TRY ME!
Preliminary Hearing Participation Required
Summary
The notice you received is a direction, not an order, emphasizing the importance of attending the preliminary hearing. If the respondent fails to engage, you can request the tribunal to make a finding on their conduct and consider a strike-out for lack of engagement. Highlight any procedural failures and their impact on your case. If the matter is remitted by the Court of Appeal, both the tribunal and respondent should handle it with increased vigilance. Consider sending a costs warning letter to the respondent before submitting a strike-out request. If the opposing party in a family matter fails to respond, you may request a default judgment. Ensure all communications and evidence are well-documented and seek legal advice for personalized guidance.Full Conversation
THE PROBLEM IS WHAT THE RESPONDENT DID - THEY DID NOT ATTEND THE PRELIM HEARING, THEY SENT A NEW SOLICITOR WHO THEY INSTRUCTED IN JAN * AND WROTE TO ET INFORMING THEM OF THIS THEN AND COPYING ME IN. BUT IN THE PRELIM HEARING THIS SOL SAID SHE ONLY WAS INSTRUCTED IN MARCH (A LIE) AND THAT SHE DID NOT HAVE FULL INSTRUCTIONS - TO AVOID/BLOCK DEALING WITH MY STRIKE OUT REQUEST. SHE ALSO DID NO RESPONSE TO MY SUBMISSION TO ET/HER IN MARCH - SHE DID NOT RESPOND TO ME OR ET.
It seems you're dealing with a complex situation regarding the respondent's failure to properly engage in the preliminary hearing. You may consider:
- Requesting the tribunal to make a finding about the respondent's conduct.
- Asking for a strike-out based on their lack of engagement.
- Seeking legal advice on how to proceed with these requests effectively.
Would you like more detailed guidance on any of these options?
- Requesting the tribunal to make a finding about the respondent's conduct.
- Asking for a strike-out based on their lack of engagement.
- Seeking legal advice on how to proceed with these requests effectively.
Would you like more detailed guidance on any of these options?
PLEASE CAN YOU GIVE more detailed guidance on THESE TWO ISSUES *. Requesting the tribunal to make a finding about the respondent's conduct - BECAUSE THIS MATTER IS BEING DELAYED AGAIN DUE TO THIS FACTOR. THIS IS A REPEAT OF THE GROUNDS I PUT IN MY STRIKE OUT REQUEST TO ET OF * JULY AND THE STRIKE OUT REQ I SENT TO C OF APPEAL TOO.
*. Asking for a strike-out based on their lack of engagement. - THERE WAS MORE LACK OF ENGAGEMENT BY THE RESPONDENT IN JULY TOO. THEY ONLY PROVIDED ONE REPLY ON THE MORNING OF THE ET HEARING WHICH WAS AT 2PM, BUT THEY ONLY ADDRESSED ONE ISSUE. THEY KNOW I HAVE A DISABILITY AND THEY KNEW THERE WERE DELIB CLASHES OF MY OTHER LITIGATION - BUT THEY CONTINUED TO CAUSE DELAYS AND OBSTRUCTION TO PREVENT THE CORRECT OUTCOME/JUSTICE.
Here are some steps you can consider for your situation:
*. Requesting a Tribunal Finding on Conduct:
- Highlight specific examples of respondent's failure to engage.
- Emphasize how their conduct has delayed proceedings.
- Provide any documentation or evidence supporting your claims.
*. Strike-Out Request for Lack of Engagement:
- Detail instances where the respondent failed to engage.
- Explain how this has prejudiced your case.
- Reference any prior tribunal directions or orders they ignored.
Seeking legal advice for personalized guidance might be beneficial. Would you like more information on how to prepare these requests?
*. Requesting a Tribunal Finding on Conduct:
- Highlight specific examples of respondent's failure to engage.
- Emphasize how their conduct has delayed proceedings.
- Provide any documentation or evidence supporting your claims.
*. Strike-Out Request for Lack of Engagement:
- Detail instances where the respondent failed to engage.
- Explain how this has prejudiced your case.
- Reference any prior tribunal directions or orders they ignored.
Seeking legal advice for personalized guidance might be beneficial. Would you like more information on how to prepare these requests?
YES, PLEASE - I WOULD like more information on how to prepare these requests.
Case Rating: *
Absolutely, here are some tips on preparing your requests:
*. Requesting a Tribunal Finding on Conduct:
- Draft a clear and concise statement detailing specific instances of the respondent's failure to engage.
- Attach supporting documents or evidence, such as emails or tribunal notes.
- State how their conduct has specifically delayed or prejudiced your case.
*. Strike-Out Request for Lack of Engagement:
- List all the instances and dates when the respondent failed to engage.
- Explain the impact of this on your case and any disadvantages you faced.
- Reference any tribunal directions/orders the respondent ignored.
Consider organizing your requests logically and ensuring all necessary evidence is included. Let me know if you need more specific advice!
Absolutely, here are some tips on preparing your requests:
*. Requesting a Tribunal Finding on Conduct:
- Draft a clear and concise statement detailing specific instances of the respondent's failure to engage.
- Attach supporting documents or evidence, such as emails or tribunal notes.
- State how their conduct has specifically delayed or prejudiced your case.
*. Strike-Out Request for Lack of Engagement:
- List all the instances and dates when the respondent failed to engage.
- Explain the impact of this on your case and any disadvantages you faced.
- Reference any tribunal directions/orders the respondent ignored.
Consider organizing your requests logically and ensuring all necessary evidence is included. Let me know if you need more specific advice!
IF THIS MATTER HAS BEEN REMITTED BACK BY C OF APPEAL - IS IT NOT CORRECT THAT BOTH THE ET AND RESPONDENT NEED/SHOULD BE MORE VIGILANT ABOUT HANDLING OF THIS CASE?
Case Rating: *
Yes, when a matter is remitted back by the Court of Appeal, both the Employment Tribunal (ET) and the respondent should handle the case with increased vigilance. This ensures that the issues raised are addressed thoroughly and fairly, preventing further delays or injustices. Would you like more guidance on how to ensure this happens effectively?
Yes, when a matter is remitted back by the Court of Appeal, both the Employment Tribunal (ET) and the respondent should handle the case with increased vigilance. This ensures that the issues raised are addressed thoroughly and fairly, preventing further delays or injustices. Would you like more guidance on how to ensure this happens effectively?
YES, PLEASE - I THINK DRAFT A SECTION - MAYBE IN MY STRIKE OUT REQUEST OR SEPARATELY AS I DID SAY THIS IN THE PRELIM HEARING - THAT IT NEEDS TO DEALT WITH THOROUGHLY THIS TIME.
Case Rating: *
To ensure your case is handled thoroughly, consider the following:
- Drafting a Section: Emphasize the importance of vigilant handling due to the Court of Appeal’s involvement.
- Highlight Past Issues: Address previous mishandlings and delays.
- Request Assurance: Ask for specific measures to ensure thoroughness.
If you need further guidance, feel free to ask!
To ensure your case is handled thoroughly, consider the following:
- Drafting a Section: Emphasize the importance of vigilant handling due to the Court of Appeal’s involvement.
- Highlight Past Issues: Address previous mishandlings and delays.
- Request Assurance: Ask for specific measures to ensure thoroughness.
If you need further guidance, feel free to ask!
MY AIM IS FOR STRIKE OUT.
Case Rating: *
To pursue a strike-out request, consider these steps:
- Document Evidence: Gather all evidence of the respondent's lack of engagement and its impact on your case.
- Detailed Submission: Clearly outline the repeated failures and how these have prejudiced your case.
- Request Tribunal Action: Explicitly request the tribunal to address these issues.
If you require specific legal advice, consulting with a legal professional is recommended.
To pursue a strike-out request, consider these steps:
- Document Evidence: Gather all evidence of the respondent's lack of engagement and its impact on your case.
- Detailed Submission: Clearly outline the repeated failures and how these have prejudiced your case.
- Request Tribunal Action: Explicitly request the tribunal to address these issues.
If you require specific legal advice, consulting with a legal professional is recommended.
FOR THIS - THE PRELIM HEARING SHOWED THE ET AND RESPONDENT DID NOT LET THIS CASE TO BE DEALT WITH PROPERLY, ACCORDING TO ET RULES AND ETs own direction of jan * in its notice of hearing - "Drafting a Section: Emphasize the importance of vigilant handling due to the Court of Appeal’s involvement." please can you draft this section for me.
Case Rating: *
Here's a draft section you can consider including in your submission:
---
Section: Importance of Vigilant Handling Due to Court of Appeal's Involvement
Given that this matter was remitted by the Court of Appeal, it is imperative that both the Employment Tribunal (ET) and the respondent demonstrate heightened vigilance in handling this case. The preliminary hearing revealed significant lapses, as set out by the ET's own directions dated January *. This is a critical opportunity to address these lapses and ensure that all procedural rules are adhered to, preventing further delays and miscarriages of justice. I respectfully request that the tribunal implements specific measures to ensure thorough and fair handling moving forward.
---
Make sure to adjust the draft to fit the specifics and evidence of your case.
Here's a draft section you can consider including in your submission:
---
Section: Importance of Vigilant Handling Due to Court of Appeal's Involvement
Given that this matter was remitted by the Court of Appeal, it is imperative that both the Employment Tribunal (ET) and the respondent demonstrate heightened vigilance in handling this case. The preliminary hearing revealed significant lapses, as set out by the ET's own directions dated January *. This is a critical opportunity to address these lapses and ensure that all procedural rules are adhered to, preventing further delays and miscarriages of justice. I respectfully request that the tribunal implements specific measures to ensure thorough and fair handling moving forward.
---
Make sure to adjust the draft to fit the specifics and evidence of your case.
I DON'T WANT TO PUT THIS IN - "I respectfully request that the tribunal implements specific measures to ensure thorough and fair handling moving forward." PLEASE ADD IN SENTENCE FOR STRIKE OUT INSTEAD.
Case Rating: *
Here's a revised draft section for your submission:
---
Section: Importance of Vigilant Handling Due to Court of Appeal's Involvement
Given that this matter was remitted by the Court of Appeal, it is imperative that both the Employment Tribunal (ET) and the respondent demonstrate heightened vigilance in handling this case. The preliminary hearing revealed significant lapses, as set out by the ET's own directions dated January *. This is a critical opportunity to address these lapses and ensure that all procedural rules are adhered to, preventing further delays and miscarriages of justice. I request that the tribunal considers a strike-out due to the repeated procedural failures and lack of engagement by the respondent.
---
Make sure to adapt the draft to fit your case specifics and supporting evidence.
Here's a revised draft section for your submission:
---
Section: Importance of Vigilant Handling Due to Court of Appeal's Involvement
Given that this matter was remitted by the Court of Appeal, it is imperative that both the Employment Tribunal (ET) and the respondent demonstrate heightened vigilance in handling this case. The preliminary hearing revealed significant lapses, as set out by the ET's own directions dated January *. This is a critical opportunity to address these lapses and ensure that all procedural rules are adhered to, preventing further delays and miscarriages of justice. I request that the tribunal considers a strike-out due to the repeated procedural failures and lack of engagement by the respondent.
---
Make sure to adapt the draft to fit your case specifics and supporting evidence.
AS ET JUDGE REFUSED TO ADDRESS MY STRIKE OUT REQUEST BASED ON MY PREVIOUS GROUNDS, I NEED TO SAY ROBUSTLY WHY ET MUST CONSIDER MY NEW STRIKE OUT ON NEW ISSUES THAT TOOK PLACCE IN THE PRELIM HEARING - WHICH ARE MORE REPEATES OF THE PREVIOUS GROUNDS I PUT IN MY STRIKE OUT REQU WHICH THE JUDGE REFUSED TO ADDRESS, SAYING A HEARING WILL BE NEDED FOR IT - THIS IS NOT CORRECT ACCORDING TO ET RULES - A HEARING IS NOT NECESSARY TO DEAL WITH STRIKE OUT - IN FACT ET SHIULD HAVE DOMNE STRIKE OUT ON ITS OWN IN MARCH * BASED ON MY SUBMISSIONS AS TO WHY AN ADJOURNMENT WAS NEEDED BY ME - MY FAM MATTER WAS MADE TO CLASH WITH THE LISTED ET HEARING OF APRIL *. THIS CLASH WAS PLANNED AND DELIBERATE. THIS WAS ONE OF MY GROUNDS FOR STRIKE OUT.
Case Rating: *
To robustly argue for a new strike-out request based on issues that occurred during the preliminary hearing, consider:
- Highlighting the repeated procedural failures by the respondent.
- Emphasizing that ET rules do not require a hearing for strike-out decisions.
- Providing evidence of deliberate scheduling conflicts affecting your case.
Would you like more assistance on drafting your arguments?
To robustly argue for a new strike-out request based on issues that occurred during the preliminary hearing, consider:
- Highlighting the repeated procedural failures by the respondent.
- Emphasizing that ET rules do not require a hearing for strike-out decisions.
- Providing evidence of deliberate scheduling conflicts affecting your case.
Would you like more assistance on drafting your arguments?
YES, BUT THIS ET JUDGE STRONGLY DENIED THAT THE CLASHES OF ANY OTHER LITIGATION AND TIMING HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS ET MATTER. I NEED A ROBUST REBUTTAL OF THIS. I HAVE ALREADY SENT THIS ET THE DATES OF THE INTERIM CHARGING ORDER THAT WAS SERVED ON ME TO CLASH AND INTERFERE WITH THE ADJOURNED ET HEARING OF JULY TOO - YET AGAIN.
Case Rating: *
To craft a robust rebuttal, consider these points:
- Clarify Impact: Emphasize how the scheduling conflict with the interim charging order directly affected your ability to participate fully.
- Evidence: Provide clear documentation showing the timeline and overlap of proceedings.
- Procedural Fairness: Argue that procedural fairness requires consideration of your litigation schedule.
- Precedents: If possible, cite precedents where similar scheduling issues were deemed relevant.
Would you need more help on how to structure this argument?
To craft a robust rebuttal, consider these points:
- Clarify Impact: Emphasize how the scheduling conflict with the interim charging order directly affected your ability to participate fully.
- Evidence: Provide clear documentation showing the timeline and overlap of proceedings.
- Procedural Fairness: Argue that procedural fairness requires consideration of your litigation schedule.
- Precedents: If possible, cite precedents where similar scheduling issues were deemed relevant.
Would you need more help on how to structure this argument?
YES PLEASE AND DO YOU HAVE PRECEDENTS OF SIMILAR CLASHING ISSUES. PLEASE NOTE I SENT THE ET IMMEDIATELY THE INTERIM CO WHEN I RECD IT ON * JUNE AND ET HEARING WAS * JULY - THE SAME DAY I HAD TO SUBMIT MY OBJECTIONS TO THE INTERIM CO. THAT EVEBIG I HAD THE CAR ACCID - I AM STILL SUFFERING FROM IT. IT WAS CONNECTED TO ALL MY MATTERS.
Case Rating: *
It seems like a high value case, especially with the car accident and potential injury involved. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, please provide the following details:
*. What is your phone number?
*. What is your name?
*. What is your email address?
*. What is your zipcode or city?
Additionally, could you give me a bit more information about the car accident and how it relates to your legal matters?
It seems like a high value case, especially with the car accident and potential injury involved. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, please provide the following details:
*. What is your phone number?
*. What is your name?
*. What is your email address?
*. What is your zipcode or city?
Additionally, could you give me a bit more information about the car accident and how it relates to your legal matters?
NO - PLEASE DON'T DO THE LAWYERS - I JUST NEED YOUR HELP IN STRUCTURING MY ARGUMENT TO ET USING THE INFO I HAVE GIVEN TO YOU.
Case Rating: *
To structure your argument effectively, consider these points:
- Clarify Impact: Clearly explain how the clash with the interim charging order and ET hearing directly hindered your case preparation.
- Evidence: Provide any documentation that shows the timeline of these events and how they overlap.
- Procedural Fairness: Argue that procedural fairness requires considering your schedule, given the deliberate conflicts.
- Precedents: Although I can't provide specific precedents, you can look for similar cases where the tribunal has considered scheduling conflicts.
Ensure your submission is organized, concise, and supported by evidence. If you need further assistance, let me know!
To structure your argument effectively, consider these points:
- Clarify Impact: Clearly explain how the clash with the interim charging order and ET hearing directly hindered your case preparation.
- Evidence: Provide any documentation that shows the timeline of these events and how they overlap.
- Procedural Fairness: Argue that procedural fairness requires considering your schedule, given the deliberate conflicts.
- Precedents: Although I can't provide specific precedents, you can look for similar cases where the tribunal has considered scheduling conflicts.
Ensure your submission is organized, concise, and supported by evidence. If you need further assistance, let me know!
OK, THANK YOU. SHOULD I SEND A COSTS WARNING LETTER TO RESPONDENT BEFORE I SEND STRIKE OUT REQUEST TO ET AND GIVE THEM TIME LIMMIT TO REPLY - SAY * HRS.
Case Rating: *
Sending a costs warning letter before submitting a strike-out request can be a strategic move. Here are some points to consider:
- Purpose: A costs warning letter serves to inform the respondent of potential costs consequences if they continue their conduct.
- Timing: Ensure you give a reasonable time frame, like * hours, for them to respond.
- Content: Clearly state the reasons for the warning, referencing their procedural failures and delays.
Providing a warning may encourage the respondent to engage more constructively. Would you like more specific guidance on drafting this letter?
Sending a costs warning letter before submitting a strike-out request can be a strategic move. Here are some points to consider:
- Purpose: A costs warning letter serves to inform the respondent of potential costs consequences if they continue their conduct.
- Timing: Ensure you give a reasonable time frame, like * hours, for them to respond.
- Content: Clearly state the reasons for the warning, referencing their procedural failures and delays.
Providing a warning may encourage the respondent to engage more constructively. Would you like more specific guidance on drafting this letter?
YES PLEASE CAN YOU DRAFT ME THIS LETTER.
Case Rating: *
Here's a draft for your costs warning letter:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Date]
[Respondent's Name]
[Respondent's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear [Respondent's Name],
Re: Costs Warning in [Your Case Reference]
I am writing to formally warn you regarding the potential for a costs application against you due to your continued failure to engage effectively in the proceedings related to our case.
As you are aware, your repeated lack of engagement, including the failure to provide timely responses and adhere to procedural requirements, has significantly delayed the resolution of this matter. This conduct has been noted on several occasions, including the recent preliminary hearing.
In light of this, please be advised that I intend to apply for a strike-out due to your procedural failures. Should the tribunal find in my favor, I will seek to request a costs order against you.
To avoid further escalation, I urge you to provide a comprehensive and timely response to this letter within * hours. Failure to do so will result in the continuation of my application for a strike-out and potential costs.
Please consider this letter as a final opportunity to rectify the situation and engage constructively in resolving this matter.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to adjust the letter to include specific incidents or evidence that support your claim. Let me know if you need any more assistance!
Here's a draft for your costs warning letter:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Date]
[Respondent's Name]
[Respondent's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear [Respondent's Name],
Re: Costs Warning in [Your Case Reference]
I am writing to formally warn you regarding the potential for a costs application against you due to your continued failure to engage effectively in the proceedings related to our case.
As you are aware, your repeated lack of engagement, including the failure to provide timely responses and adhere to procedural requirements, has significantly delayed the resolution of this matter. This conduct has been noted on several occasions, including the recent preliminary hearing.
In light of this, please be advised that I intend to apply for a strike-out due to your procedural failures. Should the tribunal find in my favor, I will seek to request a costs order against you.
To avoid further escalation, I urge you to provide a comprehensive and timely response to this letter within * hours. Failure to do so will result in the continuation of my application for a strike-out and potential costs.
Please consider this letter as a final opportunity to rectify the situation and engage constructively in resolving this matter.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to adjust the letter to include specific incidents or evidence that support your claim. Let me know if you need any more assistance!
THIS RESPONDENT ALSO REFUSED TO REPLY TO MY STRIKE OUT IN NOV/DEC * TO THE C OF APPEAL. THEY'VE BEEN CONTINUING WITH THIS CONDUCT.
Case Rating: *
It seems like you're dealing with a situation where the respondent repeatedly fails to engage. If they have a history of non-compliance, emphasizing this in your communications and submissions to the tribunal is crucial.
For your costs warning letter, consider adding a point about their previous refusal to reply to your strike-out request from November/December *. This will further support your case and demonstrate a pattern of conduct.
If you need more guidance on how to incorporate this into your letter or further steps, feel free to ask!
It seems like you're dealing with a situation where the respondent repeatedly fails to engage. If they have a history of non-compliance, emphasizing this in your communications and submissions to the tribunal is crucial.
For your costs warning letter, consider adding a point about their previous refusal to reply to your strike-out request from November/December *. This will further support your case and demonstrate a pattern of conduct.
If you need more guidance on how to incorporate this into your letter or further steps, feel free to ask!
BUT THE ET JUDGE SAID IN LAST HEARING THAT SHE IS NOT INTERETSED WHAT HAPPENED IN OTHER COURTS - ALL SHE IS GOING TO DO IS DEAL WITH THE ISSUES THAT WERE REMITTED BACK FROM C OF APPEAL, BUT THEN SHE REFUSED TO LET ME RELY ON A SINGLE NEW DOCUMENT - SHE SAYS THAT IS WHAT A REMITTAL MEANS AND SHE WILL ONLY USE THE OLD BUNDLE. BUT THERE IS NO ORDER SAYING NO MORE/NEW DOCS/EVIDENCE IS ALLOWED.
Case Rating: *
It appears you're facing a challenging situation with the tribunal's approach to your case. When dealing with a remitted matter, typically:
- The tribunal focuses on issues directed by the appellate court.
- Introducing new evidence might be restricted unless directly relevant to remitted issues.
To address this:
- Politely request clarification on why new documents aren't considered.
- Highlight any procedural rules or guidelines supporting your argument.
- Consider whether the new evidence directly impacts the remitted issues.
If you need further guidance on drafting a request for clarification or other strategies, let me know!
It appears you're facing a challenging situation with the tribunal's approach to your case. When dealing with a remitted matter, typically:
- The tribunal focuses on issues directed by the appellate court.
- Introducing new evidence might be restricted unless directly relevant to remitted issues.
To address this:
- Politely request clarification on why new documents aren't considered.
- Highlight any procedural rules or guidelines supporting your argument.
- Consider whether the new evidence directly impacts the remitted issues.
If you need further guidance on drafting a request for clarification or other strategies, let me know!
THE NEW EVIDENCE DIRECTLY IMPSCTS THE * ISSUES REMITTED BACK BY C OF APPEAL - I TOLD THE ET JUDGE OF THIS - BUT SHE IGNORED ME AND KEPT SAYING SHE IS NOT ALLOWED TO RELY ON NEW EVID AS REMITTAL MEANS NO NEW EVID. I RESEARCHED THIS AND IT IS NOT CORRECT. SHE MISLED ME ON THIS.
Case Rating: *
In situations like this, it's crucial to substantiate your position with relevant legal rules or guidelines. Here’s how you can proceed:
- Research Legal Precedents: Find cases or tribunal rules that allow for new evidence on remitted issues.
- Formal Request for Consideration: Draft a request to the tribunal, clearly explaining why the new evidence is essential for the remitted issues.
- Seek Legal Advice: Consulting a legal professional might help strengthen your argument with appropriate legal references.
If you need assistance drafting the request or further guidance, feel free to ask!
In situations like this, it's crucial to substantiate your position with relevant legal rules or guidelines. Here’s how you can proceed:
- Research Legal Precedents: Find cases or tribunal rules that allow for new evidence on remitted issues.
- Formal Request for Consideration: Draft a request to the tribunal, clearly explaining why the new evidence is essential for the remitted issues.
- Seek Legal Advice: Consulting a legal professional might help strengthen your argument with appropriate legal references.
If you need assistance drafting the request or further guidance, feel free to ask!
PLEASE CAN YOU LET ME KNOW - IF IN MY FAM MATTER - THE OPPOSITE SOL HAS NOT SENT IN ANY EVIDENCE TO OPPOSE MY * APPLICATIONS I SEN TO FAM COURT IN JUNE - THE ORDER SAID IT WAS TO BE FILED AT COURT AND SERVED ON ME BY A CERTAIN DATE. THE OPPOS SOL IS ALSO DOING NON RESPONSE JUST LIKE THE RESPONDENT IN THE ET MATTER. SO - AGAIN - ITS ALL COORDINATED AS I'VE BEEN SAYING FOR YEARS.
Case Rating: *
In your family matter, if the opposing solicitor has not filed evidence by the court-ordered deadline, you might consider the following options:
- Request the court to note the lack of response in their decision.
- Consider applying for a default judgment or other appropriate relief due to non-compliance.
If you need more guidance on these actions, feel free to ask!
In your family matter, if the opposing solicitor has not filed evidence by the court-ordered deadline, you might consider the following options:
- Request the court to note the lack of response in their decision.
- Consider applying for a default judgment or other appropriate relief due to non-compliance.
If you need more guidance on these actions, feel free to ask!
YES PLEASE - DEFAULT JUDGMENT - CAN YOU LET ME KNOW WHAT THIS MEANS.
Case Rating: *
A default judgment occurs when one party fails to respond to a court action, and the court decides in favor of the other party by default. In your family matter, if the opposing solicitor hasn't responded by the deadline, you can request a default judgment, effectively granting your applications. Let me know if you need more detailed guidance on how to proceed!
A default judgment occurs when one party fails to respond to a court action, and the court decides in favor of the other party by default. In your family matter, if the opposing solicitor hasn't responded by the deadline, you can request a default judgment, effectively granting your applications. Let me know if you need more detailed guidance on how to proceed!
YES PLEASE GO AHEAD.
To request a default judgment in your family matter, follow these steps:
- Review Court Rules: Check the specific family court rules in England concerning default judgments.
- Prepare Evidence: Gather all documentation showing the opposing party's failure to respond by the deadline.
- Draft Application: Write a formal application to the court requesting a default judgment, referencing the lack of response.
- Submit Application: File your application with the court, ensuring all procedures are followed.
Consulting a legal professional can provide additional guidance tailored to your case.
Case Rating: *
- Review Court Rules: Check the specific family court rules in England concerning default judgments.
- Prepare Evidence: Gather all documentation showing the opposing party's failure to respond by the deadline.
- Draft Application: Write a formal application to the court requesting a default judgment, referencing the lack of response.
- Submit Application: File your application with the court, ensuring all procedures are followed.
Consulting a legal professional can provide additional guidance tailored to your case.
Case Rating: *
I HAVE DRAFTED A LETTER TO FAM COURT ASKING THEM TO ALLOW MY APPLICATIONS WITHOUT THE NEED OF THE HEARING LISTED FOR NEXT MONTH - DUE TO NO EVIDENCE IN OPPOSITION HAVING BEEN FILED AT COURT OR SERVED UPON ME. CAN YOU DRAFT THE DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND MY COSTS.
Case Rating: *
While I can provide some general guidance, drafting a default judgment and costs document requires specific legal expertise. Here's a general outline you might consider:
- Default Judgment Request:
- State the lack of response by the opposing party.
- Reference any court rules that support a default judgment in such cases.
- Clearly state the relief you are seeking.
- Costs Request:
- Detail any costs incurred due to the opposing party's non-compliance.
- Provide documentation to support your costs claim.
- Request the court to order the opposing party to pay these costs.
For precise drafting and legal strategy, consulting a solicitor might be beneficial. Let me know if you need further assistance!
While I can provide some general guidance, drafting a default judgment and costs document requires specific legal expertise. Here's a general outline you might consider:
- Default Judgment Request:
- State the lack of response by the opposing party.
- Reference any court rules that support a default judgment in such cases.
- Clearly state the relief you are seeking.
- Costs Request:
- Detail any costs incurred due to the opposing party's non-compliance.
- Provide documentation to support your costs claim.
- Request the court to order the opposing party to pay these costs.
For precise drafting and legal strategy, consulting a solicitor might be beneficial. Let me know if you need further assistance!
IF I HAVE SAID IN MY DRAFT LETTER TO COURT TO SET ASIDE AND DISCHARGE THE NMO URGENTLY DUE TO NO EVIDENCE IN OPPOSITION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED BY THE DATE ORDERED - IS THAT THE SAME AS ASKING FOR A DEFAULT JUDGMENT OR DO I NEED TO SAY THIS SPECIFICALLY?
Case Rating: *
If you've requested to set aside and discharge the NMO due to lack of opposition evidence, you're essentially asking for relief based on non-compliance. For clarity, explicitly mention you're seeking a default judgment, highlighting the opposing party's failure to respond by the deadline. This ensures the court understands your request aligns with default judgment rules.
If you've requested to set aside and discharge the NMO due to lack of opposition evidence, you're essentially asking for relief based on non-compliance. For clarity, explicitly mention you're seeking a default judgment, highlighting the opposing party's failure to respond by the deadline. This ensures the court understands your request aligns with default judgment rules.
OK AS THE MAIN BASIS FOR THE APPLICATIONS WAS MY * YEAR OLD MUMS LITIGATION CAPACITY WAS NEVER ADDRESSED IN THE * YEARS OF LITIGATION DONE USING HERE AS THE APPLICANT. MY MUM NEVER HAD ABILITY TO DO LITIGATION - EVEN WHEN SHE WAS YOUNGER.
Case Rating: *
It appears you're dealing with a complex and multi-faceted legal situation. Here are some general points to consider regarding your mother's litigation capacity:
- Legal Capacity: In legal proceedings, the capacity to litigate is crucial. If it was never addressed, this might impact the validity of the proceedings.
- Legal Representation: If your mother was unable to represent herself, the court should have ensured she had appropriate representation.
- Review of Proceedings: Consider requesting a review or appeal based on her inability to litigate, citing any relevant laws or precedents.
Would you like more specific guidance on any of these aspects?
It appears you're dealing with a complex and multi-faceted legal situation. Here are some general points to consider regarding your mother's litigation capacity:
- Legal Capacity: In legal proceedings, the capacity to litigate is crucial. If it was never addressed, this might impact the validity of the proceedings.
- Legal Representation: If your mother was unable to represent herself, the court should have ensured she had appropriate representation.
- Review of Proceedings: Consider requesting a review or appeal based on her inability to litigate, citing any relevant laws or precedents.
Would you like more specific guidance on any of these aspects?
SO THE COURT IS TO BLAME BUT IT WAS MUMS SOLICITOR TOO. CAN YOU LET ME KNOW WHAT THIS MEANS. THERE WERE OTHER PARTIES INVOLVED IN THIS HORRIBLE SITUATION/PLANNING.
Case Rating: *
It seems your mother's legal capacity was not adequately addressed, which could affect the legitimacy of the proceedings. Here are some key points:
- Court Responsibility: The court should ensure all parties have the capacity to engage in litigation. Failing to do so may result in procedural errors.
- Solicitor's Role: The solicitor should have assessed and raised any concerns about your mother's capacity.
- Other Parties: If others contributed to this oversight, it might warrant further investigation.
Would you like more information on how to address these issues in court?
It seems your mother's legal capacity was not adequately addressed, which could affect the legitimacy of the proceedings. Here are some key points:
- Court Responsibility: The court should ensure all parties have the capacity to engage in litigation. Failing to do so may result in procedural errors.
- Solicitor's Role: The solicitor should have assessed and raised any concerns about your mother's capacity.
- Other Parties: If others contributed to this oversight, it might warrant further investigation.
Would you like more information on how to address these issues in court?
YES PLEASE, BUT I KEPT SAYING MUM IS NOT DOING IT - ITS AGAINST HER WISHES. NO-ONE LISTENED.
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you're dealing with a complicated legal situation involving your mother's litigation capacity. Here are some steps you might consider:
- Formal Complaint: File a complaint with the solicitor's regulatory body if they failed in their duty.
- Request Review: Seek a court review of the proceedings, highlighting the lack of capacity and your repeated concerns.
- Evidence: Gather any documentation or correspondence showing your objections and your mother's inability to litigate.
If you need more detailed guidance on how to proceed, feel free to ask!
It sounds like you're dealing with a complicated legal situation involving your mother's litigation capacity. Here are some steps you might consider:
- Formal Complaint: File a complaint with the solicitor's regulatory body if they failed in their duty.
- Request Review: Seek a court review of the proceedings, highlighting the lack of capacity and your repeated concerns.
- Evidence: Gather any documentation or correspondence showing your objections and your mother's inability to litigate.
If you need more detailed guidance on how to proceed, feel free to ask!
I THINK I WILL TRY TO ASK FOR A DEFAULT JUDGMENT BUT ITS NOT ONLY ABOUT GETTING RID OF THE NMO. WHAT ABOUT THE AFTERMATH?
Case Rating: *
After obtaining a default judgment, consider the following steps for the aftermath:
- Enforcement: Ensure the judgment is enforced, especially if financial compensation or action is required from the opposing party.
- Compensation and Costs: Pursue any compensation or costs awarded, ensuring the opposing party complies.
- Review and Appeal: Be prepared for potential appeals by the opposing party and have your evidence ready to support your case.
If you need further guidance on any of these aspects, feel free to ask!
After obtaining a default judgment, consider the following steps for the aftermath:
- Enforcement: Ensure the judgment is enforced, especially if financial compensation or action is required from the opposing party.
- Compensation and Costs: Pursue any compensation or costs awarded, ensuring the opposing party complies.
- Review and Appeal: Be prepared for potential appeals by the opposing party and have your evidence ready to support your case.
If you need further guidance on any of these aspects, feel free to ask!
BUT MY MUM NEVER HAD LITIG CAPACITY SO SHE IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR COSTS. ITS THE SOLICITOR AND S. SERVICES, MY PREV SOLICITORS/COUNSELS - OR MORE PARTIES.
Case Rating: *
In situations where there are questions of litigation capacity and responsibility for costs, consider these steps:
- Legal Capacity Evidence: Gather evidence showing your mother's incapacity. This could be medical reports or expert evaluations.
- Professional Negligence: Consider if the solicitor or other professionals failed in their duty, potentially leading to a negligence claim.
- Court Application: Apply to the court to revisit the cost responsibility, given her incapacity.
If you need more guidance on professional negligence or revisiting cost responsibilities, let me know!
In situations where there are questions of litigation capacity and responsibility for costs, consider these steps:
- Legal Capacity Evidence: Gather evidence showing your mother's incapacity. This could be medical reports or expert evaluations.
- Professional Negligence: Consider if the solicitor or other professionals failed in their duty, potentially leading to a negligence claim.
- Court Application: Apply to the court to revisit the cost responsibility, given her incapacity.
If you need more guidance on professional negligence or revisiting cost responsibilities, let me know!
AS THE NMO WAS AGAINST ME SINCE * I HAVE BEEN KEPT AWAY FROM MY MUM. SO I COULD NOT GET ANY ASSESS DONE ON MUM. BUT NOW, AS SHE HAS BEEN PUT TO SO MANY ASSESSMENTS I DO NOT THINK ITS APPROP TO DO ANOTHER ASSESSMENT - I DO HAVE A CASE FROM C . OF PROTECTION IN WHICH THIS HAPPENED. THE BEHAVIOURS OF THE PARTY WERE SUFFICIENT TO SHOW THERE WAS NO LITIG CAPACITY.
Case Rating: *
It seems like you're dealing with complex legal matters involving litigation capacity and procedural issues. Here are some considerations:
- Court of Protection: If the court has recognized a lack of litigation capacity, this can be crucial in arguing against responsibility for costs.
- Professional Negligence: If solicitors or other parties failed in their duty, you might consider a negligence claim against them.
- Assessment Appropriateness: If numerous assessments have been conducted, further assessments might not be necessary. Consider highlighting this to the court.
If you need more information on any of these points or guidance on how to proceed, let me know!
It seems like you're dealing with complex legal matters involving litigation capacity and procedural issues. Here are some considerations:
- Court of Protection: If the court has recognized a lack of litigation capacity, this can be crucial in arguing against responsibility for costs.
- Professional Negligence: If solicitors or other parties failed in their duty, you might consider a negligence claim against them.
- Assessment Appropriateness: If numerous assessments have been conducted, further assessments might not be necessary. Consider highlighting this to the court.
If you need more information on any of these points or guidance on how to proceed, let me know!
IN MY LAST MEETING WITH MY COUNSEL HE MENTIONED THAT LITIG ASSESSSMENT WILL BE REQUIRED BUT I NEVER KNEW OF THIS AND AS I'VE BEEN IN THE CAR ACCID ITS TAKEN ME OVER A WEEK TO CONFIRM I OBJECT TO ANY MORE ASSESSMENTS ON MUM. SO SHOULD I LET HIM KNOW AS THE DEADLINE FOR THE OPPOS SOL SUBMITTING OPPOSITION EVID HAS PASSED - THIS CHANGES THINGS TOO SINCE MY MEETING WITH HIM.
Case Rating: *
In your situation, it would be prudent to inform your counsel of your objections to further assessments, especially given the past assessments and your current circumstances. Highlight the missed deadline by the opposing solicitor as a significant factor. Consider formalizing your objection in writing for clarity and record-keeping. Let me know if you need any more guidance!
In your situation, it would be prudent to inform your counsel of your objections to further assessments, especially given the past assessments and your current circumstances. Highlight the missed deadline by the opposing solicitor as a significant factor. Consider formalizing your objection in writing for clarity and record-keeping. Let me know if you need any more guidance!
YES PLEASE CAN YOU HELP DRAFT ME LETTER OBJECTING TO LITIG CAPAC ASSESSMENT ON MUM.
Case Rating: *
Certainly! Here's a draft letter objecting to the litigation capacity assessment for your mother:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Date]
[Counsel's Name]
[Counsel's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear [Counsel's Name],
Re: Objection to Further Litigation Capacity Assessment for [Mother's Name]
I am writing to formally object to any further litigation capacity assessments regarding my mother, [Mother's Name]. Given the numerous assessments she has already undergone, and the clear findings from the Court of Protection, I believe additional assessments are unnecessary and could be detrimental to her well-being.
Furthermore, the opposing solicitor has failed to submit any evidence by the court-ordered deadline, which significantly alters the context of our case since our last meeting. This lack of response should be noted and considered in our legal strategy moving forward.
I trust you will take this objection into account and advise on the best course of action. Thank you for your understanding and support.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to adjust the letter to include any specific details or evidence relevant to your case. Let me know if you need further assistance!
Certainly! Here's a draft letter objecting to the litigation capacity assessment for your mother:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Date]
[Counsel's Name]
[Counsel's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear [Counsel's Name],
Re: Objection to Further Litigation Capacity Assessment for [Mother's Name]
I am writing to formally object to any further litigation capacity assessments regarding my mother, [Mother's Name]. Given the numerous assessments she has already undergone, and the clear findings from the Court of Protection, I believe additional assessments are unnecessary and could be detrimental to her well-being.
Furthermore, the opposing solicitor has failed to submit any evidence by the court-ordered deadline, which significantly alters the context of our case since our last meeting. This lack of response should be noted and considered in our legal strategy moving forward.
I trust you will take this objection into account and advise on the best course of action. Thank you for your understanding and support.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to adjust the letter to include any specific details or evidence relevant to your case. Let me know if you need further assistance!
IN MY MEETING WITH HIM I DID LET HIM KNOW THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNIC FROM THE OPPOS SOL SINCE I SUBMITTED MY * APPLICS TO FAM COURT AND COPIED HER - BUT I WAS IN A CAR ACCID WHICH WAS CONNECTED TO THIS AND MY ET MATTERS.
Case Rating: *
It seems like you have a complex and interconnected legal situation with potentially high stakes, especially with the car accident involved. Would you like to connect with local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, please provide the following details:
*. What is your phone number?
*. What is your name?
*. What is your email address?
*. What is your zipcode or city?
Additionally, could you provide a bit more information about how the car accident relates to your legal matters?
It seems like you have a complex and interconnected legal situation with potentially high stakes, especially with the car accident involved. Would you like to connect with local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, please provide the following details:
*. What is your phone number?
*. What is your name?
*. What is your email address?
*. What is your zipcode or city?
Additionally, could you provide a bit more information about how the car accident relates to your legal matters?
NO I DON'T WANT TO BE CONNECTED. BUT PLEASE NOTE THE LEGAL REP WAS SURPRISED THERE WAS NO COMMUNIC FROM THE OPPOS SOL. HE TOLD ME TO WAIT UNTIL THE DEADLINE HAS PASSED DEADLINE PASSED BEFORE I WRITE TO HER TO ENSURE SHE SENDS ME A DRAFT BUNDLE INDEX EARLIER DUE TO MY DISABILITY/CAR ACCID IMPACT. AND TO ASK COURT TO LET ME RECORD THE HEARING. BUT SINCE THEN THERE HAS BEEN NO EVIDENCE IN OPPOS SUBMITTED BY THE OTHER SOL. SO WHAT SHOULD I DO?
Case Rating: *
Given the situation, here are some steps you can consider:
- Request Court Intervention: Ask the court to acknowledge the lack of opposition evidence and move forward with your applications.
- Recording Permission: Formally request permission to record the hearing, explaining the impact of your disability and the car accident.
- Document Communication: Keep records of all communications with the opposing solicitor and your legal representative.
If you need further assistance or specific guidance on any of these steps, feel free to ask!
Given the situation, here are some steps you can consider:
- Request Court Intervention: Ask the court to acknowledge the lack of opposition evidence and move forward with your applications.
- Recording Permission: Formally request permission to record the hearing, explaining the impact of your disability and the car accident.
- Document Communication: Keep records of all communications with the opposing solicitor and your legal representative.
If you need further assistance or specific guidance on any of these steps, feel free to ask!
WHAT ABOUT THE DRAFT INDEXT TO BUNDLE AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT REQUEST.
Case Rating: *
In your situation, here's how you can proceed:
- Draft Index to Bundle: Request the opposing solicitor to provide a draft index for the bundle as soon as possible, highlighting your need for early preparation due to your disability and the impact of the car accident.
- Default Judgment Request: Since the opposing solicitor hasn't submitted evidence, apply for a default judgment, emphasizing their non-compliance and the missed deadline.
If you need more detailed guidance on drafting these requests, feel free to ask!
In your situation, here's how you can proceed:
- Draft Index to Bundle: Request the opposing solicitor to provide a draft index for the bundle as soon as possible, highlighting your need for early preparation due to your disability and the impact of the car accident.
- Default Judgment Request: Since the opposing solicitor hasn't submitted evidence, apply for a default judgment, emphasizing their non-compliance and the missed deadline.
If you need more detailed guidance on drafting these requests, feel free to ask!
I THINK SHE'S GOING TO DO A LAST MINUTE ANMBUSH. BUT THIS MUST NOT BE ALLOWED IN ANY CIRCUMSTANCE DUE TO HER ABUSE OF PROCESS BY LYING ABOUT MUM GIVING HER INSTRUCTIONS AND THAT MUM HAS ALWAYS HAD LITIG CAPACITY - EVEN THOUGH LAST YEAR THAT SOL ADMITTED FOR THE FIRST TIME SHE WROTE ALL OF MUMS FALSE WITNESS STATEMENTS.
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you're dealing with a complex situation involving potential procedural misconduct. Here are some steps to consider:
- Document Evidence: Collect all documents and communications that demonstrate the solicitor's previous admissions and contradictions.
- Formal Complaint: Consider filing a complaint with the relevant legal authority about the solicitor's conduct.
- Preemptive Motion: File a motion with the court to prevent any last-minute evidence submissions that would be prejudicial to your case.
Make sure to keep detailed records and seek tailored legal advice for further assistance. If you need more specific guidance on any of these steps, let me know!
It sounds like you're dealing with a complex situation involving potential procedural misconduct. Here are some steps to consider:
- Document Evidence: Collect all documents and communications that demonstrate the solicitor's previous admissions and contradictions.
- Formal Complaint: Consider filing a complaint with the relevant legal authority about the solicitor's conduct.
- Preemptive Motion: File a motion with the court to prevent any last-minute evidence submissions that would be prejudicial to your case.
Make sure to keep detailed records and seek tailored legal advice for further assistance. If you need more specific guidance on any of these steps, let me know!
PLEASE CAN YOU ADD THE BIT ABOUT PRE-EMPTIVE MOTION TO STOP LAST MINUTE EVID SUBMISSION TO PREJUDICE THIS MATTER - TO THE LETTER YOU DRAFTED ALREADY REG OBJECTION TO FURTHE CAPAC ASSESS FOR MUMS LITIGATION, AND ASK FOR A DEFAULT JUDGMENT.
Case Rating: *
Here's an updated draft for your letter including the pre-emptive motion request:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Date]
[Counsel's Name]
[Counsel's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear [Counsel's Name],
Re: Objection to Further Litigation Capacity Assessment for [Mother's Name] & Pre-emptive Motion
I am writing to formally object to any further litigation capacity assessments regarding my mother, [Mother's Name]. Given the numerous assessments she has already undergone, and the clear findings from the Court of Protection, I believe additional assessments are unnecessary and could be detrimental to her well-being.
Furthermore, I request a pre-emptive motion to prevent any last-minute evidence submissions by the opposing solicitor that could prejudice the matter. This is essential given their previous conduct and lack of timely communication.
Additionally, the opposing solicitor has failed to submit any evidence by the court-ordered deadline, significantly altering the context of our case since our last meeting. This lack of response should be noted, and I request a default judgment in favor of my applications.
I trust you will take this objection and request into account and advise on the best course of action. Thank you for your understanding and support.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to adjust any specifics or add any additional details relevant to your case. Let me know if you need further assistance!
Here's an updated draft for your letter including the pre-emptive motion request:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Date]
[Counsel's Name]
[Counsel's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear [Counsel's Name],
Re: Objection to Further Litigation Capacity Assessment for [Mother's Name] & Pre-emptive Motion
I am writing to formally object to any further litigation capacity assessments regarding my mother, [Mother's Name]. Given the numerous assessments she has already undergone, and the clear findings from the Court of Protection, I believe additional assessments are unnecessary and could be detrimental to her well-being.
Furthermore, I request a pre-emptive motion to prevent any last-minute evidence submissions by the opposing solicitor that could prejudice the matter. This is essential given their previous conduct and lack of timely communication.
Additionally, the opposing solicitor has failed to submit any evidence by the court-ordered deadline, significantly altering the context of our case since our last meeting. This lack of response should be noted, and I request a default judgment in favor of my applications.
I trust you will take this objection and request into account and advise on the best course of action. Thank you for your understanding and support.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to adjust any specifics or add any additional details relevant to your case. Let me know if you need further assistance!
THE BIT ABOUT THE COP NEEDS TO COME OUT AS THEY ALSO DID AN ASSESSMENT FULL OF FICTION AND NO DOUBT, WITH INPUT FROM MUMS SOL. AS SHE USED THIS PHRASE IN THE FAM COURT "I SPOKE SLOWLY AND LOUDLY TO MY CLIENT" BUT THE FAM JUDGE TOLD HER THAT IS NOT THE THRESHOLD. IT SAYS THIS IN THE COURT TRANSCRIPT. IT MEANS THIS IS NOT THE CRITERIA TO SHOW THERE IS LITIG CAPACITY.
Case Rating: *
Here's the updated draft for your letter without mentioning the Court of Protection:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Date]
[Counsel's Name]
[Counsel's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear [Counsel's Name],
Re: Objection to Further Litigation Capacity Assessment for [Mother's Name] & Pre-emptive Motion
I am writing to formally object to any further litigation capacity assessments regarding my mother, [Mother's Name]. Given the numerous assessments she has already undergone, I believe additional assessments are unnecessary and could be detrimental to her well-being.
Furthermore, I request a pre-emptive motion to prevent any last-minute evidence submissions by the opposing solicitor that could prejudice the matter. This is essential given their previous conduct and lack of timely communication.
Additionally, the opposing solicitor has failed to submit any evidence by the court-ordered deadline, significantly altering the context of our case since our last meeting. This lack of response should be noted, and I request a default judgment in favor of my applications.
I trust you will take this objection and request into account and advise on the best course of action. Thank you for your understanding and support.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to customize this draft with any specific details or additional information relevant to your situation. Let me know if you need further help!
Here's the updated draft for your letter without mentioning the Court of Protection:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Date]
[Counsel's Name]
[Counsel's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear [Counsel's Name],
Re: Objection to Further Litigation Capacity Assessment for [Mother's Name] & Pre-emptive Motion
I am writing to formally object to any further litigation capacity assessments regarding my mother, [Mother's Name]. Given the numerous assessments she has already undergone, I believe additional assessments are unnecessary and could be detrimental to her well-being.
Furthermore, I request a pre-emptive motion to prevent any last-minute evidence submissions by the opposing solicitor that could prejudice the matter. This is essential given their previous conduct and lack of timely communication.
Additionally, the opposing solicitor has failed to submit any evidence by the court-ordered deadline, significantly altering the context of our case since our last meeting. This lack of response should be noted, and I request a default judgment in favor of my applications.
I trust you will take this objection and request into account and advise on the best course of action. Thank you for your understanding and support.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to customize this draft with any specific details or additional information relevant to your situation. Let me know if you need further help!
DOES THE DEFAULT JUDGMENT TEXT NEED TO GO IN AS WELL?
Case Rating: *
Including specific text about default judgment in your letter could be beneficial, especially if you want to emphasize the urgency and seriousness of the situation. Here's how you might incorporate it:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Date]
[Counsel's Name]
[Counsel's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear [Counsel's Name],
Re: Objection to Further Litigation Capacity Assessment for [Mother's Name] & Pre-emptive Motion
I am writing to formally object to any further litigation capacity assessments regarding my mother, [Mother's Name]. Given the numerous assessments she has already undergone, I believe additional assessments are unnecessary and could be detrimental to her well-being.
Furthermore, I request a pre-emptive motion to prevent any last-minute evidence submissions by the opposing solicitor that could prejudice the matter. This is essential given their previous conduct and lack of timely communication.
Additionally, the opposing solicitor has failed to submit any evidence by the court-ordered deadline, significantly altering the context of our case since our last meeting. This lack of response should be noted, and I request a default judgment in favor of my applications, as the continued non-compliance by the opposing party warrants such action.
I trust you will take this objection and request into account and advise on the best course of action. Thank you for your understanding and support.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to adjust this draft to fit the specifics of your case. Let me know if you need any further assistance!
Including specific text about default judgment in your letter could be beneficial, especially if you want to emphasize the urgency and seriousness of the situation. Here's how you might incorporate it:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Date]
[Counsel's Name]
[Counsel's Address]
[City, Postcode]
Dear [Counsel's Name],
Re: Objection to Further Litigation Capacity Assessment for [Mother's Name] & Pre-emptive Motion
I am writing to formally object to any further litigation capacity assessments regarding my mother, [Mother's Name]. Given the numerous assessments she has already undergone, I believe additional assessments are unnecessary and could be detrimental to her well-being.
Furthermore, I request a pre-emptive motion to prevent any last-minute evidence submissions by the opposing solicitor that could prejudice the matter. This is essential given their previous conduct and lack of timely communication.
Additionally, the opposing solicitor has failed to submit any evidence by the court-ordered deadline, significantly altering the context of our case since our last meeting. This lack of response should be noted, and I request a default judgment in favor of my applications, as the continued non-compliance by the opposing party warrants such action.
I trust you will take this objection and request into account and advise on the best course of action. Thank you for your understanding and support.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to adjust this draft to fit the specifics of your case. Let me know if you need any further assistance!
THANK YOU - BUT I JUST THOUGHT THE DEFAULT JUDGMENT WAS NEEDED ON THE BASIS THAT MUM'S LITIG CAPAC WAS NEVER ASSESSED. BUT WHO WILL IT BE AGAINST - IT CAN'T BE MUM.
Case Rating: *
It seems like a complex situation involving your mother's litigation capacity and the actions of other parties. Here's how you might approach it:
- Default Judgment Basis: If seeking a default judgment, focus on the opposing party's non-compliance rather than your mother’s capacity.
- Other Parties: Ensure the default judgment request is directed against those responsible for the procedural issues, not your mother, given her incapacity.
If you need more detailed guidance on directing a default judgment request, feel free to ask!
It seems like a complex situation involving your mother's litigation capacity and the actions of other parties. Here's how you might approach it:
- Default Judgment Basis: If seeking a default judgment, focus on the opposing party's non-compliance rather than your mother’s capacity.
- Other Parties: Ensure the default judgment request is directed against those responsible for the procedural issues, not your mother, given her incapacity.
If you need more detailed guidance on directing a default judgment request, feel free to ask!
Start a new chat