your statement:
---
"My prior level one sanction in * was related to a breach of a specific social media and mobile phone policy, not inappropriate communication. I respectfully ask the panel to accurately consider this context and not view it as inappropriate communication, as stated in the disciplinary outcome."
---
Would you like assistance with any other parts of your appeal letter?
can you do the same with next statement please
Case Rating: *
Sure, Rob! Please go ahead and paste the next statement you need help with, and I'll make it as positive as possible for you.
Sure, Rob! Please go ahead and paste the next statement you need help with, and I'll make it as positive as possible for you.
I proactively blocked further contact from the young person and committed to reporting any future attempts at communication. This reflects my dedication to safeguarding and professional conduct. I respectfully ask the panel to review the allegations of loss of trust and consider my proactive measures to avoid repeat situations and my transparency with management. My actions demonstrate a firm commitment to comply with safeguarding guidelines, ensuring such occurrences are prevented in the future.
Case Rating: *
Rob, here's a positively framed version of your statement:
---
"I proactively blocked further contact from the young person and committed to reporting any future attempts at communication. This reflects my dedication to safeguarding and professional conduct. I respectfully ask the panel to review the allegations of loss of trust and consider my proactive measures to avoid repeat situations and my transparency with management. My actions demonstrate a firm commitment to comply with safeguarding guidelines, ensuring such occurrences are prevented in the future."
---
Would you like assistance with any other parts of your appeal letter?
Rob, here's a positively framed version of your statement:
---
"I proactively blocked further contact from the young person and committed to reporting any future attempts at communication. This reflects my dedication to safeguarding and professional conduct. I respectfully ask the panel to review the allegations of loss of trust and consider my proactive measures to avoid repeat situations and my transparency with management. My actions demonstrate a firm commitment to comply with safeguarding guidelines, ensuring such occurrences are prevented in the future."
---
Would you like assistance with any other parts of your appeal letter?
can you do the same with the next statement please
Case Rating: *
Sure, Rob! Please go ahead and paste the next statement you need help with, and I'll make it as positive as possible for you.
Sure, Rob! Please go ahead and paste the next statement you need help with, and I'll make it as positive as possible for you.
I respectfully ask the panel to review the actions taken, with no evidence of inappropriate contact. Considering the context, my commitment to improvement, I request the panel to consider a warning or final written warning as a proportionate response.
Case Rating: *
Rob, here's a positively framed version of your statement:
---
"I respectfully ask the panel to review the actions taken, as there is no evidence of inappropriate contact. Considering the context and my commitment to improvement, I request the panel to consider a warning or final written warning as a proportionate response."
---
Would you like assistance with any other parts of your appeal letter?
Rob, here's a positively framed version of your statement:
---
"I respectfully ask the panel to review the actions taken, as there is no evidence of inappropriate contact. Considering the context and my commitment to improvement, I request the panel to consider a warning or final written warning as a proportionate response."
---
Would you like assistance with any other parts of your appeal letter?
can you do the same with the next statement please
Case Rating: *
Sure, Rob! Please go ahead and paste the next statement you need help with, and I'll make it as positive as possible for you.
Sure, Rob! Please go ahead and paste the next statement you need help with, and I'll make it as positive as possible for you.
Start a new chat