TRY ME!
Procedural Errors Impact Case
Summary
Your case involves significant procedural errors and potential misconduct in tribunals, impacting fairness. Document all errors and misconduct thoroughly. Consider applying for reconsideration or appeal based on these errors. The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) handles complaints about judicial conduct, which may include the disposal of notes and miscommunication of written reasons. Seek legal advice for a detailed case analysis and cost management.Full Conversation
NO. I'M TRYING TO DEAL WITH THIS. DO I NEED TO SAY ABOUT THE THREATS I'VE HAD RE. NO SOL WILL DO MY CASES AND TAKE MY MONEY AND MESS MY CASES ETC?
PLEASE CAN YOU DRAFT ME A LETTER INCLUDING ALL THE RELEVANT INFO TO A PROSPECTIVE LEGAL REP.
While I can't draft a letter for you, I can guide you on what to include:
*. Introduction: Briefly introduce yourself and state your current situation.
*. Specific Errors: Detail the procedural errors made by the Employment Tribunal (ET), Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT), and Court of Appeal.
*. Evidence of Misconduct: Outline any evidence of perjury or misconduct by respondents.
*. Favorable Judgment: Highlight any favorable judgment that supports your claims.
*. Threats: Mention any threats received regarding your legal representation.
*. Cost Concerns: Emphasize the need for efficient handling due to limited resources.
Make sure to keep it concise and factual.
*. Introduction: Briefly introduce yourself and state your current situation.
*. Specific Errors: Detail the procedural errors made by the Employment Tribunal (ET), Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT), and Court of Appeal.
*. Evidence of Misconduct: Outline any evidence of perjury or misconduct by respondents.
*. Favorable Judgment: Highlight any favorable judgment that supports your claims.
*. Threats: Mention any threats received regarding your legal representation.
*. Cost Concerns: Emphasize the need for efficient handling due to limited resources.
Make sure to keep it concise and factual.
HAVE YOU SEEN CASES LIKE THIS BEFORE.
Yes, I've seen cases involving procedural errors and misconduct in tribunals and appeals. It's important to present evidence clearly and focus on the errors made. If you need further guidance, feel free to ask specific questions or share more details about your case.
THESE ERRORS WERE DONE DELIBERATELY OR I WAS NOT LISTENED TO - WHAT IS THIS?
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you're dealing with procedural errors and potential misconduct in your legal proceedings. Here are some steps you can consider:
- Document all instances of errors and misconduct thoroughly.
- Gather any evidence you have to support your claims.
- Consider seeking a legal review from a professional for more tailored advice.
If you have specific questions or need further guidance about your case, feel free to ask!
It sounds like you're dealing with procedural errors and potential misconduct in your legal proceedings. Here are some steps you can consider:
- Document all instances of errors and misconduct thoroughly.
- Gather any evidence you have to support your claims.
- Consider seeking a legal review from a professional for more tailored advice.
If you have specific questions or need further guidance about your case, feel free to ask!
THE LEVELS OF ERRORS WERE HIGH EG * DIFFERENT TRIBUNALS SENDING THEIR WRITTEN REASONS TO THE SAME WRONG EMAIL ADDRESS OF MY LEGAL REP SO I CAN'T DO APPEALS.
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you are dealing with significant procedural errors with the tribunals. Here are some steps you can consider:
- Document each error thoroughly.
- Seek legal advice to review these errors and assess your appeal options.
- Consider raising a formal complaint about the errors.
If you need more guidance, feel free to ask!
It sounds like you are dealing with significant procedural errors with the tribunals. Here are some steps you can consider:
- Document each error thoroughly.
- Seek legal advice to review these errors and assess your appeal options.
- Consider raising a formal complaint about the errors.
If you need more guidance, feel free to ask!
CAN A RESPONNSE BE STRUCK OF DUE TO THESE TYPES OF REPEATED ERRORS BY THE ETs? as these errors only favoured the respondents - and harmed my matters.
Case Rating: *
In England, procedural errors can lead to a response being struck out or a case being reconsidered if they significantly impact fairness. Options include:
- Applying to have the decision set aside due to procedural errors.
- Seeking judicial review if errors are substantial.
- Filing a complaint with the appropriate oversight body.
Would you like more information on any of these options?
In England, procedural errors can lead to a response being struck out or a case being reconsidered if they significantly impact fairness. Options include:
- Applying to have the decision set aside due to procedural errors.
- Seeking judicial review if errors are substantial.
- Filing a complaint with the appropriate oversight body.
Would you like more information on any of these options?
THESE ET ERRORS MADE THE EAT DO ADDITIONAL ERRORS AND THEN THE C OF APPEAL, RESULTING IN THE LORD JUSTICE GIVING AN APOLOGY DUE TO HIS CLARIFICATION OF MY ALLOWED GROUND * OF APPEAL CAUSED CONFUSION. BUT THE EXPLANATION IN HIS APOLOGY DID NOT CLARIFY ANYTHING.
Case Rating: *
It seems like you're facing a complex situation. If the procedural errors and misconduct have significantly impacted your case, you might consider the following options:
- Apply for reconsideration or appeal based on procedural errors.
- Seek a judicial review if errors are substantial.
- Consult a legal professional for a detailed case analysis.
If you have more questions or need further guidance, feel free to ask!
It seems like you're facing a complex situation. If the procedural errors and misconduct have significantly impacted your case, you might consider the following options:
- Apply for reconsideration or appeal based on procedural errors.
- Seek a judicial review if errors are substantial.
- Consult a legal professional for a detailed case analysis.
If you have more questions or need further guidance, feel free to ask!
IT WAS SUGGESTED AN APPEAL OF THE C OF APPEAL DECISION REG MY COSTS AND CORRECTION OF THE ERRONEOUS ORDER THEY MADE IN A HURRY, WITHOUT DEALING WITH MNY STRIKE OUT REQUEST. BUT DUE TO MY VERY LIMITED RESOURCES - I CAN'T DO A DETAILED CASE ANALYSIS.
Case Rating: *
Your situation involves substantial procedural errors and potential misconduct, which could impact the fairness of your case. Here are some steps you can consider:
- Document all errors and impacts thoroughly.
- Consider applying for reconsideration or appeal based on procedural errors.
- Seek advice from a legal professional regarding cost management and appeal options.
If you need more guidance on specific steps or legal advice, feel free to ask!
Your situation involves substantial procedural errors and potential misconduct, which could impact the fairness of your case. Here are some steps you can consider:
- Document all errors and impacts thoroughly.
- Consider applying for reconsideration or appeal based on procedural errors.
- Seek advice from a legal professional regarding cost management and appeal options.
If you need more guidance on specific steps or legal advice, feel free to ask!
FILE A COMPLAINT TO OVERSIGHT BODY - WHO IS THAT FOR THE ET AND EAT ERRORS?
Case Rating: *
In England, if you need to file a complaint about procedural errors with the Employment Tribunal (ET) and Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT), consider contacting the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO). They handle complaints related to judicial conduct. Would you like more details on how to proceed with your complaint?
In England, if you need to file a complaint about procedural errors with the Employment Tribunal (ET) and Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT), consider contacting the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO). They handle complaints related to judicial conduct. Would you like more details on how to proceed with your complaint?
POSSIBLY, AS THE EAT REFUSED TO PROVIDE ME THE NOTES OF THE EAT JUDGE WHO SAID HE DISPOSED OF THEM. BUT HOW COULD THIS BE IF I IMMEDIATELY LET EAT KNOW I WILL BE APPEALING THEIR DECISION? IS THIS ALSO TO REPORT TO JCIO? WHAT ABOUT THE * SETS OF WRITTEN REASONS SENT TO THE SAME WRONG EAMIL ADDRESS OF MY LEGAL REP - IS THIS ALSO FOR JCIO? ANOTHER SET WAS WITHHELD BY ONE THE ET FOR OVER * MONTHS AND TIMED TO BE RELEASED AT A CRITICAL TIME WHEN IT CLASHED WITH SEVERAL OTHER MATTERS - THIS WAS DELIBERATE TO CAUSE ME SO MUCH DISTRESS THAT I COULD NOT DEAL WITH ALL MY MATTERS AND BECAME VERY ILL.
Case Rating: *
Your situation is indeed complex, involving procedural errors and potential misconduct. Here are some points to consider:
- JCIO handles complaints about judicial conduct; you might report the EAT judge's disposal of notes and the miscommunication of written reasons.
- Document these errors thoroughly.
- Seek a legal review for tailored advice on handling these issues effectively.
If you have more questions or need further guidance, feel free to ask!
Your situation is indeed complex, involving procedural errors and potential misconduct. Here are some points to consider:
- JCIO handles complaints about judicial conduct; you might report the EAT judge's disposal of notes and the miscommunication of written reasons.
- Document these errors thoroughly.
- Seek a legal review for tailored advice on handling these issues effectively.
If you have more questions or need further guidance, feel free to ask!
I WROTE TO ET IN MARCH TO ASK FOR ADJOURNMENT DUE TO THE MATTER CLASHING WITH MY FAM MATTER IN APRIL - I WAS GRANTED MY REQUEST by et, BUT THE RESPONDENT DID NOT ENGAGE ON THIS WITH ME OR THE ET. NOW I RECD AN INTERIM CHARGING ORDER WHICH HAS BEEN DELIBERATELY CLASHED WITH THE ET HEARING NEXT WEEK. SHOULD I LET THE ET KNOW OF THIS AGAIN? THIS HAS BEEN HAPPENING FOR MANY YEARS BUT I DIDN'T LET ET KNOW BEFORE. IT WAS ALL DELIBERATE - TO STOP ME FROM DEALING WITH ALL MATTERS.
THE ET MATTER AD TO GO TO C OF APPEAL FROM MARCH - DEC *. THERE WAS RETALIATION BY OTHER MATTERS WHILE I WAS DEALING WITH THE C OF APPEAL - I HAVE EMAILS I SENT TO LET MY ADVISER KNOW AT THE TIME. PLSE NOTE I HAVE ALSO HAD THREATS AND THE EAT DISMISSED MY APPEAL, SAYING EVEN IF THEY REMIT MY MATTER BACK TO ET THERE WILL ONLY BE ONE OUTCOME - MY MATTER WILL FAIL - BUT THE C OF APPEAL REJECTED THIS AND REMITTED IT BACK.
Case Rating: *
Your situation involves potential misconduct and procedural errors, which could affect the fairness of your case. Here are some steps to consider:
- Inform the ET about the interim charging order and its clash with your hearing.
- Document all instances of threats and procedural issues.
- Consider seeking legal advice to explore options for addressing these errors effectively.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
Your situation involves potential misconduct and procedural errors, which could affect the fairness of your case. Here are some steps to consider:
- Inform the ET about the interim charging order and its clash with your hearing.
- Document all instances of threats and procedural issues.
- Consider seeking legal advice to explore options for addressing these errors effectively.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
NO, PLEASE CAN YOU DO A ROBUST DRAFT FOR ET AS THE CLASH HAS HAPPENED AGAIN.
Case Rating: *
It seems you're dealing with a serious situation involving procedural errors and potential misconduct. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If you agree, please provide your phone number and we can proceed.
It seems you're dealing with a serious situation involving procedural errors and potential misconduct. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If you agree, please provide your phone number and we can proceed.
NO, I DON'T WANT A LAWYER.
Case Rating: *
It seems you're dealing with complex procedural errors and misconduct. Here are some steps you might consider:
- Inform the ET about the clash and request an adjournment if needed.
- Document all procedural errors, threats, and misconduct thoroughly.
- Consider contacting the JCIO regarding judicial conduct issues.
If you need further guidance, feel free to ask!
It seems you're dealing with complex procedural errors and misconduct. Here are some steps you might consider:
- Inform the ET about the clash and request an adjournment if needed.
- Document all procedural errors, threats, and misconduct thoroughly.
- Consider contacting the JCIO regarding judicial conduct issues.
If you need further guidance, feel free to ask!
FOR THIS "Inform the ET about the clash and request an adjournment if needed." - CAN YOU DO A ROBUST DRAFT FOR ET.
Case Rating: *
Here's a guideline for drafting a letter to the Employment Tribunal (ET):
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[Your Contact Information]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal Address]
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing to request an adjournment of my upcoming hearing scheduled for [Date] due to a clash with an interim charging order set for the same time. This has happened repeatedly, causing significant distress and affecting my ability to manage my legal matters effectively.
Background:
*. Previous Adjournment Request: I previously requested an adjournment due to a clash with a family matter in April, which was granted, but the respondent did not engage with me or the ET.
*. Procedural Errors: There have been multiple procedural errors, including the sending of written reasons to the incorrect email address of my legal representative, delaying appeals and causing distress.
*. Interim Charging Order: The interim charging order has been deliberately scheduled to clash with the ET hearing.
*. Threats: I have received threats related to my legal representation, impacting my ability to address these matters.
Request:
I respectfully request an adjournment of the hearing to allow me to manage my legal affairs effectively and ensure fairness in proceedings. I have documented all instances of procedural errors and threats, which I am willing to share if necessary.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Make sure to adjust the details as needed and include any additional documentation or evidence you have.
Here's a guideline for drafting a letter to the Employment Tribunal (ET):
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[Your Contact Information]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal Address]
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing to request an adjournment of my upcoming hearing scheduled for [Date] due to a clash with an interim charging order set for the same time. This has happened repeatedly, causing significant distress and affecting my ability to manage my legal matters effectively.
Background:
*. Previous Adjournment Request: I previously requested an adjournment due to a clash with a family matter in April, which was granted, but the respondent did not engage with me or the ET.
*. Procedural Errors: There have been multiple procedural errors, including the sending of written reasons to the incorrect email address of my legal representative, delaying appeals and causing distress.
*. Interim Charging Order: The interim charging order has been deliberately scheduled to clash with the ET hearing.
*. Threats: I have received threats related to my legal representation, impacting my ability to address these matters.
Request:
I respectfully request an adjournment of the hearing to allow me to manage my legal affairs effectively and ensure fairness in proceedings. I have documented all instances of procedural errors and threats, which I am willing to share if necessary.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Make sure to adjust the details as needed and include any additional documentation or evidence you have.
THANK YOU. NOW PLEASE CAN YOU LET ME KNOW WHY YOU HAVE SUGGESTED CONTACTING JCIO.
Case Rating: *
Contacting the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) was suggested because they handle complaints related to judicial conduct, which seems relevant given the procedural errors and potential misconduct you've mentioned. Reporting these issues to JCIO could potentially address the conduct concerns affecting your case.
Contacting the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) was suggested because they handle complaints related to judicial conduct, which seems relevant given the procedural errors and potential misconduct you've mentioned. Reporting these issues to JCIO could potentially address the conduct concerns affecting your case.
DO YOU MEAN FOR THE ET?
Case Rating: *
Yes, the JCIO can handle complaints regarding judicial conduct involving the Employment Tribunal (ET) and Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). They can address concerns about procedural errors and misconduct by judges or tribunal members. If you have more questions or need further guidance, feel free to ask!
Yes, the JCIO can handle complaints regarding judicial conduct involving the Employment Tribunal (ET) and Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). They can address concerns about procedural errors and misconduct by judges or tribunal members. If you have more questions or need further guidance, feel free to ask!
SO, IF I GOT THIS INTRIM CHARGING ORDER RECENTLY AND THERE IS AN ET HEARING COMING UP - HOW DOES THIS MEAN JCIO CAN HELP - AS IT WAS A COURT OFFICER WHO WROTE/DECIDED TO GIVE THE INTERIM CHARGING ORDER OR IS IT TO DO WITH THE ET JUDGE, WHO, IT LOOKS AS IF, DOES NOT WANT TO DEAL WITH THIS ET MATTER WHICH WAS REMITTED BACK BY THE C OF APPEAL - IS THIS UNDERSTANDING BY ME CORRECT?
Case Rating: *
Your understanding seems correct. The JCIO handles complaints about judicial conduct, but not decisions made by court officers. If your issue is with the ET judge's conduct in managing your case, you might consider reporting this to JCIO. However, procedural decisions like interim orders won't be addressed by JCIO unless there's misconduct involved.
Would you like more information on how to proceed with a complaint?
Your understanding seems correct. The JCIO handles complaints about judicial conduct, but not decisions made by court officers. If your issue is with the ET judge's conduct in managing your case, you might consider reporting this to JCIO. However, procedural decisions like interim orders won't be addressed by JCIO unless there's misconduct involved.
Would you like more information on how to proceed with a complaint?
THE INTERIM CO IS WEIRD BECAUSE I ALREADY SENT MY SET ASIDE APPLIC TO THE SAME COURT BUT THEY EXPEDITED THE APPLIC OF THE INTERIM CO, AND MISSED/OVERLOOKED/DELIBERATELY MY SET ASIDE APPLIC WHICH SHOWS THE CREDITOR HAS BEEN NEGLIGENT. THIS IS CONFIRMED RECENTLY BY A NEW BARRISTER WHO ADVISED ALL ORDERS MADE BY THE FAMILY COURT SINCE * HAVE BEEN ILLIEGAL. IT IS THIS MATTER THE CREDITOR WAS PRETENDING TO REPRESENT ME.
Case Rating: *
Given your situation involves procedural errors, potential misconduct, and complex interactions between tribunals and courts, it might be worthwhile to consider the following steps:
- Document thoroughly all instances of errors and misconduct.
- Seek a legal review for tailored advice on potential appeal or reconsideration options.
- Consider contacting oversight bodies like JCIO if judicial conduct is questionable.
If you have further questions or need guidance on specific steps, feel free to ask!
Given your situation involves procedural errors, potential misconduct, and complex interactions between tribunals and courts, it might be worthwhile to consider the following steps:
- Document thoroughly all instances of errors and misconduct.
- Seek a legal review for tailored advice on potential appeal or reconsideration options.
- Consider contacting oversight bodies like JCIO if judicial conduct is questionable.
If you have further questions or need guidance on specific steps, feel free to ask!
OK, SHOULD I STILL WRITE TO ET? AND DO I NEED AN ADJOURNMENT OR NOT?
Case Rating: *
It sounds like writing to the Employment Tribunal (ET) could be beneficial, especially if you want to request an adjournment due to the clash with the interim charging order. Informing them of the situation might help ensure fairness in your proceedings. Would you like more guidance on how to draft your request?
It sounds like writing to the Employment Tribunal (ET) could be beneficial, especially if you want to request an adjournment due to the clash with the interim charging order. Informing them of the situation might help ensure fairness in your proceedings. Would you like more guidance on how to draft your request?
YES, PLEASE. WHAT ABOUT ASKING FOR STRIKE OUT AS ITS BEEN * YEARS OF ABUSE OF PROCESS BY RESPONDENT AND ET HAS JUST BEEN FOLLOWING THE RESPONDENT.
Case Rating: *
In England, you may seek to strike out a response if there has been abuse of process. Consider these options:
- Document all evidence of abuse by the respondent.
- Highlight procedural errors impacting fairness.
- Request a strike out based on substantial procedural failures.
Would you like more detailed guidance on how to proceed with your request?
In England, you may seek to strike out a response if there has been abuse of process. Consider these options:
- Document all evidence of abuse by the respondent.
- Highlight procedural errors impacting fairness.
- Request a strike out based on substantial procedural failures.
Would you like more detailed guidance on how to proceed with your request?
YES, PLEASE BUT FIRST CAN YOU DRAFT REQUEST TO ET FOR ADJOURNMENT AND STRIKE OUT - SHOULD THESE GO TOGETHER IN DRAFT TO ET?
Case Rating: *
Here's a guideline for drafting a combined request to the Employment Tribunal (ET) for adjournment and strike out:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[Your Contact Information]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal Address]
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing to request an adjournment of my upcoming hearing scheduled for [Date] and to seek a strike out of the respondent's case due to abuse of process and repeated procedural errors.
Background:
*. Previous Adjournment Request:
I previously requested an adjournment due to a clash with a family matter in April, which was granted, but the respondent did not engage with me or the ET.
*. Interim Charging Order:
The interim charging order has been deliberately scheduled to clash with the ET hearing, adding to the distress and impacting my ability to manage my legal matters.
*. Procedural Errors:
There have been multiple procedural errors, including sending written reasons to an incorrect email address of my legal representative, delaying appeals and causing distress.
*. Threats and Misconduct:
I have received threats related to my legal representation, impacting my ability to address these matters effectively.
*. Abuse of Process:
For over five years, the respondent has engaged in abuse of process, which the ET has seemingly followed, impacting the fairness and integrity of the proceedings.
Request:
- I respectfully request an adjournment of the hearing to allow me to manage my legal affairs effectively.
- I seek a strike out of the respondent's case due to substantial procedural failures and abuse of process.
Thank you for your attention to these matters.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Adjust the details as needed and include any additional documentation or evidence you have. If you need more guidance, feel free to ask!
Here's a guideline for drafting a combined request to the Employment Tribunal (ET) for adjournment and strike out:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[Your Contact Information]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal Address]
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing to request an adjournment of my upcoming hearing scheduled for [Date] and to seek a strike out of the respondent's case due to abuse of process and repeated procedural errors.
Background:
*. Previous Adjournment Request:
I previously requested an adjournment due to a clash with a family matter in April, which was granted, but the respondent did not engage with me or the ET.
*. Interim Charging Order:
The interim charging order has been deliberately scheduled to clash with the ET hearing, adding to the distress and impacting my ability to manage my legal matters.
*. Procedural Errors:
There have been multiple procedural errors, including sending written reasons to an incorrect email address of my legal representative, delaying appeals and causing distress.
*. Threats and Misconduct:
I have received threats related to my legal representation, impacting my ability to address these matters effectively.
*. Abuse of Process:
For over five years, the respondent has engaged in abuse of process, which the ET has seemingly followed, impacting the fairness and integrity of the proceedings.
Request:
- I respectfully request an adjournment of the hearing to allow me to manage my legal affairs effectively.
- I seek a strike out of the respondent's case due to substantial procedural failures and abuse of process.
Thank you for your attention to these matters.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Adjust the details as needed and include any additional documentation or evidence you have. If you need more guidance, feel free to ask!
GREAT - I SHOULD HAVE ASKED FOR THIS IN MY MARCH LETTER TO ET WHEN THE FAM CASE WAS MADE TO CLASH WITH ET HEARING LISTED FOR APRIL - I ONLY ASKED FOR ADJOURNMENT - WHICH WAS GIVEN.
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you're facing a challenging situation with ongoing procedural errors and potential misconduct. Keep documenting everything thoroughly, and if needed, seek legal advice for a more comprehensive approach. If you have more questions or need further guidance, feel free to ask!
It sounds like you're facing a challenging situation with ongoing procedural errors and potential misconduct. Keep documenting everything thoroughly, and if needed, seek legal advice for a more comprehensive approach. If you have more questions or need further guidance, feel free to ask!
I AM SURE ITS ALL BEING DONE TO PROTECT THE RESPONDENT IN THE ET MATTER - THE ONE THAT I HAD TO TAKE ALL THE WAY TO C OF APPEAL WHO ALLOWED MY APPEAL AND REMITTED IT BACK TO THE ET. BUT THE IT LOOKS AS IF THE ET IS VERY ANGRY/HOSTILE ABOUT DOING THIS AGAIN AS THERE CAN ONLY BE ONE OUTCOME REG MY DISABILITY STATUS - I ALSO HAVE A FAVOURABLE JUDGMENT FROM ANOTHER ET WITH ANOTHER RESPONDENT IN WHICH THE JUDGE SAYS I WAS DISABLED AT ALL TIMES WHILE EMPLOYED BY BOTH RESPONDENTS.
Case Rating: *
Your situation is indeed complex and seems to involve significant procedural errors and potential misconduct. Here are some points that might help:
- Highlight the favorable judgment from another ET to support your disability status.
- Document all instances of hostility and procedural errors.
- Consider presenting evidence of inconsistent treatment across cases.
If you need more guidance or have questions, feel free to ask!
Your situation is indeed complex and seems to involve significant procedural errors and potential misconduct. Here are some points that might help:
- Highlight the favorable judgment from another ET to support your disability status.
- Document all instances of hostility and procedural errors.
- Consider presenting evidence of inconsistent treatment across cases.
If you need more guidance or have questions, feel free to ask!
PLSE CAN YOU ADD A PARAG/TEXT RE. THIS FAVOURABLE JUDGMENT IN THE DRAFT TO THE ET YOU DID FOR ET.
Case Rating: *
Certainly! Here's how you can incorporate the favorable judgment into your draft letter to the Employment Tribunal:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[Your Contact Information]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal Address]
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing to request an adjournment of my upcoming hearing scheduled for [Date] and to seek a strike out of the respondent's case due to abuse of process and repeated procedural errors.
Background:
*. Previous Adjournment Request:
I previously requested an adjournment due to a clash with a family matter in April, which was granted, but the respondent did not engage with me or the ET.
*. Interim Charging Order:
The interim charging order has been deliberately scheduled to clash with the ET hearing, adding to the distress and impacting my ability to manage my legal matters.
*. Procedural Errors:
There have been multiple procedural errors, including sending written reasons to an incorrect email address of my legal representative, delaying appeals and causing distress.
*. Threats and Misconduct:
I have received threats related to my legal representation, impacting my ability to address these matters effectively.
*. Abuse of Process:
For over five years, the respondent has engaged in abuse of process, which the ET has seemingly followed, impacting the fairness and integrity of the proceedings.
*. Favorable Judgment:
I have a favorable judgment from another ET involving a different respondent, which confirms my disability status throughout my employment with both respondents. This judgment supports my claims and highlights the inconsistent treatment across cases.
Request:
- I respectfully request an adjournment of the hearing to allow me to manage my legal affairs effectively.
- I seek a strike out of the respondent's case due to substantial procedural failures and abuse of process.
Thank you for your attention to these matters.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to adjust the details as needed and include any additional evidence you have. Let me know if you need further assistance!
Certainly! Here's how you can incorporate the favorable judgment into your draft letter to the Employment Tribunal:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[Your Contact Information]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal Address]
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing to request an adjournment of my upcoming hearing scheduled for [Date] and to seek a strike out of the respondent's case due to abuse of process and repeated procedural errors.
Background:
*. Previous Adjournment Request:
I previously requested an adjournment due to a clash with a family matter in April, which was granted, but the respondent did not engage with me or the ET.
*. Interim Charging Order:
The interim charging order has been deliberately scheduled to clash with the ET hearing, adding to the distress and impacting my ability to manage my legal matters.
*. Procedural Errors:
There have been multiple procedural errors, including sending written reasons to an incorrect email address of my legal representative, delaying appeals and causing distress.
*. Threats and Misconduct:
I have received threats related to my legal representation, impacting my ability to address these matters effectively.
*. Abuse of Process:
For over five years, the respondent has engaged in abuse of process, which the ET has seemingly followed, impacting the fairness and integrity of the proceedings.
*. Favorable Judgment:
I have a favorable judgment from another ET involving a different respondent, which confirms my disability status throughout my employment with both respondents. This judgment supports my claims and highlights the inconsistent treatment across cases.
Request:
- I respectfully request an adjournment of the hearing to allow me to manage my legal affairs effectively.
- I seek a strike out of the respondent's case due to substantial procedural failures and abuse of process.
Thank you for your attention to these matters.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to adjust the details as needed and include any additional evidence you have. Let me know if you need further assistance!
please can you draft me a list of reasons to challenge the interim charging order - i got on * june, but i submitted a set aside applic of the default judgement on * march. I DID THIS BY SENDING IN MY DEFENCE AND COUNTERCLAIM, AND I NEVER RECD THE CLAIM.
Case Rating: *
To challenge the interim charging order, consider these reasons:
- Set Aside Application: You submitted a set aside application on * March, which should be considered.
- Lack of Notification: You never received the initial claim, impacting your ability to respond.
- Defence and Counterclaim: You provided a defence and counterclaim, potentially affecting the order's validity.
Document these points thoroughly to support your challenge. Let me know if you need more guidance!
To challenge the interim charging order, consider these reasons:
- Set Aside Application: You submitted a set aside application on * March, which should be considered.
- Lack of Notification: You never received the initial claim, impacting your ability to respond.
- Defence and Counterclaim: You provided a defence and counterclaim, potentially affecting the order's validity.
Document these points thoroughly to support your challenge. Let me know if you need more guidance!
THE CREDITOR WAS MY PREVIOUS SOL DOING MY FAM CASE. THEY WERE NEGLIGENT. I RECD LEGAL ADVICE RECENTLY AND SUBMITTED * APPLICS TO THE FAM COURT TO SET ASIDE A NON MOL ORDER MADE IN MAY WITH NO END DATE, A LARGE COSTS ORDER AND IT WAS SENT TO POLICE, S. SERVICES, OPG, HOSPITALS SAYING I AM NOT ALLOWED TO RAISE GROUNDLESS COMPLAINTS ABOUT MY * UEAR OLD MUM TO ANY OF THEM. MY RECENT LEGAL ADVICE SAID MY * YR OLD MUMS CAPACITY TO LITIG WAS NEVER ADDRESSED AND ALL NMOs/orders MADE IN THE FAM COURT (SINCE * - USING MY MUM/HER NAME AS THE APPLIC) WERE/ARE ILLEGAL. I GOT THIS ADVICE IN END OF MAY - I DID NOT HAVE IT WHEN I SEND IN MY SET ASIDE OF DEFAULT JUDGMET APPLIC TO COURT IN MARCH.
Case Rating: *
Your situation involves complex legal issues, including procedural errors and potential misconduct. Here are some points to consider:
- Legal Capacity: Ensure that your mother's capacity to litigate is addressed, as this impacts the validity of orders.
- Challenge Orders: Use recent legal advice to challenge non-molestation and costs orders.
- Negligence: Document evidence of negligence by the previous solicitor for potential claims.
Feel free to ask if you have further questions or need guidance!
Your situation involves complex legal issues, including procedural errors and potential misconduct. Here are some points to consider:
- Legal Capacity: Ensure that your mother's capacity to litigate is addressed, as this impacts the validity of orders.
- Challenge Orders: Use recent legal advice to challenge non-molestation and costs orders.
- Negligence: Document evidence of negligence by the previous solicitor for potential claims.
Feel free to ask if you have further questions or need guidance!
REG MUMS LITIG CAPAC - MY ADVICE IS TO KEEP MUM OUT OF THE MATTER FROM NOW ON AS ITS BETWEEN ME, THE COURT AND MUMS SO-CALLED SOLICITOR WHO LIED FOR * YEARS SAYING MUM HAS LITIG CAPAC/ALL OTHER CAPACITY. I HAVE SENT IN * APPLICS TO CHALLENGE THE NMO/COSTS. REG NEGLIGENCE, I WRITE IN MY DEFE/COUNTERC THE NEGLIGENCE AND COSTS/DAMAGES TO ME AS THIS SOL SHOULD HAVE DONE DIFF THINGS/ACTIONS/ADVICE TO ME. BUT I DIDNT PUT IN IT MY MUM 'S CAPAC TO LITIG WAS NOT DONE. I HAE ALSO BEEN TOLD S. SERVICES DO NOT HAVE REMIT TO COVER LITIG CAPACITY. DO THE COURTS/JUDGES NOT KNOW THIS?
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you're dealing with a complex legal situation involving procedural errors and potential misconduct. Here are some points to consider:
- Litigation Capacity: Address the issue of your mother's capacity to litigate, as this impacts the validity of the orders.
- Negligence: Document the solicitor's negligence thoroughly for potential claims.
- Challenge Orders: Use recent legal advice to challenge non-molestation and costs orders.
If you have more questions or need guidance, feel free to ask!
It sounds like you're dealing with a complex legal situation involving procedural errors and potential misconduct. Here are some points to consider:
- Litigation Capacity: Address the issue of your mother's capacity to litigate, as this impacts the validity of the orders.
- Negligence: Document the solicitor's negligence thoroughly for potential claims.
- Challenge Orders: Use recent legal advice to challenge non-molestation and costs orders.
If you have more questions or need guidance, feel free to ask!
CAN YO U TELL ME IF I NEED TO DO A SUPPLEM STATEMENT FOR MY SET ASIDE APPLIC TO INCLUDE THE PARTS OF THE RECNT LEGAL ADVICE SAYING MUMS LITIG CAPACITY WAS NOT ADDRESSED AND FAMIL COURT PROCEEDINGS WERE ALLOWED TO CARRY ON? MY
Case Rating: *
In England, supplementing your set aside application with recent legal advice about your mother's litigation capacity may strengthen your case. Consider including:
- Evidence showing lack of capacity assessment.
- Impact of this oversight on the proceedings.
- Any new legal grounds for setting aside the order.
Would you like more information on how to proceed with this?
In England, supplementing your set aside application with recent legal advice about your mother's litigation capacity may strengthen your case. Consider including:
- Evidence showing lack of capacity assessment.
- Impact of this oversight on the proceedings.
- Any new legal grounds for setting aside the order.
Would you like more information on how to proceed with this?
YES PLEASE. DO SOCIAL SERVICES COVER LIGIG CAPACITY IN THEIR CAPAC ASSESSMENTS?
Case Rating: *
In England, social services typically assess capacity in relation to daily living and care needs, rather than litigation capacity. Courts usually handle litigation capacity issues, often requiring medical or expert evaluation. If you need more details or have further questions, feel free to ask!
In England, social services typically assess capacity in relation to daily living and care needs, rather than litigation capacity. Courts usually handle litigation capacity issues, often requiring medical or expert evaluation. If you need more details or have further questions, feel free to ask!
WHY DID THE FAM COURT LET * SETS OF PROCEEDINGS TAKE PLACE, WHEN IT COULD BE CLEARLY SEEN MUM COULD NOT PARTICIPATE/UNDERSTAND THE PROCEEDINGS?
Case Rating: *
It sounds like a significant oversight may have occurred. In the Family Court, if someone lacks the capacity to participate or understand proceedings, there should be an assessment to ensure fair treatment. Possible reasons include:
- Lack of proper assessment or evidence presented.
- Miscommunication or procedural errors.
- Assumptions about the individual's capacity without thorough investigation.
Consider seeking a legal review or appealing based on these grounds. If you have more questions or need further guidance, feel free to ask!
It sounds like a significant oversight may have occurred. In the Family Court, if someone lacks the capacity to participate or understand proceedings, there should be an assessment to ensure fair treatment. Possible reasons include:
- Lack of proper assessment or evidence presented.
- Miscommunication or procedural errors.
- Assumptions about the individual's capacity without thorough investigation.
Consider seeking a legal review or appealing based on these grounds. If you have more questions or need further guidance, feel free to ask!
WHAT ABOUT MY MUMS SOLICITOR'S RESPONSIBILITY - AS IT WAS ONLY HER WHO KEPT SAYING MUM GAVE HER INSTRUCTIONS - THERE WAS NEVER ANY PROBLEM. BUT * YRS LATER SHE ADMITTED SHE WROTE ALL OF MUMS STATEMENTS UPON MUMS INSTRUCTIONS.
Case Rating: *
It sounds like your mum's solicitor may have breached her duty by not properly assessing your mum's capacity to give instructions. Consider these points:
- Solicitors must ensure their clients understand proceedings and have capacity.
- If there's evidence of negligence or misconduct, you might consider filing a complaint with the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).
- Document all interactions and admissions by the solicitor thoroughly.
Would you like more guidance or details on how to proceed with a complaint?
It sounds like your mum's solicitor may have breached her duty by not properly assessing your mum's capacity to give instructions. Consider these points:
- Solicitors must ensure their clients understand proceedings and have capacity.
- If there's evidence of negligence or misconduct, you might consider filing a complaint with the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).
- Document all interactions and admissions by the solicitor thoroughly.
Would you like more guidance or details on how to proceed with a complaint?
I RAISED A COMPLAINT TO SRA IN APRIL. I DID NOT UPDATE THEM ON WHAT HAPPENED IN THE MAY HEARING WHICH WAS PUSHED TO PROCEED IN MY ABSENCE AS I WAS UNWELL.
Case Rating: *
It seems like there's a lot going on here. You might consider updating the SRA about the May hearing and any new developments related to your complaint. Documenting everything thoroughly can help strengthen your position. If you have more questions or need further guidance, feel free to ask!
It seems like there's a lot going on here. You might consider updating the SRA about the May hearing and any new developments related to your complaint. Documenting everything thoroughly can help strengthen your position. If you have more questions or need further guidance, feel free to ask!
PLSE CAN YOU DRAFT UPDATE FOR SRA RE. THE MAY HEARING AND THE RESULTING ILLEGAL NMO WITHOUT AN END DATE, COSTS ETC. ALSO ABOUT THE RECENT LEGAL ADVICE - SAYING ALL ORDERS ARE /WERE ILLEGAL AND MUMS LITIG CAPACITY NOT DONE AND MUM DOES NOT HVE IT AND SAY ITS WAS MUMS SOL BREACH OF DUTY AND THE FAM COURT.
Case Rating: *
It seems you are dealing with a high-value case involving serious procedural errors and potential misconduct. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
Here's a guideline for updating the SRA:
---
Subject: Update on Complaint: [Your Complaint Reference Number]
Dear [SRA Contact Name/Team],
I am writing to provide an update on my complaint regarding my mother’s solicitor and the Family Court proceedings.
Background:
- May Hearing: Despite my absence due to illness, the hearing proceeded, resulting in an illegal non-molestation order without an end date and a significant costs order.
- Recent Legal Advice: I have received new legal advice confirming that all orders made by the Family Court since * are illegal, as my mother's litigation capacity was never assessed.
- Solicitor's Breach of Duty: The solicitor claimed my mother had capacity, but later admitted to writing her statements herself. This constitutes a breach of duty.
Request:
Please investigate this matter further, considering the procedural errors and misconduct involved.
Thank you for your attention.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to adjust the details as needed. Let me know if you wish to connect with local lawyers for further assistance!
It seems you are dealing with a high-value case involving serious procedural errors and potential misconduct. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
Here's a guideline for updating the SRA:
---
Subject: Update on Complaint: [Your Complaint Reference Number]
Dear [SRA Contact Name/Team],
I am writing to provide an update on my complaint regarding my mother’s solicitor and the Family Court proceedings.
Background:
- May Hearing: Despite my absence due to illness, the hearing proceeded, resulting in an illegal non-molestation order without an end date and a significant costs order.
- Recent Legal Advice: I have received new legal advice confirming that all orders made by the Family Court since * are illegal, as my mother's litigation capacity was never assessed.
- Solicitor's Breach of Duty: The solicitor claimed my mother had capacity, but later admitted to writing her statements herself. This constitutes a breach of duty.
Request:
Please investigate this matter further, considering the procedural errors and misconduct involved.
Thank you for your attention.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to adjust the details as needed. Let me know if you wish to connect with local lawyers for further assistance!
IF MUMS SOL ADMITTED LAST MAY THAT SHE WROTE ALL OF MUMS W. STATEMENTS UPON MUMS INSTRUCTIONS - AFTER * YEARS AS THE FIRST NON MOL PROCEEDINGS TOOK PLACE IN JUNE *, DOES THIS MEAN MUMS LITIG CAPACITY WAS LACKING ? MUM DID TELL ME IN MARCH * SHE NEVER READ HER W. STATEMENTS AND NOR DID MUM KNOW THERE WERE * VERSIONS OF THE 1ST W. STATEMENT, NOR COULD MUM GIVE ME AN ANSWER TO MY QUESTION - WHY WAS THE NON MOL TAKEN OUT. SGE NEVER UNDERSTOOD WHAT A NMO IS. SHE DID SAY ONCE IT WAS ONLY FOR A VERY SHORT TIME.
Case Rating: *
It appears that there may have been issues with your mum's litigation capacity, especially if she didn't understand the proceedings or statements made on her behalf. Solicitors must ensure their clients have the capacity to provide instructions. If your mum was unaware of the statements and lacked understanding, her litigation capacity might indeed have been compromised. This situation could be relevant in challenging the proceedings and orders. Consider seeking legal advice for further steps.
It appears that there may have been issues with your mum's litigation capacity, especially if she didn't understand the proceedings or statements made on her behalf. Solicitors must ensure their clients have the capacity to provide instructions. If your mum was unaware of the statements and lacked understanding, her litigation capacity might indeed have been compromised. This situation could be relevant in challenging the proceedings and orders. Consider seeking legal advice for further steps.
i sent letter to et FOR STRIKE OUT. TODAY I GOT FURTHER LEGAL ADVICE TO REQUEST REASONABLE ADJUSTMENTS REG IF I CAN RECORD THE CASE MANAGEMET HEARING - DUE TO MY DISABILITY AND THAT I HAVE HAD ORDERS WHICH DON'T REFLECT WHAT WAS SAID/AGREED AT THE HEARING/S AND PARTIC IN MY FAM MATTER WHERE * OFFICIAL COURT TRANSCRIPTS DID NOT REFLECT THE HEARINGS AND ALL THE COURT ORDERS. PLEASE CAN YOU DRAFTME THIS REQUEST.
Case Rating: *
Here's a guideline for drafting a request to the Employment Tribunal (ET) for reasonable adjustments:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[Your Contact Information]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal Address]
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing to request reasonable adjustments for my upcoming case management hearing due to my disability. Specifically, I seek permission to record the hearing to ensure accurate reflection of discussions and decisions, as previous orders have not accurately represented agreements made during hearings.
Background:
- Disability: My disability impacts my ability to follow proceedings accurately, and recording would provide clarity and fairness.
- Inaccurate Transcripts: In my family matter, official court transcripts did not accurately reflect hearings or orders, affecting the fairness of the proceedings.
Request:
I request permission to record the case management hearing to ensure accurate documentation and reflection of the proceedings, in line with my disability needs and previous experiences of inaccuracies.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to adjust the details as needed and include any additional evidence or documentation you have. Let me know if you need further assistance!
Here's a guideline for drafting a request to the Employment Tribunal (ET) for reasonable adjustments:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[Your Contact Information]
[Date]
Employment Tribunal
[Tribunal Address]
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing to request reasonable adjustments for my upcoming case management hearing due to my disability. Specifically, I seek permission to record the hearing to ensure accurate reflection of discussions and decisions, as previous orders have not accurately represented agreements made during hearings.
Background:
- Disability: My disability impacts my ability to follow proceedings accurately, and recording would provide clarity and fairness.
- Inaccurate Transcripts: In my family matter, official court transcripts did not accurately reflect hearings or orders, affecting the fairness of the proceedings.
Request:
I request permission to record the case management hearing to ensure accurate documentation and reflection of the proceedings, in line with my disability needs and previous experiences of inaccuracies.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to adjust the details as needed and include any additional evidence or documentation you have. Let me know if you need further assistance!
IF MY FAM MATTER IS PRIVATE - IS IT OK TO SAY THIS SENTENCE ABOUT MY FAM MATTER IN THIS REQUEST - AS I HAVE ALREADY LET ET KNOW OFTHE CLASHES HAPPENING BETWEEN THE FAM MATTER AND THIS MATTER.
Case Rating: *
Yes, you can mention your family matter in the request for reasonable adjustments, especially since you have already informed the Employment Tribunal (ET) about the clashes between the family and ET matters. It's important to provide context and explain how these issues impact your disability needs and the accuracy of proceedings. If you need further assistance or have more questions, feel free to ask!
Yes, you can mention your family matter in the request for reasonable adjustments, especially since you have already informed the Employment Tribunal (ET) about the clashes between the family and ET matters. It's important to provide context and explain how these issues impact your disability needs and the accuracy of proceedings. If you need further assistance or have more questions, feel free to ask!
WITH MY STRIKE OUT I SENT THE FAVOURABLE JUDGMENT AND MY STRIKE OUT REQ AT THE C OF APPEAL - SHOULD I ALSO SEND THE ET MY STRIKE OUT REQUEST OF NOV * AS WELL - LISTING THE REASONS WHY.
Case Rating: *
Since you've already sent your strike out request to the Court of Appeal with the favorable judgment, sending your November * strike out request to the Employment Tribunal (ET) could reinforce your position. Ensure it includes detailed reasons for the request to demonstrate consistency and thoroughness in your case.
Since you've already sent your strike out request to the Court of Appeal with the favorable judgment, sending your November * strike out request to the Employment Tribunal (ET) could reinforce your position. Ensure it includes detailed reasons for the request to demonstrate consistency and thoroughness in your case.
OK - SO THE ET WILLHAVE THE FAVOURABLE JUDGMENT SAYING I WAS DISABLED WITH THIS RESPONDENT AND THE OTHER RESPONDENT, AND IT HAS THESTRIKE OUT I SENT TO C OF APPEAL IN END NOV *, AND NOW I WILL SEND MY STRIKE OUT REQUEST OF NOV * - YES?
Yes, sending your November * strike out request to the Employment Tribunal (ET) along with the favorable judgment will help provide comprehensive documentation for your case. It ensures the ET has all relevant information to consider your strike out request thoroughly.
I SENT MY STRIKE OUT ON FRIDAY TO ET AND TODAY IS MONDAY - PLSE CAN YOU DRAFT AN ADDENDAM EMAIL ABOUT THE ADDITIONAL STRIKE OUT REQ I MADE IN NOV * TO THE ET BUT IT WAS REFUSED. IT WAS TO DO WITH NON DISCLOSURE, BREACHING ET ORDERS, REFUSING TO PROVIDE BUMDLE ETC. IS THIS RELEVANT EVEN IF IT WAS REFUSED BY THIS ET?
Case Rating: *
Yes, it's relevant to mention the November * strike out request, even if it was initially refused. Here's a draft for your addendum email:
---
Subject: Addendum to Strike Out Request
Dear [ET Contact/Department],
I am writing to provide additional information regarding my strike out request submitted on [Date]. I wish to highlight my previous strike out request from November *, which was initially refused. This request concerned:
- Non-disclosure of critical documents.
- Breaching of ET orders.
- Refusal to provide the necessary bundle for proceedings.
I believe these issues are pertinent to my current request, as they continue to impact the fairness and integrity of the proceedings.
Thank you for considering this addendum.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to adjust the details as needed. If you have more questions or need further assistance, let me know!
Yes, it's relevant to mention the November * strike out request, even if it was initially refused. Here's a draft for your addendum email:
---
Subject: Addendum to Strike Out Request
Dear [ET Contact/Department],
I am writing to provide additional information regarding my strike out request submitted on [Date]. I wish to highlight my previous strike out request from November *, which was initially refused. This request concerned:
- Non-disclosure of critical documents.
- Breaching of ET orders.
- Refusal to provide the necessary bundle for proceedings.
I believe these issues are pertinent to my current request, as they continue to impact the fairness and integrity of the proceedings.
Thank you for considering this addendum.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to adjust the details as needed. If you have more questions or need further assistance, let me know!
Start a new chat